Transvaginal minimally invasive approach: An update on safety from an anatomical, anatomopathological and clinical point of view

Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is an alternative to conventional transabdominal retrieval. We aimed to compare outcomes following transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) and transabdominal specimen extraction (TASE) in minimally invasive abdominal surgery.

METHODS

An electronic database search of PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL was performed from inception until March 2023. Comparative studies evaluating TVSE versus TASE in adult female patients were included. Studies involving transanal NOSE, endoluminal surgery, or TVSE with concomitant hysterectomy were excluded. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratio were estimated for continuous and dichotomous outcomes respectively. Primary outcomes were postoperative day 1 (POD1) pain and length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were operative time, rescue analgesia, morbidity, and cosmesis. A review of sexual, oncological, and technical outcomes was performed.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (2 randomised trials, 11 retrospective cohort studies), involving 1094 patients (TASE 583, TVSE 511), were included in the analysis. Seven studies involved colorectal disease and six assessed gynaecological conditions. TVSE resulted in significantly decreased POD1 pain (WMD 1.08, 95% CI: 0.49, 1.68) and shorter LOS (WMD 1.18 days, 95% CI: 0.14, 2.22), compared to TASE. Operative time was similar between both groups, with fewer patients requiring postoperative rescue analgesia with TVSE. Overall morbidity rates, as well as both wound-related and non-wound related complication rates were better with TVSE, while anastomotic morbidity rates were comparable. Cosmetic scores were higher with TVSE. TVSE did not result in worse sexual or oncological outcomes.

CONCLUSION

TVSE may be feasible and beneficial compared to TASE when performed by proficient laparoscopic operators, using appropriate selection criteria. Continued evaluation with prospective studies is warranted.

Feasibility and safety of hybrid transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for colon cancer: Protocol for a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial (vNOTESCA)

Introduction

It has been a decade since the first patient with colon cancer underwent colectomy by hybrid transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (hvNOTES). However, the efficacy and safety of this procedure is not well established.

Methods

This study is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial undertaken at six centers in China. Female patients aged over 18 years and below 80 years old with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, with pathologically proven, resectable, cT1-3N0-2M0 disease who have previously untreated colon cancer are eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint is a composite of major intraoperative and postoperative complications (greater than grade III, the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], version 5.0). Secondary endpoints include conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery, postoperative concentration of C-Reactive Protein and procalcitonine, complete pathological assessment of complete mesocolic excision specimens, postoperative pain, amount of narcotic pain medication administered, time to first flatus after surgery, number of harvested lymph nodes, R0 resection rate, length of hospital stay, sexual function assessment, quality of recovery, satisfaction with surgical scars, quality of life, postoperative recurrence patterns, relapse-free survival, and overall survival.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, China, number: WDRY2022-K053. All patients will receive written information of the trial and provide informed consent before enrollment. The results of this trial will be disseminated in academic conferences and peer-reviewed medical journals.Trial registration number NCT04048421.

Learning curve analysis of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy combined under the standard operating procedure

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the learning curve of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy (tVNOTEH) when using a standard operating procedure (SOP).

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients were treated with tVNOTEH by a single surgeon. The SOP for tVNOTEH was created after the first eight cases. Patients' perioperative data were retrospectively reviewed. Operative time (OT) was regarded as a replaceable marker for surgical competency. The learning curve was drawn using the cumulative sum method.

RESULTS

All patients completed surgeries without switching to other surgical paths. The overall mean OT was 90.23 ± 29.85 min. Four unique phases of the learning curve were identified: phase I (the exploring stage over eight cases), phase II (after adopting the SOP, acquirement of competence over 20 cases), phase III (post-learning of 19 cases, in which more difficult cases were introduced), phase IV (more adept at tVNOTEH), with OT 113.75 ± 43.07 min, 82.50 ± 25.88 min, 101.05 ± 27.83 min, 82.75 ± 25.53 min, respectively. No significant differences were found apart from OT, uterine size, and disease types.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrated four distinct phases of the learning curve of tVNOTEH. For an experienced surgeon, surgical competence in tVNOTEH can be grasped after eight cases. With SOP, surgical competence could be rapidly acquired.

Comparative analysis of postoperative pain after transvaginal hybrid NOTES versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients

Purpose

Even though obesity is a known risk factor for needing cholecystectomy, most research excludes patients with higher degrees of obesity. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare postoperative pain and analgesic consumption in obese patients, who underwent either transvaginal hybrid Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) cholecystectomy (NC) or traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

Between 12/2008 and 01/2017, 237 NC were performed, of which 35 (14.8%) showed a body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m² or more (obesity II and III according to the World Health Organization). Of these, procedural time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and other early postoperative parameters were collected and compared with 35 matched LC patients from the same time period.

Results

There were no differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups, but we found significant benefits for the hybrid NOTES technique in terms of less pain (P = 0.006), coherent with significantly less intake of peripheral (paracetamol; P = 0.005), and of centrally acting analgesics (piritramide; P = 0.047) within the first two-day post-surgery. We also found that those in the NC group had shorter hospital stays (P < 0.001). The postoperative complication rates and the procedural time did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion

With regard to postoperative pain and analgesic requirements and without an increase in postoperative complications, obese patients experience short-term benefits from the hybrid NOTES technique compared to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.