Effect of Foraminal Enlargement on Postoperative Pain in Necrotic Single-Rooted Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial

How Does Intentional Apical Foraminal Enlargement Affect the Foramen and Root Canal Morphology?

INTRODUCTION

This study assessed the effect of intentional foraminal enlargement on the foramen and the apical root canal morphology.

METHOD

Sixty mesial roots of mandibular molars were scanned by micro-computed tomography. Their apical foramina were photographed with a stereomicroscope before and after preparation. Three groups were formed (n = 20) according to the working length (WL). G-1: foramen - 1 mm; G0: foramen; and G+1: foramen + 1 mm. Each group originated 2 subgroups (n = 10): G-1: Buchanan's patency (size 10 K-type file) and foraminal debridement (sizes 20, 25 and 30 K-type files); G0 and G+1: rotary foraminal enlargement (ProDesign S size 25/.08) or reciprocating foraminal enlargement (R25). The area, perimeter, transportation, and noninstrumented walls of the foramen were evaluated. The root canal transportation and the centering index of preparation at 1, 3 and 5 mm from the foramen were also assessed. Data were compared statistically (α = 5%).

RESULTS

The instruments used at the foramen and 1 mm beyond promoted foraminal enlargement and transportation. Regarding NIW, there was no difference between mechanized foraminal enlargements performed at the foramen or 1 mm beyond, similar to the manual foraminal debridement group (P > .05). There was no difference in transportation and centralization at 1-, 3-, and 5-mm apical levels, regardless of the instrumentation systems.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical preparation at the foramen, or 1 mm beyond, resulted in foraminal enlargement, transportation and were not able to touch all root canal walls that delimit the foramen.

Outcome of root canal treatment of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis treated with foraminal enlargement and 2% chlorhexidine gel: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective cohort study aimed to estimate the success rate (SR) of primary root canal treatment on teeth with a diagnosis of pulp necrosis (PN) and asymptomatic apical periodontitis (AAP) when using 2% chlorhexidine gel as an auxiliary chemical substance (ACS) and foraminal enlargement instrumentation technique.

METHODS

This study evaluated 178 patients with 206 teeth submitted to primary root canal treatment performed by graduate residents in endodontics. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent treatment over a period of 1 to 7 years on teeth with a diagnosis of PN and AAP. The SR was evaluated clinically and radiographically and categorized considering strict' (complete resolution of periradicular lesion) or 'loose' (reduction in the size of existing periradicular lesion) criteria. Cases of clinical and/or radiographical absence of repair were classified as a failure. Two calibrated examiners independently assessed treatment outcomes using the ImageJ software.

RESULTS

The SR were 81.1% (95% CI: 75.7% - 86.4%) and 87.4% (95% CI: 82.8% - 91.9%) when considering the 'strict' or 'loose' criteria, respectively. Females had a higher SR when strict criteria were applied. Also, the SR was significantly reduced when there was an increase in the patient's age.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, it was found that teeth with a diagnosis of PN and AAP and treated associating the use of 2% chlorhexidine gel and foraminal enlargement achieved substantial SR. Gender and age were prognostic factors that played a significant role in the SR. Future randomized controlled trials should further investigate the effects of foraminal enlargement and 2% chlorhexidine gel as an ACS.

The effect of photodynamic therapy on postoperative pain in teeth with primary endodontic infection

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to investigate the action of photodynamic therapy on pain control after endodontic treatment in asymptomatic teeth with a primary infection, within a single visit.

METHODS

Sixty (60) single-rooted teeth with pulp necrosis and periapical lesions were selected and randomly divided into two (2) groups (n=30), according to the protocol; a control group (CG) and a group using photodynamic therapy (aPDT). The canals were instrumented with Reciproc files # 25 up to 40 along the entire length of the canal, using 2% chlorhexidine gel as the auxiliary chemical substance, followed by irrigation with sterile saline. The canals were filled with Endomethasone N cement, 0.005% methylene blue, using AsGaAl diode laser, 660 nm wavelength, 100 mW of power and 9 J of energy, using optical fibers with 365 µm in diameter.

RESULTS

Pain intensity was assessed at 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours and 1 week after endodontic treatment using a visual analogue scale. The level of pain was classified as none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-7) or severe (8-10). The data were at a significance level of 5%. There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in the periods of 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours between the control group and the aPDT group. After 1 week, there was no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that photodynamic therapy had a significant effect on decreasing post-endodontic treatment pain in teeth with necrotic pulp and asymptomatic periapical lesions.