Head and Neck Keloid: Treatment by Core Excision and Delayed Intralesional Injection of Steroid

Artificial keloid skin models: understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms and application in therapeutic studies

Keloid is a type of scar formed by the overexpression of extracellular matrix substances from fibroblasts following inflammation after trauma. The existing keloid treatment methods include drug injection, surgical intervention, light exposure, cryotherapy, etc. However, these methods have limitations such as recurrence, low treatment efficacy, and side effects. Consequently, studies are being conducted on the treatment of keloids from the perspective of inflammatory mechanisms. In this study, keloid models are created to understand inflammatory mechanisms and explore treatment methods to address them. While previous studies have used animal models with gene mutations, chemical treatments, and keloid tissue transplantation, there are limitations in fully reproducing the characteristics of keloids unique to humans, and ethical issues related to animal welfare pose additional challenges. Consequently, studies are underway to create in vitro artificial skin models to simulate keloid disease and apply them to the development of treatments for skin diseases. In particular, herein, scaffold technologies that implement three-dimensional (3D) full-thickness keloid models are introduced to enhance mechanical properties as well as biological properties of tissues, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and cellular interactions. It is anticipated that applying these technologies to the production of artificial skin for keloid simulation could contribute to the development of inflammatory keloid treatment techniques in the future.

Efficacy and Safety of Excision Combination Therapies for Earlobe Keloids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Different combinations of excision and adjuvant therapies have been applied to improve outcomes for earlobe keloids, though evidence in this field is still lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to systematically investigate efficacy and safety of these treatments.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to find all relevant studies. Meta-analysis of recurrence rates (RRs) and adverse event rates with 95% confidence intervals, and individual participants data (IPD) were calculated for each intervention when possible. Otherwise, narrative syntheses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 85 articles, covering 23 treatments for earlobe keloids, were included, indicating a preference for multiple combination therapy. The estimated RRs for 6 interventions (i.e., excision monotherapy, combinations of excision with imiquimod, pressure therapy, radiotherapy, steroids, and steroids with pressure therapy) appeared to be comparable. Electron radiotherapy was found to have potential advantages over X-ray treatment, contributing to the observed heterogeneity. Further meta-analysis using IPD revealed that both combination therapies of excision plus steroid therapy (p=0.003) and excision plus radiotherapy (p=0.003) yielded better recurrence-free survival compared to excision alone. The median recurrence-free interval for combination therapy was 10 months. Adverse event rates were similar among different intervention groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that combining excision with radiotherapy or perioperative steroid therapy has the potential to improve prognosis of earlobe keloids without increasing the risk of adverse events. Overall evaluation of patients' conditions and further studies with sufficient follow-up are warranted for clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Selective therapy (cryo or scalpel) combined with multimodal therapy for treating keloids

Background

Keloids are less responsive to any single treatment modality; hence, there is a need for combination therapy that can yield satisfactory outcomes.

Objective

The present study assessed efficacy and safety of combination therapy-surgical excision or cryotherapy and intralesional corticosteroids along with 5-fluorouracil [IL (S + 5-FU)] injection, followed by silicone gel sheet (SGS) under compression therapy in the treatment of keloids.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective, observational study comprising 21 clinically diagnosed keloid patients. All patients were treated with the stated combination therapy. Data about demographic, lesions, procedural characteristics, and treatment outcomes were reported.

Results

Of 21, 11 (52.4%) patients were treated with liquid nitrogen (LN2) cryotherapy, and 10 (47.6%) patients were treated with surgical excision. Mean age was 30.8 ± 7.6 (range: 14-44) years with slight male (52.4%) predominance. A mean surface area of keloid lesion was 96.8 ± 170.5 cm3. The most frequently involved site was auricle (8 [38.1%] patients). Patients received the following types of treatments: intralesional LN2 cryotherapy (6 [28.6%]), intralesional excisional surgery (6 [28.6%]), surface LN2 cryotherapy (5 [23.8%]), and extralesional excisional surgery (4 [19.0%]). Complications of recurrence (2 [9.5%]), secondary infections (2 [9.5%]), persistent postinflammatory hypopigmentation (1 [4.8%]), and atrophic scarring with postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (1 [4.8%]) were reported. After a study period of 2.5 years, 100% cure rate was achieved.

Conclusion

Combination therapy of surgical excision or cryotherapy and IL (S + 5-FU), followed by SGS under compression, was safe and effective in treating keloids.

Recurrence and Complications of Peri-operative Steroid Injection of Keloids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Keloid scars are a particularly challenging fibroproliferative wound healing disorder with a variety of proposed management approaches including concurrent surgery and intralesional steroid injection. We aimed to identify the optimum time for triamcinolone injection of keloids, by comparing the recurrence and complication occurrence in patients who received pre-, intra- or post-operative injection. Studies reporting on the rate of recurrence and complication occurrence following treatment of keloid scarring with concurrent surgical excision and intralesional steroid injection were identified from the PubMed, Web of science and Embase databases. The I-squared (I2) statistic was used to quantify the variability in study estimates due to heterogeneity and to determine whether the fixed or random effect models will be employed. Publication bias was visualized through funnel plots and tested with the Egger's test. We found that the recurrence rate was significantly lower with post-operative injection compared to intra-operative injection (p < 0.001) and pre-operative injection (p = 0.009). A significant difference between intra-operative and pre-operative injection was not found (p = 0.46). In conclusion, post-operative steroid injection after surgical excision results in lower keloid recurrence compared to pre- and intra-operative injection.Level of Evidence IV "This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ."

Keloid Intralesional Excision Reduces Recurrence: A Meta-analytic Study of the Available Literature on 608 Keloids

Background

The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the effectiveness of keloid intralesional excision (KILE) in preventing recurrence. Treatment of keloids using surgical excision alone leads to high rates of recurrence. To date, there are no widely accepted guidelines for keloid treatment, and a multitude of adjunctive therapies are used to reduce recurrence. Despite these efforts, recurrence remains high. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of the existing literature on KILE to determine its role in recurrence reduction.

Methods

A literature review using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed. Two authors independently evaluated studies for eligibility. Incidence of keloid recurrence was recorded, and a comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to assess the pooled keloid recurrence rate, as well as the effect of additional therapies.

Results

Twenty-two studies evaluating intralesional excision of 608 keloids were included in the study. Average time to follow-up was 19.2 months (range 6-35 months). A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted, demonstrating a pooled recurrence rate of 13% (95% confidence interval, 9%-16%). There was no evidence that using therapies in addition to KILE had a significant effect on the overall pooled recurrence rate.

Conclusions

A meta-analysis of 608 keloids shows that KILE is an effective technique in preventing keloid recurrence, with a pooled recurrence rate of 13% compared with previously reported rates of 45%-100% after complete excision. Although there are no standard guidelines for keloid treatment, our meta-analysis shows that KILE is promising in recurrence reduction.

Comparative Efficacy of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide and 5-Fluorouracil for Keloid Scars

Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC; a synthetic corticosteroid) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; a cytotoxic chemotherapy drug) are the medications most commonly used to treat keloid scars. We investigated the clinical efficacy of TAC compared with 5-FU. We included 40 patients in the study and divided them into two equal groups ( n = 20 Group A; n = 20 Group B). Group A patients received 4 mg/cm 2 or 0.1 ml/cm 2 of intralesional TAC (40 mg/ml) at 3-week intervals. Group B patients received 10 mg/cm 2 or 0.2 ml/cm 2 of intralesional 5-FU (50 mg/ml) at 3-week intervals. We assessed the scar using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), visual analog scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction score (PSS). We found that Group A patients had a lower VAS than Group B patients (2.09 vs. 3.18). We saw a reduction in the VSS in both treatment arms; however, we found that Group B patients had a more marked reduction in the VSS compared with Group A patients (2.57 vs. 2.68). The PSS was higher in Group A than in Group B (1.97 vs. 1.78). We concluded that intralesional 5-FU elicits a better response than intralesional TAC. Although 5-FU is less well tolerated and has more side effects than TAC, we found that 5-FU was more effective in resolving keloid scars. Notably, the PSS was higher in the TAC group, but the VSS and VAS were better in Group B.

A Novel Method of Steroid Delivery to Improve the Efficacy of Intralesional Injection in Keloid Treatment

BACKGROUND

Keloids are a chronic disease and cause pain, pruritus, and limitation of motion. Intralesional corticosteroid injection is the first-line treatment, but its effects can be limited, even with repeated injections.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of a tunneling method of corticosteroid injection compared with conventional intralesional injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of keloid patients treated with intralesional corticosteroid injection by conventional and tunneling methods.

RESULTS

A total of 119 cases of keloid were included in the study. Among 78 patients treated with 20 mg/mL triamcinolone, the Investigators' Global Assessment effectiveness score and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS) score were significantly higher in the tunneling group than the conventional group at 1 month. At 6 months, the tunneling group showed significantly higher effectiveness in the OSAS score than the conventional group. In the tunneling group, the interval between treatments was significantly longer than in the conventional group. The occurrence of side effects was lower in the tunneling method group than in the conventional method group.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals the benefits of the tunneling method over the conventional method for therapeutic effect and side effects in keloid treatment.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Keloids

Radiotherapy is one of the therapeutic methods for keloids, and the irradiation technique has innovated from superficial X-ray to brachytherapy after decades of clinical practice. At present, the application of adjuvant radiotherapy has been widely accepted by clinicians, while the consensus of optimal adjuvant radiotherapy strategies for keloids has not been reached. Factors such as radiation timing, dose, fractions, and lesion locations may be associated with the clinical outcomes of patients with keloids after radiotherapy while a comprehensive review is lacking. Herein, this review summarized the published literature of adjuvant radiotherapy for keloids involving mechanism, timing, dose, fractions, and complications, etc., which may facilitate clinical decision making.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Substrate-independent polymer coating with stimuli-responsive dexamethasone release for on-demand fibrosis inhibition

Tissue fibrosis caused by implantation of tissue engineering scaffolds is an urgent problem in clinical research. In this work, a substrate-independent coating with on-demand release of an antifibrotic drug has been fabricated to effectively address this issue. This coating was formed through a substrate-independent layer-by-layer (LBL) technique via a cationic polyelectrolyte (poly-diallyldimethylammonium, PDDA) and an anionic polyelectrolyte (poly-styrenesulfonate, PSS), where parts of PSS and PDDA were physically replaced by carboxyl functionalized polyethylene glycol grafted onto antifibrotic drug dexamethasone (DEX-PEG-COOH). Considering the easy generation of local inflammation after implantation, an ester bond was designed between PEG-COOH and DEX. Therefore, the overexpressed esterase under inflammatory conditions hydrolyzes the ester bond and thereby releases DEX from the film to inhibit fibrosis occurring in the tissue repair process. The in vivo capacity of this coating to restrain tissue fibrosis was investigated by a skin defect model using porous polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds as substrates. The experimental results showed that the fibrosis-related proteins (Col-I, TGF-β and fibronectin) and the infiltration of myofibroblasts (α-SMA) of skin tissues in the coated PCL scaffold group were significantly lower than those in the blank control group and pure PCL scaffold group. Moreover, the histological evaluations showed that the coating group could significantly decrease the deposition of collagen and meanwhile promote the partial regeneration of skin appendages. These results successfully demonstrate that the universal coating prepared with a simple protocol would be an effective strategy to address the fibrosis issues during tissue engineering.

Keloids: Which Types Can Be Excised without Risk of Recurrence? A New Clinical Classification

A surgical team from Interplast-Germany removed 387 keloids in 302 patients during 4 visits to Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo, from 2015-2018. Preoperative and postoperative photographs and a thorough anamnesis of keloids were done for all patients. In addition, 18 selected biopsies from 4 types of keloids were histologically examined in Germany.

Methods

Treatment options were tested and keloid recurrence rates were compared with data from questionnaires, photographs, and histology.

Results

Keloids were classified accordingly as follows: (1) fresh nodular (continuously growing) keloids had a 30% recurrence rate after surgery: no common adjuvant therapy but triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) injections on onset, only; (a) earlobe keloids had the lowest recurrence rate after complete excision with negative resection margins; (2) superficial spreading (or butterfly) keloids were treated with TAC injections only; (3) mature (nongrowing or burned-out) keloids had also a low recurrence rate of 4.5%, which were then treated with TAC on onset, only; and (4) multiple keloids comprise various types in different stages.

Conclusions

According to this classification, about 50% of keloids may be removed surgically without risk of recurrence in the examined patient population in Africa, where only TAC injections, but no radiation, are available. Adjuvant TAC or radiation should be started at the onset of recurrence and not generally.

Keloids: Current and emerging therapies

Keloids are pathological scars that grow over time and extend beyond the initial site of injury after impaired wound healing. These scars frequently recur and rarely regress. They are aesthetically disfiguring, can cause pain, itching, discomfort as well as psychological stress, often affecting quality of life. Many treatment modalities, including surgical and non-surgical, have been explored and have been reported to be beneficial; however, none have been absolutely satisfactory or optimal for the treatment of all keloid subtypes to date. This poses a major challenge to clinicians. Often, a combinational therapeutic approach appears to offer the best results with higher patient satisfaction compared to monotherapy. The aetiopathogenesis of keloids is not fully elucidated; however, with recent advances in molecular biology and genetics, insight is being gained on the complex process of scar formation and hence new therapeutic and management options for keloids. In this paper, we explore the literature and summarise the general concepts surrounding keloid development and review both current (corticosteroids, surgical excision, silicone-based products, pressure therapy, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, laser therapy, imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil) and emerging (stem cell therapy, mitomycin C, verapamil, interferons, bleomycin, botulinum toxin type A and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) treatments. Increased knowledge and understanding in this area may potentially lead to the discovery and development of novel therapeutic options that are more efficacious for all keloid types.

LAY SUMMARY

Keloids are problematic scars that are difficult to treat and manage. The aetiopathogenesis of keloids is not clear; however, recent advances in molecular biology and genetics are beginning to shed light on the underlying mechanisms implicated in keloid scar formation which will hopefully lead to the development of treatment options for all keloid types. This review summarises current and emerging therapies.

Intralesional triamcinolone alone or in combination with botulinium toxin A is ineffective for the treatment of formed keloid scar: A double blind controlled pilot study

Cutaneous injury can ignite excessive fibroproliferative growth that results in keloid formation. Keloids are associated with significant morbidity related to disfigurement and/or symptoms (e.g., pain and pruritus). First-line treatment of formed keloids involves topical or intralesional steroids. Recurrent or resistant keloids are managed by surgical excision or cryotherapy, followed by steroidal application or adjuvant irradiation. Although adjuvant irradiation appears to be most efficacious, alternative therapeutic options are needed for patients without access to radiation centers. Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) appears to have similar inhibitory effects to irradiation on the cell cycle via downregulation of pathogenic cytokines. Herein, we conducted a study to compare the efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone used alone, or in combination with BTA, in the treatment of formed keloid scars. Twenty patients with a cumulative of 40 keloids completed the study. There was no significant difference between treatment arms with respect to height vascularization, pliability, and pigmentation scores. The addition of BTA resulted in significant symptomatic improvement of pain and pruritus as compared to intralesional triamcinolone alone (p < 0.001). Irradiation is only effective when administered in the adjuvant setting where inhibitory effects on cell cycle and migration are optimized. Future studies with intralesional triamcinolone and BTA should be performed adjuvantly.

Intralesional excision as a surgical strategy to manage keloid scars: what's the evidence?

INTRODUCTION

Keloid scars are a particularly challenging clinical entity and a variety of management approaches have been described in the literature including intralesional surgery. The current literature lacks a summative review to ascertain the evidence base behind this surgical approach.

METHODS

A comprehensive English literature database search was performed using PubMed Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science from their individual dates of inception to March 2018. We present the different rationales proposed for the use of this technique, the clinical outcomes reported in the literature as well as the scientific basis for intralesional excision of keloid scars.

DISCUSSION

A number of arguments have been proposed to support intralesional excision including avoiding injury to neighbouring non-keloidal skin and the deep layer of the dermis, removal of the most proliferative fibroblastic group as well as debulking to facilitate the administration of injectable steroid. The most current literature does not provide sufficient support for the adoption of intralesional excisions based on data emerging from basic science as well as clinical outcome studies.

CONCLUSION

Emerging evidence supports the extralesional excision of keloid scars based on current mechanobiological, histological as well as clinical outcome data. Further trials comparing extralesional and intralesional surgical practices are eagerly awaited to ascertain the role of intralesional excisions in the keloid management arena.

Keloid Skin Flap Retention and Resurfacing in Facial Keloid Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Facial keloids commonly occur in young patients. Multiple keloid masses often converge into a large lesion on the face, representing a significant obstacle to keloid mass excision and reconstruction. We describe a new surgical method that excises the keloid mass and resurfaces the wound by saving the keloid skin as a skin flap during facial keloid treatment.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with facial keloids were treated in our department between January 2013 and January 2016. Multiple incisions were made along the facial esthetic line on the keloid mass. The keloid skin was dissected and elevated as a skin flap with one or two pedicles. The scar tissue in the keloid was then removed through the incision. The wound was covered with the preserved keloid skin flap and closed without tension. Radiotherapy and hyperbaric oxygen were applied after surgery. Patients underwent follow-up examinations 6 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 45 total patients, 32 patients were cured and seven patients were partially cured. The efficacy rate was 88.9%, and 38 patients (84.4%) were satisfied with the esthetic result.

CONCLUSION

We describe an efficacious and esthetically satisfactory surgical method for managing facial keloids by preserving the keloid skin as a skin flap.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comparison of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide, 5-Fluorouracil, and Their Combination for the Treatment of Keloids

Objective: Despite the myriad options available, there is no universally accepted treatment for keloids. Our objective was to compare three regimens and establish superiority in terms of objective and subjective outcomes. Approach: In this randomized parallel group study, 60 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to three groups. Patients received intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) in Group TAC, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in Group 5FU, and a combination in Group T + F every 3 weeks till 24 weeks or till the keloid resolved. Results: There was a reduction in all parameters at every successive assessment in all three groups. Improvement in terms of height, vascularity, and pliability was fastest with 5FU, TAC, and T + F group, respectively, which was statistically significant. Decrease in pigmentation was significantly faster with T+F. Reduction in pruritus, however, was significantly faster with 5FU than the other groups, but the difference in reduction of pain among the three groups was not significant. Telangiectasias and skin atrophy were seen most commonly in TAC group, while skin ulceration was a common problem in 5FU group. Conclusion: TAC, 5FU, and their combination are all effective in keloid scars. A combination of TAC +5FU seems to offer the balanced benefit of faster and more efficacious response with lesser adverse effects when compared to individual drugs.

Could 5-Fluorouracil or Triamcinolone Be an Effective Treatment Option for Keloid After Surgical Excision? A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

There is no universally accepted treatment regimen to decrease the recurrence rate of keloid formation after its removal, although many treatment options have been suggested. The purpose of this study was to investigate treatment options to prevent keloid recurrence after surgical excision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Predictor variables were 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or triamcinolone adjuvant therapy, and the outcome variable was keloid recurrence rate. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the studies and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used. Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot.

RESULTS

There were 1,224 publications identified; after screening, 5 were selected for review (1 retrospective cohort, 3 prospective cohorts, and 1 randomized controlled trial). The mean level of keloid recurrence was statistically lower in patients who received 5-FU compared with those who did not (control group; risk ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.75). Triamcinolone was ineffective in lowering the keloid recurrence (risk difference, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.28).

CONCLUSION

5-FU can be considered an effective treatment to decrease keloid recurrence after surgical excision, although further research, including a randomized controlled trial, is required.

The Use of Chemotherapeutics for the Treatment of Keloid Scars

Keloid scars are pathological scars, which develop as a result of exaggerated dermal tissue proliferation following cutaneous injury and often cause physical, psychological and cosmetic problems. Various theories regarding keloidogenesis exist, however the precise pathophysiological events remain unclear. Many different treatment modalities have been implicated in their management, but currently there is no entirely satisfactory method for treating all keloid lesions. We review a number of different chemotherapeutic agents which have been proposed for the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars while giving insight into some of the novel chemotherapeutic drugs which are currently being investigated. Non-randomized trials evaluating the influence of different chemotherapeutic agents, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); mitomycin C; bleomycin and steroid injection, either alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents or alternative treatment modalities, for the treatment of keloids were identified using a predefined PubMed search strategy. Twenty seven papers were identified. Scar improvement ≥50% was found in the majority of cases treated with 5-FU, with similar results found for mitomycin C, bleomycin and steroid injection. Combined intralesional 5-FU and steroid injection produced statistically significant improvements when compared to monotherapy. Monotherapy recurrence rates ranged from 0-47% for 5-FU, 0-15% for bleomycin and 0-50% for steroid injection. However, combined therapy in the form of surgical excision and adjuvant 5-FU or steroid injections demonstrated lower recurrence rates; 19% and 6% respectively. Currently, most of the literature supports the use of combination therapy (usually surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy) as the mainstay treatment of keloids, however further investigation is necessary to determine success rates over longer time frames. Furthermore, there is the potential for novel therapies, but further investigation is required to elucidate their true efficacy.

New insights on keloids, hypertrophic scars, and striae

This article presents an overview of the literature regarding treatments for keloid disease, hypertrophic scars, and striae distensae in dark pigmented skin. Striae, keloid, and hypertrophic scarring present a challenging problem for both the clinician and patient. No single therapy is advocated for hypertrophic scars, keloid scars, or striae distensae. New therapies have shown promise in the treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars, and in patients with dark pigmented skin. This article provides guidance on the assessment and determination of patients' suitability for certain treatment options, as well as advice on the follow-up of patients affected with problematic scarring and striae.

Pilot Study of the Efficacy of 578 nm Copper Bromide Laser Combined with Intralesional Corticosteroid Injection for Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars

Background

Treatments including intralesional corticosteroid injection, pressure therapy, cryotherapy, and various laser therapies have had limited success for keloids and hypertrophic scars.

Objective

This trial evaluated the efficacy of a combination of 578 nm copper bromide laser and the more traditional intralesional corticosteroid injection for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars with respect to scar color.

Methods

Keloids or hypertrophic scars of 12 Korean patients were treated five times by the combined treatment at 4-week intervals. Clinical improvement was assessed by the physicians' global assessment (PGA) comparing pre- and post-treatment photographs, as well as 4 weeks after the last treatment. Erythema intensity was quantified using a mexameter.

Results

Most scars showed significant clinical improvement in PGA and decreased erythema intensity after 5 treatments. All patients showed improvements in symptoms like pruritus.

Conclusion

The combined treatment is effective for keloids and hypertrophic scars, especially when the telangiectatic portion of the scars is prominent. The adjunctive use of 578 nm copper bromide laser decreased the telangiectatic side effects of an intralesional corticosteroid injection by reducing the vascular components of scars.

The management of helical rim keloids with excision, split thickness skin graft and intralesional triamcinolone acetonide

Keloids of the helical rim are disfiguring. A cosmetically acceptable reconstruction is difficult especially in moderate to large sized lesions because the helical rim is a 3-dimensional structure with curved and thin cartilage. We report our experience in the management of moderate (4-10 cm) and large (>10 cm) helical rim keloids in five patients. Six helical rim keloids were reconstructed. There were four moderate (4-10 cm) and two large (>10 cm) helical rim keloids. Four were on the right helix and two on the left helix. One patient had bilateral helical rim keloids. The follow-up period ranged from 6 months to 4 years. No secondary surgical revision was required to improve the contour of the reconstructed helical rim. The aesthetic results were satisfactory in all the patients.

Identification of steroid sensitive responders versus non-responders in the treatment of keloid disease

Intralesional corticosteroid injection is a well-recognised treatment modality for keloid disease (KD). Approximately 50% of KD cases are considered non-responders (or steroid resistant) with no consensus or indicators in detecting steroid-sensitive cases. In view of the undesirable side effects, uncertainty in timing and regularity of steroid treatment, we planned to identify responders and non-responders to target treatment more effectively. A scar injection proforma was developed capturing a detailed history focusing on symptoms and signs (redness, appearance, contour, texture, distortion and severity) associated with KD. The cause, site, number of keloid scars and scar recurrence were recorded as the lesions were injected on a monthly basis. A detailed description of response to steroid injection was documented and photographs were taken. Demographic data were collected on 65 patients (11 to 74 years with mean age 34.7 years, 60% were females, 50% were Caucasian). 77% (n = 50) were classified as steroid responders and showed improvement in symptoms and signs within 3 months. There was a statistically significant correlation between patients with higher contour scores of KD prior to treatment (p = 0.013) and frequency of injections (p = 0.003). Thus, the odds of being a responder were greater for patients with more than one injection and with higher contour scores. This preliminary case series has provided early evidence in enabling identification of steroid responders versus non-responders within a 3-month period. Selection of KD non-responders to steroid treatment can avoid potentially painful injection, its subsequent side effects and unnecessary continuation of redundant therapy and follow-up.

Intralesional cryosurgery and intralesional steroid injection: a good combination therapy for treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars

Hypertrophic scars and keloids exhibit high recurrence rates following surgical excision. Intralesional cryosurgery (ILC) can achieve a higher degree of effectiveness than the surface cryotherapy. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of ILC using Weshahy cryoneedles followed by IL steroid in a trial of getting rid of the fibrous mass by destruction, not by surgery to avoid being under tension of the new scar. This study included 22 patients. Evaluation of the volume reduction of the lesions was done after a single ILC session followed by IL steroid injections. There was a significant decrease in the volume of the lesions after 4 months (P < 0.01), with a volume reduction of 93.5%. By using ILC at the base of keloids or hypertrophic scars, we can change the old fibrous tissue into a recent scar or granulation tissue which will respond more successfully to IL steroid injection.

Surgical treatment of earlobe keloid with CO2 laser radiation: case report and clinical standpoints

Keloids are considered to be benign hyperproliferative growths of dense fibrous tissue and overabundant deposition of disorganized, thick, hyalinized collagen that result from an abnormal tissue response to cutaneous injury. Keloids do not have a specific cause, although genetic predisposition is heavily implicated. We present a case report of a patient with an earlobe keloid that was treated with carbon dioxide laser radiation (CO(2)) with an 0.8-mm focus, 7 W, a power density of 2.5 W/cm(2), in a continuous mode. The patient was seen for follow-up 6 months later. An intact hole for placement of an earring was observed with a very good esthetic and functional result.

The Use of Corticosteroids to Treat Keloids: A Review

Mechanisms for keloid formation include drastic changes in growth factor actions, collagen turnover, mechanical forces applied over the skin, and genetic and immunologic contributions. The use of corticosteroids to manage keloids increases basic fibroblast growth factor production while decreasing transforming growth factor-β1 production by human dermal fibroblasts, endogenous vascular endothelial growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor-1. The use of corticosteroid injections is, to date, the core treatment available for the management of excessive tissue production in scars. Currently, the most effective and safe regimen for keloid management appears to be the use of corticotherapy—injection of intradermal steroids after a surgical excision.