1
|
Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker CM, Tomassetti C, Krentel H, van Herendael BJ, Malzoni M, Abrao MS, Saridogan E, Keckstein J, Hudelist G. Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Pelvic Deep Endometriosis and Endometriosis Classification Systems: An International Consensus Statement. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024; 31:557-573. [PMID: 38819341 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
| | - Bassem Gerges
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia; Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery (SWAPS), Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Christian M Becker
- Endometriosis CaRe Centre Oxford, Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Harald Krentel
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Bruno J van Herendael
- Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium; Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Centre for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Avellino Italy
| | - Mauricio S Abrao
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ertan Saridogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Gernot Hudelist
- Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St. John of God Vienna; Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic & Campus, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker C, Tomassetti C, Krentel H, van Herendael BJ, Malzoni M, Abrao MS, Saridogan E, Keckstein J, Hudelist G. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2024; 64:129-144. [PMID: 38808587 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counseling and planning of surgical treatment strategies. © 2024 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, by Universa Press, by The International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy, by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and by Elsevier B.V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - B Gerges
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia
- Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery (SWAPS), Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
| | - I Thomassin-Naggara
- APHP Hopital Tenon, Department of Radiology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - C Becker
- Endometriosis CaRe Centre Oxford, Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - C Tomassetti
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Krentel
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | - B J van Herendael
- Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium
- Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - M Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Centre for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - M S Abrao
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - E Saridogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Keckstein
- Stiftung Endometrioseforschung (SEF), Westerstede, Germany
| | - G Hudelist
- Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St. John of God Vienna; Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic & Campus, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker C, Tomassetti C, Krentel H, van Herendael BJ, Malzoni M, Abrao MS, Saridogan E, Keckstein J, Hudelist G. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement†,‡. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2024; 16:127-144. [PMID: 38807551 PMCID: PMC11366111 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.16.2.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on a review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling and planning of surgical treatment strategies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker C, Tomassetti C, Krentel H, van Herendael BJ, Malzoni M, Abrao MS, Saridogan E, Keckstein J, Hudelist G. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement . Hum Reprod Open 2024; 2024:hoae029. [PMID: 38812884 PMCID: PMC11134890 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers, and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling, and planning of surgical treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - B Gerges
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy & Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australia
- Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery (SWAPS), Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
| | - I Thomassin-Naggara
- APHP Hopital Tenon, Department of Radiology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - C Becker
- Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health, Endometriosis CaRe Centre Oxford, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - C Tomassetti
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Krentel
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | - B J van Herendael
- Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium
- Università degli Studi dell‘Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - M Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Centre for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - M S Abrao
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - E Saridogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Keckstein
- Stiftung Endometrioseforschung (SEF), Westerstede, Germany
| | - G Hudelist
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Endometriosis, Hospital St John of God Vienna, Vienna,Austria
- Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic & Campus, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Avery JC, Knox S, Deslandes A, Leonardi M, Lo G, Wang H, Zhang Y, Holdsworth-Carson SJ, Thi Nguyen TT, Condous GS, Carneiro G, Hull ML. Noninvasive diagnostic imaging for endometriosis part 2: a systematic review of recent developments in magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine and computed tomography. Fertil Steril 2024; 121:189-211. [PMID: 38110143 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Endometriosis affects 1 in 9 women, taking 6.4 years to diagnose using conventional laparoscopy. Non-invasive imaging enables timelier diagnosis, reducing diagnostic delay, risk and expense of surgery. This review updates literature exploring the diagnostic value of specialist endometriosis magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI), nuclear medicine (NM) and computed tomography (CT). Searching after the 2016 IDEA consensus, 6192 publications were identified, with 27 studies focused on imaging for endometriosis. eMRI was the subject of 14 papers, NM and CT, 11, and artificial intelligence (AI) utilizing eMRI, 2. eMRI papers describe diagnostic accuracy for endometriosis, methodologies, and innovations. Advantages of eMRI include its: ability to diagnose endometriosis in those unable to tolerate transvaginal endometriosis ultrasound (eTVUS); a panoramic pelvic view, easy translation to surgical fields; identification of hyperintense iron in endometriotic lesions; and ability to identify super-pelvic lesions. Sequence standardization means eMRI is less operator-dependent than eTVUS, but higher costs limit its role to a secondary diagnostic modality. eMRI for deep and ovarian endometriosis has sensitivities of 91-93.5% and specificities of 86-87.5% making it reliable for surgical mapping and diagnosis. Superficial lesions too small for detection in larger capture sequences, means a negative eMRI doesn't exclude endometriosis. Combined with thin sequence capture and improved reader expertise, eMRI is poised for rapid adoption into clinical practice. NM labeling is diagnostically limited in absence of suitable unique marker for endometrial-like tissue. CT studies expose the reproductively aged to radiation. AI diagnostic tools, combining independent eMRI and eTVUS endometriosis markers, may result in powerful capability. Broader eMRI use, will optimize standards and protocols. Reporting systems correlating to surgical anatomy will facilitate interdisciplinary preoperative dialogues. eMRI endometriosis diagnosis should reduce repeat surgeries with mental and physical health benefits for patients. There is potential for early eMRI diagnoses to prevent chronic pain syndromes and protect fertility outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodie C Avery
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Steven Knox
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Benson Radiology, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alison Deslandes
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mathew Leonardi
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Glen Lo
- Curtin University Medical School Perth, Australia
| | - Hu Wang
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Australian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Australia
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Australian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sarah Jane Holdsworth-Carson
- Julia Argyrou Endometriosis Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Tran Tuyet Thi Nguyen
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Embrace Fertility, Adelaide, Australia
| | - George Stanley Condous
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Omni Ultrasound and Gynaecological Care, Sydney Australia, (j)Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Gustavo Carneiro
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Louise Hull
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Embrace Fertility, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|