Survey of Vital Pulp Therapy Treatment in Permanent Dentition Being Taught at U.S. Dental Schools

Exploring deep caries management and barriers to the use of vital pulp treatments by primary care dental practitioners

AIM

The European Society of Endodontology outlines best practices for the management of deep caries and the pulp. Despite evidence supporting vital pulp treatments (VPTs) as predictable alternatives to conventional endodontic treatment, studies have shown they are not widely adopted in the UK. This study aimed to explore the barriers to implementation of VPTs by primary care general dental practitioners (GDPs).

METHODOLOGY

Qualitative one-to-one semi-structured online interviews were conducted with purposively sampled UK GDPs. Interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Recurring themes were iteratively refined as additional transcripts were reviewed.

RESULTS

Eleven participants were interviewed. A range of barriers to the provision of VPTs were identified, which aligned with two core themes: 'Motivational barriers to service provision' and 'Educational access & opportunities'. Sub-themes included lack of access to materials and equipment, deficiencies in knowledge of treatment (including protocols, outcomes and prognosis), lack of confidence (in treatment efficacy and clinical ability), time constraints and public dental service funding and remuneration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies barriers to the widespread adoption of VPTs among primary care GDPs in public and private settings. Economic constraints, practitioner confidence, time limitations and educational gaps are key challenges. Addressing these may require systemic changes such as policy interventions, education and improved resource allocation.

Efficacy of pulpotomy in managing irreversible pulpitis in mature permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This paper evaluated the success rates of pulpotomy, compared its efficacy with non-surgical root canal treatment (NSRCT), evaluated different pulpotomy techniques, and analyzed the effectiveness of contemporary bioactive materials in managing irreversible pulpitis in mature permanent teeth.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Search was conducted from the inception of each database to the present, adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected through a multi-step screening process, focusing on adult populations, randomized controlled trials, and single-arm trials.

DATA

Fifteen randomized controlled trials and eight single-arm trials were included. For a follow-up period of more than 24 months, pooled clinical success rate of pulpotomy was 92.9 % (95 %CI;82.1-99.0 %), whereas pooled radiographic success rate was 78.5 % (95 %CI;66.7-88.4 %). Meta-analyses showed that there was no significant difference in success rates between pulpotomy and NSRCT, between full and partial pulpotomy techniques, or between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate pulpotomy and Calcium Enriched Mixture pulpotomy. The results indicated comparable efficacy across these variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the potential of less invasive treatments. Pulpotomy may be a viable alternative to NSRCT for managing irreversible pulpitis in mature permanent teeth. Limitations such as the low quality of some single-arm trials and the high risk of bias in some randomized controlled trials highlight the need for further research to standardize methodologies and broaden literature inclusion for a more comprehensive understanding of the efficacy of pulpotomy, considering the high success rates reported. Clinical Significance This quantitative systematic review recognizes the potential of full or partial pulpotomy as a viable treatment alternative to root canal therapy for managing irreversible pulpitis in mature permanent teeth. Future studies should aim for standardized protocols to validate these findings and improve patient treatment outcomes.

Assessment of Decision-Making and Material Selection for Vital Pulp Therapy in Deep Carious Lesions: A Study at the Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to assess decision-making, material selection, and management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth requiring vital pulp therapy (VPT); investigate the intradepartmental and interdepartmental consensus in the management of those cases; and correlate this study's results to the current scientific literature, clinical experience, and postgraduate training among staff and postgraduate students at the Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The survey included faculty from pedodontics, endodontics, and restorative/operative dentistry; postgraduate students; and interns, excluding specific categories such as retired faculty, external trainers, non-faculty hospital specialists, general practitioners, students, interns outside the institution, and other departments. An anonymous electronic questionnaire was developed and validated. Ethical approval was obtained, and the questionnaire was distributed to all 148 English-proficient members of the targeted population via email and WhatsApp, accompanied by a cover letter. The questionnaire encompassed demographic, education, experience, assessment, decision-making, and management sections. Data were collected and analyzed using Microsoft Excel, with results presented using categorical variables, Pareto charts, and statistical tests.

RESULTS

There were 86 responses, representing 58% of the target population, with the key findings including the prominence of "Pre-operative vitality test result" as the most important factor in assessing deep carious lesions, with no significant differences among specialties. The (one-step and one-visit) management approach was preferred by 50% of participants, with no significant specialty differences. For deep carious lesions without pulpal exposure, glass ionomer (GI)/resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) base was the top choice, with no variation among all specialties. In cases with pulpal exposure, the one-visit approach (direct pulp capping (DPC), base, and restoration) was the most favored, with no specialty differences. Material availability significantly influenced decision-making, with no specialty variations.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the crucial role of pre-operative vitality tests in assessing deep carious lesions for VPT or root canal treatment (RCT). Participants generally favored VPT for cases with normal pulp vitality, with some departmental variation. Controlling bleeding post-pulpal exposure was a central concern. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was the most commonly used VPT material, followed by Ca(OH)2 and Biodentine. Factors such as treatment access, patient compliance, remaining dentin thickness, and oral hygiene had minimal impact on treatment choice. Limited availability of VPT materials was the primary reason for non-use. The survey's acceptable response rate raises concerns about potential non-response bias, though limitations include a lack of data on non-responders. Nevertheless, the survey's strength lies in its comprehensive coverage of key clinical aspects, engaging professionals from diverse specialties and educational levels who are collectively interested in addressing deep caries cases.