1
|
Lymph Node Involvement in Recurrent Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumors: Current Evidence, Controversies, and a Review of the Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030890. [PMID: 36765848 PMCID: PMC9913328 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) account for 10-20% of epithelial ovarian neoplasms. They are characterized by their lack of destructive stromal invasion. In comparison to invasive ovarian cancers, BOTs occur in younger patients and have better outcome. Serous borderline ovarian tumor (SBOT) represents the most common subtype of BOT. Complete surgical staging is the current standard management but fertility-sparing surgery is an option for SBOT patients who are at reproductive age. While most cases of SBOTs have an indolent course with favorable prognosis, late recurrence and malignant transformation can occur, usually in the form of low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). Thus, assessment of the recurrence risk is essential for the management of those patients. SBOTs can be associated with lymph node involvement (LNI) in up to 30% of patients who undergo lymph node dissection at diagnosis, and whether LNI affects prognosis is controversial. The present review suggests that recurrent SBOTs with LNI have poorer oncological outcomes and highlights the biases due to the scarcity of reports in the literature. Preventing SBOTs from recurring and becoming invasive overtime and a more profound understanding of the underlying mechanisms at play are necessary.
Collapse
|
2
|
Raimondo D, Raffone A, Scambia G, Maletta M, Lenzi J, Restaino S, Mascilini F, Trozzi R, Mauro J, Travaglino A, Driul L, Casadio P, Mollo A, Fagotti A, Vizzielli G, Seracchioli R. The impact of hysterectomy on oncological outcomes in postmenopausal patients with borderline ovarian tumors: A multicenter retrospective study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1009341. [PMID: 36387131 PMCID: PMC9647053 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1009341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Data about the oncological outcomes in women with borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) undergoing uterine-sparing surgery without ovarian preservation are poor. We aimed to assess the oncological outcomes in women with BOT undergoing uterine-sparing surgery without ovarian preservation. A multi-center observational retrospective cohort study was performed including all consecutive postmenopausal patients who underwent surgical treatment for BOT at three tertiary level referral centers for gynecologic oncology from January 2005 to December 2016. Patients were divided into two groups for comparisons: patients undergoing hysterectomy (hysterectomy group) and patients undergoing uterine-sparing surgery (no hysterectomy group). Study outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and surgical complications rate. Ninety-eight patients were included: 44 in the hysterectomy group and 54 in the no hysterectomy group. The 5- and 10-year DFS rates were 97.7% (95% CI: 84.9–99.7) and 92.3% (95% CI: 69.7–98.2), in the hysterectomy group, and 86.8% (95% CI: 74.3–93.5) and 86.8% (95% CI: 74.3–93.5), in the no hysterectomy group, respectively, without significant differences (p=0.16). Hazard ratio for DFS was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.06–1.68) for the hysterectomy group. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 100.0% (95% CI: -) and 100.0% (95% CI: -), in the hysterectomy group, and 98.2% (95% CI: 87.6–99.7) and 94.4% (95% CI: 77.7–98.7), in the no hysterectomy group, respectively, without significant differences (p=0.23). No significant difference in complication rate was reported among the groups (p=0.48). As hysterectomy appears to not impact survival outcomes of women with BOT, it might be avoided in the surgical staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Raffone
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
- *Correspondence: Antonio Raffone, ; ; Giovanni Scambia,
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Antonio Raffone, ; ; Giovanni Scambia,
| | - Manuela Maletta
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lenzi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Restaino
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Santa Maria della Misericordia” University Hospital – Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Floriana Mascilini
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rita Trozzi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jessica Mauro
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Santa Maria della Misericordia” University Hospital – Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
- University of Udine – Department of Medical Area (DAME), Udine, Italy
| | - Antonio Travaglino
- Pathology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lorenza Driul
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Santa Maria della Misericordia” University Hospital – Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
- University of Udine – Department of Medical Area (DAME), Udine, Italy
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Mollo
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Schola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Santa Maria della Misericordia” University Hospital – Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
- University of Udine – Department of Medical Area (DAME), Udine, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ozenne A, De Berti M, Body G, Carcopino X, Graesslin O, Kerbage Y, Akladios C, Huchon C, Bricou A, Mimoun C, Raimond E, Ouldamer L. Risk Factors for Recurrence of Borderline Ovarian Tumours after Conservative Surgery and Impact on Fertility: A Multicentre Study by the Francogyn Group. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11133645. [PMID: 35806930 PMCID: PMC9267171 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Borderline ovarian tumours (BOT) represent 10–20% of epithelial tumours of the ovary. Although their prognosis is excellent, the recurrence rate can be as high as 30%, and recurrence in the infiltrative form accounts for 3% to 5% of recurrences. Affecting, in one third of cases, women of childbearing age, the surgical strategy with ovarian conservation is now recommended despite a significant risk of recurrence. Few studies have focused exclusively on patients who have received ovarian conservative treatment in an attempt to identify factors predictive of recurrence and the impact on fertility. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors for recurrence of BOT after conservative treatment and the impact on fertility. Material and methods: This was a retrospective, multicentre study of women who received conservative surgery for BOT between February 1997 and September 2020. We divided the patients into two groups, the “R group” with recurrence and the “NR group” without recurrence. Results: Of 175 patients included, 35 had a recurrence (R group, 20%) and 140 had no recurrence (NR group, 80%). With a mean follow-up of 30 months (IQ 8–62.5), the overall recurrence rate was 20%. Recurrence was BOT in 17.7% (31/175) and invasive in 2.3% (4/175). The mean time to recurrence was 29.5 months (IQ 16.5–52.5). Initial complete peritoneal staging (ICPS) was performed in 42.5% of patients (n = 75). In multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis, nulliparity, advanced FIGO stage, the presence of peritoneal implants, and the presence of a micropapillary component for serous tumours were factors influencing the occurrence of recurrence. The post-surgery fertility rate was 67%. Conclusion: This multicentre study is to date one of the largest studies analysing the risk factors for recurrence of BOT after conservative surgery. Five risk factors were found: age at diagnosis, nulliparity, advanced FIGO stage, the presence of implants, and a micropapillary component. Only 25% of the patients with recurrence underwent ICPS. These results reinforce the interest of initial peritoneal staging to avoid ignoring an advanced tumour stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adele Ozenne
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
| | - Marion De Berti
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
| | - Gilles Body
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
- INSERM U1069, Université François-Rabelais, 37044 Tours, France
| | - Xavier Carcopino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Nord, APHM, Aix-Marseille University (AMU), Univ Avignon, CNRS, IRD, IMBE UMR 7263, 13397 Marseille, France;
| | - Olivier Graesslin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims Champagne Ardennes University, 51100 Reims, France; (O.G.); (E.R.)
| | - Yohan Kerbage
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHRU LILLE, Rue Eugene Avinée, 59037 Lille, France;
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Surgical Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, 67000 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Department of Gynecology, CHI Poissy-St-Germain, EA 7285 Risques Cliniques et Sécurité en Santé des Femmes, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, 78000 Versailles, France;
| | - Alexandre Bricou
- Department of Gynecology, Bobigny University, AP-HP, Jean-Verdier Hospital, 93140 Bondy, France;
| | - Camille Mimoun
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lariboisiere Hospital, 750019 Paris, France;
| | - Emilie Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims Champagne Ardennes University, 51100 Reims, France; (O.G.); (E.R.)
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynecology, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France; (A.O.); (M.D.B.); (G.B.)
- INSERM U1069, Université François-Rabelais, 37044 Tours, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-2-47-47-47-41; Fax: +33-2-47-47-92-73
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oncological and reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in patients with seromucinous borderline ovarian tumor: Results of a large retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 165:446-452. [PMID: 35469684 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the oncological and reproductive outcomes in patients with seromucinous borderline ovarian tumors (SMBOT) treated with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with SMBOT who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2019. A centralized histological review was performed and recurrence rates were compared between different surgical procedures. RESULTS A total of 105 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of whom 65 underwent FSS and 40 were treated with radical surgery (RS). Fourteen patients had recurrent disease after a median follow-up time of 59.6 months (range: 22.1-256.8 months). All but one relapsed with SMBOT. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups (P = 0.141). Multivariate analysis showed that only bilateral involvement was associated with increased recurrence (P = 0.008). In the subgroup of patients treated with conservative surgery, there was no significant difference in DFS with regard to surgical procedures (ovarian cystectomy vs salpingo-oophorectomy, P = 0.487). Of the 12 patients in the FSS group who developed recurrence, 11 underwent a second round of FSS and all remained alive with no evidence of disease at the end of follow-up. Of 20 patients desiring pregnancy, 16 patients were successful and resulted in 17 term deliveries. CONCLUSIONS FSS is feasible for young patients who wish to preserve their fertility. Patients initially treated with ovarian cystectomy may be managed by close surveillance if post-operative imaging are negative. Repeat FSS remains a valuable alternative for young patients with recurrent SMBOT after thorough communication.
Collapse
|
5
|
Raimondo D, Raffone A, Zakhari A, Maletta M, Vizzielli G, Restaino S, Travaglino A, Krishnamurthy S, Mabrouk M, Casadio P, Mollo A, Scambia G, Seracchioli R. The impact of hysterectomy on oncological outcomes in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 165:184-191. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|