Non-invasive intracranial pressure assessment using shear-wave elastography in neuro-critical care patients

Diagnostic dilemma of papilledema and pseudopapilledema

BACKGROUND

Papilledema is the optic disc swelling caused by increased intracranial pressure (ICP) that can damage the optic nerve and cause subsequent vision loss. Pseudopapilledema refers to optic disc elevation without peripapillary fluid that can arise from several optic disc disorders, with optic disc drusen (ODD) being the most frequent cause. Occasionally, pseudopapilledema patients are mistakenly diagnosed as papilledema, leading to the possibility of unneeded procedures. We aim to thoroughly examine the most current evidence on papilledema and pseudopapilledema causes and several methods for distinguishing between both conditions.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was conducted on electronic databases including PubMed and google scholar using keywords that were relevant to the assessed pathologies. Data were collected and then summarized in comprehensive form.

RESULTS

Various techniques are employed to distinguish between papilledema and pseudopapilledema. These techniques include Fundus fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Lumbar puncture and other invasive procedures may be needed if results are suspicious.

CONCLUSION

Papilledema is a sight-threatening condition that may lead to visual affection. Many disc conditions may mimic papilledema. Accordingly, differentiation between papilledema and pseudopailledema is crucial and can be conducted through many modalities.

Effect of interstitial fluid pressure on shear wave elastography: an experimental and computational study

Objective. An elevated interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) can lead to strain-induced stiffening of poroelastic biological tissues. As shear wave elastography (SWE) measures functional tissue stiffness based on the propagation speed of acoustically induced shear waves, the shear wave velocity (SWV) can be used as an indirect measurement of the IFP. The underlying biomechanical principle for this stiffening behavior with pressurization is however not well understood, and we therefore studied how IFP affects SWV through SWE experiments and numerical modeling.Approach. For model set-up and verification, SWE experiments were performed while dynamically modulating IFP in a chicken breast. To identify the confounding factors of the SWV-IFP relationship, we manipulated the material model (linear poroelastic versus porohyperelastic), deformation assumptions (geometric linearity versus nonlinearity), and boundary conditions (constrained versus unconstrained) in a finite element model mimicking the SWE experiments.Main results. The experiments demonstrated a statistically significant positive correlation between the SWV and IFP. The model was able to reproduce a similar SWV-IFP relationship by considering an unconstrained porohyperelastic tissue. Material nonlinearity was identified as the primary factor contributing to this relationship, whereas geometric nonlinearity played a smaller role. The experiments also highlighted the importance of the dynamic nature of the pressurization procedure, as indicated by a different observed SWV-IFP for pressure buildup and relaxation, but its clinical relevance needs to be further investigated.Significance. The developed model provides an adaptable framework for SWE of poroelastic tissues and paves the way towards non-invasive measurements of IFP.

Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring

(1) Background: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring plays a key role in the treatment of patients in intensive care units, as well as during long-term surgeries and interventions. The gold standard is invasive measurement and monitoring via ventricular drainage or a parenchymal probe. In recent decades, numerous methods for non-invasive measurement have been evaluated but none have become established in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to reflect on the current state of research and shed light on relevant techniques for future clinical application. (2) Methods: We performed a PubMed search for “non-invasive AND ICP AND (measurement OR monitoring)” and identified 306 results. On the basis of these search results, we conducted an in-depth source analysis to identify additional methods. Studies were analyzed for design, patient type (e.g., infants, adults, and shunt patients), statistical evaluation (correlation, accuracy, and reliability), number of included measurements, and statistical assessment of accuracy and reliability. (3) Results: MRI-ICP and two-depth Doppler showed the most potential (and were the most complex methods). Tympanic membrane temperature, diffuse correlation spectroscopy, natural resonance frequency, and retinal vein approaches were also promising. (4) Conclusions: To date, no convincing evidence supports the use of a particular method for non-invasive intracranial pressure measurement. However, many new approaches are under development.

Noninvasive intracranial pressure waveforms for estimation of intracranial hypertension and outcome prediction in acute brain-injured patients

Analysis of intracranial pressure waveforms (ICPW) provides information on intracranial compliance. We aimed to assess the correlation between noninvasive ICPW (NICPW) and invasively measured intracranial pressure (ICP) and to assess the NICPW prognostic value in this population. In this cohort, acute brain-injured (ABI) patients were included within 5 days from admission in six Intensive Care Units. Mean ICP (mICP) values and the P2/P1 ratio derived from NICPW were analyzed and correlated with outcome, which was defined as: (a) early death (ED); survivors on spontaneous breathing (SB) or survivors on mechanical ventilation (MV) at 7 days from inclusion. Intracranial hypertension (IHT) was defined by ICP > 20 mmHg. A total of 72 patients were included (mean age 39, 68% TBI). mICP and P2/P1 values were significantly correlated (r = 0.49, p < 0.001). P2/P1 ratio was significantly higher in patients with IHT and had an area under the receiving operator curve (AUROC) to predict IHT of 0.88 (95% CI 0.78–0.98). mICP and P2/P1 ratio was also significantly higher for ED group (n = 10) than the other groups. The AUROC of P2/P1 to predict ED was 0.71 [95% CI 0.53–0.87], and the threshold P2/P1 > 1.2 showed a sensitivity of 60% [95% CI 31–83%] and a specificity of 69% [95% CI 57–79%]. Similar results were observed when decompressive craniectomy patients were excluded. In this study, P2/P1 derived from noninvasive ICPW assessment was well correlated with IHT. This information seems to be as associated with ABI patients outcomes as ICP.

Trial registration: NCT03144219, Registered 01 May 2017 Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03144219.