Application of modified retromandibular approach indirectly from the anterior edge of the parotid gland in the surgical treatment of condylar fracture

Electromyographic Study of Facial Nerve Function Using Two Different Surgical Approaches in Low Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Facial nerve (FN) dysfunction is a potential complication during open reduction of mandibular condylar fractures.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the postoperative FN function following transparotid (TP) and transmasseteric anterior parotid (TMAP) operative approaches in open reduction and internal fixation of condylar fractures using electromyogram.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

A randomized controlled clinical trial was designed. The study was conducted in a single tertiary-care hospital in the inpatient setting. Patients aged above 18 years with unilateral condylar fracture of the jaw or bilateral condylar fractures undergoing surgery on only 1 side were included. Patients were excluded if they had fractures of the head, bilateral condylar fractures with surgery planned on both sides, a previous history of surgery in the retromandibular area, existing lacerations to approach condyle, preoperative signs of FN weakness, or a history of parotid surgery.

PREDICTOR VARIABLE

The predictor variable was the operative approach and the subjects were allocated randomly to TMAP and TP.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S)

The primary outcome variable was postoperative FN function in the surgical approach employed using the House-Brackmann scale and electromyography (EMG) to record any subtle weakness in nerve function. The FN function is recorded at 3 time intervals postoperatively 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months (T3). The secondary outcomes studied were operating time and any other complications recorded.

COVARIATES

Age, sex, fracture pattern with classification of condylar fractures into condylar neck or base fractures according to Loukata et al.4 Any associated fracture of mandible describing the anatomical location viz symphysis and parasymphysis (anterior mandible), body, contralateral condyle or greater than 1 associated fracture were recorded. Similarly, the presence or absence of any associated midface fracture was also recorded to suggest that the study participants were homogenous in all aspects.

ANALYSES

Analytical statistics included χ2 test, t-test, and repeated measures ANOVA followed by post hoc test to compare EMG data (mean power and mean amplitude) between 2 operative approaches (TP vs TMAP) for facial muscles including frontalis, oculi, and buccinator at different time intervals (T0, T1, T2, T3). Patients within each group were also analyzed to check for nerve recovery occurring during the follow-up period. The level of significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The study sample was composed of 22 patients with a mean age of 32.82 ± 11.21 years in TMAP and 27.82 ± 8.54 years in the TP group respectively (P = .26); male predominance of 81.8 and 90.9% in TMAP and TP group respectively (P = .53) was noted. The FN deficit as assessed by the House-Brackmann scale clinically, was at 54% (T1), 36.4% (T2), and 9.1% (T3) for the TP group and 27% (T1),9% (T2), and 0% (T3) for TMAP group; however, the results were statistically insignificant (P = .31). In surface EMG evaluation, the mean power for the frontalis muscle was significantly higher in the TMAP approach at the T3 time (105.03 ± 9.7 vs 89.56 ± 10; 95% confidence interval -24.28 to -6.65 with P value = .002). TP approach was faster with a mean exposure time of 9.9 minutes.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The results show that both approaches give comparable long-term results with the TMAP group showing better frontalis muscle activity.

Retromandibular Approach and its Different Variations in the Management of Fracture Condyle: Surgical Experience

The management of condylar fractures is a controversial topic in maxillofacial surgery. Surgical treatment is the preferred treatment choice nowadays and the article aims to describe different variations of the retromandibular approach with their surgical outcome based on experience. A total of 15 cases were managed with the retromandibular approach and its different variations. We advocate retromandibular approach for the management of condyle fractures, and among which retromandibular retroparotid and retromandibular anteroparotid provide best accessiblity with less bleeding and minimal risk of injury to the facial nerve.

Interventions for the Management of Mandibular Coronoid Process Fractures: A Systematic Review

Background

The fracture of the coronoid process of mandible is one of the rarest fractures seen and the paucity of literature on the topic reflects the same. Despite the low incidence rate, the complications maybe grave which is why proper management is important. The treatment is controversial also because of the absence of standardized treatment protocol. This systematic review aims to compare the outcome of various treatment modalities available.

Methods

Registered under PROSPERO: CRD42020200700. Systematic research was conducted across databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, Pro Quest, Wiley Online. All clinical studies done till January 2021 which included participants above 14 years of age were included. Case reports, case series and studies not mentioning the treatment plan were excluded. The studies were shortlisted by the authors based on the eligibility criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS tool and JBI checklist.

Results

A total of five studies were included. Four were retrospective studies and one was a retrospective case-controlled study. Two studies reported high, two moderate and one low risk of bias. Various treatment modalities were reported for the management of coronoid process fractures including conservative management, ORIF and coronoidectomy. Most authors preferred conservative management in asymptomatic cases and surgical management in symptomatic cases.

Discussion

No randomized control trials were found on the topic. Majority of the articles were case reports. Conservative management was preferred in minimally displaced fractures of coronoid process. However, in presence of displaced coronoid process fractures causing impediment of mandibular function surgical management is preferred.

Comparison of three different approaches in treatment of mandibular condylar fractures - Our experience

Background

The principal transfacial routes described to approach condylar process fractures are preauricular, retromandibular, high submandibular, and their various modifications. The selection of a specific surgical approach mainly depends on the level of condylar fracture, displacement/dislocation of the proximal segment and time elapsed from the date of trauma. Not too many studies proclaim a unanimous consensus on "gold standard" approaches for particular levels of fracture.

Aim

This study was conducted with the aim to lay down guidelines for determining the ideal surgical approach for treating different condylar fractures based on different clinical situations.

Methodology

This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients that underwent open reduction internal fixation of condylar fractures according to preset study design. Inclusion criteria were fracture displacement more than 10 degrees, dislocation, shortening of ramal height more than 2 mm. Patients having maxillofacial fractures other than mandible and condylar fractures in edentulous patients were excluded from this study.

Results

The risk of facial nerve injury was more in endaural group and parotid fistula was more evident in retromandibular subparotid group but there was no statistical difference between the groups. The surgical scar was inconspicuous in all three groups. Excellent results were achieved in the other parameters such as mouth opening, range of motion, bite force, and occlusion with all the three approaches. Postoperative CT scan showed satisfactory anatomical reduction.

Conclusion

This study concludes that the decision-making on the approach to be selected for any particular condylar fracture depends on the level of fracture, presence of fracture dislocation, and time elapsed from the date of trauma.

Infinitesimal Periangular Pterygomasseteric Transectioning Approach for the Base Fractures of the Mandibular Condyle: A Technical Note and Quality of Life Outcome

Purpose Infinitesimal Periangular Pterygomasseteric Transectioning Approach (IPPTA) is a minimal access surgical approach utilized for the management of base fractures of the mandibular condyle. The aim of the study was to evaluate and report the long-term post-operative functional outcome using this surgical access approach. Materials and method A prospective clinical study involving 20 patients was undertaken to evaluate the post-operative functional and aesthetic outcome for the patients that underwent surgery for base fractures of the mandibular condyle using IPPTA. The various parameters assessed were wound healing, marginal mandibular nerve injury, diet intake, mandibular function, and any other complications at twelfth post-operative month. Results IPPTA provided adequate exposure to the condylar base fracture for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and was found to have an uneventful post-operative recovery phase in terms of functional and aesthetic outcomes. Conclusion IPPTA involves utilizing a smaller incision and provides adequate exposure to the condylar base region for ORIF to establish a satisfactory form and function with a predictable outcome.

Is the retromandibular approach a suitable approach to anatomical reduction of unilateral subcondylar fracture? A non-randomized clinical trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the retromandibular approach (RMA) to produce three-dimensional (3-D) reduction of the unilateral subcondylar fracture and Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) functional implication.

METHODS

 A prospective cohort study was designed. Twenty-nine patients with unilateral subcondylar fracture underwent consecutively Open Reduction, and Internal Fixation. The cohorts were divided into two groups; RMA group (n = 16, 55.17%) and submandibular approach SMA group (n = 13, 44.82%). The primary outcome was the anatomical 3-D reduction of the condyle. The secondary outcome was to compare the condyle position and inclination finding with TMJ outcomes. Helkimo Index score was used to evaluate the TMJ outcome at six months postoperatively.

RESULT

 There was a significant difference between the mediolateral condylar inclination, condylar medial and vertical positions when RMA compared with SMA groups (P < 0.05). The medial joint space was correlated with the medial condylar position in both groups (P < 0.05). The Helkimo Ai and Di was associated with mediolateral condylar inclination in SMG; however, Helkimo Ai was found to be correlated with the RMA group.

CONCLUSION

 The current study demonstrates that the RMA could re-establish the anatomical position of the unilateral subcondylar fracture in patients undergoing ORIF. The clinical outcome of the TMJ with RMA was better than SMA.

Pre-auricular Transparotid Approach for the Management of Mandibular Condylar Fracture: An Experience of 82 Cases

Purpose

This paper retrospectively analyses the functional outcomes and complications associated with pre-auricular transparotid approach for the management of mandibular condylar fractures.

Material and Methodology

The retrospective data of 82 condylar fractures were analysing in 73 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with pre-auricular transparotid approach. Evaluation of post-operative complications and the post-operative occlusion status, maximal inter-incise opening, adequacy of reduction and stability of fixation were assessed clinically and radiographically.

Results

The exposure of fracture segment was adequate in all the cases, and fixation was easy with 2 mm delta miniplate. Transient facial nerve palsy occurred in 2 patients (2.43%). 1 patient developed sialocele which was managed conservatively. There were slight occlusal discrepancies in 10 patients at the end of 1-week follow-up which was corrected with guiding elastics at the end of 1-month follow-up. The reduction was adequate, and fixation was stable. The functional outcomes were satisfactory in term of mouth-opening and range of motion.

Conclusion

The pre-auricular transparotid approach provides direct access to the fracture site resulting in less retraction of the tissue containing facial nerve and also less amount of periosteal stripping is required, thus it maintains good vascularity to the fracture segments. It provides direct visualization of the fracture without much retraction of the tissue containing facial nerve branches. It allows better fixation of the fracture with very less complication which results in good functional outcomes.

Modified Blair Approach for the Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures

PURPOSE

The management of fractures of the condyle of the mandible has been a topic of debate and still no consensus exists in the literature about the most appropriate approach. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified Blair approach for the open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condyle fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 18 patients with 20 mandibular condyle fractures from 2014 to 2020. All patients were treated surgically using the modified Blair approach. Postoperative occlusion status and mouth opening were assessed for treatment outcomes. Also, the rate of complications such as facial nerve paralysis, wound infection, hematoma, salivary fistula, Frey syndrome, and greater auricular nerve paraeesthesia evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventeen out of 18 patients (94.4%) achieved their original pretraumatic occlusion after the surgery. One patient (5.5%) had postoperative occlusal interference due to premature dental contact. The maximal postoperative interincisal distance was measured with a range between 33 and 41 mm (mean 37.6 mm). One patient (5.6%) had transient facial nerve palsy. Also, salivary fistula developed in 1 (5.6%) patient in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study revealed that the modified Blair approach provides satisfactory clinical outcomes with low complication rates and may offer an alternative, safe, and effective method for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condyle fracture.

A comparative evaluation of retromandibular versus Modified Risdon approach in surgical treatment of condylar fracture

The purpose of this study was aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of retromandibular versus modified Risdon approach using periangular incision for open reduction and internal fixation of low subcondylar mandibular fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation with different plating systems were utilized via retromandibular approach (group I) and via modified Risdon approach with periangular incision (group II). Twenty four (n= 24) condylar fractures in 21 adult patients were divided randomly into two equal groups (12 each) according to the cutaneous incision (approach) utilized. The evaluation score for scarring in group I it was excellent in 9 patients, good in 2 patients and acceptable in only one patient (Mean 2.4 ± SD 3.38). While in group II was excellent in 10 patients and good in 2 patients (Mean 2.4 ± SD 3.87) and the p value was 0.591. Symptoms of transient facial nerve weakness were noted in only 3 patients in group I with slight to moderate dysfunction (Mean 2 ± SD 3.21), while only one patient had facial nerve weakness in group II with House - Brackman score of 2 immediate postoperatively and this got resolved in 6 weeks (Mean 2 ± SD 4.04) and the p value was 0.00022. Within the limitations of the study it seems that a modified Risdon approach using periangular incision for reduction and fixation of low subcondylar fracture should be preferred whenever possible because it yields better outcomes.

Infinitesimal Peri-angular Pterygomasseteric Transectioning Approach (IPPTA) for the Base Fractures of the Mandibular Condyle: A Preliminary Study

Purpose

To investigate a reliable and safe surgical access to the condylar base region with minimal surgical trauma to the surrounding anatomic structures. In an attempt to do so, to describe Infinitesimal Peri-angular Pterygomasseteric Transectioning Approach (IPPTA) for the management of base fractures of the mandibular condyle.

Materials and Method

A preliminary clinical study involving 20 patients was undertaken to treat patients with unilateral condylar base fracture of the mandible using IPPTA under general anaesthesia (GA). Various parameters assessed were adequacy of surgical access, wound healing at the incision site, marginal mandibular nerve injury, diet intake and complications post-operatively.

Result

This method provided adequate exposure to fractured condylar base for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with uneventful post-operative recovery phase. There was no limitation to function which was identified by restoration of normal pre-trauma diet intake by 14th post-operative day in more than 50% of the study patients. No complications were observed in any patients among the study population.

Discussion

The peri-angular approach has been discussed in the literature. The IPPTA highlights the use of a smaller incision providing an adequate exposure to the condylar base region for ORIF.

Direct transparotid approach via a modified mini-preauricular incision for open reduction and internal fixation of subcondylar fractures

A transparotid approach, with a retromandibular or preauricular incision, is an alternative surgical approach for treating a subcondylar fracture and reducing the potential for complications such as injury to the facial nerves. However, retromandibular and preauricular incisions are both created far away from the parotid gland-dissection area. Thus, it is necessary to undermine the skin and retract it anteriorly to access the surgical field. Here, we introduce a modified approach wherein the incision allows for direct access to the fracture site. This approach may be adopted to shorten the incision length, reduce the retraction trauma at the surgical site, and help prevent injury to the facial nerve.

Analysis between Retromandibular and Periangular Transmasseteric Approach for Fixation of Condylar Fracture - A Prospective Study

Introduction:

Condylar fractures make up for an average of 17.5%–52% of all mandibular fractures. The aim of the present study was to compare the ease, success, and complications between retromandibular and periangular transmasseteric approaches when used for open reduction and internal fixation of condylar fractures.

Materials and Methods:

A total 20 cases with condylar fracture, ten each for retromandibular and periangular transmasseteric approach, were included in the study. Patients were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Postoperative occlusion, maximum mouth opening, range of movement, facial nerve function, visibility, convenience of plating, and time taken for exposure, fixation, and closure were recorded. Incidence of complications such as wound dehiscence, wound infection, hematoma, sialocele formation, Frey's syndrome, and hypertrophic scars were also evaluated.

Results:

The mean exposure time in the retromandibular approach was 10 min 31 s and 9 min 17 s in the periangular transmasseteric approach. The incidence of facial nerve injury was 2 of 10 patients in the retromandibular group and 3 of 10 patients in the periangular transmasseteric group, all of which resolved within 6 months. The incidence of sialocoele was 2 of 10 in the retromandibular group. The time taken for exposure of the fracture site was statistically significant between the two approaches (P = 0.048) with longer time required for retromandibular approach.

Discussion:

It can be summarized that both the approaches are comparable and well suited for surgical management of condylar fractures. It was observed that in displaced condylar neck fractures, greater difficulty was experienced in the periangular transmasseteric approach than the retromandibular approach.

Retromandibular transparotid approach for subcondylar mandibular fracture: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

The retromandibular transparotid approach provides the shortest and the most direct access to mandibular sub-condylar fractures. However, this approach is less preferred due to the fear of facial nerve injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and morbidity of the retromandibular transparotid approach for open reduction and internal fixation of sub-condylar mandibular fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 29 patients with 35 sub-condylar mandibular fractures who underwent open reduction and internal fixation through the retromandibular transparotid approach was conducted. The primary study variable was facial nerve palsy, whereas the secondary variables were infection, sialocele, salivary fistula, stability of the fractured segments, post-operative malocclusion, Frey's syndrome, and unesthetic scar. All patients were followed up for 6 months. Predictor variables included age, gender, side, location, displacement, etiology, concomitant maxillofacial fractures, and healing status. Fisher's exact test was calculated to find the association between primary variables and predictor variables.

RESULT

Out of 35 sub-condylar fractures (29 patients; 23 male, 6 female), four (11.42%) developed transient facial nerve palsy. Fractures at the condylar neck level (P = .045) and with displacement (P = .026) were significantly associated with the development of facial nerve palsy. Four patients (13.8%) developed slight malocclusion, two had surgical site infections, two developed sialoceles, and one had a salivary fistula.

CONCLUSION

The retromandibular transparotid approach is safe and effective with rare major complications in the management of sub-condylar fractures of the mandible. Condylar neck fractures and displaced fractured segments are associated with an increased risk of development of facial nerve palsy.

Does the Retromandibular Transparotid Approach Provide Quicker Access to Fracture of Mandibular Subcondyle Compared With the Retromandibular Transmasseteric Anterior Parotid Approach?

PURPOSE

Limited studies are available in the literature comparing various surgical approaches for the management of condylar fractures, and those comparing different types of retromandibular approaches are even fewer in number. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 2 variants of the retromandibular approach-retromandibular transmasseteric anterior parotid (RMTMAP) and retromandibular transparotid (RMTP) in terms of exposure time, blood loss, facial nerve palsy, sialoceles or parotid fistula formation, infection, and esthetics of scar tissue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was designed in patients with mandibular subcondylar fractures requiring operative intervention. Patients were randomized into 2 groups based on a computer-generated randomization table. Group A included 37 cases, treated with the RMTMAP approach, and group B included 38 cases treated with the RMTP approach. The primary outcome variable was exposure time. Secondary outcome variables were blood loss during exposure, complications like facial nerve palsy, sialocele formation, surgical site infection, and scar esthetics. All patients were followed for 3 months. Collected data were analyzed using the χ² and analysis of variance tests.

RESULTS

The mean exposure time for fractures treated with the RMTMAP approach and RMTP approach was 21.08 ± 9.18 and 13.57 ± 6.09, respectively (P < .05). The mean blood loss for RMTMAP and RMTP approach was 11.75 ± 5.11 and 9.9 ± 3.77 mL, respectively (P = .078). No facial nerve injury was seen in patients treated with the RMTMAP approach, whereas 3 (7.8%) patients in the RMTP group had transient facial nerve injury (P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

This study concludes that the RMTP approach provides quicker access to the condyle as compared with the RMTMAP approach. However, the incidence of transient facial nerve injury was more in the RMTP approach. Except for reduced blood loss in the RMTP approach, all other parameters were comparable in both the approaches.

Clinical Assessment of Retromandibular Antero-Parotid Approach for Reduction of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures: Report of 60 Cases and Review of the Literature

This study assessed the efficacy of the retromandibular antero-parotid approach for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of subcondylar fractures. Sixty patients with the mean age of 31.03 years underwent surgical reduction with a 20–25mm incision in the retromandibular area with an antero-parotid transmasseteric approach. All patients were followed between 6 to 12 months. At the end of the first week, six patients exhibited postoperative malocclusion. At the next visits, all patients had optimal occlusion. Maximal interincisal opening (MIO) of 56 patients (93.3%) was >37mm, and only four patients (6.7%) had MIO<37mm. In three patients (5%), weakness of the buccal branch of the facial nerve was noticed postoperatively. No salivary gland complications were seen. The surgical scar was hardly noticeable. Retromandibular access with transmasseteric antero-parotid approach is the technique of choice for treatment of high- and low-level subcondylar fractures with adequate visibility and direct access to the condylar area.

Modified Tragus Edge and Transmasseteric Anteroparotid Approach for Intracapsular and Condylar Neck Fractures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of protecting the facial nerve and reducing the scar visibility using a modified tragus edge and transmasseteric anteroparotid approach compared to classic preauricular approach for intracapsular and condylar neck fractures. This retrospective study included 64 patients (78 sides) who underwent surgical treatment for intracapsular or condylar neck fractures from January 2014 to June 2018. Patients were divided into the experimental group (treated via a modified tragus edge and transmasseteric anteroparotid approach), and the control group (treated via the classical preauricular approach). Therapeutic outcome assessment parameters included facial nerve injury, salivary fistulae, wound infection, restricted mouth opening, postoperative occlusion disorders, and scar visibility. In the control group, there were 3 cases of facial nerve injuries and 2 cases of salivary fistulae. One case of temporary facial nerve injury occurred in the experimental group, with complete recovery within 1 month. The scars were less visible in the experimental group than in the control group. These results suggest that a modified tragus edge and transmasseteric anteroparotid approach reduced the incidences of facial nerve injuries, minimized the scar visibility, improved exposure of the operative site and fixation of titanium screws or plates, and did not increase the frequency of other complications.

Retromandibular transparotid approach compared with transmasseteric anterior parotid approach for the management of fractures of the mandibular condylar process: a prospective randomised study

Fractures of the mandibular condyle lead to displacement of the condyle and loss of the height of the ramus. A retromandibular approach is the most commonly used for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of such fractures. We aimed to compare the complications associated with a retromandibular transparotid approach with a retromandibular transmasseteric anterior parotid (TMAP) approach for their management. Thirty patients were randomly selected into two groups (15 in each): Group A comprised the retromandibular transparotid approach and Group B the retromandibular TMAP. The variables evaluated were: operating time, facial nerve injury, occurrence of Frey syndrome, and sialocoele at one week, four weeks, three months, and six months. The mean (SD) age in group A and B was 33.93 (17.97) years and 33.53 (16.15) years, respectively, and there were 28 men and two women. Mean (SD) exposure time in the transparotid approach was 26.93 (5.19) minutes and 25.4 (8.35) minutes in the TMAP approach. The incidence of facial nerve injury was 2/15 patients in the transparotid group and 3/15 in the TMAP group, all of which resolved within six months. The incidence of sialocoele was 2/15 in the transparotid group. The results did not show any significant difference in complications between the two approaches, but the retromandibular transparotid approach provided straight-line access in fractures of the condylar neck, with fewer incidences of nerve injury. The anterior parotid approach, on the other hand, provided easier access for fractures that were medially dislocated or of the condylar base but had an increased incidence of facial nerve injuries.

Variations in the retromandibular approach to the condyle-transparotid versus anteroparotid transmasseteric - a prospective clinical comparative study

BACKGROUND

The management of mandibular condylar fracture remains controversial many surgeons still favour the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) which provides good result and immediate functioning as compared to closed reduction. With proven consensus for ORIF, dilemma remains in choosing the surgical approach to condyle due to proximity of complex and important anatomic structure. Various extra-oral surgical approaches are available for ORIF including preauricular, submandibular, retromandibular, transmasseteric anteroparotid etc. Variations in retromandibular approach such as transparotid, retro-parotid and anteroparotid are reported in literature. In our study we compared the retromandibular transparotid and retromandibular anteroparotid transmasseteric variations.

METHODOLOGY

Thirty condylar fracture in 26 patients, 15 in each group (group A - Retromandibular transparotid approach & group B - Retromandibular anteroparotid approach) were treated under general anaesthesia with naos-tracheal intubation and by the same surgeon having 20 years of experience in maxillofacial surgeries. We evaluated time taken for the procedure, amount of bone exposure, intra-operative haemorrhage. Postoperative presence of infection, sinus and fistula formation at the incision site, parotid fistula formation, facial nerve functioning using House-Brackman scale in immediate postoperative period, 3^rd month postoperatively and 6 month postoperatively.

RESULT

The mean average time taken for group A was 78.2minutes and mean average time taken for group B was 64.8minutes. None of the patient had haemorrhage intra-operatively in both the groups. Exposure was sufficient in both the groups with same length of the incision. None of the patient suffered from postoperative infection in both the groups. Parotid fistula formation was present in 2 patients in group A while none of the patient had parotid fistula in group B. Three patients out of 15 had the transient facial nerve weakness in group A which got resolved in 6 month while none of the patient had facial nerve weakness in group B. All patients had adequate mouth opening with no occlusal discrepancies.

CONCLUSION

Retromandibular anteroparotid approach as described in this study has proven to be an extremely useful approach provides good access, and associated with minimal complications and morbidity compare to retromandibular transparotid approach. It is hence safe to say that this approach is relatively useful for an inexperienced and novice surgeon as well.

Surgical approaches for condylar fractures related to facial nerve injury: deep versus superficial dissection

The aim of this study was to investigate the probability of facial nerve injury (FNI) in the treatment of condylar neck and subcondylar fractures (CN/SCFs) with percutaneous approaches and to identify factors predicting FNI. The data of 80 patients with 87 CN/SCFs were evaluated retrospectively. The primary outcome was FNI occurrence. The predictor variables were age, sex, aetiology, alcohol consumption, fracture site and pattern (dislocation or not), concomitant fractures, time interval to surgery, surgeon experience, plate type, and the dual classification of percutaneous approaches. The approaches were classified based on whether subcutaneous dissection traversed the marginal mandibular branch (MMB) deeply (deep group: submandibular and retroparotid approaches) or superficially (superficial group: transparotid, transmasseteric anteroparotid (TMAP), and high cervical-TMAP approaches). Twenty-two patients (27.5%) suffered FNI, of whom two in the deep group had permanent paralysis of the MMB. In the multivariate logistic regression model, deeply traversing surgery approaches (odds ratio 12.4, P=0.025) and the presence of a dislocated fracture (odds ratio 6.66, P=0.012) were associated with an increased risk of FNI. These results suggest that percutaneous approaches in the superficial group should be recommended for the treatment of CN/SCFs to reduce the risk of FNI.

Surgical Treatment for Extracapsular Condylar Fractures of the Mandible

BACKGROUND

Condylar fractures are considered the most controversial mandibular fractures, regarding both the diagnosis and the treatment. With the increase in surgical indications for handling this type of fracture, it is important to discuss about the advantages and disadvantages of the several surgical approaches available. This article describes the surgical details and postoperative results of the mini-retromandibular transparotid approach for treating extracapsular condylar fractures of the mandible.

METHODS

In a 1-year period, 16 patients affected by extracapsular condylar fractures with surgical indication were treated with the mini-retromandibular transparotid approach. All the surgeries were executed by the same surgeon. Preoperative and postoperative details of each patient were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the postoperatory, only 2 patients had purulent drainage in the associated fractures area and only 1 patient had paresis of the buccal branch of the facial nerve. No scar issues concerning the surgical wound were observed and reintervention was not necessary in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The mini-retromandibular transparotid approach offers advantages and should be included as an option for the open treatment of extracapsular condylar fractures of the mandible.

The Influence of Dissection Range of the Facial Nerve on Transient Postoperative Facial Palsy in Mandibular Condyle Fractures

PURPOSE

This study examined the relation between dissection range of facial nerve branches and transient postoperative facial palsy caused by nerve traction for open treatment of mandibular condyle fractures using a preauricular approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 58 patients who underwent rigid fixation of condylar head and upper neck fractures. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on dissection range of the frontal and zygomatic branches. For group 1 (n = 22), the dissection range was extended anteriorly and posteriorly from the condylar borders through the retroparotid approach. The transparotid approach was used in groups 2 (n = 19) and 3 (n = 17) in which nerve dissection was limited to the condylar borders and was extended only anteriorly, respectively. Using multivariate correlation and multiple regression analyses, differences in duration of nerve traction and angle difference by traction from the natural course of the nerve were analyzed according to dissection range, and the recovery period for facial palsy was evaluated.

RESULTS

The duration of nerve traction for group 2 was 77.53 minutes, which was longer than that for groups 1 (66.00 minutes) and 3 (65.41 minutes). The angle differences by traction were 62.42° and 58.00° for the frontal and zygomatic branches in group 2, respectively, which were considerably greater than those in groups 1 (23.32° and 20.14°) and 3 (37.24° and 28.88°). In consequence, group 2 showed the longest recovery, requiring 64.47 days for the frontal branch and 51.63 days for the zygomatic branch. The angle difference by traction had a greater influence on the recovery period than duration of nerve traction.

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of nerve traction and angle difference by traction were quantitatively dependent on the dissection range of facial nerve branches and were related to the recovery period for transient facial palsy.

Does encountering the facial nerve during surgical management of mandibular condylar process fractures increase the risk of facial nerve weakness? A systematic review and meta-regression analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify whether the incidence of systematically identified or incidentally encountered facial nerve branches during dissection to approach condylar fractures increases risk of transient and/or permanent facial nerve weakness.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed that included several databases with specific keywords, a reference search, and a manual search for suitable articles. The inclusion criteria were all clinical trials, with the aim of assessing the rate of facial nerve injuries when open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of condylar process fractures was performed using different surgical approaches. The articles had to have documented the number of encountered facial nerve branches during ORIF. The main outcome variable was transient and permanent facial nerve injury. The dependent variable was the event and/or number of encountered facial nerve branches during surgery, and how they were handled (i.e. dissected, retracted, etc.).

RESULTS

A total of 1202 mandibular condylar fractures were enrolled in 29 studies. Rate of transient facial nerve injury (TFNI) was 11.3 % (136/1202). The number of facial nerve branches encountered intraoperatively was 543, namely buccal, marginal mandibular, zygomatic and temporal nerve branches. There was a significant correlation suggesting that there is a strong positive linear relationship between TFNI and encountered facial nerve branches (Coef = 0.1916, P = 0.001). There was no significant relationship between permanent facial nerve injury and encountered facial nerve branches (P = 0.808). TFNI was 4.3% and 18.7% for those studies expressly reporting that facial nerve branches were encountered incidentally without dissection and with dissection, respectively. For studies reporting deliberate and systematic facial nerve dissection, TFNI was 20.9%. Finally, studies that did not report any encounters of facial nerve branches, TFNI was 7.9 %.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that manipulation of the facial nerve during different surgical approaches causes different incidences of facial nerve injury. The choice of surgical approach for a given fracture should take this into consideration.

A Modified Peri-Angular Approach for Exposure of Condylar Fractures

PURPOSE

To describe a modified peri-angular approach to address subcondylar and condylar neck fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A modified peri-angular incision is used to approach a fractured condyle through the anteroparotid transmasseteric approach.

RESULTS

In the authors' experience, this method provides quick and clean exposure to the fractured condylar base and neck fractures for open reduction and internal fixation.

CONCLUSION

Although the peri-angular approach has been discussed in the literature, the authors' modification lessens the chance of complications, such as marginal nerve injury and parotid fistula formation, because the nerve is visualized and kept isolated throughout.

Efficacy of the Retroparotid Trans-Masseteric Approach via Retromandibular Incision in ORIF of Subcondylar Fractures: Our Institution Experience

Background

Fractures of the mandible subcondyle have always presented a challenge to the maxillofacial surgeon, with a myriad of treatment options existing ranging from conservative management to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to condylotomy. The complex anatomy of the region poses a challenge, with injury to the facial nerve branches being the primary concern.

Objective

This study evaluated the efficacy of a modified retromandibular approach, with retroparotid trans-masseteric dissection for ORIF of subcondylar fractures.

Methodology

Twenty-five patients with subcondylar fractures at varying levels were treated surgically by ORIF using this approach.

Results

All patients managed by this modified retromandibular approach had satisfactory results with restoration of vertical ramal height, satisfactory mouth opening, stable occlusion and no facial nerve damage post-op.

Conclusion

In our study, the modified retromandibular approach, with retroparotid trans-masseteric approach was effective in surgical management of subcondylar fractures by ORIF with minimal complications.

Retraction force necessary to expose the mandibular neck in Risdon and high cervical anteroparotid transmasseteric approaches: an anatomic comparative study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this anatomic study was to compare the retraction force necessary to expose the mandibular neck in the Risdon and the high cervical anteroparotid transmasseteric (HAT) approaches.

METHODS

An anatomic study was performed on 18 formalin-embalmed cadavers. We performed a Risdon approach on the left side, and an HAT approach on the right side in all the cases. The subjects were placed in a normative frame and the force necessary to maintain a satisfactory exposure of the condyle was measured with a system of cables, pulleys, and mechanical dynamometer. The statistical comparison between the two sides was carried out using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired series.

RESULTS

In all the cases, the region of interest was exposed as in the operating room. In the Risdon approach, the mean force was 32 Newtons (4-47). In the HAT approach, the mean force was 19 Newtons (4-33). The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The age, gender, and duration of conservation had no influence on the retraction force.

CONCLUSION

In the HAT approach, the retraction of the soft tissues was significantly lower than in the Risdon approach. This study gave an additional explanation to the remarkable safety of the HAT approach. Our results were in favor of the generalization of this technique.

Use of a modified high submandibular approach to treat condylar base fractures: Experience with 44 consecutive cases treated in a single institution

PURPOSE

The aim of this article is to present our experience treating fractures of the condylar base with a modification of the high submandibular approach (HSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2012 and April 2015, 44 fractures of the condylar base were treated in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Medical Hospital of Graz using the modified HSA.

RESULTS

We did not observe any damage (even transient) to the facial nerve or any complication related to violation of the parotid capsule (such as a salivary fistula, Frey syndrome, or a sialocele).

CONCLUSIONS

This approach provides good access to the condylar base, ensuring easier internal fixation, excellent protection of the facial nerve and parotid gland, and good cosmetic results.

Efficacy of Retromandibular Transparotid Approach for the Management of Extracapsular Subcondylar Mandibular Fractures Using 2-mm Titanium Miniplates: A Prospective Clinical Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiologic results of the retromandibular transparotid approach to displaced extracapsular subcondylar mandibular fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted over a period of 5 years on patients surgically treated for displaced extracapsular subcondylar mandibular fractures by the retromandibular transparotid approach. Variables including the type of fracture, degree of mouth opening, fracture displacement, deviation, excursive movements of the mandible, and facial nerve function were monitored before and after treatment. Appropriate statistics were computed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with 47 fractures were evaluated. There were 34 subcondylar fractures (located below the sigmoid notch) (87%), and 5 fractures were located in the head region in bilateral cases. Of the fractures, 31 (79%) were unilateral and 8 (21%) were bilateral. In a multivariate study, condylar coronal displacement, coronal sagittal displacement, difference in the ramal height, maximal interincisal distance, protrusive movements, and deviation of the mandible on opening showed statistically significant differences in pretreatment and post-treatment patients (P = .001). The interincisal distance was 46.8 mm (SD, 5.2 mm) postoperatively versus 24.1 mm (SD, 6.7 mm) before treatment. The average range of protrusion was significantly lower (P = .001) in patients before treatment, at 1.9 mm (SD, 1.2 mm), when compared with 6.1 mm (SD, 2.0 mm) postoperatively. During mouth opening, deviation of the mandible is often a sign of compensatory movement of the contralateral joint due to shortening of the ascending ramal height on the affected joint. The mean deviation of the mandible from the midline was 4.2 mm (SD, 1.0 mm) in patients before treatment, with a significant difference (P = .001) in patients after treatment, with a mean of 1.9 mm (SD, 0.995 mm). Temporary injuries to the facial nerve branches were observed in 3 cases (8%) 1 week after treatment, which later resolved within 3 weeks to 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The retromandibular transparotid approach provides good exposure and facilitates accurate reduction and fixation of the subcondylar fragment with positive outcomes, good cosmetic results, and rare major complications. Most facial nerve injuries are transient in nature after this approach. A Synthes 2-mm titanium single mini-plate (West Chester, PA) provides stable results after fixation.

Transmasseteric antero-parotid facelift approach for open reduction and internal fixation of condylar fractures

Surgical approaches to the condylar fracture include intraoral, preauricular, submandibular, and retromandibular approaches. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. When a patient needs esthetic results and an intraoral approach is not feasible, the transmasseteric antero-parotid facelift approach is considered. This approach permits direct exposure and allow the surgeon to fixate the fractured unit tangentially. Tangential fixation is critical to osteosynthesis. Disadvantages of the transmasseteric antero-parotid facelift approach include damage to the facial nerve and a longer operation time. However, after the initial learning curve, facial nerve damage can be avoided and operation time may decrease. We report three cases of subcondylar fractures that were treated with a transmasseteric antero-parotid facelift approach. Among these, two cases had trivial complications that were easily overcome. Instead of dissecting through the parotid gland parenchyma, the transmasseteric antero-parotid facelift approach uses transmasseteric dissection and reduces facial nerve damage more than the retromandibular transparotid approach. The esthetic result is superior to that of other approaches.

Surgical treatment of mandibular condyle fractures using the retromandibular anterior transparotid approach and a triangular-positioned double miniplate osteosynthesis technique: A clinical and radiological evaluation of 124 fractures

OBJECTIVE

Different modalities have been described regarding the treatment of mandibular condyle fractures. The most advantageous and safest one is still a topic of discussion. The present analysis describes the combination of a retromandibular, transparotideal approach combined to a triangular-positioned double-miniplate osteosynthesis, with a special regard for the patients' long term outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinical data of 102 patients with 124 condyle fractures treated with the mentioned surgical procedure were evaluated. Functional parameters such as the maximal interincisal distance, deviations/deflections, facial nerve function, occlusion as well as complications regarding the parotid gland, osteosynthesis, and esthetics were evaluated 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean maximal interincisal distance ranged from 38 mm after 1 week to 45 mm after 6 months. Deviations/deflections were seen in 22.5% of the cases 1 week postoperatively and decreased to 2% at 6 months postoperatively. A temporary facial palsy was diagnosed in 3.9% during the first follow-up, whereas no impairment was recorded after 3 or 6 months. At the same time, no patient had occlusional disturbances or complications regarding the parotid gland or the osteosynthesis 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct fracture visualization and a stable three-dimensional fracture stabilization are the main advantages of the presented combination of a surgical approach and osteosynthesis technique. Additionally, the absence of long-term complications confirms the safety of the procedure. Therefore, it may be considered as a successful treatment option for mandibular condyle fractures.

Neurovascular structures of the mandibular angle and condyle: a comprehensive anatomical review

BACKGROUND

Various surgical interventions including esthetic surgery, salivary gland excision, and open reduction of fracture have been performed in the area around the mandibular angle and condyle. This study aimed to comprehensively review the anatomy of the neurovascular structures on the angle and condyle with recent anatomic and clinical research.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We provide detailed information about the branching and distributing patterns of the neurovascular structures at the mandibular angle and condyle, with reported data of measurements and proportions from previous anatomical and clinical research. Our report should serve to help practitioners gain a better understanding of the area in order or reduce potential complications during local procedures. Reckless manipulation during mandibular angle reduction could mutilate arterial branches, not only from the facial artery, but also from the external carotid artery. The transverse facial artery and superficial temporal artery could be damaged during approach and incision in the condylar area. The marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve can be easily damaged during submandibular gland excision or facial rejuvenation treatment. The main trunk of the facial nerve and its upper and lower distinct divisions have been damaged during parotidectomy, rhytidectomy, and open reductions of condylar fractures.

CONCLUSION

By revisiting the information in the present study, surgeons will be able to more accurately prevent procedure-related complications, such as iatrogenic vascular accidents on the mandibular angle and condyle, complete and partial facial palsy, gustatory sweating (Frey syndrome), and traumatic neuroma after parotidectomy.

Anatomy of the facial nerve at the condylar area: measurement study and clinical implications

The aim of this study was to elucidate the detailed anatomy of the facial nerve (FN) at the condylar area to helping physicians preventing the iatrogenic trauma on the nerve. We dissected 25 specimens of the embalmed Korean cadavers (13 males and 2 females; mean age 76.9 years). The FN course at the condylar was examined, and the location of the FN branches was measured with superficial standards. The trunks of the FN emerged in the condylar area as one trunk, two trunks, and a loop or plexiform in 36%, 12%, and 52% areas, respectively. The zygomatic branch (Zbr) of FN passed over the tragus-alar line 23 mm anterior to the tragus (Tg) in most of the cases. The Zbr passed over the vertical line 2 cm anterior to the Tg through the area about 6 to 20 mm inferior to the Tg. Regardless of careful approach techniques to the condylar area, the FN could be damaged by a careless manipulation. Any reference landmarks could not guarantee the safety during the approach to the condylar area because more than half of the cases present the complicated branching type in the front of the Tg.

A new surgical approach to treat medial or low condylar fractures: the minor parotid anterior approach

OBJECTIVE

A new surgical approach, denoted as the minor parotid anterior approach, was designed to treat medial or low mandibular condylar fractures.

STUDY DESIGN

Sixty patients (72 sides) with medial or low condylar fractures were treated surgically. Thirty-six patients (42 sides) were treated with the minor parotid anterior approach, and 24 patients (30 sides) were treated with a retromandibular approach. Data on the surgical procedures and complications were recorded. The follow-up period was 3 to 12 months.

RESULTS

Four patients suffered facial nerve injury in the group treated with the retromandibular approach. No cases of facial nerve injury occurred in the minor parotid anterior approach group.

CONCLUSIONS

The minor parotid anterior approach avoided facial nerve injury, resulted in less visible facial scarring, and required less manipulation time. Therefore, the minor parotid anterior approach is worth application in the clinical setting.

Treatment of mandibular condyle fractures using a modified transparotid approach via the parotid mini-incision: experience with 31 cases

Surgery for mandibular condyle fractures must allow direct vision of the fracture, reduce surgical trauma and achieve reduction and fixation while avoiding facial nerve injury. This prospective study was conducted to introduce a new surgical approach for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condyle fractures using a modified transparotid approach via the parotid mini-incision, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. The modified transparotid approach via the parotid mini-incision was applied and rigid internal fixation using a small titanium plate was carried out for 36 mandibular condyle fractures in 31 cases. Postoperative follow-up of patients ranged from 3 to 26 months; in the first 3 months after surgery, outcomes for all patients were analyzed by evaluating the degree of mouth opening, occlusal relationship, facial nerve function and results of imaging studies. The occlusal relationships were excellent in all patients and none had symptoms of intraoperative ipsilateral facial nerve injury. The mean degree of mouth opening was 4.0 (maximum 4.8 cm, minimum 3.0 cm). No mandibular deviations were noted in any patient during mouth opening. CT showed complete anatomical reduction of the mandibular condyle fracture in all patients. The modified transparotid approach via the smaller, easily concealed parotid mini-incision is minimally invasive and achieves anatomical reduction and rigid internal fixation with a simplified procedure that directly exposes the fracture site. Study results showed that this procedure is safe and feasible for treating mandibular condyle fracture, and offers a short operative path, protection of the facial nerve and satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.

Mandibular coronoid fractures: treatment options

Fractures of the coronoid process are uncommon and can easily be missed. The purpose of this study was to classify the fracture patterns and explore the treatment options. This retrospective study included 39 patients with fractures of the mandibular coronoid process. Treatment protocols were developed based on the time of fracture, degree of mouth opening, location of the coronoid fracture, types of fracture, and other concomitant fractures. All patients were followed up for 12-60 months. Sixteen patients underwent conservative management and four of these patients developed progressive trismus, which improved significantly after removal of the coronoid process. Twenty-three patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) via the modified retromandibular approach. Follow-up data showed significant improvement in maximum mouth opening and symptoms (diet and pain) compared to their preoperative status. In summary, conservative management is first recommended for fractures of the coronoid process with minimal displacement or restriction of mouth opening. For patients with significant fracture displacement and limited mouth opening, or with concomitant fractures of the zygoma, zygomatic arch, or mandibular ramus, ORIF via the modified retromandibular approach through the anterior border of the parotid gland is an alternative treatment method.

Surgical management of a mandible subcondylar fracture

Open reduction and anatomic reduction can create better function for the temporomandibular joint, compared with closed treatment in mandible fracture surgery. Therefore, the double miniplate fixation technique via mini-retromandibular incision was used in order to make the most stable fixation when performing subcondylar fracture surgery. Those approaches provide good visualization of the subcondyle from the posterior edge of the ramus, allow the surgeon to work perpendicularly to the fracture, and enable direct fracture management. Understanding the biomechanical load in the fixation of subcondylar fractures is also necessary in order to optimize fixation methods. Therefore, we measured the biomechanical loads of four different plate fixation techniques in the experimental model regarding mandibular subcondylar fractures. It was found that the loads measured in the two-plate fixation group with one dynamic compression plate (DCP) and one adaption plate showed the highest deformation and failure loads among the four fixation groups. The loads measured in the one DCP plate fixation group showed higher deformation and failure loads than the loads measured in the two adaption plate fixation group. Therefore, we conclude that the selection of the high profile plate (DCP) is also important in order to create a stable load in the subcondylar fracture.

[Modified Risdon approach for non-traumatic ramus surgery]

INTRODUCTION

The Risdon modified approach, for mandibular surgery, is well adapted to treatment of low subcondylar fractures. According to our experience, this approach with a low rate of complications should also be considered for non-traumatic ramus surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty Risdon modified approaches were used in 11 patients for non-traumatic indications (seven bilateral osteotomies, four unilateral osteotomies, one biopsy, one bone graft). One patient was operated twice with the same approach.

RESULTS

In all cases, the planned surgery could be performed using this approach. The only complication was a case of temporary paresis of the facial nerve's mandibular branch. The scar was always considered as quite acceptable.

DISCUSSION

As for traumatology, the Risdon modified approach is an improvement for ramus non-traumatic surgery. It has a very low rate of complications, especially for the facial nerve. The intraoral approach avoids scarring, but the resulting exposure is insufficient and requires using a transcutaneous device or endoscopy. In orthognathic surgery, the wide exposure of the lateral aspect of the ramus, the corpus, and the basilar edge, facilitates important mandibular advancement.

Transmasseteric anterior parotid approach for condylar fractures: experience of 129 cases

We have evaluated the transmasseteric anterior parotid (TMAP) approach in the treatment of 163 condylar fractures in 129 patients. Ninety-five patients presented with unilateral, and 34 with bilateral, fractures. The inclusion criteria were patient's choice for open reduction and internal fixation, displaced unilateral condylar fractures with occlusal derangement, and displaced bilateral condylar fractures with anterior open bite. Mean (SD) maximum interincisal opening after 3 months was 44(5)mm. There were no differences in lateral movements during the reviews 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Protrusive movement at the end of 3 months was 7(2)mm. All patients achieved functional occlusion identical to the pretraumatic occlusion and good reduction of the condyles. No patient developed temporary or permanent facial palsy, sialocele, salivary fistula, or Frey syndrome. The mean (SD) operating time was 46(11)min. The TMAP approach avoids the complications of incision of the parotid gland, minimises the risk of facial nerve palsy, and offers excellent access to the fractured condyle.

Comparison of approaches for the rigid fixation of sub-condylar fractures

AIM

The objective of this study was to compare the rate of complications encountered on using different incisions to access the fracture site for the open reduction and internal fixation of isolated subcondylar fractures. The parameters evaluated are: the occurrence of salivary fistula, infection, and injuries to the seventh facial nerve. An assessment of the surgical scar was also undertaken.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

20 patients who met the previous criteria and were willing to participate in the study were placed (five each) into the pre-auricular, submandibular, retromandibular transparotid or retromandibular transmassetric group based on the incision scar they selected after a description of the operation and being explained about the possible complications.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Comparison of the complications could not ascertain the superiority of any approach over the other since the outcomes were not statistically significant. However, judging by operator and assistants' subjective assessment, the retromandibular approaches seem to provide a more direct visual field and an almost straight line access for the fixation of the fracture. The transmassetric approach seems to be a safer approach since the nerves encountered can be visualized and avoided.

Open reduction of subcondylar fractures using a new retractor

Many operative approaches have been described for the open reduction of subcondylar fractures and rigid fixation. However, fracture portions are deep and embedded among facial nerves so that visual surgery in this region is extremely limited. Once the operative field is exposed, the displacement of the condylar head is often dislocated by the anteromedial pull of the lateral pterygoid muscle and the fracture end of the condylar process is pulled up to the mandibular fossa by contraction of the masseter muscle. We made a new retractor to achieve a better field of view. It is possible to pull down the condylar process by opening the tips of the retractor using the specially made wrench system without special effort and keep the condylar process in the same position during reduction. In using this retractor, the fracture stumps were clearly exposed and more easily reposited.