In Vitro Comparison of Porcelain Fused to Metal Crown Retention after Endodontic Access and Subsequent Restoration: Composite, Amalgam, Amalgam with Composite Veneer, and Fiber Post with Composite

Outcome of Endodontic Treatment through Existing Full Coverage Restorations: An Endodontic Practice Case Series

INTRODUCTION

This case series assessed the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment completed through retained full coverage restorations (FCRs) in a board-certified endodontist private practice. The number of cases completed by the first author was 153.

METHODS

All cases were performed following a standardized protocol for treatment and restoration depending on the type of FCR. Number of cases that showed up for 2- to 4-year follow-up was 127, with 83% recall rate. The age range of patients was 33-95 years, with mean age of 54.734 years. The mean recall time was 2.448 years. FCRs and their distribution were as follows: 4 anterior teeth, 14 premolars, and 109 molars. There were 103 nonsurgical root canal treatments and 24 retreatments. Patients who presented for recall had 74 porcelain fused to metal crowns, 17 zirconia crowns, 15 abutments of porcelain fused to metal bridges, 14 lithium disilicate crowns, 5 gold crowns, 1 full metal crown, and 1 gold onlay.

RESULTS

There were no endodontically related failures. Six cases failed; 3 were due to vertical root fractures, 1 was due to horizontal root fracture, and 2 were due to extensive recurrent caries causing restorative failure. The percentage of healed cases following the American Association of Endodontists outcome criteria adopted in 2004 with intact retained FCR was 95.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest predictable favorable outcomes for nonsurgical endodontic treatment through FCR following the proposed protocol for diagnosis, treatment, and restoration.