Outcome of intrastromal corneal ring segment relative to depth of insertion evaluated with scheimpflug image

Long-Term Results of Sterile Corneal Allograft Ring Segments Implantation in Keratoconus Treatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sterile corneal allograft ring segments implantation for the treatment of keratoconus by analyzing long-term visual, refractive, and tomographic clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This prospective study included 62 eyes of 49 patients with keratoconus who underwent corneal allograft ring segments implantation at Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine between February 2020 and August 2022. Surgical outcomes using the Istanbul nomogram were evaluated in patients preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. Outcomes measured were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), spherical refraction (SR), cylindrical refraction (CR), topographic keratometric values, and corneal thickness at the thinnest point.

RESULTS

Preoperative mean UDVA and CDVA (LogMAR) were 0.96 ± 0.50 and 0.72 ± 0.47, respectively, and increased to 0.41 ± 0.34 and 0.22 ± 0.19 at the last visit (P < 0.001). There was a significant decrease in SE, SR, and keratometric values postoperatively (P < 0.001). There was no difference in CR and thinnest corneal thickness values (P = 0.333 and 0.154, respectively). The stromal and epithelial thicknesses measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography were stabilized at 6 months and 1 year, respectively. No major complications or side effects were observed intraoperatively or postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that sterile corneal allograft ring segments implantation is a safe and feasible treatment for keratoconus, yielding notable long-term visual outcomes with minimal implant-related complications.

Intrastromal corneal ring segments: effect of depth of implantation in visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes in patients with keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes of intracorneal ring segment implantation in relation to the achieved segment depth, using the manual technique.

SETTING

Ophthalmology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We obtained 104 eyes of 93 patients with keratoconus submitted to Ferrara intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation, using a manual technique. Subjects were divided into 3 groups according to the achieved depth of implantation: 40% to 70% (Group 1), 70% to 80% (Group 2), and 80% to 100% (Group 3). Visual, refractive, and topographic variables were evaluated at baseline and 6 months. Topographic measurement was performed using Pentacam. Thibos-Horner and Alpins methods were used to analyze the vectorial change of refractive and topographic astigmatism, respectively.

RESULTS

We found a significant improvement of uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity in all groups at 6 months ( P < .005); no differences were observed regarding safety and efficacy indexes in the 3 groups ( P > .05). Manifest cylinder and spherical equivalent significantly reduced in all groups ( P < .05). Topographic evaluation showed a significant improvement of all parameters in the 3 groups ( P < .05). A shallower (Group 1) or deeper (Group 3) implantation was associated with topographic cylinder overcorrection, a higher magnitude of error, and a higher mean centroid postoperative corneal astigmatism.

CONCLUSIONS

ICRS implantation with the manual technique showed to be equally effective in visual and refractive outcomes despite the depth of implantation; however, shallower or deeper implants were associated with topographic overcorrection and a higher mean centroid postoperative astigmatism, which explain the lower topographic predictability associated with manual surgery for ICRS implantation.

Comparison of the MyoRing implantation depth by mechanical dissection using PocketMaker microkeratome versus Melles hook via AS-OCT

Background

This paper seeks to evaluate the depth and outcomes of MyoRing implantation using two mechanical dissection procedures including: PocketMaker microkeratome in opposition to the Melles hook method.

Methods

This retrospective study was carried out on 39 eyes of 38 keratoconus patients (28 male and 10 female) with the mean age of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ 28.97\frac{+}{.}10.37 $$\end{document}28.97+.10.37 years and had undergone MyoRing implantation by the two mentioned methods. The MyoRing was inserted into the corneal pocket which was made manually in 18 eyes (Melles hook group) or with PocketMaker microkeratome in 21 eyes (PocketMaker group). The mean follow up time was \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ 9.81\frac{+}{.}3.7 $$\end{document}9.81+.3.7 months with pre-operative and post-operative ophthalmic examination including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), keratometry readings and central corneal thickness measurement. AS-OCT (Casia, SS-1000, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) imaging was used to measure MyoRing insertion depth, exactly.

Results

Pre-operative and post-operative UCVA (LogMAR) mean change for the PocketMaker and Melles hook groups were recorded at 0.75 ± 0.32 and 0.78 ± 0.33, respectively. Similarly, BCVA (LogMAR) mean change were 0.27 ± 0.22 and 0.23 ± 0.22. Mean keratometry (Kmean) change were 6.06 ± 4.18 and 6.56 ± 3.55 respectively. UCVA change (P = 0.767), BCVA change (P = 0.77) and Kmean change (P = 0.693) showed that there was no statistically significant difference between both groups for any parameter. Depth measurements achieved from AS-OCT images showed that there was no statistically significant difference in pocket depth between two methods of MyoRing implantation (P = 0.413).

Conclusions

The results of Myoring implantation outcomes using mechanical dissection via PocketMaker microkeratome as against Melles hook are comparable.