Wandering Ozurdex in eyes with scleral fixated intraocular lens and its management: A report of two cases

Anterior migration of Ozurdex implant: a review on risk factors, complications, and management

PURPOSE

To describe the common risk factors, complications, and management options for anterior migration of Ozurdex implant.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed.

RESULTS

Amongst the most common risk factors predisposing to implant anterior migration we found a history of pseudophakia or aphakia or previous vitrectomy. The most common complication is that of corneal edema.

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of management options to treat migration of the dexamethasone implant are utilized by different specialists around the world. These depend on the doctor's preference, presence of corneal damage and history of previous migrations after repositioning the implant. The most common approaches are operative or non-operative implant repositioning and surgical implant removal.

Review of Risk Factors and Complications of Anterior Migration of Ozurdex Implant: Lessons Learnt from the Previous Reports

Purpose: Ozurdex had shown promising anatomical and functional outcomes in managing refractory Irvine-Gass syndrome over the years. Burgeoning usage of Ozurdex has prompted the study of its related complications, particularly the anterior chamber migration of the implant. Methods: Literature reviews on the anterior chamber migration of the Ozurdex via PubMed, EBSCO, and TRIP databases were searched from 2012 to 2020. The predisposing factors, outcomes, and management of such cases were evaluated. Results: A total of 54 articles consisting of 105 cases of anterior migration of Ozurdex were included in this analysis. The vitrectomized eye and compromised posterior capsule were highly associated with this complication. About 81.9% of the cases had cornea edema upon presentation, with 31.4% of them ending up with cornea decompensation despite intervention. Although there was high intraocular pressure reported initially in 22 cases, only 2 cases required glaucoma filtration surgeries in which they had preexisting glaucoma. Numerous techniques of repositioning or surgical removal of the implant were described but they were challenging and the outcomes varied. Conclusions: A noninvasive method of manipulating the Ozurdex into the vitreous cavity via the "Trendelenburg position, external pressure with head positioning" maneuvers is safe yet achieves a favorable outcome. Precaution must be taken whenever offering Ozurdex to the high-risk eyes. Prompt repositioning or removal of the implant is crucial to deter cornea decompensation. Clinical Trial Registration number: NMRR-22-02092-S9X (from the Medical Research and Ethics Committee (MREC), Ministry of Health, Malaysia).

OFFICE MANAGEMENT OF OZURDEX IMPLANT DISLOCATION INTO THE ANTERIOR CHAMBER

PURPOSE

To describe a novel office procedure that permits the repositioning of an Ozurdex implant from the anterior chamber back into the vitreous cavity.

METHODS

Description of an office technique for Ozurdex repositioning using a 30-gauge needle.

RESULTS

In both cases, the Ozurdex implant was successfully returned to the vitreous cavity. In Case 1, the patient's visual acuities 1 and 2 weeks after this were 20/70 and 20/40, respectively, and had no further complications. In Case 2, the patient returned 1 week later, with the implant remaining posterior and a visual acuity of 20/40.

CONCLUSION

The success of this novel technique in these cases demonstrates the potential to avoid a surgical procedure in the event of Ozurdex implant migration to the anterior chamber, while at the same time allowing the Ozurdex implant to remain effective in the eye.

Design and In Vitro Evaluation of a Slow-Release Intraocular Implant of Betamethasone

Posterior eye diseases are a common cause of vision problems in developing countries, which have encouraged the development of new treatment models for these degenerative diseases. Intraocular implants are one of the drug delivery systems to the posterior region of the eye. Using these implants, the blood-eye barrier can be bypassed; the complications caused by repeated in vitro administrations can be eliminated, and smaller amounts of the drug would be used during the treatment process. Meanwhile, biodegradable implants have received more attention due to their biodegradable structure and the lack of need for re-surgery to remove the rest of the system from the eye. The aim of this study is to employ biodegradable implants composed of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and 3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerat (PHBV) to deliver betamethasone to the back of the eye in the treatment of retinopathy. PHBV polymer has been selected as the main polymer with a certain ratio of drug to polymer for fabrication of enamel and different amounts of PEG with three molecular weights used as pore generators to control drug release over a period of time. Based on the analysis of the results of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and FTIR spectroscopy, none of the polymers were degraded in the temperature range of the manufacturing process, and among betamethasone derivatives, the best option for implant preparation is the use of its basic form. Drug release studies over a period of three months showed that implants containing PHBV HV2% and PEG 6000 had a more appropriate release profile.

Dexamethasone implant migration in an eye with congenital glaucoma: A case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The dexamethasone (DEX) implant is an FDA approved treatment for diabetic macular edema, non-infectious posterior uveitis, and macular edema secondary to branch or central retinal vein occlusions. We describe a case of anterior chamber (AC) migration of a DEX implant in a patient with a history of congenital glaucoma and perform a review of the literature on this particular complication, summarizing the common risk factors, subsequent complications, and management options.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 46-year-old female with a history of congenital glaucoma, status post cataract extraction with insertion of intraocular lens, pars plana vitrectomy, and Baerveldt tube implant in the left eye was referred for post-operative cystoid macular edema (CME). The patient underwent insertion of a DEX implant, resulting in improvement in her CME. After the fourth implant was injected, the patient noticed a white line in her eye while looking in the mirror after doing jumping jacks. Slit lamp examination confirmed migration of the implant into the AC. Ultimately, the patient was taken to the operating room, where her implant was removed via bimanual vitrectomy through an anterior approach.

CONCLUSION

This case report and literature review explores the ophthalmic structural changes specific to congenital glaucoma which may have predisposed this eye to anterior migration of the DEX implant. The purpose of this review is to detail the anatomic changes that may increase the risk of anterior chamber implant migration in patients with congenital glaucoma so that physicians may be aware of these risks when selecting patients for this implant.

Extended release of dexamethasone from oleogel based rods

HYPOTHESIS

Topical and systemic methods are not able to deliver ophthalmic drugs for treatment of retinal diseases. Consequently, invasive monthly intravitreal injections through the eyeball are required to deliver retinal drugs. A reduction in the frequency of the injection through extended release of the drugs could have significant clinical benefits.

EXPERIMENTS

Oleogels containing ethyl cellulose as the gelator at 10% (wt%) in soybean oil were loaded with dexamethasone above the solubility limit and expunged from a syringe to create cylindrical rods for extended drug delivery. The devices were imaged to explore particle distribution and drug release was measured under sink conditions in buffer. A model was developed and fitted to data to determine effective drug diffusivity.

FINDINGS

Dexamethasone is released slowly due to the presence of the drug particles that serve as drug depots. The release increases from 600 to 3000 h as the drug loading is increased from 3% to 28%. The release profiles can be modeled by considering drug dissolution and diffusion, as well as the tortuosity of the matrix due to the presence of the voids formed after the drug particles have dissolved. The proposed approach is promising as the release profiles of the drug are comparable to commercial devices.