1
|
Kaur P, Rufin K, Finlayson SJ, Huntsman DG, Kwon JS, McAlpine JN, Miller DM, Hanley GE. Opportunistic Salpingectomy Between 2017 and 2020: A Descriptive Analysis. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2024; 46:102278. [PMID: 37944815 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during another pelvic surgery for the purpose of ovarian cancer prevention. Herein, we describe the rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization between 2017 and 2020. METHODS This study uses the Canadian Institute of Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories except for Quebec between the fiscal years 2017 and 2020. A descriptive analysis on all people aged 15 years and older who had hysterectomies or tubal sterilizations was conducted to determine the proportion of hysterectomies that included bilateral salpingectomy (OS) and the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS compared to tubal ligation. RESULTS There were 174 006 people included in the study. The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 31.7% in 2017 to 39.9% by 2020. With respect to tubal sterilizations, rates of OS increased from 26.3% of all tubal sterilizations in 2017 to 42.5% in 2020. British Columbia remained the jurisdiction with the highest rates of OS, but rates increased significantly in many jurisdictions, particularly at the time of tubal sterilization. CONCLUSION The rates of OS have continued to increase in all Canadian jurisdictions following the official Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada recommendation to consider OS in 2015. Assuming that all tubal ligations could have been OS and 75% of hysterectomies with ovarian conservation could have included OS, our data indicate 76 932 missed opportunities for ovarian cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paramdeep Kaur
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Khaye Rufin
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sarah J Finlayson
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Janice S Kwon
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Dianne M Miller
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Gillian E Hanley
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li M, Lv J. Effect of salpingectomy versus tubal ligation on postoperative wound infection in patients: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2024; 21:e14543. [PMID: 38272821 PMCID: PMC10805532 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
After several institutions recommended salpingectomy as opposed to tubal ligation, we attempted to perform meta-analysis to compare operative properties and rates of postoperative wound infections. There are no temporal or linguistic limitations to our search in PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase. The search was carried out in September 2023. The database search identified 401 potential studies and five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Our study involved a comparison of salpingectomy with tube ligating in female patients who wanted to be sterilized. Our trial included at least one result of the wound and haemorrhage. The articles that did not qualify for inclusion or did not submit data, and those who did not answer questions were excluded. Abstracts and full-text articles were assessed independently by two authors using blinding. Conflicting decisions were settled by consensus. The Cochrane-recommended ROBINS-I instrument has been applied to evaluate the risk of bias in clinical trials and to establish the quality of inclusion. Two authors separately evaluated the risk of bias for each trial; differences were settled by consensus. There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of postoperative wound infections among those who had received salpingectomy or tubal ligation (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.18-1.20 p = 0.11). In the three trials, the risk of bleeding following the ligation of the fallopian tubes was lower than that of the salpingectomy group (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.21-1.30 p < 0.0001). From this information we have come to the conclusion that it is possible to give preference to tubal ligation for reduction of bleeding in suitable circumstances, and that the findings currently do not provide sufficient evidence for a reduction in the risk of postoperative wound infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Li
- Department of Pre‐Pregnancy and Post‐Natal CareJinan Second Maternanl and Child Health HospitalJinanChina
| | - Jian Lv
- Department of ObstetricsJinan Second Maternanl and Child Health HospitalJinanChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Magarakis L, Idahl A, Sundfeldt K, Liv P, Pålsson M, Strandell A. SALpingectomy for STERilisation (SALSTER): study protocol for a Swedish multicentre register-based randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071246. [PMID: 37666548 PMCID: PMC10481827 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Salpingectomy is currently suggested as an alternative to tubal ligation for sterilisation. Precursor lesions of ovarian carcinoma can be found in the fallopian tubes; thus, salpingectomy could possibly reduce the incidence. Most of the existing trials on safety are small, on caesarean section and report on surrogate ovarian function measures. Randomised trials in laparoscopy are lacking. Well-designed trials are needed to evaluate safety of laparoscopic opportunistic salpingectomy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In SALSTER, a national register-based randomised controlled non-inferiority trial, 968 women <50 years, wishing laparoscopic sterilisation will be randomised to either salpingectomy or tubal ligation. The Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery (GynOp) will be used for inclusion, randomisation and follow-up. Primary outcomes are any complication up to 8 weeks postoperatively, and age at menopause. Both outcomes are measured with questionnaires, complications are also assessed by a gynaecologist. In a nested trial, ovarian function will be evaluated comparing the mean difference of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), assessed preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Performing salpingectomy for sterilisation has become increasingly common, despite the unclear risk-benefit balance. SALSTER studies the safety of salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation. Regardless of the result, SALSTER will provide gynaecologists with high quality evidence to inform women to decide on salpingectomy or not. The central ethical review board of Gothenburg, Sweden (Dnr. 316-18) approved the trial in 2018. Results will be presented at scientific congresses and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. The results will be communicated through professional organisations and research networks. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03860805.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonidas Magarakis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Annika Idahl
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Liv
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Mathias Pålsson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Annika Strandell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Giannakeas V, Murji A, Lipscombe LL, Narod SA, Kotsopoulos J. Salpingectomy and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Ontario. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2327198. [PMID: 37566421 PMCID: PMC10422181 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance A body of pathological and clinical evidence supports the position that the fallopian tube is the site of origin for a large proportion of high-grade serous ovarian cancers. Consequently, salpingectomy is now considered for permanent contraception (in lieu of tubal ligation) or ovarian cancer prevention (performed opportunistically at the time of surgical procedures for benign gynecologic conditions). Objective To evaluate the association between salpingectomy and the risk of invasive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based retrospective cohort study included all women aged 18 to 80 years who were eligible for health care services in Ontario, Canada. Participants were identified using administrative health databases from Ontario between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2019. A total of 131 516 women were included in the primary (matched) analysis. Women were followed up until December 31, 2021. Exposures Salpingectomy (with and without hysterectomy) vs no pelvic procedure (control condition) among women in the general population. Main Outcomes and Measures Women with a unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy in Ontario between April 1, 1992, and December 31, 2019, were matched 1:3 to women with no pelvic procedure from the general population. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer combined. Results Among 131 516 women (mean [SD] age, 42.2 [7.6] years), 32 879 underwent a unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy, and 98 637 did not undergo a pelvic procedure. After a mean (range) follow-up of 7.4 (0-29.2) years in the salpingectomy group and 7.5 (0-29.2) years in the nonsurgical control group, there were 31 incident cancers (0.09%) and 117 incident cancers (0.12%), respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55-1.21). The HR for cancer incidence was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.53-1.44) when comparing those with salpingectomy vs those with hysterectomy alone. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, no association was found between salpingectomy and the risk of ovarian cancer; however, this observation was based on few incident cases and a relatively short follow-up time. Studies with additional years of follow-up are necessary to define the true level of potential risk reduction with salpingectomy, although longer follow-up will also be a challenge unless collaborative efforts that pool data are undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasily Giannakeas
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ally Murji
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lorraine L. Lipscombe
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matsuo K, Chen L, Matsuzaki S, Mandelbaum RS, Ciesielski KM, Silva JP, Klar M, Roman LD, Accordino MK, Melamed A, Elkin E, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e1116-e1123. [PMID: 35129467 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis to examine the utility and effectiveness of OS performed at the time of elective cholecystectomy [laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LAP-CHOL)]. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA OS has been adopted as a strategy to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women undergoing hysterectomy and tubal sterilization, although the procedure is rarely performed as a risk reducing strategy during other abdominopelvic procedures. METHODS A decision model was created to examine women 40, 50, and 60 years of age undergoing LAP-CHOL with or without OS. The lifetime risk of ovarian cancer was assumed to be 1.17%, 1.09%, and 0.92% for women age 40, 50, and 60 years, respectively. OS was estimated to provide a 65% reduction in the risk of ovarian cancer and to require 30 additional minutes of operative time. We estimated the cost, quality-adjusted life-years, ovarian cancer cases and deaths prevented with OS. RESULTS The additional cost of OS at LAP-CHOL ranged from $1898 to 1978. In a cohort of 5000 women, OS reduced the number of ovarian cancer cases by 39, 36, and 30 cases and deaths by 12, 14, and 16 in the age 40-, 50-, and 60-year-old cohorts, respectively. OS during LAP-CHOL was cost-effective, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $11,162 to 26,463 in the 3 age models. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for OS were less than $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-years in 90.5% or more of 1000 simulations. CONCLUSIONS OS at the time of LAP-CHOL may be a cost-effective strategy to prevent ovarian cancer among average risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ling Chen
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Jack P Silva
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Maximilian Klar
- University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; and
| | | | | | - Alexander Melamed
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Elena Elkin
- Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
- Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Jason D Wright
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Varga I, Csöbönyeiová M, Visnyaiová K, Záhumenský J, Pavlíková L, Feitscherová C, Klein M. Functional Morphology of the Human Uterine Tubes in the 21st Century: Anatomical Novelties and Their Possible Clinical Applications. Physiol Res 2022. [DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.935036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The uterine tube (UT) pathologies account for 25-35 % of female factor infertility. Although these peculiar organs were first studied several hundred years ago, they have become overlooked and neglected mainly due to the successes of reproductive medicine. Nevertheless, reproductive medicine still faces many challenges regarding the fertility outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Many obstacles and problems can be resolved by a more detailed understanding of the UT morphology and function during normal reproduction. Over the course of the 21st century, many new insights have been obtained: the presence of a population of telocytes in the tubal wall responsible for normal motility and hormone sensory function, the demonstration of lymphatic lacunae of the mucosal folds necessary for oocyte capture and tubal fluid recirculation, or a thorough profiling of the immune makeup of the UT epithelial lining with the discovery of regulatory T cells presumably important for maternal tolerance towards the semi-allogenic embryo. New discoveries also include the notion that the UT epithelium is male sex hormone-sensitive, and that the UT is not sterile, but harbors a complex microbiome. The UT epithelial cells were also shown to be the cells-of-origin of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. Finally, yet importantly, several modern morphological directions have been emerging recently, including cell culture, the development of tubal organoids, in silico modelling, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. All these novel insights and new approaches can contribute to better clinical practice and successful pregnancy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Varga
- Institute of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ruel-Laliberté J, Kasasni SM, Oprea D, Viau M. Outcome and Management of Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma Following Opportunistic Salpingectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:1174-1180. [PMID: 36099965 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Serous ovarian cancer is the most common subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma-the most prevalent type of ovarian cancer. High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is thought to arise from the distal fallopian tube, with a precursor lesion known as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). STICs are found in the final pathology of a salpingectomy specimen in 10%-20% of women with a BRCA gene mutation and 1%-7% of women without a mutation. However, there is currently no official guideline and a paucity of data on the management of STICs. DATA SOURCES We performed a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Five databases were searched for relevant studies on STICs. STUDY SELECTION Two independent reviewers performed the abstract and full-text screening and data extraction, with conflicts resolved through discussion with the third reviewer. The risk of bias of each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Fourteen articles were included. Ninety-nine patients who were diagnosed with STIC and subsequently followed for a mean period of 55.5 months were included in this analysis. Eighty-three patients (83.9%) were BRCA mutation carriers. After the diagnosis of isolated STIC, 7 patients (7.3%) received chemotherapy and 25 (26%) underwent surgical staging. Three of the 25 patients were diagnosed with HGSOC based on the staging surgery. Nine patients were later diagnosed with HGSOC during follow-up, with an average duration of follow-up of 58.5 months between the diagnosis of STIC and the diagnosis of HGSOC. CONCLUSION Based on our review of the literature, there is a 10.7% risk of having concurrent HGSOC at the time of STIC diagnosis, and the risk of developing a subsequent HGSOC is 14.5%. BRCA mutation status should be determined in cases of isolated STIC, as 83.9% of patients included in this study were found to carry BRCA mutations. We believe it is necessary to further investigate the role of surgical staging following the diagnosis of STIC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ruel-Laliberté
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC.
| | | | - Diana Oprea
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC
| | - Mathieu Viau
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hanley GE, Niu J, Han J, Fung S, Bryant H, Kwon JS, Huntsman DG, Finlayson SJ, McAlpine JN, Miller D, Earle CC. Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis. CMAJ Open 2022; 10:E466-E475. [PMID: 35640988 PMCID: PMC9177200 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy for benign indications or instead of tubal ligation, for the purpose of preventing ovarian cancer. We determined rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization and examined how they changed over the study period. METHODS Using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories (except Quebec) between the fiscal years 2011 and 2016, we conducted a descriptive analysis of all patients aged 15 years or older who underwent hysterectomy or tubal sterilization. We excluded those with diagnostic codes for any gynecologic cancer and those who underwent unilateral salpingectomy. We examined the proportion who had OS during their hysterectomy and compared the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS with the proportion that were tubal ligations. RESULTS A total of 318 528 participants were included in the study (mean age 42.5 yr). The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 15.4% in 2011 to 35.5% by 2016. With respect to tubal sterilization, the rate of OS increased from 6.5% of all tubal sterilizations in 2011 to 22.0% in 2016. There was considerable variation across jurisdictions in 2016, with British Columbia having the highest rates (53.2% of all hysterectomies and 74.0% of tubal sterilizations involved OS). INTERPRETATION The rates of OS increased between 2011 and 2016, but there was considerable variation across the included jurisdictions. Our study indicates room for rates of OS to increase across many of the included jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian E Hanley
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
| | - Jin Niu
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Jihee Han
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Sharon Fung
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Heather Bryant
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Janice S Kwon
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - David G Huntsman
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Sarah J Finlayson
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Dianne Miller
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Craig C Earle
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology (Hanley, Kwon, Huntsman, Finlayson, McAlpine, Miller), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Huntsman), University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health (Finlayson), Vancouver, BC; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Niu, Han, Fung, Bryant, Huntsman, Earle), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Community Health Sciences (Bryant) and Department of Oncology (Bryant), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hanley GE, Pearce CL, Talhouk A, Kwon JS, Finlayson SJ, McAlpine JN, Huntsman DG, Miller D. Outcomes From Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2147343. [PMID: 35138400 PMCID: PMC8829665 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS), which is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy or instead of tubal ligation without removal of ovaries, is recommended to prevent ovarian cancer, particularly serous ovarian cancer. However, the effectiveness of OS is still undetermined. OBJECTIVE To examine observed vs expected rates of ovarian cancer among individuals who have undergone OS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This is a population-based, retrospective cohort study of all individuals in British Columbia, Canada, who underwent OS or a control surgery (hysterectomy alone or tubal ligation) between 2008 and 2017, with follow-up until December 31, 2017. Those with any gynecological cancer diagnosed before or within 6 months of their procedure were excluded. Data analysis was performed from April to August 2021. EXPOSURES Removal of both fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy or instead of tubal ligation while leaving ovaries intact. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES An ovarian cancer diagnosis listed in the British Columbia Cancer Registry. Age-specific rates of epithelial and serous ovarian cancer in the control group were combined with the specific follow-up time in the OS group to calculate expected numbers (and 95% CIs) of ovarian cancers in the OS group. These were compared with observed numbers. Age-adjusted expected and observed numbers of breast and colorectal cancers were also examined in the OS group. RESULTS There were 25 889 individuals who underwent OS (mean [SD] age, 40.2 [7.1] years; median [IQR] follow-up, 3.2 [1.6-5.1] years) and 32 080 who underwent hysterectomy alone or tubal ligation (mean [SD] age, 38.2 [7.9] years; median [IQR] follow-up, 7.3 [4.6-8.7] years). There were no serous ovarian cancers in the OS group and 5 or fewer epithelial ovarian cancers. The age-adjusted expected number was 5.27 (95% CI, 1.78-19.29) serous cancers and 8.68 (95% CI, 3.36-26.58) epithelial ovarian cancers. Age-adjusted expected vs observed numbers of breast cancers (22.1 expected vs 23 observed) and colorectal cancers (9.35 expected vs 8 observed) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, the OS group had significantly fewer serous and epithelial ovarian cancers than were expected according to the rate at which they arose in the control group. These findings suggest that OS is associated with reduced ovarian cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian E. Hanley
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Vancouver General Hospital Research Pavilion, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janice S. Kwon
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sarah J. Finlayson
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jessica N. McAlpine
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David G. Huntsman
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dianne Miller
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Lieshout LA, Gelderblom ME, de Hullu JA, The R, van Ginkel AA, Oerlemans AJ, Smeets KM, Schreurs MP, Piek JM, Hermens RP. Primary prevention of ovarian cancer: a patient decision aid for opportunistic salpingectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:234.e1-234.e14. [PMID: 34536392 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The discovery of the fallopian tube epithelium as the origin of high-grade serous ovarian cancer has brought a new option for ovarian cancer prevention. The fallopian tubes have no known function after completion of childbearing and can be removed to reduce the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Although the lifetime risk in the general population does not justify preventive surgery in itself, salpingectomy can be performed during abdominal surgery for other indications, also known as an opportunistic salpingectomy. The popularity of opportunistic salpingectomy is increasing worldwide; however, the variation between gynecologists and hospitals in their advice on opportunistic salpingectomy occurs because of the remaining uncertainty of evidence. Therefore, whether a woman can make her own decision depends on the hospital or gynecologist she visits. We aimed to lower this practice variation by providing standardized and unbiased counseling material. OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop and test a patient decision aid for opportunistic salpingectomy in women undergoing pelvic gynecologic surgery to either retain the ovaries or opt for sterilization. STUDY DESIGN We followed a systematic development process based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. Data were collected between June 2019 and June 2020, using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The development process that occurred in collaboration with patients and healthcare professionals was overseen by a multidisciplinary steering group and was divided into 4 phases: (1) assessment of decisional needs using individual telephone interviews and questionnaires; (2) development of content and format based on decisional needs, current literature, and guidelines; (3) alpha testing and the first revision round; and (4) alpha testing and the second revision round. RESULTS An outline of the patient decision aid was developed on the basis of decisional needs, current literature, and guidelines. It became clear that the decision aid should consist of 2 separate paths: one with information specifically for salpingectomy in addition to abdominal surgery and one for salpingectomy as a sterilization method. Both paths contained information on the anatomy and function of ovaries and fallopian tubes, risk reduction of ovarian cancer, and potential benefits and risks of opportunistic salpingectomy. Moreover, the sterilization path contains information on various sterilization methods and risks of unwanted pregnancy. The patient decision aid was developed as an online tool that includes information chapters, a knowledge quiz, consideration statements, and a summary detailing the patient's preferences and considerations. Adjustments were made following alpha testing round 1. The improved patient decision aid was subjected to usability tests (alpha testing round 2), in which it scored an "excellent" in tests with patients and a "good" in tests with gynecologists. Furthermore, our patient decision aid met the requirements of 45 of 49 applicable items from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards criteria. CONCLUSION In collaboration with patients and healthcare professionals, a patient decision aid was developed on opportunistic salpingectomy and salpingectomy as a sterilization method. Both patients and gynecologists believed it is a useful tool that supports patients in making an informed decision whether to undergo an opportunistic salpingectomy and supports the counseling process by gynecologists.
Collapse
|
11
|
Cusimano MC, Ferguson SE, Moineddin R, Chiu M, Aktar S, Liu N, Baxter NN. Ovarian cancer incidence and death in average-risk women undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at benign hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:220.e1-220.e26. [PMID: 34563499 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opportunistic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is often offered to patients undergoing benign hysterectomy to prevent ovarian cancer, but the magnitude of risk reduction obtained with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in this population remains unclear and must be weighed against potential risks of ovarian hormone deficiency. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to quantify the relative and absolute risk reduction in ovarian cancer incidence and death associated with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of benign hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN We performed a population-based cohort study of all adult women (≥20 years) undergoing benign hysterectomy from 1996 to 2010 in Ontario, Canada. Patients with ovarian pathology, previous breast or gynecologic cancer, or evidence of genetic susceptibility to malignancy were excluded. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to quantify the effect of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on ovarian cancer incidence and death while accounting for competing risks and adjusting for demographic characteristics, gynecologic conditions, and comorbidities. Analyses were performed in all women and specifically in women of postmenopausal age (≥50 years) at the time of hysterectomy. RESULTS We identified 195,282 patients (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 24%; ovarian conservation, 76%) with a median age of 45 years (interquartile range, 40-51 years). Over a median follow-up of 16 years (interquartile range, 12-20 years), 548 patients developed ovarian cancer (0.3%), and 16,170 patients (8.3%) died from any cause. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with decreased ovarian cancer incidence (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.38; P<.001) and decreased ovarian cancer death (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.57; P<.001). At 20 years follow-up, the weighted cumulative incidences of ovarian cancer were 0.08% and 0.46% with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian conservation, respectively, yielding an absolute risk reduction of 0.38% (95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.45; number needed to treat, 260). After restricting to women aged ≥50 years at hysterectomy, the absolute risk reduction was 0.62% (95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.77; number needed to treat, 161). CONCLUSION Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy resulted in a significant absolute reduction in ovarian cancer among women undergoing benign hysterectomy. Population-average risk estimates derived in this study should be balanced against other potential implications of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to inform practice guidelines, patient decision-making, and surgical management.
Collapse
|
12
|
Karia PS, Joshu CE, Visvanathan K. Uptake and Predictors of Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction in the United States. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2021; 14:1101-1110. [PMID: 34413116 PMCID: PMC8756422 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-21-0121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Evidence suggesting that high-grade serous ovarian cancers originate in the fallopian tubes has led to the emergence of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) as an approach to reduce ovarian-cancer risk. In the U.S., some national societies now recommend OS in place of tubal ligation for sterilization or during a benign hysterectomy in average-risk women. However, limited data exist on the dissemination of OS in clinical practice. We examined the uptake and predictors of OS in a nationwide sample of inpatient and outpatient claims (N = 48,231,235) from 2010 to 2017. Incidence rates of OS were calculated, and an interrupted time-series analysis was used to quantify changes in rates before (2010-2013) and after (2015-2017) national guideline release. Predictors of OS use were examined using Poisson regression. From 2010 to 2017, the age-adjusted incidence rate of OS for sterilization and OS during hysterectomy increased 17.8-fold [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.2-19.5] and 7.6-fold (95% CI, 5.5-10.4), respectively. The rapid increase (age-adjusted increase in quarterly rates of between 109% and 250%) coincided with the time of national guideline release. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, OS use was more common in young women and varied significantly by geographic region, rurality, family history/genetic susceptibility, surgical indication, inpatient/outpatient setting, and underlying comorbidities. Similar differences in OS uptake were noted in analyses limited to women with a family history/genetic susceptibility to breast/ovarian cancer. Our results highlight significant differences in OS uptake in both high- and average-risk women. Defining subsets of women who would benefit most from OS and identifying barriers to equitable OS uptake is needed. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian-cancer risk reduction has been rapidly adopted in the U.S., with significant variation in uptake by demographic and clinical factors. Studies examining barriers to opportunistic salpingectomy access and the long-term effectiveness and potential adverse effects of opportunistic salpingectomy are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pritesh S Karia
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Corinne E Joshu
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Swyer Syndrome/46 XY Gonadal Dysgenesis: Remove the Tubes or Not? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2021; 34:771-772. [PMID: 34742465 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
14
|
Gormley R, Vickers B, Cheng B, Norman WV. Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review. Reprod Health 2021; 18:154. [PMID: 34284794 PMCID: PMC8290533 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01201-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple options for permanent or long-acting contraception are available, each with adverse effects and benefits. People seeking to end their fertility, and their healthcare providers, need a comprehensive comparison of methods to support their decision-making. Permanent contraceptive methods should be compared with long-acting methods that have similar effectiveness and lower anticipated adverse effects, such as the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraception (LNG-IUC). We aimed to understand the comparability of options for people seeking to end their fertility, using high-quality studies. We sought studies comparing laparoscopic tubal ligation, hysteroscopic tubal occlusion, bilateral salpingectomy, and insertion of the LNG-IUC, for effectiveness, adverse events, tolerability, patient recovery, non-contraceptive benefits, and healthcare system costs among females in high resource countries seeking to permanently avoid conception. METHODS We followed PRISMA guidelines, searched EMBASE, Pubmed (Medline), Web of Science, and screened retrieved articles to identify additional studies. We extracted data on population, interventions, outcomes, follow-up, health system costs, and study funding source. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess risk of bias and excluded studies with medium-high risk of bias (NOS < 7). Due to considerable heterogeneity, we performed a narrative synthesis. RESULTS Our search identified 6,612 articles. RG, BV, BC independently reviewed titles and abstracts for relevance. We reviewed the full text of 154 studies, yielding 34 studies which met inclusion criteria. We excluded 10 studies with medium-high risk of bias, retaining 24 in our synthesis. Most studies compared hysteroscopic tubal occlusion and/or laparoscopic tubal ligation. Most comparisons reported on effectiveness and adverse events; fewer reported tolerability, patient recovery, non-contraceptive benefits, and/or healthcare system costs. No comparisons reported accessibility, eligibility, or follow-up required. We found inconclusive evidence comparing the effectiveness of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion to laparoscopic tubal ligation. All studies reported adverse events. All forms of tubal interruption reported a protective effect against cancers. Tolerability appeared greater among tubal ligation patients compared to hysteroscopic tubal occlusion patients. No high-quality studies included the LNG-IUC. CONCLUSIONS Studies are needed to directly compare surgical forms of permanent contraception, such as tubal ligation or removal, with alternative options, such as intrauterine contraception to support decision-making. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO [CRD42016038254].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Gormley
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.,Contraception & Abortion Research Team, Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Brian Vickers
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Contraception & Abortion Research Team, Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Brooke Cheng
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Contraception & Abortion Research Team, Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Wendy V Norman
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,Contraception & Abortion Research Team, Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. .,Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, 320-5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Increase of fallopian tube and decrease of ovarian carcinoma: fact or fake? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 147:911-925. [PMID: 32915262 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03387-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate disease classification is fundamental for the selection of the treatment approach, prognostication, selection of clinical trials and for research purposes in routine clinical practice. Extrauterine high-grade serous carcinoma (HG-SC) may arise from the ovary, the fallopian tube and rarely from the peritoneal surface epithelium. Regardless of its origin, the vast majority of patients with HG-SC share clinical symptoms, present with advanced stage disease and suffer from a poor prognosis. Recent data suggest that there is an increasing incidence of HG-SC arising from the fallopian tube. METHODS Data from the Clinical Cancer Registry of Leipzig of surgically treated non-uterine pelvic carcinomas were analyzed regarding their sites of origin. Depending on the histology, cases were separated into high-grade serous and non-high-grade serous tumors. Based on different approaches in the assessment of the site of origin, three distinct time periods were defined. The frequency of the specific sites of origin was compared to the different time periods and histologic subtypes. RESULTS The majority of cases (57.9%; 279/482) were high-grade serous carcinomas, 42.1% of the cases presented with endometrioid, clear cell or mucinous histology. Overall, a 1.7-fold decrease of carcinomas with ovarian origin, paralleled by a 10.3-fold increase of tubal carcinomas was noted between 2000 and 2019. Based on the histopathological subtype, there was a 2.1-fold decrease of ovarian and a 7.1-fold increase of tubal carcinomas in patients with HG-SC. In non-high-grade serous tumors, the frequency of the different sites of origin did not change. 83.7% of tumors with non-high-grade serous histology originated from the ovary, whereas 86.8% of the carcinomas with tubal origin were of high-grade serous histology. CONCLUSION The present and published data of non-uterine pelvic cancers may suggest an increase of tubal and decrease of ovarian carcinomas. However, there is rising morphologic and molecular evidence that non-uterine HG-SC actually arise from the fallopian tubes via its precursor STIC instead of from the ovary. This evidence has had an impact on the handling and reporting of non-uterine surgical specimens and its definition of the site assessment. In conclusion, the increasing frequency of tubal carcinomas and the associated decrease in ovarian cancer appears to be due to the reclassification of tumors previously classified as ovarian and greater emphasis on examining the resection specimens of non-uterine pelvic carcinomas.
Collapse
|
16
|
Wolfman W, Thurston J, Yeung G, Glanc P. Guideline No. 404: Initial Investigation and Management of Benign Ovarian Masses. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2020; 42:1040-1050.e1. [PMID: 32736855 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide recommendations for a systematic approach to the initial investigation and management of a benign ovarian mass and facilitate patient referral to a gynaecologic oncologist for management. INTENDED USERS Obstetricians, gynaecologists, family physicians, internists, nurse practitioners, radiologists, general surgeons, medical students, medical residents, fellows, and other health care providers. TARGET POPULATION Women ≥18 years of age presenting for evaluation of an ovarian mass (including simple and unilocular cystic masses, endometriomas, dermoids, fibromas, and hemorrhagic cysts) who are not acutely symptomatic and without known genetic predisposition to ovarian cancer. OUTCOMES This guideline aims to encourage conservative management and help reduce unnecessary surgery and long-term health complications, maintain fertility, and decrease operative costs and improve overall patient care and outcomes by providing criteria for referral of patients with ultrasound imaging findings suggestive of a malignant mass to a gynaecologic oncologist. EVIDENCE Databases searched: Medline, Cochrane, and PubMed. Medical terms used: benign asymptomatic and symptomatic ovarian cysts, adnexal masses, oophorectomy, ultrasound diagnosis of cysts, simple ultrasound rules, surgical and medical therapies for cysts, screening for ovarian cancer, ovarian torsion, and menopause. Initial search was completed by 2017 and updated in 2018. Exclusion criteria were malignant ovarian cystic masses, endometriosis therapies, and other adnexal pathologies unrelated to the ovary. VALIDATION METHODS The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the authors. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada's Board of Directors approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology framework. BENEFITS, HARMS, COSTS Implementation of the recommendations could reduce costs due to unnecessary surgeries and hospitalizations and reduce lost work days and the risk of loss of fertility, early menopause, and surgical complications. SUMMARY STATEMENTS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES) RECOMMENDATIONS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES).
Collapse
|
17
|
Wolfman W, Thurston J, Yeung G, Glanc P. Directive clinique no 404 : Évaluation initiale et prise en charge des masses ovariennes bénignes. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2020; 42:1051-1062.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
18
|
Hanley GE, Kwon JS, McAlpine JN, Huntsman DG, Finlayson SJ, Miller D. Examining indicators of early menopause following opportunistic salpingectomy: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223:221.e1-221.e11. [PMID: 32067967 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The fallopian tube may often be the site of origin for the most common and lethal form of ovarian cancer, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. As a result, many colleges of obstetrics and gynecology, which include the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, are recommending surgical removal of the fallopian tube (bilateral salpingectomy) at the time of other gynecologic surgeries (particularly hysterectomy and tubal sterilization) in women at general population risk for ovarian cancer, collectively referred to as opportunistic salpingectomy. Previous research has illustrated no increased risk of complications after opportunistic salpingectomy. However, most studies that have examined potential hormonal consequences of opportunistic salpingectomy have had limited follow-up time and have focused on surrogate hormonal markers. OBJECTIVE We examine whether there are differences in physician visits for menopause and filling a prescription for hormone replacement therapy among women who undergo opportunistic salpingectomy in the population of British Columbia, Canada. STUDY DESIGN We identified all women who were ≤50 years old in British Columbia who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy from 2008-2014. We compared women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy at hysterectomy with women who underwent hysterectomy alone and women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization with women who underwent tubal ligation. We used Cox Proportional hazards models to model time to physician visits for menopause and for filling a prescription for hormone replacement therapy. We calculated adjusted hazards ratios for these outcomes and adjusted for other gynecologic conditions, surgical approach, and patient age. We performed an age-stratified analysis (<40, 40-44, 45-49 years) and conducted a sensitivity analysis that included only women with ≥5 years of follow up. RESULTS We included 41,413 women in the study. There were 6861 women who underwent hysterectomy alone, 6500 who underwent hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy, 4479 who underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 18,621 who underwent tubal ligation, and 4952 who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization. In women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy, there was no difference in time to the first physician visit related to menopause for both women who underwent hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.09) and women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.10). There was also no difference in time to filling a prescription for hormone replacement therapy for women who underwent hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy or opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.92; and adjusted hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.12; respectively). In contrast, we report significantly increase hazards for time to physician visit for menopause (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.78, 2.13) and filling a prescription for hormone replacement therapy (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 3.45, 4.18) among women who underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. There were no increased hazards for physician visits for menopause or initiation of hormone replacement therapy among women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy in any of the age-stratified analyses, nor among women with at least 5 years of follow up. CONCLUSION Our results reveal no indication of an earlier age of onset of menopause among the population of women who underwent hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization as measured by physician visits for menopause and initiation of hormone replacement therapy. Our findings are reassuring, given that earlier age at menopause is associated with increased mortality rates, particularly from cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
|
19
|
Levy D, Casey S, Zemtsov G, Whiteside JL. Salpingectomy versus Tubal Occlusion for Permanent Contraception during Cesarean Delivery: Outcomes and Physician Attitudes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:860-864. [PMID: 32745622 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Compare clinical outcomes and physician attitudes toward tubal occlusion and salpingectomy during cesarean section. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study with survey. SETTING Private hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio. PATIENTS Women aged ≥18 years undergoing permanent contraception during cesarean delivery with and without salpingectomy from January 2016 to December 2017. INTERVENTIONS Rate measurements of permanent contraception during cesarean section by salpingectomy versus tubal occlusion. Online survey assessment of study population physicians' attitudes toward salpingectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Study subjects identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Subject demographics, operative details, and perioperative morbidity indicators were identified by chart review. A total of 363 subjects were included: 116 (32%) had salpingectomies, and 247 (68%) had tubal occlusions. Study variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher exact tests. Despite similar cohort demographics, salpingectomy increased mean operative time by 6.5 minutes compared with tubal occlusion (p = .001). Compared with subjects who had a salpingectomy, those who had a tubal occlusion had more postoperative symptomatic anemia (5.7% vs 0.9%) and infection (6.9% vs 1.7%). The primary surgeon was identified by logistic regression as the factor most predictive of salpingectomy (p <.001). Of 30 physicians, 23 (77%) completed the survey, and these physicians performed 80% of procedures. Physicians did not differ by sex, age, years of practice, solo vs group practice, or hospital-employed vs private practice when compared with the number or rate of salpingectomies performed. Cancer risk reduction was the most common physician-identified salpingectomy benefit (17 of 23, 74%). A total of 65% believed that salpingectomy posed additional risks, but 70% believed the benefits were equal to or greater than the risks. Of the 23 (87%) who completed the survey, 20 believed that salpingectomy added no additional operative time and was cost-neutral. CONCLUSION Relative to tubal ligation, salpingectomy during cesarean section increases operative time but not perioperative morbidity. Physicians do not seem biased against salpingectomy and express awareness of published benefits and risks, yet it is not the dominant surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Levy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (Drs. Levy and Whiteside).
| | - Sarah Casey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Advocate Aurora Health, Grafton, Wisconsin (Dr. Casey)
| | - Gregory Zemtsov
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Dr. Zemtsov)
| | - James L Whiteside
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (Drs. Levy and Whiteside)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ruel-Laliberté J, Binette A, Bertrand A. Salpingectomie bilatérale aux fins de contraception permanente : série de cas et facteurs limitant le changement de pratique. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2020; 42:948-952. [PMID: 32345552 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and the Society of Gynaecologic Oncology of Canada (GOC) recommend complete removal of the fallopian tubes as a permanent contraceptive method because of its association with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer. Currently, many women are not offered bilateral salpingectomy as an alternative to tubal ligation for permanent contraception. METHOD As part of a quality improvement initiative, we reviewed all cases of sterilization performed at our university centre between 1 January and 31 December 2018. A literature review of the clinical and ethical considerations that prevent clinicians from offering bilateral salpingectomy as permanent contraception is also presented. RESULTS The records of 111 women who underwent tubal sterilization were reviewed. Of these, 31.5% underwent bilateral salpingectomy; 46.8% underwent tubal fulguration; 12.6% underwent clip ligation; and 9.1% underwent tubal implant ligation (Essure). According to the information on file, only 36.3% of women were offered bilateral salpingectomy, and of these, 83.8% chose this method. CONCLUSION Bilateral salpingectomy should be offered to all women seeking permanent contraception. The benefits and very low risks associated with this procedure should make it a first choice option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ruel-Laliberté
- Médecin résidente, Service d'obstétrique-gynécologie générale, Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke.
| | - Audrey Binette
- Obstétricienne-gynécologue, Service d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Hôpital régional de Rimouski, Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux du Bas-St-Laurent
| | - Amélie Bertrand
- Professeure adjointe, Service d'obstétrique-gynécologie générale, Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kotsopoulos J, Karlan B, Gronwald J, Hall E, Moller P, Tung N, Zakalik D, Foulkes WD, Rosen B, Neuhausen SL, Sun P, Lubinksi J, Narod SA. Long-term outcomes following a diagnosis of ovarian cancer at the time of preventive oophorectomy among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:825-830. [PMID: 32354794 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-001141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preventive bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is the most effective means of reducing the risk of ovarian cancer among women with an inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Some women are diagnosed with an invasive cancer (ovarian or fallopian tube) at the time of preventive surgery, referred to as an 'occult' cancer. The survival experience of these women is not known. METHODS We estimated the 10-year survival for 52 BRCA mutation carriers diagnosed with an occult ovarian or fallopian tube cancer at the time of preventive bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. RESULTS The mean age at diagnosis was 51.6 (range 33-69) years. All were serous cancers (although 14 were missing information on histologic subtype). Of the 20 cases with information available on stage at diagnosis, 10 were stage I, 1 was stage II, and 9 were stage III (n=32 missing). After a mean of 6.8 years, 12 women died (23%). The 10-year all-cause survival was 74%. CONCLUSION Although based on only 52 cases, these findings suggest a more favorable prognosis for BRCA mutation carriers diagnosed with an occult rather than incident disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beth Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland
| | - Elizabeth Hall
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pal Moller
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dana Zakalik
- Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Troy, Michigan, USA
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Barry Rosen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Division of Biomarkers of Early Detection and Prevention, Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinksi
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kotsopoulos J, Narod SA. Prophylactic salpingectomy for the prevention of ovarian cancer: Who should we target? Int J Cancer 2020; 147:1245-1251. [PMID: 32037528 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most fatal gynecologic malignancy (50% 5-year survival) due to a typically advanced stage at diagnosis and a high rate of recurrence. Chemoprevention options are limited, and few interventions have been shown to reduce cancer risk or mortality. Emerging data support the model that fallopian tubes are the site of origin for a proportion of high-grade serous cancers. This implies that a subset of cancers may be prevented by removing the fallopian tubes while leaving the ovaries intact. Accordingly, there has been shift in clinical practice for average risk women; some now recommend removal of both the fallopian tubes only instead of tubal ligation for sterilization or at the time of benign gynecologic surgery. This has been termed opportunistic salpingectomy and represents a means of decreasing the burden of ovarian cancer by preventing cancers that arise in the fallopian tubes. There have been no detailed, prospective reports that have estimated ovarian cancer risk reduction with opportunistic salpingectomy, neither among women at baseline population risk nor among women at a high risk of developing the disease. The situation is complicated for women with a BRCA mutation-bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is a proven means of risk reduction and salpingectomy alone is not the standard of care. Based on the existing data, salpingectomy alone should only be reserved for women with a lifetime risk of ovarian cancer of less than 5%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Auclair MH, Yong PJ, Salvador S, Thurston J, Colgan T(TJ, Sebastianelli A. Guideline No. 390-Classification and Management of Endometrial Hyperplasia. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 41:1789-1800. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
24
|
Directive clinique N° 390-Classification et prise en charge de l'hyperplasie de l'endomètre. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 41:1801-1813. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
25
|
Walker M, Jacobson M, Sobel M. Management of ovarian cancer risk in women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. CMAJ 2019; 191:E886-E893. [PMID: 31405835 PMCID: PMC6690830 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.190281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Walker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Walker), University of Toronto; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Walker, Jacobson, Sobel), Women's College Hospital; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Jacobson, Sobel), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Michelle Jacobson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Walker), University of Toronto; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Walker, Jacobson, Sobel), Women's College Hospital; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Jacobson, Sobel), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ont
| | - Mara Sobel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Walker), University of Toronto; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Walker, Jacobson, Sobel), Women's College Hospital; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Jacobson, Sobel), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Thurston J, Murji A, Scattolon S, Wolfman W, Kives S, Sanders A, Leyland N. No 377- Indications gynécologiques bénignes de l'hystérectomie. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 41:558-574. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
27
|
Thurston J, Murji A, Scattolon S, Wolfman W, Kives S, Sanders A, Leyland N. No. 377-Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecologic Indications. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 41:543-557. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
28
|
Perioperative Management of Women Undergoing Risk-reducing Surgery for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26:253-265. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Revised: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
29
|
Collins E, Strandell A, Granåsen G, Idahl A. Menopausal symptoms and surgical complications after opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy, a register-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220:85.e1-85.e10. [PMID: 30321526 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, the fallopian tubes have been found to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. Therefore, bilateral salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy has been proposed as a preventive procedure, but with scarce scientific evidence to support the efficiency and safety. OBJECTIVE Our primary objective was to evaluate the risk of surgical complications and menopausal symptoms when performing bilateral salpingectomy in addition to benign hysterectomy. Furthermore, we sought to compare time in surgery, perioperative blood loss/blood transfusion, duration of hospital stay, days to normal activities of daily living, and days out of work for hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy compared with hysterectomy only. A secondary objective was to study the uptake of opportunistic salpingectomy in Sweden. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective observational cohort study based on data from the National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery in Sweden. Women <55 years of age who had a hysterectomy for benign indications with or without bilateral salpingectomy in 1998 through 2016 were included. Possible confounding was adjusted for in multivariable regression models. RESULTS During the study period, 23,369 women had a hysterectomy for benign indications. The frequency of bilateral salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy increased mainly from 2013, which is why the period 2013 through mid-2016 was selected for further analysis (n = 6892). There was a low frequency of vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy performed in this period, which is why only abdominal and laparoscopic surgeries were selected for comparative analysis (n = 4906). This study indicates an increased risk of menopausal symptoms (adjusted relative risk, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.69) 1 year after hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy compared with hysterectomy only. Hospital stay was 0.1 days longer in women having salpingectomy (P = .01), and bleeding was slightly reduced in the salpingectomy group (-20 mL, P = .04). Other outcome measures were not significantly associated with salpingectomy, albeit a tendency toward higher risk of minor complications was seen (adjusted relative risk, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.83). CONCLUSION Bilateral salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy was associated with an increased risk of menopausal symptoms 1 year after surgery. Randomized clinical trials reducing the risk of residual and unmeasured confounding and longer follow-up are needed to correctly inform women on the risks and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy.
Collapse
|
30
|
Houlihan S, Kim-Fine S, Birch C, Tang S, Brennand EA. Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach. Int Urogynecol J 2018; 30:611-621. [PMID: 30393822 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3801-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS To compare laparoscopic and vaginal approaches to uterosacral ligament vault suspension (USLS) by perioperative data, short-term complications, rates of successful concomitant adnexal surgery and procedural efficacy. METHODS Retrospective cohort of USLS procedures performed at the time of hysterectomy at a tertiary care center over a 3-year period. Patient demographics, surgical data, concomitant adnexal procedures and complications were abstracted from a surgical database and compared using parametric or non-parametric tests as appropriate. Validated questionnaires (POPDI-6, UDI-6, PROMIS) were used to collect information on recurrence and long-term complications. Patients were analyzed according to both intention-to-treat analysis based on the intended approach and the completed route of surgery to deal with intraoperative conversions. RESULTS Two hundred six patients met the criteria for inclusion; 152 underwent vaginal USLS (V-USLS) and 54 laparoscopic USLS (L-USLS). No statistically significant differences in mean case time, postoperative length of stay or perioperative infection were found. While no ureteric obstructions occurred in the L-USLS group, in the V-USLS group 14 (9%) obstructions occurred (p = 0.023). Postoperative urinary retention was higher with V-USLS (31% vs. 15%, p = 0.024). Rates of successfully completed adnexal surgery differed (56% vs. 98%, p < 0.001) in favor of L-USLS. Patient-reported symptomatic recurrence of prolapse was higher in the V-USLS group (41% vs. 24%, p = 0.046); despite this, re-treatment did not differ between the groups (0% vs. 7%, p = 0.113). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative case time and complications did not differ between approaches. However, rates of completed adnexal surgery were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group, which could influence surgical decisions concerning approaches to prolapse surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Houlihan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 4th Floor North Tower, Room 432, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
| | - Shunaha Kim-Fine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 4th Floor North Tower, Room 432, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Colin Birch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 4th Floor North Tower, Room 432, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Selphee Tang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 4th Floor North Tower, Room 432, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Erin A Brennand
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 4th Floor North Tower, Room 432, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Soong TR, Howitt BE, Miron A, Horowitz NS, Campbell F, Feltmate CM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Nucci MR, Xian W, Crum CP. Evidence for lineage continuity between early serous proliferations (ESPs) in the Fallopian tube and disseminated high-grade serous carcinomas. J Pathol 2018; 246:344-351. [PMID: 30043522 DOI: 10.1002/path.5145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The distal Fallopian tube is a site of origin for many 'ovarian' high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) with intraepithelial carcinomas (STICs) that share identical TP53 mutations with metastatic tumors. TP53 mutation-positive early serous proliferations (ESPs) comprise a spectrum including p53 signatures and serous tubal intraepithelial lesions (STILs) and are not considered malignant; however, ESPs are often the only abnormality found in Fallopian tubes of women with metastatic HGSC. The purpose of this study was to determine if a relationship exists between isolated ESPs and concurrent metastatic HGSCs in the absence of STIC. Fallopian tubes from 32 HGSCs without a co-existing STIC/HGSC in the endosalpinx were exhaustively sectioned. The presence of either STIC/HGSC or ESP in the endosalpinx was documented and DNA from tissues containing ESPs, concurrent HGSC, and control epithelia were interrogated for TP53 mutations by targeted amplicon-based sequencing with average coverage reads >4000 across DNA replicate samples. Serial sectioning revealed a previously unrecognized STIC/HGSC in 3 of 32 (9.3%) and ESPs in 13 (40.6%). Twelve contained TP53 mutations. Nine (75%) shared identical TP53 mutations with concurrent HGSCs, four at high (≥ 5%) and five at low (< 5%) allele frequency. All control epithelia were TP53 mutation-negative. This study, for the first time, indicates lineage identity between ESPs in the distal tube and some metastatic HGSCs via a shared site-specific TP53 mutation. It supports a novel serous carcinogenic sequence in which an ESP could eventually culminate in a metastatic serous cancer via 'precursor escape' and would explain the apparent sudden onset of cancers without co-existing STICs. This paradigm for serous cancer development underscores the likelihood that multiple precursor types in the Fallopian tube contribute to serous cancer development with implications for the evolution, pathologic classification, and prevention of this lethal malignancy. Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thing Rinda Soong
- Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brooke E Howitt
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | | | - Neil S Horowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Colleen M Feltmate
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael G Muto
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ross S Berkowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marisa R Nucci
- Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wa Xian
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christopher P Crum
- Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gockley AA, Elias KM. Fallopian tube tumorigenesis and clinical implications for ovarian cancer risk-reduction. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 69:66-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Revised: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
33
|
Hanley GE, Kwon JS, Finlayson SJ, Huntsman DG, Miller D, McAlpine JN. Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219:172.e1-172.e8. [PMID: 29852159 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent evidence has suggested that the fallopian tube may often be the site of origin for the most common and lethal form of ovarian cancer. As a result, many Colleges of Obstetrics and Gynecology, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology, are recommending surgical removal of the fallopian tube (bilateral salpingectomy) at the time of other gynecologic surgeries (particularly hysterectomy and tubal sterilization) in women at general population risk for ovarian cancer, collectively referred to as opportunistic salpingectomy. OBJECTIVE Previous research with the use of hospital data has indicated good perioperative safety of opportunistic salpingectomy, but no data on minor complications have been presented. Herein, we examine whether women who undergo opportunistic salpingectomy are at increased risk of minor complications after surgery. STUDY DESIGN We identified all women in British Columbia who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy between 2008 and 2014 and examined all physician visits in the 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital. We compared women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy at hysterectomy with women who underwent hysterectomy alone and women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization with women who underwent tubal ligation. We examined visits for surgical infection, surgical complication, orders for laboratory tests, and orders for imaging (x-ray, ultrasound scan, or computed tomography scan) and whether women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy were more likely to fill a prescription for an antibiotic or analgesic in the 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital. We calculated adjusted odds ratios for these outcomes, adjusting for other gynecologic conditions, surgical approach, and patient age. RESULTS We included 49,275 women who had undergone a hysterectomy alone, a hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy, a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, a tubal ligation, or an opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization. In women who had undergone opportunistic salpingectomy, there was no increased risk for physician visits for surgical infection, surgical complication, ordering a laboratory test, or ordering imaging in the 2 weeks after discharge. There was no increased risk of filling a prescription for an antibiotic. However, women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy were at approximately 20% increased odds of filling a prescription for an analgesic in the 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.32 for hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy; adjusted odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.29 for opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization). CONCLUSION We report no differences in minor complications between women who undergo opportunistic salpingectomy and women who undergo hysterectomy alone or tubal ligation, except for a slightly increased likelihood of filling a prescription for analgesic medication in the immediate 2 weeks after discharge.
Collapse
|
34
|
Straub MM, Podoll MB, David SN, Wiesner GL, Desouki MM. Subsequent breast and high grade serous carcinomas after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers and patients with history of breast cancer. Ann Diagn Pathol 2018; 36:28-30. [PMID: 30055521 DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2018.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is a procedure to reduce the risk of adnexal cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and for hormonal manipulation in women with breast cancer (BC). The goal of the study is to report the frequency of subsequent BC and high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) following RRSO in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and in patients with personal history of BC with or without BRCA mutation. A series of 147 consecutive patients who received a RRSO were reviewed. Patient's age, clinical history, BC histotype, gene mutation data, incidence of post-RRSO BC and HGSC and time intervals were analyzed. The cases were followed for a mean of 49 months. Group 1 consists of 97 cases with pathogenic or likely pathogenic "deleterious" mutation BRCA1 (n = 49) or BRCA2 (n = 48). Group 2 consists of 50 cases with history of BC and no documented BRCA gene mutation. Prior to RRSO, 42 (43%) cases in group 1 had a history of BC and all cases in group 2 had a history of BC. There was no difference between the groups in the age at diagnosis for BC (Mean of 44 years). Following RRSO, 2/49 cases (4%) with BRCA1 mutation were found to have occult HGSC and none in BRCA2 cases. There were also 1 BC recurrence and 1 primary BC with BRCA1 mutation compared to 5 recurrent BC in Group 2 (10%). In conclusion, the risk of subsequent recurrent BC after RRSO appears to be higher (10%) in patients with history of BC with no BRCA mutation when compared to (2%) in BRCA mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa M Straub
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mirna B Podoll
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Stephanie N David
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Georgia L Wiesner
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, USA
| | - Mohamed M Desouki
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chene G, Urvoas S, Moret S, Nadaud B, Buenerd A, Chabert P, Mellier G, Lamblin G. Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Benign Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Assessment of Possible Complications and Histopathological p53-Signatures. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:605-611. [PMID: 29962519 PMCID: PMC6018067 DOI: 10.1055/a-0611-5167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2017] [Revised: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction
The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of tubal histopathological abnormalities (serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma STIC and p53 signatures) and the prevalence of perioperative and postoperative complications related to opportunistic laparoscopic salpingectomy in a low risk population.
Materials and Methods
In this observational prospective cohort, prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy during benign laparoscopic hysterectomy was systematically performed in 100 consecutive women. Peri- and postoperative complications were registered. Duration of salpingectomy and post-salpingectomy blood loss were also measured. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis with anti-p53 antibody were performed on the whole fallopian tubes according to a specific and validated protocol.
Results
Laparoscopic salpingectomy was always possible without any peri- or postoperative complication attributable to the salpingectomy itself. The mean duration was 428 seconds (354 – 596) and the blood loss was 9 cm
3
(2 – 15). Using histopathological and immunohistochemical assessment with anti-p53 antibody on 199 fallopian tubes (99 bilateral salpingectomies and one unilateral salpingectomy because of previous salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy), there was a prevalence of 5.52% (11/199) of p53 signatures. No STIC were observed and no associated cancer.
Conclusions
Laparoscopic salpingectomy is both feasible and innocuous during benign hysterectomy. Meticulous histopathologic examination of the tubes may reveal specific abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautier Chene
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, HFME, Lyon CHU, Lyon, France.,University of Claude Bernard Lyon 1, EMR 3738, Lyon, France
| | - Sarah Urvoas
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, HFME, Lyon CHU, Lyon, France
| | - Stéphanie Moret
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, HFME, Lyon CHU, Lyon, France
| | - Béatrice Nadaud
- Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Est, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Annie Buenerd
- Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Est, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Philippe Chabert
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, HFME, Lyon CHU, Lyon, France
| | - Georges Mellier
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, HFME, Lyon CHU, Lyon, France
| | - Gery Lamblin
- Department of Gynecology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, HFME, Lyon CHU, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Steenbeek MP, van Lieshout LAM, Aarts JWM, Piek JMJ, Coppus SFPJ, Massuger LFAG, Hermens RPMG, de Hullu JA. Factors influencing decision-making around opportunistic salpingectomy: a nationwide survey. J Gynecol Oncol 2018; 30:e2. [PMID: 30479086 PMCID: PMC6304401 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore current practice and influencing factors on adoption of the opportunistic salpingectomy (OS), particularly regarding the decision making, to eventually enhance the development and implementation of clear guidelines. Methods This nationwide cross-sectional survey study was conducted in all hospitals in the Netherlands. An anonymous online survey was sent to gynecologists with special interest in gynecological oncology, gynecological endoscopy or urogynecology and all Dutch gynecology trainees. The survey mainly focused on current practice regarding OS and identification of influencing factors on the level of innovation, organization, healthcare professional and individual patient. Results The response rate was 348 out of 597 gynecologists (58.3%) and 142 out of 340 trainees (41.8%). Current practice of discussing and performing the OS varied widely, with ovarian cancer (OC) risk reduction as most important supportive factor on innovation level. Supportive factors on the level of organization and healthcare provider were; working in a non-training hospital, knowledge of current literature and extensive work experience (in years and annual number of hysterectomies). On individual patient level, a vaginal approach of hysterectomy, negative family history for OC and the presence of firm adhesions were suppressive factors for the OS. Conclusion In this study we evaluated the current practice regarding the opportunistic salpingectomy in the Netherlands and identified influencing factors on different levels to raise awareness and attribute to development of a targeted implementation strategy, on both national and international level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda P Steenbeek
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Laura A M van Lieshout
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W M Aarts
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen M J Piek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Sjors F P J Coppus
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chen Y, Du H, Bao L, Liu W. Opportunistic salpingectomy at benign gynecological surgery for reducing ovarian cancer risk: a 10-year single centre experience from China and a literature review. J Cancer 2018; 9:141-147. [PMID: 29290779 PMCID: PMC5743721 DOI: 10.7150/jca.21187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Current evidences indicate that the fallopian tube plays a major role in the pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Salpingectomy represents a novel and potentially effective risk-reducing option. In this study, there were 1822 patients diagnosed and treated for EOC or primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) at Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from January 1, 2007 to April 30, 2017. Among them, 198 patients with a history of gynecological surgery because of benign diseases were enrolled to analyze further. Using 1:2 case-control study, we found that the incidence of EOC was significantly decreased in the population with salpingectomy, compared to women with fallopian tube reserved (P<0.05). At the same period, there were 4339 patients receiving opportunistic salpingectomy in our centre because of benign gynecological diseases. The results showed the rate of bilateral salpingectomy was annually increased from 2007 to 2017 (22.02% to 60.22%), which showed approximately threefold increase in a decade. In general, factors affecting the rate of salpingectomy included age, child number, menopause or not, marital status, educational status, income status, and with or without family history of tumor. Therefore, based on ten years experiences from our centre, it is recommended that physician should discuss with appropriate patients to perform opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of receiving benign gynecological surgery for preventing ovarian cancer. Moreover, the prospective, large scale and multi-centre studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of salpingectomy as a preventive strategy for ovarian cancer warrant to conduct in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Chen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Centre of Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Hui Du
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, China
| | - Lewen Bao
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Wenxin Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Piszczek C, Ma J, Gould CH, Tseng P. Cancer Risk-Reducing Opportunities in Gynecologic Surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 25:1179-1193. [PMID: 29097232 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Revised: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This review article discusses cancer risk-reducing opportunities in gynecologic surgery. We cover strategies to reduce ovarian and uterine cancer risk by presenting general practice guidelines and expanding on the literature behind clinical decision points. We address populations of women at increased hereditary risk and those at population risk. We specifically discuss risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy, concomitant hysterectomy, opportunistic salpingectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, and hysterectomy. For clinical scenarios in which data are limited or conflicting, we detail the studies on which clinicians' decisions hinge to allow the reader to weigh the available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Piszczek
- Division of Women's Services, Legacy Health System, Portland, Oregon.
| | - Jun Ma
- Divisions of Gynecologic Oncology, Legacy Medical Group, Portland, Oregon
| | - Claire H Gould
- Advanced Gynecology, Legacy Medical Group, Portland, Oregon
| | - Paul Tseng
- Divisions of Gynecologic Oncology, Legacy Medical Group, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Singh SS, Bougie O, Suen MWH, Flaxman T, Arendas K. The Practical Side of Opportunistic Salpingectomy. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2017; 39:1124-1125. [PMID: 29032070 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sukhbir S Singh
- Ottawa Minimally Invasive Gynecology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Newborn Care, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - Olga Bougie
- Ottawa Minimally Invasive Gynecology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Newborn Care, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - Michael W H Suen
- Ottawa Minimally Invasive Gynecology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Newborn Care, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - Teresa Flaxman
- Ottawa Minimally Invasive Gynecology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Newborn Care, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - Kristina Arendas
- Ottawa Minimally Invasive Gynecology Group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Newborn Care, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Salvador S, Scott S, Francis JA, Agrawal A, Giede C. Guidelines About Opportunistic Salpingectomy, IVF, and the Practical Side - In Response. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2017; 40:15-16. [PMID: 29032063 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|