1
|
Chargari C, Wasserman J, Gabro A, Canlobre G, Spano JP, Uzan C, Maingon P. Vulvar Carcinoma: Standard of Care and Perspectives. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:961-972. [PMID: 38315939 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment of vulvar carcinoma (VC) is challenging. The objectives of this review were to describe for clinicians the epidemiologic and clinical aspects of VC, the standard of care in terms of primary local treatment and systemic therapies, and the recent innovations and perspectives emerging from translational research in immuno-oncology. DESIGN We conducted a comprehensive review outlying the clinical aspects and biologic background of vulvar cancer, highlighting modern treatment strategies on the basis of a personalized approach. RESULTS Epidemiologic data showed a recent rise in incidence of VC, attributed to human papillomavirus. Surgery is the mainstay of primary treatment, but multimodal approaches are frequently required in the presence of adverse prognosis histopathologic factors. Chemoradiation is indicated when organ-sparing surgery is not feasible. However, inability to achieve high locoregional control rates in advanced cases and the morbidity associated with local treatments are still key issues. Recent clinical data showed the benefit of individualized strategies combining organ-sparing surgical strategies, less invasive lymph node staging procedures, and refinement in radiotherapy modalities. Among the most important research area, there is a sound rationale for testing modern systemic approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibitors in selected patients with recurrent and/or metastatic tumors. Although no specific data exist for VC, the role of supportive care and post-treatment rehabilitation strategies is also crucial. CONCLUSION There are still insufficient studies dedicated to patients with VC. Public health programs for prevention, screening, and early diagnosis are required, and clinical research should be strengthened to provide high-quality clinical evidence and improve patients' oncologic and functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrus Chargari
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Johanna Wasserman
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Gabro
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Geoffroy Canlobre
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Service de chirurgie et cancérologie gynécologique et mammaire, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR S938, Biologie et Thérapeutique des cancers, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Spano
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Uzan
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Service de chirurgie et cancérologie gynécologique et mammaire, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR S938, Biologie et Thérapeutique des cancers, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Maingon
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gutiérrez Miguélez C, Rodríguez Villalba S, Villafranca Iturre E, Fuentemilla Urio N, Richart Sancho J, Córdoba Lago S, Pino Sorroche F, Gracia Lucio R, Herreros Martínez A, Najjari-Jamal D. Recommendations of the Spanish brachytherapy group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology and the Spanish Society of Medical Physics for interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy for gynaecologic malignancies. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:912-932. [PMID: 36445642 PMCID: PMC10025210 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-03016-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
The present document includes consensus-based recommendations from the Brachytherapy Group (GEB) of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and the Spanish Society of Medical Physics (SEFM) for interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) for gynaecologic malignancies. A nine-item survey-which included questions on experience with interstitial BT; indications and technique; applicator type; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based planning; dose; fractionation schedule; and treatment planning-was sent to all radiation oncology departments (n = 174) in Spain in 2021. Responses were received from 36 centres (50% of all centres [n = 72] with a BT unit). The consensus-based recommendations presented here are based on a review of the available literature, professional experience among the group of experts, and in-person discussions held during the annual meeting of these two societies. We describe the results of the survey and the following: indications; contraindications; patient selection; description of applicators; role of imaging in planning; contouring; dose prescription; dosimetric reconstruction; optimisation; and dose indications for cancers of the cervix, vagina, and vulva. The various clinical scenarios in which interstitial BT is used in the treatment of gynaecological tumours are described in detail, including cervix intracavitary/interstitial hybrid HDR-BT; cervix perineal templates/freehand implants; primary vaginal malignancies/vaginal recurrences; and vulvar interstitial implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Gutiérrez Miguélez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB) Catalonia, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
| | | | | | | | - Jose Richart Sancho
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clínica Benidorm, Benidorm, Spain
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario San Juan, Alicante, Spain
| | - Sofía Córdoba Lago
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco Pino Sorroche
- Radiophysics Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ruth Gracia Lucio
- Radiophysics Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | - Dina Najjari-Jamal
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB) Catalonia, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cordoba Largo S, Rodriguez Rodriguez I, Rodriguez Villalba S, Najjari Jamal D, Anchuelo Latorre J, Celada Alvarez F, Garcia Cabezas S, de la Fuente Alonso C, Couselo Paniagua L, Martinez Montesinos I, Villafranca Iturre E, Belinchon Olmeda B, Farga Albiol D, Navarrete Solano PA, Sanchez Belda M. Radiation therapy for vulvar cancer: consensus technical guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology. Part 2: radiotherapy recommendations. Clin Transl Oncol 2023:10.1007/s12094-023-03101-z. [PMID: 36961728 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03101-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present consensus statement was developed by the GINECOR working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR). This document provides an up-to-date review of the technical aspects in radiation treatment of vulvar cancer. METHODS A two-round modified Delphi study was conducted to reach consensus on the appropriateness of technical aspects of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Three clinical scenarios were proposed: adjuvant treatment of vulvar cancer, radiation treatment of locally advanced vulvar carcinoma and locoregional recurrences. After the first round, an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journal was performed to define evidence-based treatment options. In the second round, participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the preliminary recommendations according to the GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria, as follows: strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree and strongly disagree. RESULTS The main recommendations on external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, both in adjuvant setting and local advanced disease are summarized. Recommendations include treatment technique, treatment volume, and doses in target and organs at-risk. Taking into consideration the different clinical scenarios of recurrent disease, the radiation treatment should be individualized. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of robust clinical data, these recommendations may help to select the optimal radiotherapy approach for this relatively rare cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Cordoba Largo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | - Dina Najjari Jamal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institut of Oncology, University of Barcelona, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Anchuelo Latorre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | | | - Sonia Garcia Cabezas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofía, University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain
| | | | - Luz Couselo Paniagua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Dolores Farga Albiol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Consorcio Hospital General de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Maria Sanchez Belda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cordoba Largo S, Rodriguez Rodriguez I, Rodriguez Villalba S, Najjari Jamal D, Anchuelo Latorre J, Celada Álvarez F, Garcia Cabezas S, de la Fuente Alonso C, Couselo Paniagua L, Martínez Montesinos I, Villafranca Iturre E, Belinchón Olmeda B, Farga Albiol D, Navarrete Solano PA, Sánchez Belda M. Radiation therapy for vulvar cancer: consensus guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology. Part 1: clinical recommendations. Clin Transl Oncol 2023:10.1007/s12094-023-03095-8. [PMID: 36961727 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03095-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present consensus statement was developed by the GINECOR working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR). Given the lack of prospective data on the management of vulvar carcinoma, this document provides an up-to-date review of radiotherapy treatment in vulvar cancer and a series of consensus-based recommendations from a group of experts. METHODS A two-round, online modified Delphi study was conducted to reach consensus treatment recommendations in three clinical settings: 1) adjuvant treatment, 2) locally-advanced vulvar cancer (LAVC), and 3) recurrent disease. After the first round, we comprehensively reviewed the available medical literature from peer-reviewed journals to assess and define the evidence-based treatment options. In the second round, participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the preliminary recommendations according to the GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria, as follows: strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree; strongly disagree. RESULTS The main recommendations were as follows: 1) following surgical resection, adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended with the presence of adverse risk factors (primarily positive margins and lymph node involvement); 2) radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) should be considered in LAVC; and 3) in recurrent disease, radiotherapy should be individualised on a case-by-case basis. A high level of agreement over 80% was reached. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of robust clinical data, these final recommendations may help to select the optimal radiotherapy approach for this relatively rare cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Cordoba Largo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | - Dina Najjari Jamal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institut of Oncology, University of Barcelona, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Anchuelo Latorre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | | | - Sonia Garcia Cabezas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofía, University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain
| | | | - Luz Couselo Paniagua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Dolores Farga Albiol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, La Fe, University Hospital and Politécnico, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - María Sánchez Belda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parpex G, Bucau M, Estevez JP, Raimond E, Ouldamer L, Carcopino X, Touboul C, Bendifallah S, Graesslin O, Lavoue V, Bolze PA, Koskas M. Impact of vulvar reconstruction on the accuracy of a nomogram for predicting local recurrence after surgery for vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 165:143-148. [PMID: 35177278 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND DATA Vulvar carcinoma is a rare disease accounting for 3%-5% of all gynaecological cancers. Although surgery is the standard treatment at an early stage, the outcomes are highly correlated with clear resection margins. Therefore, surgical defects can be important and require reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate vulvar reconstructions using a previously validated nomogram predicting the risk of local recurrence at 2 years. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for vulvar cancer between 1998 and 2017 were extracted from eight FRANCOGYN centres. We estimated the probability of local recurrence at 2 years using a previously validated nomogram and compared it with actual relapse in patients with or without vulvar reconstruction. Patients were clustered into tiertiles according to their nomogram score: low-, intermediate-, and high-risk for local relapse probability. RESULTS We reviewed 254 patients, of whom 49 underwent immediate vulvar reconstruction. The predicted and actual probability of two-year local relapse were 20.1% and 15.7%, respectively, with a concordance index of 0.75. In the low- and intermediate-risk groups, the difference between predicted and observed recurrence was less than 10% in patients with or without vulvar reconstruction. For the high-risk group, the difference reached 25% and observed recurrence probability was lower in patients who underwent vulvar plasty compared with those who did not (20.0% vs. 36.2%, respectively). Local recurrence-free survival rates following vulvar reconstruction were comparable at two years (82.1% vs. 84.8%, respectively, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION Vulvar reconstruction after surgical resection for vulvar cancer is safe. Vulvar reconstruction should be considered in aggressive cases to decrease local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Parpex
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Bichat University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), France; Paris University, Paris, France.
| | - Margot Bucau
- Department of Pathology, Bichat University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), France
| | - Juan Pablo Estevez
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Bichat University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), France
| | - Emilie Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne, Universitary Hospital of Reims, University of Reims Champagne Ardenne (URCA), 51092 Reims Cedex, France
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre, Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - Xavier Carcopino
- Hôpital Nord (APHM), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aix-Marseille Université (AMU), CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Paris University, Paris, France; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), France
| | - Olivier Graesslin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne, Universitary Hospital of Reims, University of Reims Champagne Ardenne (URCA), 51092 Reims Cedex, France
| | - Vincent Lavoue
- Department de Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France; Faculty of Medicine, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre-Adrien Bolze
- Université Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Gynaecologic Surgery and Oncology, Obstetrics, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Martin Koskas
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Bichat University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), France; Paris University, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zubor P, Wang Y, Liskova A, Samec M, Koklesova L, Dankova Z, Dørum A, Kajo K, Dvorska D, Lucansky V, Malicherova B, Kasubova I, Bujnak J, Mlyncek M, Dussan CA, Kubatka P, Büsselberg D, Golubnitschaja O. Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma (CAP) as a New Tool for the Management of Vulva Cancer and Vulvar Premalignant Lesions in Gynaecological Oncology. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21217988. [PMID: 33121141 PMCID: PMC7663780 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21217988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Vulvar cancer (VC) is a specific form of malignancy accounting for 5–6% of all gynaecologic malignancies. Although VC occurs most commonly in women after 60 years of age, disease incidence has risen progressively in premenopausal women in recent decades. VC demonstrates particular features requiring well-adapted therapeutic approaches to avoid potential treatment-related complications. Significant improvements in disease-free survival and overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with post-stage I disease have been achieved by implementing a combination therapy consisting of radical surgical resection, systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Achieving local control remains challenging. However, mostly due to specific anatomical conditions, the need for comprehensive surgical reconstruction and frequent post-operative healing complications. Novel therapeutic tools better adapted to VC particularities are essential for improving individual outcomes. To this end, cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) treatment is a promising option for VC, and is particularly appropriate for the local treatment of dysplastic lesions, early intraepithelial cancer, and invasive tumours. In addition, CAP also helps reduce inflammatory complications and improve wound healing. The application of CAP may realise either directly or indirectly utilising nanoparticle technologies. CAP has demonstrated remarkable treatment benefits for several malignant conditions, and has created new medical fields, such as “plasma medicine” and “plasma oncology”. This article highlights the benefits of CAP for the treatment of VC, VC pre-stages, and postsurgical wound complications. There has not yet been a published report of CAP on vulvar cancer cells, and so this review summarises the progress made in gynaecological oncology and in other cancers, and promotes an important, understudied area for future research. The paradigm shift from reactive to predictive, preventive and personalised medical approaches in overall VC management is also considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavol Zubor
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway; (Y.W.); (A.D.)
- OBGY Health & Care, Ltd., 010 01 Zilina, Slovakia
- Correspondence: or
| | - Yun Wang
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway; (Y.W.); (A.D.)
| | - Alena Liskova
- Department of Medical Biology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovakia; (A.L.); (M.S.); (L.K.); (P.K.)
| | - Marek Samec
- Department of Medical Biology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovakia; (A.L.); (M.S.); (L.K.); (P.K.)
| | - Lenka Koklesova
- Department of Medical Biology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovakia; (A.L.); (M.S.); (L.K.); (P.K.)
| | - Zuzana Dankova
- Biomedical Centre Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovakia; (Z.D.); (D.D.); (V.L.); (B.M.); (I.K.)
| | - Anne Dørum
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway; (Y.W.); (A.D.)
| | - Karol Kajo
- Department of Pathology, St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute Hospital, 81250 Bratislava, Slovakia;
| | - Dana Dvorska
- Biomedical Centre Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovakia; (Z.D.); (D.D.); (V.L.); (B.M.); (I.K.)
| | - Vincent Lucansky
- Biomedical Centre Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovakia; (Z.D.); (D.D.); (V.L.); (B.M.); (I.K.)
| | - Bibiana Malicherova
- Biomedical Centre Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovakia; (Z.D.); (D.D.); (V.L.); (B.M.); (I.K.)
| | - Ivana Kasubova
- Biomedical Centre Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovakia; (Z.D.); (D.D.); (V.L.); (B.M.); (I.K.)
| | - Jan Bujnak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kukuras Michalovce Hospital, 07101 Michalovce, Slovakia;
| | - Milos Mlyncek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty Hospital Nitra, Constantine the Philosopher University, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia;
| | - Carlos Alberto Dussan
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedics and Oncology, University Hospital Linköping, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden;
| | - Peter Kubatka
- Department of Medical Biology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovakia; (A.L.); (M.S.); (L.K.); (P.K.)
| | - Dietrich Büsselberg
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Education City, Qatar Foundation, P.O. Box 24144 Doha, Qatar;
| | - Olga Golubnitschaja
- Predictive, Preventive Personalised (3P) Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|