Radiological factors associated with the severity of corticospinal tract dysfunctions for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: An analysis of the central motor conduction time and kinematic CT myelography

Differentiation Between Compressive Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy Using the Central Motor Conduction Time Ratio

PURPOSE

Thoracic myelopathy is a rare condition whose diagnosis is often missed or delayed. This study aimed to differentiate between cervical and thoracic myelopathy using motor-evoked potential testing.

METHODS

The authors included 835 patients with compressive cervical myelopathy and 94 patients with compressive thoracic myelopathy. Myelopathy using motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the bilateral abductor digiti minimi and abductor hallucis muscles through transcranial magnetic stimulation. The peripheral conduction time was measured through electrical stimulation of the ulnar and tibial nerves; moreover, the central motor conduction time (CMCT) was calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time from the myelopathy using motor-evoked potential latency.

RESULTS

The most accurate differentiation between compressive cervical myelopathy and compressive thoracic myelopathy was achieved by the CMCT ratios (CMCT-ADM:CMCT-AH; cutoff value of 0.490, sensitivity of 83.0%, and specificity of 80.5%). After excluding patients with compressive cervical myelopathy who had spinal cord compression at C6-7, the cutoff value was 0.490, with a sensitivity of 83.0% and specificity of 87.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Determining the CMCT ratio (cutoff value of 0.490) through motor-evoked potential testing could facilitate differentiation between compressive cervical myelopathy and compressive thoracic myelopathy.

Is Upper Extremity or Lower Extremity Function More Important for Patient Satisfaction? An Analysis of 24-Month Outcomes from the QOD Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Cohort

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether upper or lower limb mJOA improvement more strongly associates with patient satisfaction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) is commonly used to assess functional status in patients with CSM. Patients present with upper and/or lower extremity dysfunction, and it is unclear whether improvement in one and/or both symptoms drives postoperative patient satisfaction.

METHODS

This study utilizes the prospective Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM data set. Clinical outcomes included mJOA and North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction. The upper limb mJOA score was defined as upper motor plus sensory mJOA, and the lower limb mJOA as lower motor plus sensory mJOA. Ordered logistic regression was used to determine whether upper or lower limb mJOA was more closely associated with NASS satisfaction, adjusting for other covariates.

RESULTS

Overall, 1141 patients were enrolled in the QOD CSM cohort. In all, 780 had both preoperative and 24-month mJOA scores, met inclusion criteria, and were included for analysis. The baseline mJOA was 12.1±2.7, and postoperatively, 85.6% would undergo surgery again (NASS 1 or 2, satisfied). Patients exhibited mean improvement in both upper (baseline:3.9±1.4 vs. 24 mo:5.0±1.1, P<0.001) and lower limb mJOA (baseline:3.9±1.4 vs. 24 mon:4.5±1.5, P<0.001); however, the 24-month change in the upper limb mJOA was greater (upper:1.1±1.6 vs. lower:0.6±1.6, P<0.001). Across 24-month NASS satisfaction, the baseline upper and lower limb mJOA scores were similar (pupper=0.28, plower=0.092). However, as satisfaction decreased, the 24-month change in upper and lower limb mJOA decreased as well (pupper<0.001, plower<0.001). Patients with NASS scores of 4 (lowest satisfaction) did not demonstrate significant differences from baseline in upper or lower limb mJOA (P>0.05). In ordered logistic regression, NASS satisfaction was independently associated with upper limb mJOA improvement (OR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.97; P=0.019) but not lower limb mJOA improvement (OR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.70-1.0; P=0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

As the magnitude of upper and lower mJOA improvement decreased postoperatively, so too did patient satisfaction with surgical intervention. Upper limb mJOA improvement was a significant independent predictor of patient satisfaction, whereas lower limb mJOA improvement was not. These findings may aid preoperative counseling, stratified by patients' upper and lower extremity treatment expectations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level-III.

Defining and measuring objective and subjective spinal stiffness: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Examine and identify the breadth of definitions and measures of objective and subjective spinal stiffness in the literature, with a focus on clinical implications.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted to determine what is known about definitions and measures of the specific term of spinal stiffness. Following the framework by Arksey and O'Malley, eligible peer-reviewed studies identified using PubMed, Ebsco health, and Scopus were included if they reported definitions or measures of spinal stiffness. Using a data abstraction form, the studies were classified into four themes: biomechanical, surgical, pathophysiological, and segmental spinal assessment. To identify similarities and differences between studies, sixteen categories were generated.

RESULTS

In total, 2426 records were identified, and 410 met the eligibility criteria. There were 350 measures (132 subjective; 218 objective measures) and 93 indicators of spinal stiffness. The majority of studies (n = 69%) did not define stiffness.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the breadth of objective and subjective measures that are both clinically and methodologically diverse. There is no consensus regarding a standardised definition of stiffness in the reviewed literature.

Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee

The review provides a comprehensive update (previous report: Chen R, Cros D, Curra A, Di Lazzaro V, Lefaucheur JP, Magistris MR, et al. The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119(3):504-32) on clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in neurological diseases. Most TMS measures rely on stimulation of motor cortex and recording of motor evoked potentials. Paired-pulse TMS techniques, incorporating conventional amplitude-based and threshold tracking, have established clinical utility in neurodegenerative, movement, episodic (epilepsy, migraines), chronic pain and functional diseases. Cortical hyperexcitability has emerged as a diagnostic aid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Single-pulse TMS measures are of utility in stroke, and myelopathy even in the absence of radiological changes. Short-latency afferent inhibition, related to central cholinergic transmission, is reduced in Alzheimer's disease. The triple stimulation technique (TST) may enhance diagnostic utility of conventional TMS measures to detect upper motor neuron involvement. The recording of motor evoked potentials can be used to perform functional mapping of the motor cortex or in preoperative assessment of eloquent brain regions before surgical resection of brain tumors. TMS exhibits utility in assessing lumbosacral/cervical nerve root function, especially in demyelinating neuropathies, and may be of utility in localizing the site of facial nerve palsies. TMS measures also have high sensitivity in detecting subclinical corticospinal lesions in multiple sclerosis. Abnormalities in central motor conduction time or TST correlate with motor impairment and disability in MS. Cerebellar stimulation may detect lesions in the cerebellum or cerebello-dentato-thalamo-motor cortical pathways. Combining TMS with electroencephalography, provides a novel method to measure parameters altered in neurological disorders, including cortical excitability, effective connectivity, and response complexity.

Laminoplasty is relevant for degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis when there is little risk of postoperative excessive kyphosis during neck flexion

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy frequently have severe symptoms due to spondylolisthesis. The effectiveness of laminoplasty for degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS) is an important question.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to elucidate factors associated with the outcome of laminoplasty for DCS.

METHOD

Eighty-nine patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) who underwent laminoplasty without instrumented posterior fusion were enrolled. Positive spondylolisthesis was defined as more than 2 mm during neck flexion or extension, from this, 46 DCS cases and 43 non-DCS cases were classified. Radiological parameters, including cervical alignment, balance, range of motion, and slippage along with the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, were obtained before and 1 year after surgery. Factors associated with good surgical outcomes for DCS were analyzed using multivariate logistic analysis.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in background and preoperative JOA score, but the DCS group recovery rate was significantly less (42% vs 53%). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed only the postoperative C2-7 angle during neck flexion was associated with a favorable outcome for DCS (P = 0.0039, Odds ratio: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.14-1.94). Multivariate regression analysis positively correlated the preoperative C2-7 angle in neutral and during flexion with the postoperative C2-7 angle during flexion.

CONCLUSION

The major factor related to poor outcome was the magnitude of postoperative kyphotic C2-7 angle during neck flexion. Slippage was not directly related to outcome and postoperative cervical alignment. Caution is recommended for surgeons performing laminoplasty on patients with risk factors for postoperative excessive kyphotic C2-7 angle during flexion.

Classification of expert-level therapeutic decisions for degenerative cervical myelopathy using ensemble machine learning algorithms

Background

Therapeutic decisions for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) are complex and should consider various factors. We aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models for classifying expert-level therapeutic decisions in patients with DCM.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with DCM, and the diagnosis of DCM was confirmed clinically and radiologically. The target outcomes were defined as conservative treatment, anterior surgical approaches (ASA), and posterior surgical approaches (PSA). We performed the following classifications using ML algorithms: multiclass, one-versus-rest, and one-versus-one. Two ensemble ML algorithms were used: random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was the primary metric. We also identified the variable importance for each classification.

Results

In total, 304 patients were included (109 conservative, 66 ASA, 125 PSA, and 4 combined surgeries). For multiclass classification, the AUC-ROC of RF and XGB models were 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. In addition, ML models showed AUC-ROC values of >0.9 for all types of binary classifications. Variable importance analysis revealed that the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and central motor conduction time were the two most important variables for distinguishing between conservative and surgical treatments. When classifying ASA and PSA, the number of involved levels, age, and body mass index were important contributing factors.

Conclusion

ML-based classification of DCM therapeutic options is valid and feasible. This study can be a basis for establishing generalizable ML-based surgical decision models for DCM. Further studies are needed with a large multicenter database.