In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of the Effect of Pattern, Inclination, and Size of Positional Screws on Load Resistance for Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy

Computer Aided Orthognathic Surgery: A General Method for Designing and Manufacturing Personalized Cutting/Repositioning Templates

Orthognathic surgery allows broad-spectrum deformity correction involving both aesthetic and functional aspects on the TMJ (temporo-mandibular joint) and on the facial skull district. The combination of Reverse Engineering (RE), Virtual Surgery Planning (VSP), Computer Aided Design (CAD), Additive Manufacturing (AM), and 3D visualization allows surgeons to plan, virtually, manipulations and the translation of the human parts in the operating room. This work’s aim was to define a methodology, in the form of a workflow, for surgery planning and for designing and manufacturing templates for orthognathic surgery. Along the workflow, the error chain was checked and the maximum error in virtual planning was evaluated. The three-dimensional reconstruction of the mandibular shape and bone fragment movements after segmentation allow complete planning of the surgery and, following the proposed method, the introduction of both the innovative evaluation of the transversal intercondylar distance variation after mandibular arch advancement/set and the possibility of use of standard plates to plan and realize a customized surgery. The procedure was adopted in one clinical case on a patient affected by a class III malocclusion with an associated open bite and right deviation of the mandible with expected good results. Compared with the methods from most recent literature, the presented method introduces two elements of novelty and improves surgery results by optimizing costs and operating time. A new era of collaboration among surgeons and engineer has begun and is now bringing several benefits in personalized surgery.

Fixation methods in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a systematic review on in vitro biomechanical assessments

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the stability of rigid internal fixation (RIF) techniques in sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) based on in vitro biomechanical assessments, with particular interest in large mandibular advancements. In general, RIF methods can be divided into three groups: bicortical screws, miniplates, and a combination of the two. An electronic search of the PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases was performed, and studies published between January 2003 and March 2018 were screened for inclusion. Comparative studies with an in vitro experimental design, using biomechanical assessments to measure the stability of RIF methods in SSRO, were included. Of 104 unique studies identified in the initial search, 24 were included. Twenty-two of these 24 studies analyzed an advancement of the mandible of 7mm or less. The use of a single four-hole or six-hole miniplate was less stable than the use of bicortical screws, hybrid techniques, double miniplates, or grid plates. Two studies analyzed advancements of 10mm, for which two miniplates placed in parallel and a grid plate showed most stability. Although there was agreement between studies with regard to results, more biomechanical studies are required to quantify the stability of fixation methods in larger mandibular advancements.

Evaluation of Intersegmental Displacement After Mandibular Setback Split Ramus Osteotomy Using Modified L-Shaped Monocortical Plate: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study is to compare intersegmental displacements after mandibular setback sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) using 4 types of osteosynthesis methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 53 subjects who presented underwent bilateral setback SSRO at Pusan National University Hospital from January 2009 to December 2013. The subjects were divided into 4 groups according to the osteosynthesis method applied: group A-modified L-type monocortical plate; B-conventional miniplate; group C-bicortical screws; group D-metal and absorbable screws. To obtain the intersegmental displacement, the mean of the differences of the 3-dimensional from T0 (2 days after surgery) to T1 (6 months after surgery) was calculated for the right and left condylar heads (condylion, Cd) and the right and left coronoid processes (Cps) using 3-dimensional imaging software (Ondemand 3D; Cybermed Co, Seoul, Korea).

RESULTS

For the condylion in the x, y, z coordinate system, in group A, there were significant differences in the y-axis for the right and left Cd; in group B, significant differences in the y-axis for the right Cd and in the y- and z-axes for the left Cd; in group C, no significant differences in the axis for the Cd; and in group D, there were significant differences in the y- and z-axes for the right Cd and in the x- and y-axes for the left Cd. For the Cps, the results are not much different from the condylion movement in all group.

CONCLUSION

In the current study, group C manifested the greatest displacement for the healing period. Group A did not show the significant difference to group B. In view of these results, modified L-shaped monocortical plate can be applied for osteosynthesis effectively.

Analysis of Mandibular Test Specimens Used to Assess a Bone Fixation System

The aim of this study was to assess through biomechanical testing if different synthetic materials used to fabricate test specimens have a different biomechanical behavior in comparison with other materials when simulating in vitro load resistance of a fixation method established for sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Thirty synthetic and standardized human hemimandible replicas with SSRO were divided into three groups of 10 samples each. Group A-ABS plastic; Group B-polyamide; and Group C-polyurethane. These were fixated with three bicortical position screws (16 mm in length, 2.0-mm system) in an inverted l pattern using perforation guide and 5-mm advancement. Each sample was submitted to linear vertical load, and load strength values were recorded at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm of displacement. The means and standard deviation were compared using the analysis of variance (p < 0.05) and the Tukey test. A tendency for lower values was observed in Group B in comparison with Groups A and C. At 3 and 5 mm of displacement, a difference between Groups A and C was found in comparison with Group B (p < 0.05). At 7 and 10 mm of displacement, a difference was found among the three groups, in which Group C showed the highest values and Group B the lowest (p < 0.05). Taking into consideration the results obtained and the behavior of each material used as a substrate, significant differences occurred among the materials when compared among them.

In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies

The sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is a surgical technique used widely to treat many congenital and acquired mandibular discrepancies. Stabilization of the osteotomy site and the potential for skeletal relapse after the procedure are still major problems. The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical stability of six methods of rigid fixation in SSRO using a biomechanical test model. Sixty polyurethane replicas of human hemimandibles were divided into six groups. In group I, the osteotomies were fixed with two four-hole titanium miniplates; in group II, with one four-hole miniplate; in group III, with one four-hole miniplate+a bicortical screw; in group IV, with a grid miniplate; in group V, with a four-hole locking miniplate; and in group VI, with a six-hole miniplate. A linear load in the premolar region was applied to the hemimandibles. The resistance forces (N) needed to displace the distal segment by 1, 3, and 5mm were recorded and the data transmitted from the load cell to a computer. One-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test was performed to compare the means between groups. For the three displacement conditions, there was a strong tendency for the 2.0-mm plate+screw and the grid plate to have higher values.

Evaluation of intersegmental displacement according to osteosynthesis method for mandibular setback sagittal split ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomographic superimposition

PURPOSE

To compare intersegmental displacements after mandibular setback sagittal split ramus osteotomy with reference to the fixation system applied: miniplate with monocortical screw, 3 bicortical screws, and 1 bicortical screw and 2 resorbable screws.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 42 subjects were divided into 3 groups according to the osteosynthesis method applied. To evaluate the intersegmental displacements from immediately after surgery (T0) to 6 months after surgery (T1), 2 cone-beam computed tomographic data sets were superimposed on the symphyseal area and the lower part of the mandible below the root apex. On the superimposed 3-dimensional images, the mean and standard deviation of the differences of the coordinates (x, y, z) between T0 and T1 were calculated.

RESULTS

From T0 to T1, group B (bicortical screws) manifested the greatest condylion (Cd) and coronoid process (Cp) displacements (P < .05). In group A, the right Cd moved anteriorly and the left Cd moved anteriorly and inferiorly, whereas the right and left Cps moved anteriorly. In group B, the right and left Cps moved laterally and inferiorly. In group C, the right Cd moved anteriorly and inferiorly, the left Cd changed laterally and anteriorly, the right Cp moved anteriorly, and the left Cp moved anteriorly and inferiorly.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, group B (bicortical screws) showed the greatest displacement after the healing period. In view of these findings, surgeons should consider carefully their choice of osteosynthesis method to effectively decrease intersegmental displacement.