Effects of Ultrasonic Removal of Fractured Files from the Middle Third of Root Canals on the Resistance to Vertical Root Fracture

Vertical root fractures in root treated teeth-current status and future trends

Vertical root fracture (VRF) is a common reason for the extraction of root filled teeth. The accurate diagnosis of VRF may be challenging due to the absence of clinical signs, whilst conventional radiographic assessment is often inconclusive. However, an understanding of the aetiology of VRFs, and more importantly, the key predisposing factors, is crucial in identifying teeth that may be susceptible. Thorough clinical examination with magnification and co-axial lighting is essential in identifying VRFs, and although CBCT is unable to reliably detect VRFs per se, the pattern of bone loss typically associated with VRF can be fully appreciated, and therefore, increases the probability of correct diagnosis and management. The prevalence of VRFs in root filled teeth is significantly greater than in teeth with vital pulps, demonstrating that the combination of loss of structural integrity, presence of pre-existing fractures and biochemical effects of loss of vitality, are highly relevant. Careful assessment of the occlusal scheme, presence of deflective contacts and identification of parafunctional habits is imperative in both preventing and managing VRFs. Furthermore, anatomical factors such as root canal morphology, may predispose certain teeth to VRF. The influence of access cavity design and root canal instrumentation protocols should be considered although the impact of these on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth is not clearly validated. The post-endodontic restoration of root filled teeth should be expedient and considerate to the residual tooth structure. Posts should be placed 'passively' and excessive 'post-space' preparation should be avoided. This narrative review aims to present the aetiology, potential predisposing factors, histopathology, diagnosis and management of VRF and present perspectives for future research. Currently, there are limited options other than extraction for the management of VRF, although root resection may be considered in multi-rooted teeth. Innovative techniques to 'repair' VRFs using both orthograde and surgical approaches require further research and validation. The prevention of VRFs is critical; identifying susceptible teeth, utilizing conservative endodontic procedures, together with expedient and appropriate post-endodontic restorative procedures is paramount to reducing the incidence of terminal VRFs.

Effectiveness of different fiber post removal techniques and their influence on dentinal microcrack formation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different fiber post removal techniques and to correlate dentinal loss with microcrack formation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five extracted single-rooted teeth were root canal treated and fiber posts were adhesively luted. Specimens were divided into three groups (n = 15) according to the removal technique: long-shaft round bur (EndoTracer #08, Komet, Lemgo, Germany), SonicFlex Endo (KaVo, Biberach, Germany), DT Post Removal Kit (VDW, Munich, Germany). Roots were scanned before post cementation and after post removal using micro-computed tomography. Dentin loss, residual luting material, working time, and the induction of microcracks were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed by using multiple contrast tests (max-t tests, α = 0.05). Correlations between parameters dentin loss/new microcracks and dentin loss/residual material were calculated using Kendall's tau.

RESULTS

Post removal with SonicFlex Endo resulted in the highest amount of removed dentin with significant differences to the round bur and the DT Post Removal Kit. No technique was found to completely remove the post and luting material. All techniques induced microcracks with the DT Post Removal Kit presenting the highest number of new defects. No correlation between dentin loss and new microcracks was observed. Deviations from the original root canal occurred in all groups, but no perforation was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

All techniques resulted in dentin loss, residual luting material, and the formation of microcracks. However, no correlation between dentin loss and the induction of microcracks was observed.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As all techniques resulted in microcrack formation and dentin loss, this study emphasizes the risk of iatrogenic damage due to post removal procedures.

Techniques to address fractured instruments in the middle or apical third of the root canal in human permanent teeth: a systematic review of the in vitro studies

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate techniques for approaching fractured instruments in the root canal and to present possible outcomes in relation to dentin thickness, fracture resistance, technique success, and clinical time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The bibliographic research was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane, Lilacs, Web of Science, Scopus, grey literature, and manual search. Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the titles and abstracts of 506 articles were read. Of these, 60 articles were selected and read in full. Fourteen articles were included in this systematic review.

RESULTS

The most studied technique was the ultrasonic technique and obtained good general results. The more apically the instrument is located, the more difficult it is to remove, the more dentin is removed, and the lower the fracture resistance of the tooth. When removal is not possible, the bypass technique can be performed (bypassing), and on weakened teeth or with little dental remnants, the GentleWave System technique can be used.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows the evidence from laboratory studies that the curvature and the root third in which the fracture of instruments occurred is relevant to fracture resistance and success. The ultrasonic technique got the best results. Well-conducted clinical studies should be performed for clinical practice.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The approach of fractured instruments in the root canal is efficient with the use of ultrasound, bypass technique, and Gentle Wave System.

Vertical root fracture resistance and dentinal crack formation of root canal-treated teeth instrumented with different nickel-titanium rotary systems: an in-vitro study

To compare the vertical root fracture (VRF) resistance of root canal-treated teeth instrumented with four different nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary file systems and examine the dentinal crack pattern and direction using a new classification. Eighty mature mandibular premolars were selected and decoronated, leaving 13 mm of the root. The root samples were mounted in acrylic resin and divided randomly into five groups of different NiTi file systems: Group 1-control, Group 2-T-Pro, Group 3-HyFlex CM, Group 4-TG6 and lastly Group 5-ZenFlex. Samples in Group 2 and Group 3 were instrumented up to size 25/0.04, whereas Group 4 and Group 5 were instrumented up to size 25/0.06. Obturation was performed with AH Plus sealer and gutta-percha using single cone technique. Subsequently, all samples were subjected to occlusal compressive force until they were fractured. The force (N) needed to cause root fracture was recorded. The crack patterns and directions were also inspected under magnification and classified using a new and simple classification. The highest (VRF) resistance was noted in the control group (453.15 ± 92.23 N), followed by T-Pro (387.43 ± 76.81 N), HyFlex CM (381.88 ± 52.73 N), ZenFlex (369.15 ± 89.41 N) and finally TG6 (346.05 ± 72.08 N), but there was no significant difference between T-Pro and HyFlex (P = 0.438). A significantly higher prevalence (P = 0.001) of Type 1 crack pattern was observed, especially in samples instrumented with TG6. Majority of the cracks ran buccolingually except in some samples instrumented with ZenFlex (P = 0.898). Smaller file taper increased the VRF resistance of root canal-treated teeth. Majority of the dentinal crack exhibited Type 1 pattern and ran buccolingually.

Management of an over-extruded fragment in a C-shaped root canal configuration: A case report and literature review

Separation of root canal instruments is a common incident during root canal treatments' procedures. The complex configuration of root canal systems is one of the most influencing factors, not only during the occurrence of instrument separation but also during the management of such unpleasant incidents. There are few reports on the management of fractured instruments located in the apical third of the root canals apical, especially those extruded beyond the apex. A 37-year-old woman was referred to an endodontic specialist to complete a root canal treatment after the separation of an endodontic file in the middle-third of the C-shaped root canal configuration (Vertucci type II) of the mandibular second molar. A failed attempt at managing the fragment by the dentist resulted in the backward placement of the fragment, which was more apically, and partial extrusion beyond the root apex. The fractured instrument was successfully and safely retrieved using different procedures and techniques including bypassing the fragment, loosening the fragment using ultrasonics and then removing it by the crab-claw shaped tweezers (Zumax broken instruments removal kit). This case report demonstrates the importance of high magnification provided by the dental operating microscopes and sound clinical skills and judgment, especially in assessing the difficulty of cases that is necessary for various treatment approaches. In addition, the availability of different armamentaria to manage separated instruments is essential. Finally, this case report proposes and advocates the idea of removing fractured instruments extruding beyond the apex without surgery.