Transmasseter approach to condylar fractures by mini-retromandibular access

Feasibility of the preauricular transparotid approach in open reduction and internal fixation of intracapsular mandibular condyle fracture

Mandibular condyle fractures pose surgical challenges owing to their proximity to the facial nerve and the complex temporomandibular joint anatomy. Traditional approaches limit exposure and hinder effective fracture management. The preauricular transparotid approach is a potential alternative. We aimed to assess the feasibility of this approach and the postoperative complications. A retrospective analysis of 45 patients who underwent open reduction/internal fixation (OR/IF) for intracapsular condylar fractures using a preauricular transparotid approach was conducted. Patient demographics, surgical procedures, radiological assessments, and postoperative complications were analyzed. The preoperative computed tomography analysis revealed the fractured segment's location: 17.0 ± 2.6 mm anteriorly, 24.0 ± 4.0 mm medially, and 17.8 ± 3.7 mm inferiorly from the remaining condyle end. A cubic space of 17-24 mm from the condylar stump is necessary to reach the fractured segment end. Postoperative facial nerve weakness occurred in 14 patients but resolved within 4.5 weeks. At 5.5 months of follow-up, the mean interincisional mouth opening measured 40.5 ± 5.1 mm, without malocclusion. The approach enhances visualization, facilitates precise fixation, and results in inconspicuous scarring during OR/IF of intracapsular condylar fractures. It requires careful surgical techniques and increases the risk of transient facial nerve weakness. Further research should compare its outcomes with those of traditional approaches and optimize surgical outcomes.

Prevalence of surgical site infections after open reduction and internal fixation for mandibular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Our study aims to estimate the prevalence of surgical site infections (SSI) following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for mandibular fractures and to determine the effect of potential moderators on it. A systematic literature search (Medline and Scopus databases) was conducted independently by two reviewers. The pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals was estimated. Quality assessment as well as outlier and influential analysis were performed. Additionally, subgroup and meta-regression analysis were conducted in order the effect of categorical and continuous variables on the estimated prevalence to be investigated. In total, seventy-five eligible studies (comprising a sum of 5825 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of SSI following ORIF for mandibular fractures was estimated as high as 4.2% (95% CI 3.0-5.6%) with significant heterogeneity between studies. One study was identified to be critically influential. In the subgroup analysis, the prevalence was 4.2% (95% CI 2.2-6.6%) among studies conducted in Europe, 4.3% (95% CI 3.1-5.6%) among studies conducted in Asia and higher among those conducted in America (7.3%) (95% CI 4.7-10.3%). It is important for healthcare professionals to be aware of the etiology of these infections, despite the relatively low rate of SSI in these procedures. However, further, well-designed prospective and retrospective studies need to be conducted in order this issue to be fully clarified.

Innsbruck-style Retromandibular Anterior Trans-parotid Approach for Condylar Fractures: A Retrospective Review of 39 Fractures

The retromandibular anterior trans-parotid (RAT) approach and a triangular-positioned double mini-plate osteosynthesis (TDO) technique have been reported from Innsbruck Medical University. This minimally invasive technique involves direct visualization of the condyle and is associated with lower incidence of facial palsy.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on the RAT approach and TDO technique conducted by a surgeon and team at two hospitals in Tokyo during a period of 3 years and 10 months.

Results

This technique was performed on 35 patients with 39 condylar fractures. Sixty-nine percent of cases were due to accidental fall, 17% to traffic accidents, and 9% to sports. Furthermore, 92% cases were condylar base fractures. Nighty-seven percent of cases achieved good occlusion. The mean maximum mouth opening was 49 ± 1.3 mm. Postoperatively, facial palsy developed in three patients (7.7%), and two of them developed Frey syndrome at approximately 2.5 years postoperatively (5.1%). All patients completely recovered within 3 months postoperatively. One case each of salivary fistula, visible scar, and condylar resorption was found (2.6%). No case of massive bleeding during surgery, hematoma, or TMJ pain after surgery was found.

Conclusion

This technique could achieve good occlusion with low incidence of complications and could contribute to early social reintegration among patients.

Comparison of three different approaches in treatment of mandibular condylar fractures - Our experience

Background

The principal transfacial routes described to approach condylar process fractures are preauricular, retromandibular, high submandibular, and their various modifications. The selection of a specific surgical approach mainly depends on the level of condylar fracture, displacement/dislocation of the proximal segment and time elapsed from the date of trauma. Not too many studies proclaim a unanimous consensus on "gold standard" approaches for particular levels of fracture.

Aim

This study was conducted with the aim to lay down guidelines for determining the ideal surgical approach for treating different condylar fractures based on different clinical situations.

Methodology

This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients that underwent open reduction internal fixation of condylar fractures according to preset study design. Inclusion criteria were fracture displacement more than 10 degrees, dislocation, shortening of ramal height more than 2 mm. Patients having maxillofacial fractures other than mandible and condylar fractures in edentulous patients were excluded from this study.

Results

The risk of facial nerve injury was more in endaural group and parotid fistula was more evident in retromandibular subparotid group but there was no statistical difference between the groups. The surgical scar was inconspicuous in all three groups. Excellent results were achieved in the other parameters such as mouth opening, range of motion, bite force, and occlusion with all the three approaches. Postoperative CT scan showed satisfactory anatomical reduction.

Conclusion

This study concludes that the decision-making on the approach to be selected for any particular condylar fracture depends on the level of fracture, presence of fracture dislocation, and time elapsed from the date of trauma.

Comparative Evaluation of Modified Tragus Edge Approach and Retromandibular Approach to Mid- or Low-Level Mandibular Condylar Fractures

Objectives

To compare and evaluate the modified tragus edge approach (MTEA) with retromandibular approach for surgical access to mid-level or low-level mandibular condylar fractures.

Materials and Methods

This study comprised of 22 patients with mid-level or low-level condylar fracture. Patients with clinical and radiological evidence of mid-level or low-level condylar fracture are included only in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A includes 11 patients, in which modified tragus edge approach was used, and group B includes 11 patients treated with retromandibular approach. Patients were evaluated clinically after first week, second week, fourth week, third month, and sixth month radiographically.

Results

The mean age of the study subjects in group A was 32.45 ± 8.98 years, while in group B, the mean age was 26.91 ± 5.79 years. Post-operatively, no significant difference was seen in relation to pain, occlusal relationship, mouth opening, and deviation of jaw during opening and closing movements. In terms of post-operative complication, only significant difference found between two groups is post-operative scar visibility, which is higher in retromandibular incision group as compared to MTEA.

Conclusion

Thus, we can conclude that MTEA provides ease of operation as a good exposure of mandibular mid- or low-level condylar fracture as retromandibular approach but with less visibility of post-operative scar as compared to retromandibular approach.

Mini - Retromandibular access to sub condylar mandibular fractures - Our experience

Condylar fractures alone accounts to about 25% to 40% of all the fractures of mandible. Management of condylar fractures has always been a controversy. Nowadays there has been more emphasis on open reduction of condylar fractures by the surgeons.The reasons could be the result of complications of closed reduction where the patient may not be able to masticate properly and deviation still present thereby the structural and functional loss forcing the surgeons' choice to open up. The anterior parotid approach has lesser risk of injury to parotid gland and also to facial nerve we attempted to use mini retro mandibular access for such fractures. So the aim was to explore the feasibility of the mini retro mandibular approach to sub condylar fractures. The patients reported to the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery department clinically and radio logically diagnosed and treated for condylar fractures were included. The maximal mouth opening, protrusive and lateral excursive movements, midline orientation with opposing arch, scar visibility, sialocele and facial nerve weakness were all recorded post operatively and compared with pre-operative recording. The mini retro mandibular access with anterior parotid transmessetric approach to sub condylar fractures can be the choice for the surgical management of sub condylar fractures which is absolutely easy, reliable, with less visible scar and with less chances of landing in facial nerve complications.

Evaluation of 3D Trapezoidal Plates in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Subcondylar Fractures of Mandible: A Clinical Trial

Background  Fractures of the mandibular condyle are common and account for 25% to 50% of all fractures of the mandible. Various methods exist for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of condylar fractures. This study was done to explore three-dimensional (3D) plates as a viable option. Aim  This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of 3D trapezoidal plates in open reduction and internal fixation of subcondylar fractures. Materials and methodology This was a non-randomized clinical trial conducted on 20 patients who reported at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India. The ORIF was done under general anesthesia. A retromandibular transmasseteric approach was used to expose the fracture site, and the fracture was stabilized using 3D titanium trapezoidal plates. Parameters, such as mouth opening, mandibular deviation, occlusion, surgical accessibility, fracture reduction, adaptability, the difference in ramal height, angulation of the fractured condyle, operative time, facial nerve weakness, implant failure, complications, and scar formation were assessed. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 21 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). Results  There was an improvement in mouth opening and occlusion in the immediate postoperative period. The surgical accessibility ranged from good to excellent. The fracture reduction was excellent in 60% of patients and good in 40%. In one patient, there was a transient weakness of the marginal mandibular nerve which recovered by three months. Another patient had a wound infection that subsided within the first postoperative week. None of the patients had a device failure during the six-month follow-up period. Conclusion  The trapezoidal 3D plates could be considered as a viable option for treating subcondylar fractures of the mandible in terms of surgical accessibility, stability, ease of device placement, stability of reduced fracture, reduced osteosynthesis material requirement, and minimal damage to the surrounding tissues.

Does Surgical Specialty Impact Mandibular Fracture Outcomes?

PURPOSE

Maxillofacial trauma is treated by two medical specialties, plastic surgery (PRS) and otolaryngology (ENT). Differences in training exposure and practice patterns exist between specialties, but their respective outcomes have never been compared.

METHODS

Mandible fracture data were reviewed from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2005 to 2016. Demographics variables, repair types, and adverse outcomes were compared between PRS and ENT.

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2016, one thousand two hundred eighty-two cases were identified with 756 cases managed by ENT and 526 cases managed by PRS. Mean patient age was 34.6 years for both specialties (P = 0.95). Patient demographics between both cohorts were not statistically different except for higher rates of hypertension among ENT patients (10.2% for ENT versus 6.7% for PRS, P = 0.027) and higher rates of smoking history among PRS patients (46.8% versus 52.3%, P = 0.055). Mean operative time (131.3 versus 124.0 min, P = 0.090) had a trend toward being longer for ENT and mean length of stay (1.3 versus 2.0, P = 0.002) was significantly longer for PRS. Despite a greater proportion of high ASA class patients in the ENT group (P = 0.012) and patients with dirty/infected wounds in the PRS group (P = 0.013), there were no significant differences in 30-day readmission rates, 30-day reoperation rates, or wound infection rates.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in 30-day readmission rates, reoperation rates, or wound infection rates for mandible fracture management exist between specialties. Despite differences in training between PRS and ENT, both specialties have comparable perioperative outcomes for mandible fracture management.

Does the Retromandibular Transparotid Approach Provide Quicker Access to Fracture of Mandibular Subcondyle Compared With the Retromandibular Transmasseteric Anterior Parotid Approach?

PURPOSE

Limited studies are available in the literature comparing various surgical approaches for the management of condylar fractures, and those comparing different types of retromandibular approaches are even fewer in number. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 2 variants of the retromandibular approach-retromandibular transmasseteric anterior parotid (RMTMAP) and retromandibular transparotid (RMTP) in terms of exposure time, blood loss, facial nerve palsy, sialoceles or parotid fistula formation, infection, and esthetics of scar tissue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was designed in patients with mandibular subcondylar fractures requiring operative intervention. Patients were randomized into 2 groups based on a computer-generated randomization table. Group A included 37 cases, treated with the RMTMAP approach, and group B included 38 cases treated with the RMTP approach. The primary outcome variable was exposure time. Secondary outcome variables were blood loss during exposure, complications like facial nerve palsy, sialocele formation, surgical site infection, and scar esthetics. All patients were followed for 3 months. Collected data were analyzed using the χ² and analysis of variance tests.

RESULTS

The mean exposure time for fractures treated with the RMTMAP approach and RMTP approach was 21.08 ± 9.18 and 13.57 ± 6.09, respectively (P < .05). The mean blood loss for RMTMAP and RMTP approach was 11.75 ± 5.11 and 9.9 ± 3.77 mL, respectively (P = .078). No facial nerve injury was seen in patients treated with the RMTMAP approach, whereas 3 (7.8%) patients in the RMTP group had transient facial nerve injury (P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

This study concludes that the RMTP approach provides quicker access to the condyle as compared with the RMTMAP approach. However, the incidence of transient facial nerve injury was more in the RMTP approach. Except for reduced blood loss in the RMTP approach, all other parameters were comparable in both the approaches.

Clinical Assessment of Retromandibular Antero-Parotid Approach for Reduction of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures: Report of 60 Cases and Review of the Literature

This study assessed the efficacy of the retromandibular antero-parotid approach for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of subcondylar fractures. Sixty patients with the mean age of 31.03 years underwent surgical reduction with a 20–25mm incision in the retromandibular area with an antero-parotid transmasseteric approach. All patients were followed between 6 to 12 months. At the end of the first week, six patients exhibited postoperative malocclusion. At the next visits, all patients had optimal occlusion. Maximal interincisal opening (MIO) of 56 patients (93.3%) was >37mm, and only four patients (6.7%) had MIO<37mm. In three patients (5%), weakness of the buccal branch of the facial nerve was noticed postoperatively. No salivary gland complications were seen. The surgical scar was hardly noticeable. Retromandibular access with transmasseteric antero-parotid approach is the technique of choice for treatment of high- and low-level subcondylar fractures with adequate visibility and direct access to the condylar area.

Modified Tragus Edge and Transmasseteric Anteroparotid Approach for Intracapsular and Condylar Neck Fractures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of protecting the facial nerve and reducing the scar visibility using a modified tragus edge and transmasseteric anteroparotid approach compared to classic preauricular approach for intracapsular and condylar neck fractures. This retrospective study included 64 patients (78 sides) who underwent surgical treatment for intracapsular or condylar neck fractures from January 2014 to June 2018. Patients were divided into the experimental group (treated via a modified tragus edge and transmasseteric anteroparotid approach), and the control group (treated via the classical preauricular approach). Therapeutic outcome assessment parameters included facial nerve injury, salivary fistulae, wound infection, restricted mouth opening, postoperative occlusion disorders, and scar visibility. In the control group, there were 3 cases of facial nerve injuries and 2 cases of salivary fistulae. One case of temporary facial nerve injury occurred in the experimental group, with complete recovery within 1 month. The scars were less visible in the experimental group than in the control group. These results suggest that a modified tragus edge and transmasseteric anteroparotid approach reduced the incidences of facial nerve injuries, minimized the scar visibility, improved exposure of the operative site and fixation of titanium screws or plates, and did not increase the frequency of other complications.

Surgical Treatment for Extracapsular Condylar Fractures of the Mandible

BACKGROUND

Condylar fractures are considered the most controversial mandibular fractures, regarding both the diagnosis and the treatment. With the increase in surgical indications for handling this type of fracture, it is important to discuss about the advantages and disadvantages of the several surgical approaches available. This article describes the surgical details and postoperative results of the mini-retromandibular transparotid approach for treating extracapsular condylar fractures of the mandible.

METHODS

In a 1-year period, 16 patients affected by extracapsular condylar fractures with surgical indication were treated with the mini-retromandibular transparotid approach. All the surgeries were executed by the same surgeon. Preoperative and postoperative details of each patient were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the postoperatory, only 2 patients had purulent drainage in the associated fractures area and only 1 patient had paresis of the buccal branch of the facial nerve. No scar issues concerning the surgical wound were observed and reintervention was not necessary in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The mini-retromandibular transparotid approach offers advantages and should be included as an option for the open treatment of extracapsular condylar fractures of the mandible.

Efficacy of the Retroparotid Trans-Masseteric Approach via Retromandibular Incision in ORIF of Subcondylar Fractures: Our Institution Experience

Background

Fractures of the mandible subcondyle have always presented a challenge to the maxillofacial surgeon, with a myriad of treatment options existing ranging from conservative management to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to condylotomy. The complex anatomy of the region poses a challenge, with injury to the facial nerve branches being the primary concern.

Objective

This study evaluated the efficacy of a modified retromandibular approach, with retroparotid trans-masseteric dissection for ORIF of subcondylar fractures.

Methodology

Twenty-five patients with subcondylar fractures at varying levels were treated surgically by ORIF using this approach.

Results

All patients managed by this modified retromandibular approach had satisfactory results with restoration of vertical ramal height, satisfactory mouth opening, stable occlusion and no facial nerve damage post-op.

Conclusion

In our study, the modified retromandibular approach, with retroparotid trans-masseteric approach was effective in surgical management of subcondylar fractures by ORIF with minimal complications.

Use of a modified high submandibular approach to treat condylar base fractures: Experience with 44 consecutive cases treated in a single institution

PURPOSE

The aim of this article is to present our experience treating fractures of the condylar base with a modification of the high submandibular approach (HSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2012 and April 2015, 44 fractures of the condylar base were treated in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Medical Hospital of Graz using the modified HSA.

RESULTS

We did not observe any damage (even transient) to the facial nerve or any complication related to violation of the parotid capsule (such as a salivary fistula, Frey syndrome, or a sialocele).

CONCLUSIONS

This approach provides good access to the condylar base, ensuring easier internal fixation, excellent protection of the facial nerve and parotid gland, and good cosmetic results.

Evaluation of Retro Mandibular Approach to Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Condylar Fractures: A Cross-sectional Study

PURPOSE

The present study was carried out to evaluate the usefulness of mini retromandibular approach on accessibility, scarring and stability in open reduction and internal fixation of sub condylar fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients underwent open reduction and rigid fixation of middle and low subcondylar fractures, with mini-retro mandibular approach.

RESULTS

No signs of infection were observed in any patient postoperatively. Surgical scar was imperceptible and esthetically acceptable in all the cases. Out of 15 patients, only one patient had discrepancy in occlusion and after 2 months satisfactory centric occlusion was achieved. Salivary fistula (parotid fistula) was observed in 3 cases within 1 week postoperatively, which was treated spontaneously with the use of hypertonic saline. Transient facial nerve weakness was observed in 2 patients, in one patient it resolved in 4 weeks postoperatively and in second patient 3 months postoperatively. Mouth opening increased in all the patients with time. Average mouth opening at 1 week interval was 19.6 mm, at 2 months interval 28.2 mm, and after 6 months 38.33 mm suggesting that mouth opening gradually increased with time. At the end of 2 months postoperatively none of the patients had any restriction in lateral movements. At 2 months postoperatively 4 patients had deviation but none of the patients had any deviation 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

It is evident from the results of our study that open reduction and internal fixation using mini-retromandibular approach is good treatment option in management of mandibular condylar fractures.

Surgical treatment of mandibular condyle fractures using the retromandibular anterior transparotid approach and a triangular-positioned double miniplate osteosynthesis technique: A clinical and radiological evaluation of 124 fractures

OBJECTIVE

Different modalities have been described regarding the treatment of mandibular condyle fractures. The most advantageous and safest one is still a topic of discussion. The present analysis describes the combination of a retromandibular, transparotideal approach combined to a triangular-positioned double-miniplate osteosynthesis, with a special regard for the patients' long term outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinical data of 102 patients with 124 condyle fractures treated with the mentioned surgical procedure were evaluated. Functional parameters such as the maximal interincisal distance, deviations/deflections, facial nerve function, occlusion as well as complications regarding the parotid gland, osteosynthesis, and esthetics were evaluated 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean maximal interincisal distance ranged from 38 mm after 1 week to 45 mm after 6 months. Deviations/deflections were seen in 22.5% of the cases 1 week postoperatively and decreased to 2% at 6 months postoperatively. A temporary facial palsy was diagnosed in 3.9% during the first follow-up, whereas no impairment was recorded after 3 or 6 months. At the same time, no patient had occlusional disturbances or complications regarding the parotid gland or the osteosynthesis 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct fracture visualization and a stable three-dimensional fracture stabilization are the main advantages of the presented combination of a surgical approach and osteosynthesis technique. Additionally, the absence of long-term complications confirms the safety of the procedure. Therefore, it may be considered as a successful treatment option for mandibular condyle fractures.

Minimizing the Submandibular Incision in Endoscopic Subcondylar Fracture Repair

Endoscope-assisted treatment of mandibular condylar fractures is an evolving surgical technique of this controversial subject. The approach is performed through an intraoral and additional submandibular incision. This study presents a technique for minimizing the length of the optional submandibular incision. Ten patients with displaced subcondylar fractures and malocclusion underwent endoscope-assisted open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). A limited (<1 cm) submandibular incision (dissected under endoscopic guidance from within) was needed in eight patients to complement the intraoral incision and facilitate the reduction in the fractures. Satisfactory small scar could be obtained in all patients with neither wound complications nor facial nerve injuries. Our technique depends on dissection first then incision. Performing the external incision after complete intraoral dissection is safe for the facial nerve and minimizes scarring markedly. This very limited submandibular incision facilitates reduction in relatively difficult cases and enables clear visualization of posterior border of the mandible to confirm adequate fracture reduction.

A preauricular long-corniform approach for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures

INTRODUCTION

We report functional and clinical outcomes following use of a preauricular long-corniform incision for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of mandibular condylar fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with mandibular condylar fractures who underwent ORIF via a 120° preauricular long-corniform incision were included in the study. A total of 78 patients (100 condyles) were included. Follow-up occurred 10 days and 1-6 months after surgery, and included assessments of clinical, functional outcome, complications, and bone fusion.

RESULTS

There were 38 high neck, 26 low base, and 35 diacapitular condylar fractures. All measures of functional outcome significantly improved over time after surgery regardless of fracture type (all P < 0.001). The vast majority of patients in all fracture type groups had good occlusion (≥ 88.5%), no pain (≥ 89.5%), and anatomical reduction 10 days after surgery (≥ 81.6%). Fracture healing was complete in all patients after 6 months. There were no long-term complications and all patients were satisfied with their postoperative appearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that a preauricular long-corniform incision provides a good visual field during surgery, and allows for effective ORIF of mandibular high neck, low base, and diacapitular condylar fractures, with positive outcomes and minimal postoperative complications.

Mini-retromandibular access to the condyle in panfacial fractures

Surgical management of panfacial fractures can be extremely challenging. The many fracture lines and lack of landmarks make it difficult to restore the facial skeletal morphology. Extracapsular fractures of the mandibular condyle require open reduction and internal fixation to restore the vertical and sagittal dimensions of the mandible, representing the base for further facial skeleton reconstruction. Six patients with panfacial fractures, including a bilateral extracapsular condylar fracture, were treated between January 2006 and November 2009. One patient underwent surgical procedure 60 days after the injury. The condylar fractures were treated via a mini-retromandibular access. Overall, the bone morphology restoration was good. In particular, all of the condylar fractures were reduced satisfactorily. No complication was detected, and no facial nerve lesion was observed. The literature contains many proposals for surgically accessing panfacial fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation of condylar fractures are crucial for restoring face height. The mini-retromandibular access is especially suitable, because it allows safe, rapid surgical management.

Combined surgical approach retromandibular and intraoral to subcondylar mandibular fractures

BACKGROUND

Condylar and subcondylar fractures are very common and account for at least one third of all mandibular fractures. In literature, little agreement exists about the management of extracapsular condylar and subcondylar fractures in adults. Some studies provide better results of occlusion, masticatory function, mouth opening, and bone morphology with surgical treatment. Conversely, other studies report excellent results with conservative treatment avoiding complications such as facial nerve injury and unsightly scar.

METHODS

In this study, we report our experience of 25 condylar/subcondylar fractures. We report the case of a man with bilateral subcondylar fractures treated by a double surgical approach, intraoral and retromamdibular. Intraoral approach lets us dissect the masseter and disconnect the temporal muscle tendon, thus favoring further reduction of fracture stumps, whereas retromandibular approach favors a good operative field and the positioning of titanium microplate.

RESULTS

Postoperative monitoring reported good results of occlusion. Postoperative computed tomographic scans show the good reduction and positioning of titanium miniplate.