1
|
Möhlhenrich SC, Kniha K, Peters F, Heitzer M, Szalma J, Prescher A, Danesh G, Hölzle F, Modabber A. Evaluation of bone contact area and intercondylar distance changes in orthognathic surgery - a comparison between BSSO and HSSO technique depending on mandibular displacement extent. Clin Oral Investig 2024; 28:182. [PMID: 38424318 PMCID: PMC10904418 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05584-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The present study aims to assess the impact of bilateral and high oblique sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO/HSSO), as well as displacement distances and directions on the expected and achievable bone contact area (BCA) and changes in the intercondylar distance (ICD). The primary question addressed is whether mandibular splitting through BSSO results in a greater BCA and/or ICD when compared to splitting through HSSO. MATERIALS AND METHODS Totally 80 mandibular displacements were performed on 20 fresh cadavers, for each subject, four splints were produces to facilitate mandibular advancement as well as setbacks of 4 and 8 mm. Pre- and postoperative CBCT scans were performed to plan the surgical procedures and to analyze the expected and achieved BCA and ICD. RESULTS Regarding the maximum mandibular displacement, the expected BCA for HSSO/BSSO were 352.58 ± 96.55mm2 and 1164.00 ± 295.50mm2, respectively, after advancement and 349.11 ± 98.42mm2 and 1344.70 ± 287.23mm2, respectively, after setback. The achieved BCA for HSSO/BSSO were 229.37 ± 75.90mm2 and 391.38 ± 189.01mm2, respectively, after advancement and 278.03 ± 97.65mm2 and 413.52 ± 169.52 mm2, respectively after setback. The expected ICD for HSSO/BSSO were 4.51 ± 0.73 mm and 3.25 ± 1.17 mm after advancement and - 5.76 ± 1.07 mm and - 4.28 ± 1.58 mm after setback. The achieved ICD for HSSO/BSSO were 2.07 ± 2.9 mm and 1.7 ± 0.60 mm after advancement and - 2.57 ± 2.78 mm and - 1.28 ± 0.84 mm after setback. Significant differences between the BCA after HSSO and BSSO were at each displacement (p < 0.001), except for the achieved BCA after 8-mm setback and advancement (p ≥ 0.266). No significant differences were observed regarding ICD, except for the expected ICD after 8-mm setback and advancement (p ≤ 0.037). CONCLUSIONS Compared to the virtual planning, the predictability regarding BCA and ICD was limited. ICD showed smaller clinical changes, BCA decreased significantly in the BSSO group. CLINICAL RELEVANCE BCA and ICD might have been less important in choosing the suitable split technique. in orthognathic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich
- Department of Orthodontics, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany.
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Kristian Kniha
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Florian Peters
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marius Heitzer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Josef Szalma
- Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical School, University of Pécs, 1. Tüzér St., Pécs, 7623, Hungary
| | - Andreas Prescher
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, Medical Faculty of RWTH-Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gholamreza Danesh
- Department of Orthodontics, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany
| | - Frank Hölzle
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ali Modabber
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Comparison of two surgical techniques (HOO vs. BSSO) for mandibular osteotomies in orthognathic surgery-a 10-year retrospective study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022:10.1007/s10006-022-01073-y. [PMID: 35595944 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-022-01073-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively compare the high-angled sagittal split osteotomy (HOO) and the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) for the correction of skeletal dysgnathias regarding intra- and postoperative complications. METHODS The electronic medical records of all patients treated with an orthognathic surgery at the Department for Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany, between the years 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-one patients were included. The overall complication rates were 19.78% (BSSO) compared to 12.5% (HOO) (p = 0.14). Significant differences were found regarding the operation time (HOO < BSSO, p = 0.02), material failure (HOO > BSSO, p = 0.04), and early recurrence requiring revision surgery (HOO < BSSO, p = 0.002). The use of a ramus plate significantly reduced the risk of plate failure (2.8% < 13.6%, p = 0.05). More bad splits (p = 0.08) and early sensory disorders (p = 0.07) occurred in the BSSO group. CONCLUSION The HOO presents a possible alternative to the BSSO since newly developed osteosynthesis material significantly reduces the risk of material failure. The BSSO is accompanied by higher risks of developing complications like a bad split and sensory disorders but, however, remains the standard for large anterior-posterior transpositions of the mandible.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kämmerer PW, Müller D, Linz F, Peron PF, Pabst A. Patient-specific 3D-printed cutting guides for high oblique sagittal osteotomy-an innovative surgical technique for nerve preservation in orthognathic surgery. J Surg Case Rep 2021; 2021:rjab345. [PMID: 34457236 PMCID: PMC8390334 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjab345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandible according to Obwegeser/Dal Pont is considered to be gold standard in orthognathic surgery. Frequently reported complications of BSSO are injuries of the mandibular nerve resulting in paresthesia/anesthesia as well as inadequate mandibular bone fracturing ('bad split'). High oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO) was introduced to overcome these complications. We present an innovative HOSO modification using patient-specific 3D-printed cutting guides positioned on the outside of the ascending mandibular ramus and fixed in the incisura semilunaris, precisely marking the optimal height and angle of the osteotomy. Advantages are a decreased operation time due to the simplicity of this less invasive procedure, a potentially reduced frequency of mandibular nerve damage and bad splits as well as a lower bleeding risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peer W Kämmerer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniel Müller
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Friedemann Linz
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Pabst
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Savoldelli C, Ehrmann E, Tillier Y. Biomechanical assessment of different fixation methods in mandibular high sagittal oblique osteotomy using a three-dimensional finite element analysis model. Sci Rep 2021; 11:8755. [PMID: 33888844 PMCID: PMC8062482 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88332-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
With modern-day technical advances, high sagittal oblique osteotomy (HSOO) of the mandible was recently described as an alternative to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for the correction of mandibular skeletal deformities. However, neither in vitro nor numerical biomechanical assessments have evaluated the performance of fixation methods in HSOO. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics and stress distribution in bone and osteosynthesis fixations when using different designs and placing configurations, in order to determine a favourable plating method. We established two finite element models of HSOO with advancement (T1) and set-back (T2) movements of the mandible. Six different configurations of fixation of the ramus, progressively loaded by a constant force, were assessed for each model. The von Mises stress distribution in fixations and in bone, and bony segment displacement, were analysed. The lowest mechanical stresses and minimal gradient of displacement between the proximal and distal bony segments were detected in the combined one-third anterior- and posterior-positioned double mini-plate T1 and T2 models. This suggests that the appropriate method to correct mandibular deformities in HSOO surgery is with use of double mini-plates positioned in the anterior one-third and posterior one-third between the bony segments of the ramus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Savoldelli
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Head and Neck Institute, University Hospital of Nice, 30 Avenue Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France. .,Department of Computational Mechanics Physics CEMEF, MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, Centre de Mise en Forme Des Matériaux (CEMEF), French National Centre for Scientific Research, Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | - Elodie Ehrmann
- Department of Computational Mechanics Physics CEMEF, MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, Centre de Mise en Forme Des Matériaux (CEMEF), French National Centre for Scientific Research, Sophia Antipolis, France.,Department of Orthodontics, Oral Rehabilitation and Facial Pain, Dentistry Unit, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
| | - Yannick Tillier
- Department of Computational Mechanics Physics CEMEF, MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, Centre de Mise en Forme Des Matériaux (CEMEF), French National Centre for Scientific Research, Sophia Antipolis, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Herrera-Vizcaino C, Seifert L, Berdan M, Ghanaati S, Klos M, Landes C, Sader R. Revision of 116 orthognathic surgery patients operated on with the high-oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO): a retrospective case series (PROCESS-compliant article). Clin Oral Investig 2020; 25:3229-3236. [PMID: 33106901 PMCID: PMC8060227 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03653-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The high-oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO) is an alternative to a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Due to its novelty, there are no long-term studies which have focused on describing the incidence and type of complications encountered in the post-operative follow-up. The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze patients operated on with this surgical technique and the post-operative complications encountered. PATIENT AND METHODS The electronic medical records of all patients treated with orthognathic surgery at the Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany, between the years 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS A total of 116 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The cases operated on with the standard osteosynthesis (X, Y, and straight) showed a complication rate of 36.37% (n = 4/11). The cases operated on with the HOSO-dedicated plates (HOSO-DP) showed, in total, a complication rate of 6.67% (n = 7/105). The most common post-operative complication resulting from both fixation methods was a reduction in mouth opening and TMJ pain for 4.3%. During the first years of performing the surgery (2009-211), a variety of standard plates had material failure causing non-union or pseudarthrosis. No cases of material failure were observed in the cases operated on with the HOSO-DP. The statistical results showed a highly significant dependence of a reduction in OP-time over the years, when the HOSO was performed without additional procedures (R2 > 0.83, P < 0.0015). CONCLUSION The rate of complications in the HOSO were shown to be comparable to the rate of complications from the BSSO reported in the literature. Moreover, the use of the ramus dedicated plate appears to provide enough stability to the bone segments, making the surgery safer. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The HOSO needs to be considered by surgeons as an alternative to BSSO. Once the use of the HOSO-DP was established, the rate of complications and the operation time reduced considerably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Herrera-Vizcaino
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - L Seifert
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - M Berdan
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - S Ghanaati
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - M Klos
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - C Landes
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Sana Klinikum, Offenbach am Main, Germany
| | - Robert Sader
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carlos HV, Marta BL, Orlando PM, Samuel UE, Sader R, Seifert LB. Stress distribution is susceptible to the angle of the osteotomy in the high oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO): biomechanical evaluation using finite element analyses. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2020; 24:67-75. [PMID: 32845167 DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1810242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
AIM This computational study aimed to evaluate the influence of the angle of the osteotomy when performing a high oblique sagittal osteotomy over the distribution of stress to the osteosynthesis plates and mandibular segments. Material and methods: For this purpose, a finite element analysis of different combinations was carried out based on the osteotomy angle and mandibular mobilization using Autodesk Inventor® resulting in a total of 72 simulations. To check the correlation between the osteotomy angles with respect to the tension in the mandibular structure in different mobilizations, a student t-test was used. Results: The results of the advancement mobilizations (2.5 mm to 5.5 mm) reported increasing values for tension in the probe of the fourth screw and in the probe of the plate surface as the osteotomy angle increased (p-value <10-8). The results of the setback mobilizations (-2.5 mm to -5.5 mm) show comparable values (p-value <10-8). The resulting contact surface between bone segments varies depending on the osteotomy angle, increasing 44.67% from 45° to 70° and decreasing 22.05% when the angle is reduced to 30°. Conclusion: The angle of the osteotomy is a very relevant parameter in the design of the studied mandibular osteotomy, since the distribution of the reported stresses is substantially susceptible to its variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herrera-Vizcaíno Carlos
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Baselga Lahoz Marta
- Applied Mechanics and Bioengineering Group (AMB) of Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Udeabor E Samuel
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Robert Sader
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lukas Benedikt Seifert
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Suojanen J, Hodzic Z, Palotie T, Stoor P. CAD/CAM Engineered Patient-Specific Impants as a Reposition Device in Le Fort I and Modified Subcondylar Osteotomies: Case Report of Facial Deformity Correction in Acromegaly. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2020; 13:226-236. [PMID: 33456692 DOI: 10.1177/1943387520924521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Acromegaly is a medical condition where elevated growth hormone or insulin-like growth factor I levels cause several changes in the craniofacial soft and hard features. We report the correction of facial deformity and posterior open bite with Le Fort I and modified subcondylar osteotomies in a patient affected by acromegaly. Computer-aided design and manufacturing generated saw and drill guides were used to perform osteotomies and segment removal. The placement of the patient-specific implants (PSIs) was guided by predesigned drill holes ensuring the required and planned movement of the jaws and position of the PSIs. After segment removal, the PSIs fitted the predesigned drill holes with high precision and were secured without problems. The planned amount of mandibular and maxillary movement was achieved. The occlusion and osteotomies remained stable for the follow-up of 22 months. The use of PSIs combined with guided surgery can be beneficial for selected cases with asymmetry or posterior open bite enabling new approaches and yielding good functional and aesthetic outcome. The modification of conventional ramus osteotomy combined with utilization of ramus segment removal and the use of PSI for reposition is an interesting and promising technique for rare conditions with ramus height asymmetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juho Suojanen
- Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Centre, Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Päijät-Häme Joint Authority for Health and Wellbeing, Lahti, Finland
| | - Zlatan Hodzic
- Departments of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Diseases at the University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tuula Palotie
- Departments of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Diseases at the University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Patricia Stoor
- Departments of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Diseases at the University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Changes in the temporomandibular joint position depending on the sagittal osteotomy technique and extent of mandibular movement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 50:356-366. [PMID: 32620453 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and high oblique sagittal split osteotomy (HSSO) are common techniques for mandibular movement in orthognathic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of both techniques, as well as movement distances and directions, on the position of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). A total of 80 mandibular movements were performed on 20 fresh human cadaver heads, four on each head. Pre- and postoperative cone beam computed tomography was used to plan the surgical procedure and analyse the TMJ. Reference measurements included the anterior, superior, and posterior joint spaces, intercondylar distances and angles in the axial and coronal planes, and the sagittal, coronal, and axial angulations of the proximal segment. Only minor differences were found between the BSSO and HSSO techniques, particularly in terms of the intercondylar angle in the axial plane (P < 0.03) and the condylar angle of the proximal segment in the sagittal plane (P < 0.011). Observed changes in the TMJ were mostly opposite when moving the mandible forwards and backwards and increased with increasing movement distance. BSSO and HSSO result in similar changes in TMJ position. The extent of the movement distance influences the position of the condyle more than the osteotomy technique.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chowdhury SKR, Mishra A, Saxena V, Rajkumar K, Krishnan VG, Arunkumar SR, Dubey PK. Application of Navigation Surgery in Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis Case and Review of Literature. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2020; 19:44-46. [PMID: 31988562 DOI: 10.1007/s12663-019-01231-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this article is to develop a navigation-guided oral and maxillofacial surgery including surgical planning, simulation and navigation in temporomandibular joint ankylosis case practiced in tertiary care hospital. After getting the computed tomographic angiography of head and neck, the special software of Brain lab® is used to mark the arteries and veins of the patient, which was in close approximation to the mandibular condyle. Brain lab® navigation system was used during the surgery to ascertain the middle meningeal artery location, and osteotomy cut was given. Navigation technology use in the neurosurgery is not new. But its use in the subcontinent in the field of maxillofacial surgery is quite rare. First time, it has been used scientifically in temporomandibular joint ankylosis case. Navigation technology use in the maxillofacial surgery requires a holistic imaginative/creative approach to make the surgeries more predictive and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Roy Chowdhury
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Surgery Oral Health Sciences, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, 411040 India
| | - Abhishek Mishra
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Surgery Oral Health Sciences, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, 411040 India
| | - Vivek Saxena
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Surgery Oral Health Sciences, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, 411040 India
| | - K Rajkumar
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Surgery Oral Health Sciences, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, 411040 India
| | - V Gopal Krishnan
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Surgery Oral Health Sciences, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, 411040 India
| | - S R Arunkumar
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Surgery Oral Health Sciences, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, 411040 India
| | - Prasun Kumar Dubey
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Surgery Oral Health Sciences, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, 411040 India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bachelet JT, Adnot J, Termont A, Decaudaveine S, Paulus C. [Short osteotomy use in orthognathic surgery: benefit, disadvantage and perspective]. Orthod Fr 2019; 90:161-168. [PMID: 31241458 DOI: 10.1051/orthodfr/2019015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The short osteotomy was first reported by Blair in 1907 and was later described and characterized by Kater and Paulus in 2013. The technique involves an oblique supra-lingular osteotomy from internal to external, from top to bottom and from back to front. It is designed to divide the ramus into two segments, the joint and the mandibular body, and to ensure minimal valve equivalents. Both osseous valves were maintained in contact by obtaining surface contact proportional to the angle of the osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We present a series of 82 patients to demonstrate the benefits of this technique in terms of stability and conservation of sensitivity. RESULTS 82 patients were included, of which 74 (90%) described normal sensitivity and 8 (10%) reported modified sensitivity two years post-surgery. DISCUSSION On account of the nature and height of the short osteotomy cut, it is possible to avoid direct manipulation of the lower alveolar nerve. The postoperative sensitivity level is identical to the pre-operative level in more than 90% of cases. In good indications, this technique could be used preferentially to optimize postoperative nerve recovery. We also discuss the current limitations of this orthognathic surgery procedure, as well as the perspectives linked to the development of 3D printing and preoperative planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Thomas Bachelet
- Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4 rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, 1205 Genève, Suisse - Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, CHU de Lyon, 3 quai des Célestins, 69002 Lyon, France - INSERM, UMR 1052, Groupe de Radiobiologie, 28 rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Jérôme Adnot
- Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, CHU de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Aurélien Termont
- Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, CHU Saint-Pierre, Rue Haute 290, 1000 Bruxelles, Belgique
| | - Suzanne Decaudaveine
- Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, Hôpital Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Christian Paulus
- Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, CHU de Lyon, 59 boulevard Pinel, 69677 Bron, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mandibular osteotomies aim to displace the dental arch to the necessary position, ideally without limitation, while preserving inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) function. Supraforaminal osteotomies offer nerve safety but limit the extent of advancement, whereas Epker and Obwegeser-Dal Pont osteotomies enable unchallenged mandibular advancement but are associated with an inferior border notch. Here, we describe a new technique to avoid such disadvantages. TECHNICAL NOTE The beginning of the procedure was similar to Epker's technique, with sectioning of the lingual cortex up to the level of the lingula. Sectioning of the buccal cortex was stopped 3 to 4 mm above the inferior border and then performed horizontally up to the gonial angle in total thickness. The inferior border periosteum and muscles attachments were conserved and hence, appropriately vascularized. DISCUSSION This technique offers 4 advantages: absence of the inferior border notch, lower risk of damage to the IAN than with Epker's technique, sufficiently large bony surface to obtain bone healing as in Epker's technique, and no limitation to setback movement in contrast to Obwegeser-Dal Pont's or the supraforaminal osteotomy techniques.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kuehle R, Berger M, Saure D, Hoffmann J, Seeberger R. High oblique sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: assessment of the positions of the mandibular condyles after orthognathic surgery based on cone-beam tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 54:638-42. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 03/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
13
|
Möhlhenrich SC, Kamal M, Peters F, Fritz U, Hölzle F, Modabber A. Bony contact area and displacement of the temporomandibular joint after high-oblique and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a computer-simulated comparison. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 54:306-11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2015] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
14
|
Thiele OC, Kreppel M, Bittermann G, Bonitz L, Desmedt M, Dittes C, Dörre A, Dunsche A, Eckert AW, Ehrenfeld M, Fleiner B, Frerich B, Gaggl A, Gerressen M, Gmelin L, Hammacher A, Haßfeld S, Heiland M, Hemprich A, Hidding J, Hölzle F, Howaldt HP, Iizuka T, Kater W, Klein C, Klein M, Köhnke RH, Kolk A, Kübler AC, Kübler NR, Kunkel M, Kuttenberger JJ, Kreusch T, Landes C, Lehner B, Mischkowski RA, Mokros S, Neff A, Nkenke E, Palm F, Paulus GW, Piesold JU, Rasse M, Rodemer H, Rothamel D, Rustemeyer J, Sader R, Scheer M, Scheffler B, Schippers C, Schliephake H, Schmelzeisen R, Schramm A, Spitzer WJ, Stoll C, Terheyden H, Weingart D, Wiltfang J, Wolff KD, Ziegler CM, Zöller JE. Moving the mandible in orthognathic surgery - A multicenter analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44:579-83. [PMID: 27017103 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2015] [Revised: 01/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Orthognathic surgery has always been a classical focus of maxillofacial surgery. Since more than 100 years, various surgical techniques for mandibular repositioning have been developed and clinically tested. Since the establishment of plate and screw osteosynthesis, orthognathic surgery became more stable and safe. Nowadays, different surgical methods for mobilising the mandible are existing. This international multicenter analysis (n = 51 hospitals) is providing first evidence based data for the current use of different surgical methods. The dominating techniques were Obwegeser/dal Pont (61%) followed by Hunsuck/Epker (37%) and Perthes/Schlössmann (29%). The main osteosynthesis materials were plates (82%), bicortical screws (23.5%), or a combination of both (5.9%). 47% of all centers reported to use several surgical methods at the same time, depending on the anatomical problem and the surgeon's preference. This shows that different surgical methods seem to work as comparable, safe, and reliable procedures in everydays clinical practise. On this basis, further prospective studies could evaluate possible advantages for our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver C Thiele
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. R. A. Mischkowski), Ludwigshafen Hospital, Germany.
| | - Matthias Kreppel
- Department of Craniomaxillofacial and Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. J.E. Zöller), University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Gido Bittermann
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. R. Schmelzeisen), University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lars Bonitz
- Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery - Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. S. Haßfeld), University Witten/Herdecke, Hospital Dortmund, Germany
| | - Maria Desmedt
- Fachklinik Hornheide, Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. M. Klein), Münster, Germany
| | - Carsten Dittes
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: C. Dittes), Dietrich-Bonhoeffer-Hospital, Neubrandenburg, Germany
| | - Annegret Dörre
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: A. Dörre), Chemnitz Hospital, Germany
| | - Anton Dunsche
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. A. Dunsche), City Hospital Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Alexander W Eckert
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. A. Eckert), Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Michael Ehrenfeld
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. M. Ehrenfeld), Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Germany
| | - Bernd Fleiner
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: B. Fleiner), Im Pferseepark, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Frerich
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. B. Frerich), Facial Plastic Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Germany
| | - Alexander Gaggl
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. A. Gaggl), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria
| | - Marcus Gerressen
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery (Head: PD M. Gerressen), Heinrich-Braun Hospital Zwickau, Germany
| | - Leonore Gmelin
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. R. A. Mischkowski), Ludwigshafen Hospital, Germany
| | - Andreas Hammacher
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. A. Hammacher and H. Sieber), Malteser Hospital St. Johannes, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Haßfeld
- Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery - Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. S. Haßfeld), University Witten/Herdecke, Hospital Dortmund, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. M. Heiland), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Alexander Hemprich
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. A. Hemprich), Leipzig University, Germany
| | - Johannes Hidding
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. J. Hidding), Bethesda Hospital Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Frank Hölzle
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery (Head: Prof. F. Hölzle), RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Howaldt
- Department for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. H.P. Howaldt), University Hospital Giessen, Germany
| | - Tateyuki Iizuka
- Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. T. Iizuka), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Wolfgang Kater
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: W. Kater), Hochtaunus Hospital Bad Homburg, Germany
| | - Cornelius Klein
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. C. Klein), Donauisar Hospital Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Martin Klein
- Fachklinik Hornheide, Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. M. Klein), Münster, Germany
| | - Robert H Köhnke
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. M. Heiland), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Kolk
- Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. K.D. Wolff), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander C Kübler
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. A.C. Kübler), University of Würzburg, Germany
| | - Norbert R Kübler
- Department of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. N.R. Kübler), Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Kunkel
- Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. M. Kunkel), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - Johannes J Kuttenberger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: PD J. Kuttenberger), Luzerner Kantonsspital, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Kreusch
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. T. Kreusch), Asklepios Hospital Nord, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Constantin Landes
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. C. Landes), Sana Hospital Offenbach, Germany
| | - Bernhard Lehner
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: B. Lehner), Health Center St. Marien, Hospital Amberg, Germany
| | - Robert A Mischkowski
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. R. A. Mischkowski), Ludwigshafen Hospital, Germany
| | - Steffen Mokros
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: S. Mokros), Ameos Hospital Halberstadt, Germany
| | - Andreas Neff
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. A. Neff), University of Marburg, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Germany
| | - Emeka Nkenke
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. E. Nkenke), Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Frank Palm
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. F. Palm), Hospital Konstanz, Germany
| | - Gerhard W Paulus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. G.W. Paulus), Paracelsus Hospital Munich, Germany
| | - Jörn U Piesold
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: PD J.U. Piesold), Helios Hospital Erfurt, Germany
| | - Michael Rasse
- Department for Cranio-, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery (Head: Prof. M. Rasse), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Herbert Rodemer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: H. Rodemer), Saarbrücken Hospital, Germany
| | - Daniel Rothamel
- Department of Craniomaxillofacial and Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. J.E. Zöller), University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan Rustemeyer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. J. Rustemeyer), Plastic Operations, Hospital Bremen, Germany
| | - Robert Sader
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery (Head: Prof. R. Sader), University Medical Centre Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Martin Scheer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: PD M. Scheer), Hospital Minden, Germany
| | - Birgit Scheffler
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. A. Eckert), Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Christian Schippers
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. C. Schippers), Agaplesion Diakonie Hospital Rotenburg (Wümme), Germany
| | - Henning Schliephake
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. H. Schliephake), George-Augusta-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Rainer Schmelzeisen
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. R. Schmelzeisen), University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Schramm
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. A. Schramm), Facial Plastic Surgery, Military Hospital of Ulm and University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - Wolfgang J Spitzer
- Department for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. W. Spitzer), University Clinic of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Christian Stoll
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. C. Stoll), Ruppiner Kliniken, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Hendrik Terheyden
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. H. Terheyden), Red Cross Hospital, Kassel, Germany
| | - Dieter Weingart
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. D. Weingart), Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Jörg Wiltfang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. J. Wiltfang), University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - Klaus D Wolff
- Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. K.D. Wolff), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph M Ziegler
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. C. Ziegler), St Olavs University Hospital, Norwegian University for Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Joachim E Zöller
- Department of Craniomaxillofacial and Plastic Surgery (Head: Prof. J.E. Zöller), University of Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Verweij JP, Mensink G, Houppermans PNWJ, van Merkesteyn JPR. Angled Osteotomy Design Aimed to Influence the Lingual Fracture Line in Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Human Cadaveric Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73:1983-93. [PMID: 25869983 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Revised: 01/31/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The traditional osteotomy design in the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy includes a horizontal lingual bone cut, a connecting sagittal bone cut, and a vertical buccal bone cut perpendicular to the inferior mandibular cortex. The buccal bone cut extends as an inferior border cut into the lingual cortex. This study investigated a modified osteotomy design including an angled oblique buccal bone cut that extended as a posteriorly aimed inferior border cut near the masseteric tuberosity. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors implemented a randomized controlled study. The study sample was comprised of 28 cadaveric dentulous mandibles. The primary outcome variable was the pattern of lingual fracture induced using the conventional (n = 14) and modified (n = 14) osteotomy designs. The secondary outcome variables included the incidence of bad splits and the status of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed. RESULTS The angled osteotomy design resulted in a significantly larger number of the lingual fractures originating from the inferior border cut (odds ratio [OR] = 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.86; P < .01), with a significantly more posterior relation of the fracture line to the mandibular canal (OR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.22-3.63; P < .01) and foramen (OR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.28-3.08; P < .01). No bad splits occurred with the angled design, whereas 3 bad splits occurred with the conventional design, although this difference was not statistically significant (OR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99-1.25; P = .07). IAN status was comparable between designs, although the nerve more frequently required manipulation from the proximal mandibular segment when the conventional design was used (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.99-1.47; P = .06). CONCLUSION The results suggest that the angled osteotomy design promotes a more posterior lingual fracture originating from the inferior border cut and a trend was apparent that this also might decrease the incidence of bad splits and IAN entrapment. These results must be carefully extrapolated to the clinical setting, with future studies clarifying these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jop P Verweij
- Senior Researcher, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gertjan Mensink
- Senior Researcher and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal N W J Houppermans
- Junior Researcher and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J P Richard van Merkesteyn
- Professor, Department Head, and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bobek SL. Applications of Navigation for Orthognathic Surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2014; 26:587-98. [DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2014.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
17
|
Landes C, Tran A, Ballon A, Santo G, Schübel F, Sader R. Low to high oblique ramus piezoosteotomy: a pilot study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42:901-9. [PMID: 24503387 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2013] [Revised: 10/07/2013] [Accepted: 01/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Two major drawbacks of classical bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) are occasional inferior alveolar nerve damage and bad splits. In order to avoid these two well-known disadvantages and benefit from ultrasonic bone cutting, a low-to-high oblique piezoosteotomy (LHO) was developed from Schlössmann's 1922 high oblique osteotomy, clinically evaluated with a standard and a novel osteosynthesis system. Eighty-five patients were retrospectively evaluated, 23 with an LHO osteotomy with standard osteosynthesis, 33 LHO with a dedicated plate osteosynthesis and compared to 29 patients with BSSO and standard osteosyntheses. The mean mandibular advancement in the LHO standard osteosynthesis/LHO dedicated plate osteosynthesis/BSSO collectives was 4.7 ± 2.5/7.8 ± 7.1/4.1 ± 2.8 mm, the mean one year relapse 2.6 ± 0.8 (p = 0.58)/1.4 ± 1.4 (p = 0.28)/2.1 ± 1.4 mm; the mean mandibular setback was 6.9 ± 3.6/7.7 ± 4.1/8.1 ± 4.9 mm and the one year relapse 2.9 ± 2.9 (p = 0.16)/1.4 ± 1.0 (p = 0.38)/1.5 ± 1.9 mm; clockwise rotation of the mandible was 5.2 ± 3.2/6.3 ± 5.1/10.2 ± 6.9°, the one year relapse 2.7 ± 1.2 (p = 0.18)/2.1 ± 1.7 (p = 0.09)/11.4 ± 9.3°; counterclockwise rotation averaged 6.4 ± 3.2/6.5 ± 7.9/6.5 ± 6.1° with a mean one year relapse of 3.3 ± 0.6 (p = 0.37)/3.7 ± 1.9 (p = 0.21)/4.5 ± 6.2°. LHO had 3%, BSSO 5% three months postoperative inferior alveolar nerve deficit (p = 0.17). The operation time was significantly shorter when LHO and dedicated plates were used compared to BSSO. Two broken conventional plates occurred in LHO, which stimulated the development of the dedicated plates used, one in BSSO; four bad splits in BSSO and two in LHO. Reosteosyntheses were performed using the newly developed dedicated "orthognathics" plate. LHO was successfully performed, easier and faster than BSSO. Gonial angle modifications were possible due to the oblique cut. Postoperative stability appears sufficient for moderate repositioning with a lower incidence of bad split and inferior alveolar nerve irritation, moreover blood loss was reduced. Since 2 standard miniplate fractures occurred in LHO, the "orthognathics" osteosynthesis was developed, applied and no further osteosynthesis fractures were seen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Landes
- Cranio-Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery (Head: Robert Sader, MD, DMD, PhD, FEBOMFS), J. W. Goethe-University of Frankfurt Medical Centre, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Andreas Tran
- Cranio-Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery (Head: Robert Sader, MD, DMD, PhD, FEBOMFS), J. W. Goethe-University of Frankfurt Medical Centre, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Alexander Ballon
- Cranio-Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery (Head: Robert Sader, MD, DMD, PhD, FEBOMFS), J. W. Goethe-University of Frankfurt Medical Centre, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregor Santo
- Cranio-Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery (Head: Robert Sader, MD, DMD, PhD, FEBOMFS), J. W. Goethe-University of Frankfurt Medical Centre, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Florian Schübel
- Cranio-Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery (Head: Robert Sader, MD, DMD, PhD, FEBOMFS), J. W. Goethe-University of Frankfurt Medical Centre, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Robert Sader
- Cranio-Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery (Head: Robert Sader, MD, DMD, PhD, FEBOMFS), J. W. Goethe-University of Frankfurt Medical Centre, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kaduk WMH, Podmelle F, Louis PJ. Surgical navigation in reconstruction. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2013; 25:313-33. [PMID: 23642674 DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2013.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Navigational systems are paramount in solving today's traffic dilemmas, and have important applications in the human body. Current imaging must be diagnostic and is often dictated by the radiologist, but it is up to the surgeon to consider surgical procedures and to decide in which case surgical navigation (SN) has advantages. Knowledge of the surgical capabilities of SN is indispensable. The aims of this article are to support real-time image-guided SN, present routine and advanced cases with precise preoperative planning, and show the scientific capabilities of SN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfram M H Kaduk
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery/Plastic Surgery, Greifswald University, Greifswald, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mensink G, Verweij JP, Frank MD, Eelco Bergsma J, Richard van Merkesteyn J. Bad split during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible with separators: a retrospective study of 427 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51:525-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2012] [Accepted: 10/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
20
|
Seeberger R, Asi Y, Thiele OC, Hoffmann J, Stucke K, Engel M. Neurosensory alterations and function of the temporomandibular joint after high oblique sagittal split osteotomy: an alternative technique in orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51:536-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2012] [Accepted: 11/25/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
21
|
Seeberger R, Thiele OC, Mertens C, Hoffmann J, Engel M. Proximal segment positioning with high oblique sagittal split osteotomy: indications and limits of intraoperative mobile cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 115:731-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2012] [Accepted: 10/29/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|