Internal structure of zygomatic bone related to zygomatic fixture

Anatomical study of the zygomaticofacial foramen and zygomatic canals communicating with the zygomaticofacial foramen for zygomatic implant treatment: a cadaver study with micro-computed tomography analysis

In the present study, anatomical assessment of zygomaticofacial foramina (ZFFs) and zygomatic canals communicating with ZFFs were performed using cadaver micro-computed tomography images. It was suggested that all ZFFs were located above the jugale (Ju)-zygomaxillare (Zm) line, which is the reference line connecting the Ju and Zm, and most were located in the zygomatic body area (ZBA). The anteroposterior position of the ZFF in the ZBA was within a middle to posterior region and was most often located slightly posteriorly in males and closer to the middle of the region in females. The mean distance from the Ju-Zm line to the ZFF in the ZBA was 12.36 mm (standard deviation [SD] 1.52 mm) in males and 11.48 mm (SD 1.61 mm) in females. In zygomatic canals communicating with ZFFs, most zygomatic canals were type I canals, communicating from the zygomaticoorbital foramen and harboring the zygomaticofacial nerve, and the others were type II canals, communicating from the zygomaticotemporal foramen and located near the posterior margin of the frontal process. These results provide useful anatomical information for preventing nerve injury during surgical procedures for zygomatic implant treatment.

Effectiveness of zygomatic-implant fixed rehabilitation for the atrophic edentulous maxilla: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrophic edentulous maxilla is a debilitating condition caused by the progressive and irreversible bone resorption following loss of teeth, that results in bone of inadequate volume and density. This makes conventional implant therapy extremely challenging without complex reconstructive procedures. Several techniques such as sinus augmentation, short implants, and tilted implants have been used for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla. In recent years, zygomatic implants have emerged as a graftless rehabilitation technique. However, few studies compare zygomatic-implant fixed rehabilitation with other fixed rehabilitation techniques. The existing body of evidence on zygomatic implants is largely based on clinical and disease-oriented outcomes.

METHODS

A network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted in order to compare the effectiveness of zygomatic-implant fixed rehabilitation with the other rehabilitation techniques. Experimental and observational studies comparing different implant-assisted fixed rehabilitation in adults with atrophic maxilla will be included. The primary and secondary outcomes will be patient's satisfaction and quality of life respectively. Additional outcomes include the implant's survival/success, and biological and prosthetic complications. An electronic search will be performed through various databases for articles in English and French, without time limits. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized controlled trials, and ROBINS-I for non-randomized and observational studies. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts and extract data. Any discrepancy between reviewers will be discussed and resolved through consensus or with the help of a third reviewer. Pairwise meta-analyses will be performed using a random effects model. I2, τ2, transitivity, subgroup/meta-regression analyses will assess and explain heterogeneity and distribution of effect modifiers. A network plot will be created to connect the different interventions directly and indirectly. Interventions will be ranked using the surface under cumulative ranking curve. Confidence in the results of the NMA will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

DISCUSSION

This study will be the first to assess the effectiveness of zygomatic-implant fixed rehabilitation for the atrophic maxilla using NMA. The evidence obtained will aid clinical decision-making and will advance the knowledge of the rehabilitation techniques for the atrophic maxilla.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023353303.

Zygoma implant under function: biomechanical principles clarified

PURPOSE

The purpose of this document is to clarify the biomechanical principles involved when zygoma implants are placed under functional loads.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers conducted electronic search of the literature from January 2000 to February 2023 describing the biomechanical principles involved using the zygoma implant for maxillary reconstruction. Articles describing the stresses within the zygoma implant, the maxillary bone and the zygoma bone under functional loads were included.

RESULTS

The lack of maxillary boney support at the implant platform resulted in significant higher stress measured within the zygoma implant as well as the zygoma bone.

CONCLUSION

The maxilla is the primary support when zygoma implants are placed under functional loads. Quad-cortical stabilization of the zygoma implants and their cross-arch stabilization are recommended to reduce the degree of stress whenever possible.

Facts to Consider in Developing Materials That Emulate the Upper Jawbone: A Microarchitecture Study Showing Unique Characteristics at Four Different Sites

The maxilla is generally acknowledged as being more trabecular than the mandible. Allograft currently available for use in the maxillofacial region is harvested from the hip and long bones, irrespective of their local characteristics, and grafted onto the jawbones. Other alternative are autograft or commercially available bone substitutes. Due to their inherent differences, an in-depth understanding of the bone microarchitecture is important to develop the most compatible graft for use at the maxilla. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the microstructures of bone harvested from different sites of the maxilla, to be used for standard setting. Forty-nine specimens from seven human cadavers were harvested from the zygomatic buttress, anterior maxillary sinus wall, anterior nasal spine and anterior palate. Each bone block, measuring of 10 mm × 5 mm, was harvested using rotary instruments. Bone analysis was performed following micro-computed tomography to obtain trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and bone volume fraction (BV/TV). There were site-related differences, with BV/TV that ranged between 37.38% and 85.83%. The Tb.N was the lowest at the palate (1.12 (mm−1)) and highest at the anterior maxillary sinus wall (1.41 (mm−1)) region. The palate, however, had the highest trabecular separation value (Tb.Sp) at 0.47 mm. The TB.Th was the lowest at the anterior nasal spine (0.34 mm) but both the zygoma and anterior maxillary sinus regions shared the highest Tb.Th (0.44 mm). Except for having the lowest Th.Sp (0.35 mm), the anterior maxillary sinus wall consistently showed higher values together with the zygomatic buttress in all other parameters. Concurring with current clinical practice of harvesting autograft from the zygomatic buttress and anterior maxillary sinus wall, their bony characteristic serve as the microarchitecture standard to adopt when developing new bone graft materials for use in the maxilla.

Zygomatic approach with single-piece implants: A technical note

Single piece zygomatic implant, or a remote anchorage implant, is an effective tool for the rehabilitation of the atrophic/resected jaws with least postoperative complications such as screw loosening, screw fractures, bone loss, mucositis, and peri implantitis. The aim of this paper was to summarize a technique for the use of a zygomatic approach for single piece implants. We used the key-words 'single piece implants” and the search revealed 700 papers in the PubMed database. After screening through the abstracts, we selected 50 articles that we finally reviewed. Zygomatic fixtures avoid the grafting procedures and cantilever situation, restoration of atrophic or postablative jaws are completed with immediate loading. It is advisable placement of zygomatic implant flapless with surgical guide, but the author believes more on the tactile perception and when the splint is at mucosal or bone level, a small change in orientation will lead the dramatic error in desired angulation leading to unwanted complication.

Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt-Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of micromotion of dental implants under immediate loading supported by Titanium (Ti) and Cobalt‐Chrome (Co‐Cr) superstructures.

Material and methods

A model of tridimensional half‐edentulous maxilla with three dental implants was made using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Two standard and one zygomatic implants were connected to a superstructure with an elliptic section of 6x 3 mm (mm). Two study models were established. Model A: Titanium (Ti) alloy superstructure; Model B: Cobalt‐Chrome (Co‐Cr) alloy superstructure. To simulate an immediate‐loading situation, a friction coefficient of 0.71 was applied between the implant and the bone surface. An axial load of 252.04 [N] was applied on standard and zygomatic implants.

Results

The Micromotion of dental implants was similar in both superstructure situations. The amount of micromotion was slightly higher in B1 and B3 models (Co‐Cr alloy‐superstructure) compared with A1 and A3 models (Titanium alloy superstructure). The micromotion values in two groups were greater than 150 μm in the incisive region (standard implant) and molar region (zygomatic). In general, the micromotion was higher on the implant that received the load with respect to the other implants. The greater difference was observed when the load was applied on the standard implant A1 (Model A1 = 189.12 μm) compared with standard implant B1(Model B1 = 263.25 μm).

Conclusions

Within the limits of present study, all implants on different load application points showed micromotion; in general, the amount of micromotion was slightly higher in the implants connected with Co‐Cr alloy superstructure.

Platform switch hybrid zygoma implants improve prosthetics and marginal bone protection after extra-sinus placement

PURPOSE

The aim of our studdy is clinical evaluation of Platform switch hybrid zygoma implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

117 zygomatic implants were followed up during this time. They included 55 Brånemark System zygoma implants, 38 Noris implants, and 24 novel iRES hybrid implants with platform switch.

RESULTS

Bone quality and quantity are the prerequisite for successful implant treatment. Zygomatic implants are intended for patients with severely resorbed maxilla that cannot accommodate conventional implants without prior extensive bone grafting. Such regenerative procedures, like sinus lifts, prolong implant rehabilitation to several months (12-18). Furthermore, extensive grafts are less predictable showing varying degrees of graft resorption. Zygoma implants enable full, often immediate, reconstruction of the upper dental arch without the need for sinus lift treatment. The original zygoma protocol runs the implants through the sinus, requires general anesthesia, and positions the prosthetic platform of the implants on the palate, which makes prosthesis cumbersome. It also induces risk for post-op sinusitis. Extra-sinus approach with novel zygoma hybrid implants bypasses sinuses and positions the implant prosthetic platform on the crest allowing for same good prosthetics as on conventional dental implants. Furthermore, crestal threads and a platform-switch, of the novel zygoma design, increase implant anchorage and minimize marginal bone loss. The study presents evolution of zygoma implant rehabilitation protocol and zygoma implant design in our clinical practice over 15 years (2004-2019).

CONCLUSION

Extra-sinus zygomatic implant placement lowers the risk of post-op sinusitis and makes procedure possible to be done in local anesthesia.

Three-dimensional descriptive study of the pterygomaxillary region related to pterygoid implants: A retrospective study

The objective of this study was to analyze three-dimensionally the morphological characteristics of the pterygomaxillary region related to pterygoid implants. Volume, height, width and bone density were studied in relation to age, sex and dental status. This retrospective observational study analyzed the CBCT of 52 hemi-maxillas three-dimensionally (females n = 28, males n = 24; dentate = 31, edentulous = 21). Patients were exposed between September 2009 and October 2014, and data collection was performed between November 2015 and May 2016. Bone density, volume, height and width were analyzed in various locations of the maxilla and pterygoid process, and the variables age, gender and dental status patients were compared. The results show that the mean width of the pterygomaxillary joint was 7.5 mm (SD 1.00 mm), mean height was 12.51 mm (SD 1,82 mm) and mean volume was 321.7 mm³ (SD 142.02 mm³). Statistically significant differences between dentate and edentulous patients were found, showing a higher osseous density in dentate patients in the pterygoid process (758.2, SD 106.8, 95% CI 729.2 to 787.3 GSD - Gray Scale Density - compared to 689.9, SD 107.3, 95% CI 660.8 to 719.1 GSD; P = 0.022). In the maxilla, density was statistically significant lower in female subjects (571.0, SD 74.1, 95% CI 594.9 to 645.4 GSD) than in male subjects (620.2, SD 93.8, 95% CI 594.4 to 645.4 GSD, P = 0.047). In conclusion, due to the significant variation in the morphological characteristics of the pterygomaxillary region among subjects, personalized pre-surgical radiological assessment should always be performed. Gender, age and dental status are critical factors as they significantly affect bone density in this region.

Extra-Sinus Zygomatic Implants to Avoid Chronic Sinusitis and Prosthetic Arch Malposition: 12 Years of Experience

This report retrospectively at the 12-year follow-up results of the treatment and rehabilitation of edentulous maxillae, applying extra-sinus zygomatic implants alone or in combination with intra-sinus zygomatic implants. We recruited 22 patients with 35 zygomatic Brånemark system implants; 24 implants in the standard Brånemark protocol through the sinus and 11 extra-sinus implants outside the sinus. Additionally, 147 regular implants were placed. The minimum follow-up period was 50 months to a maximum of 152 months. The zygoma survival rate after 12 years was 97.15%. Chronic sinusitis occurred in 11.42% of patients. We lost 1 (2.85%) zygomatic implant placed through the sinus and none of those in the extra-sinus position. The survival rate of the regular implants was 93.87%. Chronic sinusitis occurred in 4 patients (11.42%) who received zygomatic implants using standard protocol through the sinus. None of the extra-sinus zygoma patients developed sinusitis. Peri-implantitis was detected with only 3 zygomatic implants. In the original P-I Brånemark zygoma protocol the implants were passing through the sinus, which resulted in chronic sinusitis in some patients and malposition of the prosthetic platform toward the palate. These complications can be avoided by the extra-sinus placement of zygoma implants as demonstrated in this study.

Zygomatic Implants: The Impact of Zygoma Bone Support on Biomechanics

Maxillectomy and severely resorbed maxilla are challenging to restore with provision of removable prostheses. Dental implants are essential to restore esthetics and function and subsequently quality of life in such group of patients. Zygomatic implants reduce the complications associated with bone grafting procedures and simplify the rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla and maxillectomy. The purpose of this study was to compare, by means of 3-dimensional finite element analysis, the impact of different zygomatic bone support (10, 15, and 20 mm) on the biomechanics of zygomatic implants. Results indicated that maximum stresses within the fixture were increased by 3 times when bone support decreased from 20 to 10 mm and were concentrated at the fixture/bone interface. However, stresses within the abutment screw and the abutment itself were not significantly different regardless of the bone support level. Supporting bone at 10 mm sustained double the stresses of 15 and 20 mm. Fixture's deflection was decreased by 2 to 3 times when bone support level increased to 15 mm and 20 mm, respectively. It was concluded that zygomatic bone support should not be less than 15 mm, and abutment screw is not at risk of fracture regardless of the zygomatic bone support.

Zygoma implant reconstruction of acquired maxillary bony defects

The reconstruction of acquired maxillary bony defects after pathologic ablation, infectious debridement, avulsive trauma, or previously failed reconstructions with zygoma implants represents a treatment alternative that is safe, predictable, and cost-effective. Still the single most important factor for treatment success of these complex reconstructions is the implementation of a team approach between the surgeon and the restorative dentist. The focus of this article is to review the surgical and prosthetic nuances to successfully reconstruct acquired maxillary defects with zygoma implants.

[Zygomatic anchorage concept in full edentulism]

The zygoma anchorage concept for severe atrophy of the maxilla was developed by Brånemark in the 1980s. It concerned patients having undergone maxillectomy as well as patients with edentulous upper jaws and mild to severe maxillary atrophy. The concept was created and clinically developed in 1997, by placing two zygomatic implants and four standard ones to compensate sub-sinus bone resorption. It was applied later to patients presenting extremely severe maxillary atrophy, using the "zygoma quad" concept with the placement of four zygomatic implants. Zygoma anchorage is reliable in terms of osseo-integration and biomechanical support of screwed prostheses, according to frequently published data (overall survival rate ranging between 91 and 100%). The increasing practice of immediate loading makes it the treatment of choice for oral rehabilitation. It decreases surgical invasiveness and the delay between surgery and oral rehabilitation. It allows a quick social and professional reinsertion and increases the comfort and quality of life for patients with fully edentulous maxilla with mild, moderate, or severe atrophy.

Concise review: personalized human bone grafts for reconstructing head and face

Regeneration of normal shape, architecture, and function of craniofacial tissues following congenital abnormality, trauma, or surgical treatment presents special problems to tissue engineering. Because of the great variations in properties of these tissues, currently available treatment options fall short of adequate care. We propose that the engineering of personalized bone graft customized to the patient and the specific clinical condition would revolutionize the way we currently treat craniofacial defects and discuss some of the current and emerging treatment modalities.

Zygomatic implant placement with flapless computer-guided surgery: a proposed clinical protocol

PURPOSE

The aim of the present report is to describe a procedure for zygomatic implant placement using image-guided implant surgery. This is an innovative technique and includes a new clinical approach to provide the direction to guide drilling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ethical committee of the University of Genoa approved the study. All patients had clinical indications of severe maxillary atrophy (Class 4 Cadwood-Howell). A total of 25 implants were placed, of which 17 were in the premaxilla, 7 in the zygomatic area, and 1 in the pterygoid bone. The treatment was performed in 2 phases. The first phase included cone-beam acquisition to exclude sinus disease and evaluate the anatomy of the residual premaxillary bone in 3 dimensions. The success of osseointegration achieved by the primary implants (PIs) was confirmed after temporary loading and before proceeding with the second phase, in which all patients were scheduled for zygomatic implants. A total of 3 or 4 regular platform MK III implants (17 in all) were placed in the premaxilla using conventional implant surgery. A model within the analogs of the PIs was prepared (master model), taking a conventional impression. Next, a radiologic template was prepared on the same master model and stabilized on the PIs, using dedicated prosthetic components. The guide was screwed onto the PIs during computed tomography acquisition to determine a fixed and repeatable position of the guide. In the second phase, after routine planning, a mucosa-supported stereolithographic SurgiGuide with sleeves for the zygomatic implants and the corresponding stereolithographic model, including the mucosa, were received from the manufacturers. The guide was repositioned on the master model to replace the sleeves for the PIs in the same position. With an original customized surgical kit, including an innovative intrasinus device, we next simulated surgery on the stereolithographic model to determine and control the direction of the osteotomies and the final depth of drilling. The SurgiGuide was anchored onto the PIs before the zygomatic osteotomy, after which flapless surgery was performed to place the zygomatic implants according to the plan.

RESULTS

Two PIs in the premaxillary area failed (and were replaced before the zygomatic step). No zygomatic implants failed. The follow-up examinations at 4 to 39 months showed good esthetic, phonetic, and functional results.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the proposed surgical procedure appear to be encouraging. Although it is difficult to achieve the correct driven angle of osteotomies for zygomatic implants, in all patients we achieved correct zygomatic positioning, in agreement with previous planning. Additional research and randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the predictability of the procedure.

Accuracy evaluation of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in zygomatic implant placement in human cadavers

Presurgical planning is essential to achieve esthetic and functional implants. For implant planning and placement, the association of computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) techniques furnishes some advantages regarding tridimensional determination of the patient's anatomy and fabrication of both anatomic models and surgical guides. The goal of this clinical study was to determine the angular deviations between planned and placed zygomatic implants using stereolithographic surgical guides in human cadavers. A total of 16 zygomatic implants were placed, 4 in each cadaver, with the use of stereolithographic (SLA) surgical guides generated by computed tomography (CT). A new CT scan was made after implant insertion. The angle between the long axis of the planned and actual implants was calculated. The mean angular deviation of the long axis between the planned and placed implants was 8.06 ± 6.40 (mean ± SD) for the anterior-posterior view, and 11.20 ± 9.75 (mean ± SD) for the caudal-cranial view. Use of the zygomatic implant, in the context of this protocol, should probably be reevaluated because some large deviations were noted. An implant insertion guiding system is needed because this last step is carried out manually. It is recommended that the sinus slot technique should be used together with the CT-based drilling guide to enhance final results. Further research to enhance the precision of zygomatic implant placement should be undertaken.

Anatomical bases for the insertion of zygomatic implants

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to obtain anatomical information for installing four zygomatic implants, by measurements of maxillae and zygomata.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Linear and angular measurements were obtained from the maxillae and zygomata of 40 dry skulls.

RESULTS

Based on mean and standard deviation values, the installation angle of the additional implant in the four zygoma technique was between 25 degrees and 47 degrees , and that of the conventional zygomatic implant was between 39 degrees and 62 degrees . The distance between the alveolar crest in the canine region and the lateral margin of the orbital socket was 53.42 mm, and between the alveolar crest in the premolar region and the area closest to the lateral margin of the orbital socket was 42.47 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

When the angle of installation of the additional implant is less than 25 degrees and that of the conventional zygomatic implant is less than 39 degrees , perforation of the maxilla, zygoma, or the infratemporal fossa must be avoided. When the angle of installation of an additional implant is greater than 47 degrees and that of the conventional zygomatic implant is greater than 62 degrees , perforation of the orbital floor must be avoided. The length of an additional implant was greater than the length of a conventional zygomatic implant, and should be measured prior to drilling, because the greatest value found for this distance was 61.94 mm, while the maximum length of the zygomatic implants currently available on the market is 52.5 mm.

Immediate function in the atrophic maxilla using zygoma implants: a preliminary study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Oral rehabilitation of the edentulous atrophic maxilla to allow placement of a fixed dental prosthesis remains a challenge, especially if immediate function is provided.

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective, preliminary study was to evaluate, after a period of a 6 to 29 months' follow-up of prosthetic loading, the survival rate of 36 immediately loaded zygomatic implants placed in 18 atrophied maxillae.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighteen consecutive patients (6 men and 12 women), with an average age of 58 years (range of 44-74 years), were followed up to 29 months (average of 14 months). The clinical criteria included stability of the implants and the prosthesis, resonance frequency analysis (RFA), and evaluation of swelling, pain, or discomfort. Radiographic analysis was completed for conventional implants, but not for zygoma implants. All patients had a fixed prosthesis screwed onto implants within 48 hours after implant placement. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

No zygomatic implants were lost over the observation period. Survival rate was 100% over an average 14-month observation period. Three conventional implants were lost, resulting in a survival rate of 95.6%. All the provisional prostheses were stable, and no relevant complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of zygoma implants, together with conventional implants, in severely resorbed maxilla, appears to be a reliable technique for providing immediate function to patients.

Three-dimensional finite elemental analysis of zygomatic implants in craniofacial structures

The objective of this study was to analyse stress distribution in craniofacial structures around zygomatic osseointegrated implants. An integrated system for Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data were utilized to create a three-dimensional model of craniofacial structures. The amount and distribution of the main stresses were compared using three-dimensional finite elemental analysis. The system allowed visual confirmation and analysis of stress distribution as well as the convenient and simple construction of a digital biomechanical model that provided details of anatomical structures in the regions of interest. Zygomatic implants with or without connected implants supporting the superstructure were compared. Stresses in severely resorbed maxillae with connected implants were not concentrated around the alveolar bone supporting the zygomatic implants. Stresses where there were no connected implants tended to be generated in the zygomatic bone, at the middle part of the zygomatic implant and at the joint of the fixture-abutment. Stress due to occlusal forces is mainly supported by the zygomatic bone, is transferred predominantly through the infrazygomatic crest, and is divided between the frontal and temporal processes of the zygomatic bone in different directions.