Treatment outcomes of post cataract surgery endophthalmitis in a tertiary referral center in Iran

Tap and inject of intravitreal antibiotics versus pars plana vitrectomy for post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of initial tap and inject (T/I) compared with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for acute postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis following cataract surgery is unclear. Understanding the comparative safety and efficacy of initial T/I and initial PPV can provide context for treatment decision making in this setting.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to January 2021. Comparative studies reporting on final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) following initial T/I or PPV in patients with infectious endophthalmitis secondary to cataract surgery were included. Cochrane's Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to evaluate the risk of bias, and GRADE criteria were used to assess certainty of evidence. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seven nonrandomized studies reporting on 188 eyes at baseline were included in this meta-analysis. Initial T/I achieved a significantly better BCVA at last study observation than initial PPV (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.61 logMAR; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.03; p = 0.04; I2 = 89%; n = 7 studies; GRADE = very low). The incidence of enucleation was similar between initial T/I and initial PPV (risk ratio [RR] = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.09-6.25; p = 0.78; I2 = 4%; n = 2 studies; GRADE = very low). The risk of retinal detachment was similar between treatment modalities (RR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.01-5.94; p = 0.42; I2 = 52%; n = 2 studies; GRADE = very low).

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of evidence in this setting is limited. T/I had a significantly better BCVA at last study observation than initial PPV. Safety profiles were similar between T/I and PPV.

Early Vitrectomy for Endophthalmitis: Are EVS Guidelines Still Valid?

BACKGROUND

Endophthalmitis, a potentially sight-threatening condition, remains a challenge for ophthalmologists worldwide. The endophthalmitis vitrectomy study (EVS) conducted in 1995 compared vitrectomy and intravitreal antibiotic injections to intravitreal antibiotic injections alone for acute post-cataract surgery and secondary intraocular lens endophthalmitis, setting treatment guidelines. However, the landscape of clinical practice has evolved considerably since then, raising questions about the applicability of EVS recommendations today.

SUMMARY

Recent studies have proposed that early and complete vitrectomy (CEVE) could potentially be an effective approach for managing endophthalmitis cases, irrespective of the initial visual acuity. However, it is important to note that the level of rigor in these recent studies may not match that of the EVS study, and as such, this assertion should be considered with caution. Furthermore, the EVS study exclusively focused on post-cataract surgery cases, leaving other endophthalmitis types, like post-intravitreal injection and post-traumatic endophthalmitis, without standardized treatment guidelines. Research exploring the role of early vitrectomy in these contexts yields mixed results, emphasizing the need for further investigation and well-designed prospective trials. Endogenous endophthalmitis, originating from systemic infections, adds complexity to the scenario. While early vitrectomy shows promise in specific cases, conflicting evidence necessitates comprehensive research.

KEY MESSAGES

This review underscores the necessity for tailored treatment strategies, supporting early vitrectomy when clinically indicated, and advocating for prospective trials to clarify its role in diverse endophthalmitis scenarios. As surgical techniques and antimicrobial therapies continue to advance, reevaluating treatment paradigms becomes crucial to enhance patient outcomes and protect ocular health.

Cost-Effectiveness of Preoperative Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Endophthalmitis Following Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of preoperative topical antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of endophthalmitis following cataract surgery.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision-analytic microsimulation model.

METHODS

Preoperative topical antibiotic prophylaxis vs no-prophylaxis costs and effects were projected over a life-time horizon for a simulated cohort of 500 000 adult patients (≥18 years old) requiring cataract surgery in theoretical surgical centers in the United States. Efficacy and cost (2021 US dollars) values were obtained from the literature and discounted at 3% per year.

RESULTS

Based on inputted parameters, the mean incidence of endophthalmitis following cataract surgery for preoperative topical antibiotic prophylaxis vs no-prophylaxis was 0.034% (95% CI 0%-0.2%) and 0.042% (95% CI 0%-0.3%), respectively-an absolute risk reduction of 0.008%. The mean life-time costs for cataract surgery with prophylaxis and no-prophylaxis were $2486.67 (95% CI $2193.61-$2802.44) and $2409.03 (95% CI $2129.94-$2706.69), respectively. The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with prophylaxis and no-prophylaxis were 10.33495 (95% CI 7.81629-12.38158) and 10.33498 (95% CI 7.81284-12.38316), respectively. Assuming a cost-effectiveness criterion of ≤$50 000 per QALY gained, the threshold analyses indicated that prophylaxis would be cost-effective if the incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery was greater than 5.5% or if the price of the preoperative topical antibiotic prophylaxis was less than $0.75.

CONCLUSIONS

General use of preoperative topical antibiotic prophylaxis is not cost-effective compared with no-prophylaxis for the prevention of endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. Preoperative topical antibiotic prophylaxis, however, would be cost-effective at a higher incidence of endophthalmitis and/or a substantially lower price for prophylaxis.

Endophthalmitis after pediatric cataract surgery in the United States: report using an insurance claims database

PURPOSE

To describe the characteristics and incidence of children developing endophthalmitis within the first 90 days following pediatric cataract surgery.

SETTING

Deidentified commercial and Medicare Advantage health claims across the United States.

DESIGN

Population-based retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

In a retrospective review of approximately 58 million charts in Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database, patients aged <13 years who underwent cataract surgery in one or both eyes with or without primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation between 2003 and 2017 were identified. Excluded were patients with traumatic cataract, <90 days of continuous insurance coverage, a prior diagnosis of endophthalmitis, and a diagnosis of endophthalmitis occurring after 90 days of cataract surgery. The main outcome measure was the incidence of endophthalmitis occurring within the first 90 days of cataract surgery and the odds ratio for developing endophthalmitis according to demographic and intraoperative factors.

RESULTS

Cataract surgery was performed on 789 eyes (52.6% male), with a median age of 4 (interquartile range 1-8) years. The rate of IOL implantation at the time of cataract surgery was 66.8%. Endophthalmitis was diagnosed in 4 of 789 eyes (0.51%). The median time to diagnosis of endophthalmitis was 6.5 days (range: 5-44 days). There was no significant association between endophthalmitis and age, sex, or primary IOL implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large insurance claims database, the incidence of endophthalmitis following pediatric cataract surgery reported was more than the rate previously reported by any study with patients of a similar age.

Atypical Microbiological Feature of Infectious Endophthalmitis on Jeju Island: A 10-Year Study at a Single Tertiary Referral Center

Background

To analyze the microbiological causes of infectious endophthalmitis on an isolated island over ten years.

Methods

A retrospective review of the medical records of 49 eyes clinically diagnosed with infectious endophthalmitis between January 2009 and December 2018 was done. The subjects were recruited from a single tertiary referral center on Jeju Island. The baseline characteristics of all subjects were investigated, and a culture examination was performed. The isolated pathogens were analyzed to determine how their microbiological features differed from those in regions with different geographical conditions.

Results

Of the 49 eyes, causative microorganisms were identified in 27 eyes (55.1%). Bacteria were found in 24 cases and fungi in 3 cases. Among the exogenous causes, Staphylococcus species (Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, and S. hominis) were the most common pathogens (7 cases). Achromobacter xylosoxidans was the second most common causative pathogen (4 cases) followed by Moraxella species (3 cases). The most frequent endogenous origin was due to Klebsiella pneumoniae (6 cases). The subjects were divided into two groups according to the treatment results and analyzed for predisposing factors related to visual outcomes. The presence of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.038) and initial visual acuity (P ≤ 0.001) were significant predisposing factors for visual outcomes.

Conclusion

The causative microorganisms of endogenous endophthalmitis on Jeju Island were not different from those reported previously. However, isolated exogenous microorganisms were different from those reported in other studies from inland areas. A high incidence and atypical clinical features of Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Moraxella in exogenous endophthalmitis were observed, reflective of the distinct climatic features of Jeju Island: high humidity and temperature. Therefore, considering the causative microorganisms of exogenous endophthalmitis, it may be assumed that the causative microorganisms of exogenous endophthalmitis and its clinical manifestations differ according to the region.