Perinatal outcomes associated with the positional relationship between the placenta and the adenomyosis lesion

Differences in the incidence of obstetric complications depending on the extent and location of adenomyosis lesions

OBJECTIVES

Although adenomyosis is reportedly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, clinical factors related to the high risk of obstetric complications are unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of adenomyosis lesions associated with the increased incidence of obstetric complications based on imaging findings.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational cohort study conducted in a tertiary perinatal care center. Eighty-eight singleton pregnant women with adenomyosis were included in the study. Based on magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography before and/or during pregnancy, patients were classified according to three types of image characteristics: the extent of adenomyosis lesion (focal type or diffuse type), location of the lesion (extrinsic type, intrinsic type, or indeterminate type), the positional relationship between the lesion and the placenta (placenta distant from adenomyosis or placenta over adenomyosis), and the incidence of obstetric complications were examined.

RESULTS

Patients with diffuse type adenomyosis are significantly more likely to have spontaneous second-trimester miscarriage (diffuse type vs. focal type: 16.7 vs. 0%, p < .01), preterm premature rupture of membranes (19.4 vs. 1.9%, p < .01), and preeclampsia (25.0 vs. 7.7%, p = .02), as compared to those with focal type adenomyosis. In a comparison of the three location types, the incidence of placental malposition was higher in patients with the extrinsic type adenomyosis (extrinsic type vs. intrinsic type vs. indeterminate type: 20.0 vs. 6.7 vs. 2.3%, p = .03). Comparisons between the types of the placenta over or distant from adenomyosis lesion displayed no significant differences in the frequencies of obstetric complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that the frequency of obstetric complications related to adenomyosis varies depending on the extent and location of the lesion; patients with diffuse type adenomyosis have an increased risk of spontaneous second-trimester miscarriage, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and preeclampsia, while patients with extrinsic type adenomyosis have an increased risk of placental malposition. Imaging evaluation of adenomyosis prior to conception or early in pregnancy may be useful for the obstetrical risk assessment among patients with adenomyosis.

Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Adenomyomectomy on Perinatal Outcomes

Objectives

The objective of this study was to observe the influence of laparoscopic adenomyomectomy on perinatal outcomes.

Materials and Methods

The retrospective cohort study included 43 pregnant cases with adenomyosis who did not undergo laparoscopic surgery before pregnancy (nonsurgery group; 26 cases) and did (surgery group; 17 cases). To evaluate the impact of surgery on perinatal outcomes, nine obstetric complications including preterm delivery, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, placental malposition, oligohydramnios, gestational diabetes mellitus, uterine rupture, abruptio placentae, and postpartum hemorrhage were selected. One obstetric complication was counted as one point (Maximum 9 points for one person). The obstetrical morbidity was compared by adding up the number of relevant events (0-9) between the two groups. Apgar score, umbilical artery pH (UApH), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal death were also examined.

Results

The surgery group had a significantly lower prevalence of fetal growth restriction compared to the nonsurgery group (nonsurgery vs. surgery; 26.9%, 7/26 vs. 0%, 0/17: P = 0.031). No differences were found in the morbidity of the nine obstetric complications (19.2%, 45/234 vs. 13.7%, 21/153), gestational weeks (mean ± standard deviation, 37.2 ± 2.4 vs. 36.4 ± 3.2), birth weight (2573.6 ± 557.9 vs. 2555.4 ± 680.8 g), Apgar score (1, 5 min; 8.0 ± 0.7 vs. 7.7 ± 1.2, 8.9 ± 0.6 vs. 8.5 ± 1.8), UApH (7.28 ± 0.08 vs. 7.28 ± 0.06), NICU admission (26.9%, 7/26 vs. 41.2%, 7/17), and neonatal death (0%, 0%) between both groups.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy may not increase obstetric complications, although attention must be paid to uterine rupture during pregnancy.

Impact of adenomyosis on perinatal outcomes: a large cohort study (JSOG database)

BACKGROUND

A previous study investigated the effect of adenomyosis on perinatal outcomes. Some studies have reported varying effect of adenomyosis on pregnancy outcomes in some patients and dependence on the degree and subtype of uterine lesions. To elucidate the impact of adenomyosis on perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

This large-scale cohort study used the perinatal registry database of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. A dataset of 203,745 mothers who gave birth between January 2020 and December 2020 in Japan was included in the study. The participants were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of adenomyosis. Information regarding the use of fertility treatment, delivery, obstetric complications, maternal treatments, infant, fetal appendages, obstetric history, underlying diseases, infectious diseases, use of drugs, and maternal and infant death were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

In total, 1,204 participants had a history of adenomyosis and 151,105 did not. The adenomyosis group had higher rates of uterine rupture (0.2% vs. 0.01%, P = 0.02) and placenta accreta (2.0% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001) than the non-adenomyosis group. A history of adenomyosis (odds ratio: 2.26; 95% confidence interval: 1.43-3.27; P < 0.001), uterine rupture (odds ratio: 3.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.89-19.65; P = 0.02), placental abruption (odds ratio: 2.11; 95% confidence interval: 1.27-3.31; P < 0.01), and fetal growth restriction (odds ratio: 2.66; 95% confidence interval: 2.00-3.48; P < 0.01) were independent risk factors for placenta accreta.

CONCLUSION

Adenomyosis in pregnancies is associated with an increased risk of placenta accreta, uterine rupture, placental abruption, and fetal growth restriction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Institutional Review Board of Tottori University Hospital (IRB no. 21A244).

Adenomyosis and fertility: does adenomyosis impact fertility and does treatment improve outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adenomyosis has recently been associated with infertility. Relief of bleeding and pain has been demonstrated with medical and surgical therapy. Less is known about reproductive outcomes after treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Imaging findings during infertility evaluation can be suggestive of adenomyosis without pathologic evaluation. Among women with infertility undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART), adenomyosis is associated with lower live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates. Treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) modulators prior to frozen embryo transfer may increase the live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate among women with adenomyosis. Pregnancy has been documented following image-guided adenomyosis ablation; however, the reproductive impact is not well established. Pregnancy following excisional procedures appears to be well tolerated, although may carry a higher risk of uterine rupture compared with pregnancy following myomectomy. It is not clear if ablative therapy or resection increases pregnancy rates.

SUMMARY

Adenomyosis is associated with lower embryo implantation rates and ongoing pregnancy rates. Adenomyotic changes in the uterus can be seen by ultrasound and MRI. GnRH modulators may be useful for women with adenomyosis undergoing ART. Additional prospective data is warranted to determine the optimal medical or surgical therapy for women with adenomyosis desiring conception.Video abstract Supplementary digital content, http://links.lww.com/COOG/A78.

Increased risk of obstetric complications in patients with adenomyosis: A narrative literature review

Background

Reproductive-age women occasionally face the pathological condition of adenomyosis, which is often concurrent with endometriosis. It is believed that endometriosis and adenomyosis increases the risk of obstetric complications. Although new insights into the mechanism of obstetric complications due to endometriosis are emerging, there is little information on the etiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with adenomyosis.

Methods

We performed a literature review focusing on the pathophysiological pathways of obstetric complications in women with adenomyosis using currently available basic and clinical studies. We used the internet search engines PubMed and Google Scholar to search for studies published between January 2000 and June 2021. We carefully read pertinent sections within each document to ensure relevancy.

Main findings

The prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis is increased after adjusting for conceiving by assisted reproductive technology. Thus, adenomyosis emerges as a relevant factor associated with several obstetric complications such as preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption, small for gestational age/fetal growth restriction, and preeclampsia.

Conclusion

It is plausible that the impact of adenomyosis on pregnancy outcomes is not always the same; rather it is dependent on the degree of uterine involvement and subtypes.