1
|
Vink E, Antaya G, Hamula C, Holinaty C, Minion J, Pond GR, McCrea S, Dwernychuk L, Graham H, Broderick G, Kinloch M, Brown Broderick J. HPV Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening in Under-Screened Saskatchewan Populations: A Pilot Study. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:4261-4269. [PMID: 39195300 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31080317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2024] [Revised: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Of all cancers in female Canadians, the most rapidly increasing incidence is that of cervical cancer. The objective of this pilot study was to assess how HPV self-sampling might improve cervical cancer screening participation in both urban and rural settings in Saskatchewan, one of the most sparsely populated provinces in Canada. Study groups consisted of n = 250 participants to whom self-swabbing kits were mailed with instructions and n = 250 participants to whom kits were handed out in 6 urban and rural clinics. The inclusion criteria selected subjects aged 30-69 years who were Saskatchewan residents for at least 5 years with valid health coverage, had a cervix, and had no record of cervical cancer screening in 4 years. The returned samples were analyzed for specific HPV strains using the Roche Molecular Diagnostics Cobas 4800® System. The overall response rate was ~16%, with the response to the handout distribution being roughly double that of the mailout. While HPV positivity did not differ across the distribution groups, participants at a specific inner-city clinic reported significantly higher positivity to at least one HPV strain as compared to any other clinic and all mailouts combined. For this high-risk population, in-person handout of self-sampling kits may be the most effective means of improving screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Vink
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A2, Canada
| | - Gabriella Antaya
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A2, Canada
| | - Camille Hamula
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, College of Medicine University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada
| | - Carla Holinaty
- Department of Academic Family Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 3Y5, Canada
| | - Jessica Minion
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, College of Medicine University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada
| | - Gregory R Pond
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Sabryna McCrea
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A2, Canada
| | | | - Holly Graham
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7K 2Z4, Canada
| | - Gordon Broderick
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization (VIDO), Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E3, Canada
| | - Mary Kinloch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, College of Medicine University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada
| | - Jennifer Brown Broderick
- Department of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aimagambetova G, Atageldiyeva K, Marat A, Suleimenova A, Issa T, Raman S, Huang T, Ashimkhanova A, Aron S, Dongo A, Iztleuov Y, Shamkeeva S, Azizan A. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of self-sampling devices for human Papillomavirus detection: A systematic review. Prev Med Rep 2024; 38:102590. [PMID: 38283967 PMCID: PMC10821625 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Cervical cancer screening coverage remains low in many countries worldwide. Self-sampling approach for cervical cancer screening has a good potential to improve the screening coverage. This study aims to compare different types of HPV self-sampling devices for cervical cancer screening to identify the most accurate and acceptable device(s). Methods A systematic review was performed on data extracted from all studies specific to HPV self-sampling devices by searching relevant articles in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO published from 2013 to October 2023. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022375682). Results Overall, 70 papers met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review and were included in the analysis: 22 studies reported self-sampling devices diagnostic accuracy, 32 studies reported self-sampling devices acceptability and 16 studies reported both (accuracy and acceptability). The most popular self-sampling devices were Evalyn Brush, FLOQ Swab, Cervex-Brush, and Delphi Screener. Out of overall 38 studies analyzing self-sampling devices' diagnostic accuracy, 94.7% of studies reported that self-collected specimens provided sensitivity and specificity comparable with clinician-collected samples; acceptability of Evalyn Brush, FLOQ Swab, Delphi Screener, and Colli-Pee, varied between 84.2% and 100%. Conclusion The self-sampling approach has a good potential to increase cervical cancer screening coverage. Evalyn Brush, Cervex-Brush, FLOQ Swab, and Delphi Screener self-sampling devices for HPV detection were the most commonly utilized and found to be the most accurate, and patient-acceptable. HPV detection accuracy using these self-sampling devices had no significant difference compared to the sampling performed by healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulzhanat Aimagambetova
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Kuralay Atageldiyeva
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
- Clinical Academic Department of Internal Medicine, CF “University Medical Center”, 10000 Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Aizada Marat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology #1, NJSC “Astana Medical University”, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Assem Suleimenova
- Kazakh National Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Torgyn Issa
- School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Sarina Raman
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, Nevada, USA
| | - Timothy Huang
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, Nevada, USA
| | - Ayimkul Ashimkhanova
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
- Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Al Farabi University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Saida Aron
- School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - Andrew Dongo
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, Nevada, USA
| | - Yerbolat Iztleuov
- Medical Center, Marat Ospanov West-Kazakhstan Medical University, 030000, Aktobe, Kazakhstan
| | - Saykal Shamkeeva
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, Leipzig University Hospital, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Azliyati Azizan
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, Nevada, USA
| |
Collapse
|