Subcuticular Suture Type at Cesarean Delivery and Infection Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evidence-based surgical procedures to optimize caesarean outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews

Background

Caesarean section (CS) is the most performed major surgery worldwide. Surgical techniques used for CS vary widely and there is no internationally accepted standardization. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to summarize the evidence on surgical techniques or procedures related to CS.

Methods

Searches were conducted from database inception to 31 January 2024 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, EMBASE, Lilacs and CINAHL without date or language restrictions. AMSTAR 2 and GRADE were used to assess the methodological quality of the SRs and the certainty of evidence at outcome level, respectively. We classified each procedure-outcome pair into one of eight categories according to effect estimates and certainty of evidence. The overview was registered at PROSPERO (CRD 42023208306).

Findings

The analysis included 38 SRs (16 Cochrane and 22 non-Cochrane) published between 2004-2024 involving 628 RCT with a total of 190,349 participants. Most reviews were of low or critically low quality (AMSTAR 2). The SRs presented 345 procedure-outcome comparisons (237 procedure versus procedure, 108 procedure versus no treatment/placebo). There was insufficient or inconclusive evidence for 256 comparisons, clear evidence of benefit for 40, possible benefit for 17, no difference of effect for 13, clear evidence of harm for 14, and possible harm for 5. We found no SRs for 7 pre-defined procedures. Skin cleansing with chlorhexidine, Joel-Cohen-based abdominal incision, uterine incision with blunt dissection and cephalad-caudal expansion, cord traction for placental extraction, manual cervical dilatation in pre-labour CS, changing gloves, chromic catgut suture for uterine closure, non-closure of the peritoneum, closure of subcutaneous tissue, and negative pressure wound therapy are procedures associated with benefits for relevant outcomes.

Interpretation

Current evidence suggests that several CS surgical procedures improve outcomes but also reveals a lack of or inconclusive evidence for many commonly used procedures. There is an urgent need for evidence-based guidelines standardizing techniques for CS, and trials to fill existing knowledge gaps.

Funding

UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery is a commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide. There is limited good-quality evidence regarding subcuticular skin closure with absorbable sutures in transverse incisions after cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare poliglecaprone-25 (3-0) and polyglactin-910 (4-0) sutures for subcuticular skin closure in Pfannenstiel incisions among women undergoing cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

In this double-blind, single-center, randomized controlled trial among women undergoing cesarean delivery (elective and emergency), 200 women were randomized (Group 1-subcuticular skin closure with poliglecaprone-25 [3-0] vs Group 2-subcuticular skin closure with polyglactin-910 [4-0]). All women received similar preoperative and postoperative care. A sample size of 200 women was selected with the aim of reducing the composite wound complication rate from 15.8% to 3.6% with a power of 0.80 and a 2-tailed α of 0.05. Thus, 90 women were required in each group, but 100 were selected to account for attrition.

RESULTS

Composite wound complications (including surgical site infection, hematoma, seroma, need for resuturing or readmission for wound complications) were similar in the 2 groups (Group 1 vs 2: 16 vs 10; P=.293; relative risk, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.79). Surgical site infection (8 vs 7; P=1.000; relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.83), hematoma (1 vs 2; P=.561; relative risk, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-3.31), seroma (8 vs 2; P=.052; relative risk, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.33), need for resuturing (4 vs 3; P=.700; relative risk, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.22), and need for readmission (4 vs 4; P=1.000) were similar in the 2 groups. Pain score on the visual analog scale at 3 days (3.2±1.0 vs 3.6±1.2) and 6 weeks after operation (1.6±0.8 vs 1.7±0.9;) was significantly lower in Group 1 (P=.023 and P=.033, respectively). There was no difference between observer and patient scar assessment scores measured at 6 weeks after operation (P=.069 and P=.431, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Poliglecaprone-25 (3-0) and polyglactin-910 (4-0) subcuticular sutures were comparable regarding composite wound complications (surgical site infection, hematoma, seroma, wound separation or re-suturing, need for readmission) and cosmetic appearance (patient scar assessment score & observer scar assessment score) related to skin closure among women undergoing cesarean delivery through a Pfannenstiel incision in nonobese women (average body mass index, 25).