Cleaning Efficiency of Different Irrigation Techniques in Simulated Severely Curved Complex Root Canal Systems

Comparative Analysis of Irrigation Techniques for Cleaning Efficiency in Isthmus Structures

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the removal of a biofilm-mimicking hydrogel from isthmus structures in a simulated complex root canal system consisting of 2 curved root canals by Laser-activated irrigation (LAI, AdvErl Evo, Morita) and mechanical activation techniques.

METHODS

A 3D-printed root canal model with 2 parallel root canals (60°-curvature, radius 5 mm, dimension 25/.06) with a total length of 20 mm connected via isthmuses (2.5 × 0.4 × 0.2 mm) at 5 mm and 8 mm from the apical endpoint and with lateral canals (diameter 0.2 mm) in all directions at 2, 5, and 8 mm from the apex was filled with a colored biofilm-mimicking hydrogel. Irrigation protocols under continuous irrigation with distilled water (3 × 20s per root canal; 3 ml/20s; n = 20) included conventional needle irrigation (=NI); manual agitation (=MA, gutta-percha point 25/.06); EndoActivator (=SAI-EA, 25/.04); EDDY (=SAI-E, 25/.04); ultrasonically-activated irrigation (=UAI) and LAI (Er:YAG-laser; P400FL tip at canal entrance; 25pps, 50 mJ, 300μs). Removal of the hydrogel was determined as a percentage via standardized photos through a microscope. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Conover tests (P = .05).

RESULTS

Laser-activated irrigation (LAI) was associated with the greatest removal of hydrogel from the entire root canal system (P < .05), followed by SAI-E. No significant differences were reported for the coronal isthmus between LAI, SAI-E, NI, and MA (P > .05), but inferior results for SAI-EA and UAI (P < .05). In the apical isthmus, all techniques outperformed UAI (P < .05), with LAI, SAI-E, and NI showing the best results (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Laser-activated irrigation (LAI) was superior to other irrigation techniques in the entire root canal system. SAI-E and NI performed comparable to LAI in the isthmuses.

Three-Dimensional Printed Teeth in Endodontics: A New Protocol for Microcomputed Tomography Studies

This study aimed to describe a support material removal protocol (SMRP) from inside the root canals of three-dimensional printed teeth (3DPT) obtained by the microcomputed tomography (microCT) of a natural tooth (NT), evaluate its effectiveness by comparing the 3DPT to NT in terms of internal anatomy and behaviour toward endodontic preparation, and evaluate if 3DPT are adequate to assess the differences between two preparation systems. After the SMRP, twenty 3DPT printed by PolyJet™ were microCT scanned before preparation and thereafter randomly assigned into two groups (n = 10). One group and NT were prepared using ProTaper Gold® (PTG), and the other group with Endogal® (ENDG). MicroCT scans were carried out after preparation, and the volume increase, volume of dentin removed, centroids, transportation, and unprepared areas were compared. For the parameters evaluated, no significant differences were found between the 3DPT and NT before and after preparation (p > 0.05), and no significant differences were found between the 3DPT PTG group and the 3DPT ENDG group (p > 0.05). It can be concluded that the SMRP described is effective in removing the support material SUP706B™. PolyJet™ is adequate for printing 3DPT. Furthermore, 3DPT printed with high-temperature RGD525™ have similar behaviour during endodontic preparation with PTG as the NT, and 3DPT can be used to compare two preparation systems.

Influence of pulse energy, tip design and insertion depth during Er:YAG-activated irrigation on cleaning efficacy in simulated severely curved complex root canal systems in vitro

AIM

To investigate the influence of pulse energy, tip geometry and tip position in simulated 3D-printed root canals with multiple side canals at different levels in all directions on the cleaning performance of laser-activated irrigation (LAI) compared to sonic activation (EDDY) and conventional needle irrigation (NI).

METHODOLOGY

3D-printed root canal models (25/.06, length 20 mm, curvature 60°, radius 5 mm) with side canals (diameter 0.2 mm) at 2, 5 and 8 mm from the apex were filled with coloured biofilm-mimicking hydrogel. LAI (Morita AdvErL Evo, Kyoto, Japan) was performed with six settings (n = 20; pulse-energy, pulses per second [PPS], tip position): LAI1 (50 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL, canal entrance [CE]), LAI2 (same as LAI1, but insertion depth 9 mm before the apical endpoint [AE] [corresponding to 1 mm above the first lateral canals]), LAI3 (80 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL, 9 mm before AE), LAI4 (same as LAI 3, but at CE) for 3 × 20 s each, LAI5 (50 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL 2 × 20 s, CE & R200T (30 mJ, 25 PPS, 1 × 20 s, 9 mm before AE), LAI6 (30 mJ, 25 PPS, R200T, 9 mm before AE, 3 × 20 s). A continuous irrigation (3 mL/20 s) using distilled water accompanied the irrigation cycles. NI and EDDY (3 × 20 s each; 3 mL/20 s irrigation, insertion AE minus 1 mm, amplitude 4 mm) served as control groups. Biofilm-mimicking hydrogel removal (ImageJ, NIH) was assessed for the entire system, the central canal and the lateral canals using standardized photographs with a microscope (Expert DN, Müller-Optronic) and statistically analysed was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (p = .05). Irrigant extrusion beyond the foramina was also recorded.

RESULTS

LAI2 (99.08%; interquartile range [IQR]: 96.85-100.00) and LAI3 (97.50%; 96.24-100.00) achieved the significantly best and LAI6 (80.08%; 73.41-84.69) the significantly worst removal of hydrogel from the entire root canal system amongst all LAI configurations (p < .05). There were no significant differences between LAI6, EDDY (72.89%; 67.49-76.22) and manual irrigation (54.39%; 51.01-56.94) (p > .05). R200T laser tip caused significantly more often irrigant extrusion than all other techniques (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Tip design, energy settings, and the positioning of the laser tip below the canal entrance caused an improvement in cleaning performance of the LAI. However, the small R200T tip created significantly more procedural errors (irrigant extrusion) due to higher concentrated energy.