1
|
Diniz JA, Dourado ACAG, Barbirato DDS, de Oliveira MSV, de Lira VLBDO, de Melo Filho SMC, da Silveira KG, Laureano Filho JR. Evaluation of the effects of pregabalin and dexamethasone coadministration on preemptive multimodal analgesia and anxiety in third molar surgeries: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2024; 28:304. [PMID: 38717697 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05700-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin and dexamethasone coadministration in preemptive analgesia and anxiety control in lower third molar surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS A triple-blind, split-mouth clinical trial conducted with patients divided into two groups: control group, receiving placebo and dexamethasone, and test group, receiving pregabalin and dexamethasone preoperatively. The evaluated variables were pain, measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), anxiety assessed through the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaires, hemodynamic parameters [Blood Pressure (BP), Heart Rate (HR), Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)], and sedation assessed by the Ramsay scale. RESULTS A total of 31 patients were included. The test group exhibited a significant reduction in pain at 2,4,6,8,12,16,24, and 48 h after surgery and in the consumption of rescue analgesics. Anxiety, evaluated by STAI and VAS, showed a significant decrease in the test group (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant decrease in BP at most of the assessed time points (p < 0.05) and a significant reduction in HR at two different time intervals (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009), indicating a positive effect in the test group. There was no significant difference in SpO2 between the groups. Sedation assessment revealed a significant difference at all time points favoring the test group (p < 0.05). There were no significant postoperative adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS Pregabalin coadministered with dexamethasone demonstrated significant efficacy in controlling postoperative pain and anxiety, as well as a sedative effect. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The coadministration of pregabalin with dexamethasone may presents potential advantages in both pain modulation and psychological well-being of individuals undergoing third molar surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (REBEC), No. RBR-378h6t6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiordanne Araújo Diniz
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, University of Pernambuco, Arnóbio Marques St., 310, Recife, 50100-130, PE, Brazil.
| | | | - Davi da Silva Barbirato
- Postdoctoral Fellowship in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Myers AL, Jeske AH. Provider-directed analgesia for dental pain. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2023; 16:435-451. [PMID: 37083548 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2206118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Extraction of impacted molar teeth is a common procedure performed by oral surgeons and general dentists, with postoperative pain being a significant adverse event post-surgery. If mismanaged, pain can lead to complications that impact oral and systemic health. The current scourge of the opioid epidemic has ushered in a new era of provider-directed analgesic (PDA) therapy in dentistry. AREAS COVERED This article provides an in-depth review on the major pharmacological and therapeutic properties of established and alternative analgesics used to manage dental pain. EXPERT OPINION Substantial evidence-based literature shows combination of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID; e.g. ibuprofen) and acetaminophen provides superior pain relief than single-agent or combination opioid regimens. However, there are clinical scenarios (e.g. severe pain) when short-course opioid prescription is appropriate in select patients, in which a 2-3-day treatment duration is typically sufficient. Alternative agents (e.g. caffeine, gabapentin, phytotherapies), typically in combination with established agents, can mitigate postoperative dental pain. Some evidence suggests preemptive therapies (e.g. corticosteroids, NSAIDs) reduce amounts of postsurgical analgesic consumption and might lessen opioid prescription burden. In summary, this comprehensive review provides an opportune update on the evolving landscape of pharmacotherapy for acute postsurgical dental pain, informing best practices for PDA in the dental setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan L Myers
- Department of Diagnostic & Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arthur H Jeske
- Office of the Dean, School of Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sulukdjian A, L'Homme R, Chanlon A, Moreau N. Gabapentinoid prescription in Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery practice. Part II − a systematic scoping review of the literature. JOURNAL OF ORAL MEDICINE AND ORAL SURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.1051/mbcb/2020038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Gabapentinoids, pregabalin and gabapentin, neuronal voltage-gated calcium channel inhibitors are first-line treatments for painful neuropathic conditions (and several non-neuropathic painful conditions). Nevertheless, their efficacy and prescription in Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery practice has received little attention so far. A previous article, the first of a two-part series, presented the experience of a French tertiary orofacial pain clinic regarding the prescription of gabapentinoids in orofacial conditions. This second article aimed to explore the scientific literature on the subject. Material and methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted on multiple relevant databases (MEDLINE®, Cochrane®, Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé, Haute Autorité de Santé) and journal archives (JOMOS, JSOMFS) to assess the indications, non-indications and contraindications of gabapentinoids in an Oral Medicine/Oral Surgery context. Results: Out of 131 records selected during the initial screening, 34 matched the inclusion criteria and were used for subsequent analyses. Gabapentinoids were prescribed in three clinical contexts: orofacial pain management (32 studies), anxiolysis (1 study) and prevention of postoperative nausea/vomiting (1 study), with variable quality of evidence: high (6 studies), moderate (3 studies), low (5 studies) and very low (20 studies) quality studies (GRADE scale). Untoward effects of gabapentinoids were reported in 16 studies, mainly neurological (vertigo, drowsiness, sedation) and gastro-intestinal (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation). Gabapentinoids were ineffective in preemptive and postoperative analgesia and for the management of mucositis-related pain. Discussion: There is some evidence supporting the use of gabapentinoids in Oral Medicine/Oral Surgery in adherence with current practices observed in France and other countries (practices often extrapolated from their use in other non-orofacial painful conditions). The methodological quality of the studies included in this scoping review is often poor and publication bias is most probable in this field. Therefore, any conclusion drawn from such studies must be subject to circumspection. Conclusion: Data obtained from the present scoping review suggests the potential use of gabapentinoids as second-line treatments for anxiolysis, prevention of postoperative nausea/vomiting and the management of trigeminal neuralgia and masticatory myalgia. Other potential indications of gabapentinoids in Oral Medicine/Oral Surgery practice include cranial neuralgias, post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathies, first bite syndrome, burning mouth syndrome and migraine prophylaxis, when other treatment options are inefficient or unavailable.
Collapse
|
4
|
Axelby E, Kurmis AP. Gabapentoids in knee replacement surgery: contemporary, multi-modal, peri-operative analgesia. J Orthop 2020; 17:150-154. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/30/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
5
|
Gabapentin Decreases Narcotic Usage: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway in Free Autologous Breast Reconstruction. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2019; 7:e2350. [PMID: 31592040 PMCID: PMC6756647 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The opioid crisis is public health emergency, in part due to physician prescribing practices. As a result, there is an increased interest in reducing narcotic use in the postsurgical setting.
Collapse
|
6
|
Liébana-Hermoso S, Manzano-Moreno FJ, Vallecillo-Capilla MF, Olmedo-Gaya MV. Oral pregabalin for acute pain relief after cervicofacial surgery: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 22:119-129. [PMID: 29101547 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-017-2272-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2017] [Accepted: 10/26/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives of this systematic review were to unify criteria on the effectiveness of oral pregabalin to treat acute post-operative pain after cervicofacial surgery, to establish the most effective dose regimens, and to determine its effect on rescue medicine consumption and its association with adverse effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed/Medline (National Library of Medicine, Washington, DC), Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies in any language published between January 2000 and September 2016. The following question was posed, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines: Is oral pregabalin effective and safe for the relief of acute pain after cervicofacial surgery? The critical reading of the literature utilized a list of questions prepared by the CASPe Network, applying the Jadad scale for evaluation of the methodological quality of trials. RESULTS Eleven randomized controlled clinical trials were selected. The 11 trials obtained a score ≥ 3, considered as Ib evidence level and high quality. A single oral dose of 75-mg pregabalin before or after cervicofacial surgery alleviates pain and lessens the need for rescue analgesia consumption, while the statistical significance of these effects is higher with a single dose of 150-mg pregabalin, either before or after the surgery. CONCLUSION Oral pregabalin appears to significantly alleviate post-operative pain and reduce rescue analgesia consumption, with no severe adverse effects. However, the ideal dose and most effective administration regimen remain controversial issues that need to be addressed in further high-quality clinical trials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE These findings suggest that pregabalin may be useful for acute pain relief after cervicofacial surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Liébana-Hermoso
- Master of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Manzano-Moreno
- Master of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. .,Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain. .,Biomedical Group (BIO277), University of Granada, Granada, Spain. .,Instituto Investigación Biosanitaria, ibs, Granada, Spain.
| | - Manuel Francisco Vallecillo-Capilla
- Master of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.,Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain
| | - Maria Victoria Olmedo-Gaya
- Master of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.,Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shimony N, Amit U, Minz B, Grossman R, Dany MA, Gonen L, Kandov K, Ram Z, Weinbroum AA. Perioperative pregabalin for reducing pain, analgesic consumption, and anxiety and enhancing sleep quality in elective neurosurgical patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and controlled clinical study. J Neurosurg 2016; 125:1513-1522. [DOI: 10.3171/2015.10.jns151516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to assess in-hospital (immediate) postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption (primary goals) and preoperative anxiety and sleep quality (secondary goals) in patients who underwent craniotomy and were treated with pregabalin (PGL). Whenever possible, out-of-hospital pain scores and analgesics usage data were obtained as well.
METHODS
This prospective, randomized, double-blind and controlled study was conducted in consenting patients who underwent elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection at Tel Aviv Medical Center between 2012 and 2014. Patients received either 150 mg PGL (n = 50) or 500 mg starch (placebo; n = 50) on the evening before surgery, 1.5 hours before surgery, and twice daily for 72 hours following surgery. All patients spent the night before surgery in the hospital, and no other premedication was administered. Opioids and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were used for pain, which was self-rated by means of a numerical rating scale (score range 0–10).
RESULTS
Eighty-eight patients completed the study. Data on the American Society of Anesthesiologists class, age, body weight, duration of surgery, and intraoperative drugs were similar for both groups. The pain scores during postoperative Days 0 to 2 were significantly lower in the PGL group than in the placebo group (p < 0.01). Analgesic consumption was also lower in the PGL group, both immediately and 1 month after surgery. There were fewer requests for antiemetics in the PGL group, and the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting was lower. The preoperative anxiety level and the quality of sleep were significantly better in the PGL group (p < 0.01). There were no PGL-associated major adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
Perioperative use of twice-daily 150 mg pregabalin attenuates preoperative anxiety, improves sleep quality, and reduces postoperative pain scores and analgesic usage without increasing the rate of adverse effects.
Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01612832 (clinicaltrials.gov)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nir Shimony
- 2Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine at the Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Uri Amit
- Departments of 1Anesthesia and Post-Anesthesia Care Unit and
| | - Bella Minz
- 2Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine at the Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Rachel Grossman
- 2Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine at the Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Marc A. Dany
- Departments of 1Anesthesia and Post-Anesthesia Care Unit and
| | - Lior Gonen
- 2Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine at the Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Karina Kandov
- 2Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine at the Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Zvi Ram
- 2Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine at the Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park M, Jeon Y. Preoperative pregabalin prolongs duration of spinal anesthesia and reduces early postoperative pain: A double-blind, randomized clinical CONSORT study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e4828. [PMID: 27603398 PMCID: PMC5023921 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000004828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The administration of oral pregabalin preoperatively has been reported to reduce acute postoperative pain. However, no clinical study to date has yet fully investigated whether or not pregabalin premedication affects sensory and motor blocks using spinal anesthesia and its effect upon early postoperative pain management. This prospective, randomized, and double-blind clinical study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a single dose of pregabalin in terms of spinal blockade duration and its potential opioid-sparing effect during the first 24 hours subsequent to urogenital surgery. METHODS Forty-four patients scheduled for urogenital surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to 2 groups: group C (no premedication; orally administered placebo 2 hours before surgery) and group P (orally administered 150 mg pregabalin 2 hours before surgery). RESULTS The duration of sensory and motor blockade was significantly prolonged in group P patients when compared with that in group C patients, and the pain scores at postoperative 6 and 24 hours were significantly lower in group P patients. Requests for analgesics during the first postoperative 24 hours were lower among group P patients. CONCLUSION Premedication with a single dose of 150 mg pregabalin before surgery promoted the efficacy of intrathecal bupivacaine and improved postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing urogenital surgery under spinal anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MiHye Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine
| | - Younghoon Jeon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- Correspondence: Younghoon Jeon, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, 130 Dongduck-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chan ACS, Qiu Q, Choi SW, Wong SSC, Chan ACY, Irwin MG, Cheung CW. Effects of Intra-Operative Total Intravenous Anaesthesia with Propofol versus Inhalational Anaesthesia with Sevoflurane on Post-Operative Pain in Liver Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0149753. [PMID: 26901037 PMCID: PMC4763721 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2015] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol have been shown to experience less postoperative pain. We evaluated the post-operative analgesic effects of propofol compared with sevoflurane maintenance of anesthesia in liver surgery. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02179437). Methods In this retrospective study, records of patients who underwent liver surgery between 2010 and 2013 were reviewed. Ninety-five patients anesthetized with propofol TIVA were matched with 95 patients anesthetized with sevoflurane. Numeric pain rating scale (NRS) pain scores, postoperative morphine consumption, side effects and patients’ satisfaction with pain relief were evaluated. Results The TIVA group reported lower NRS pain scores during coughing on postoperative days 1 and 2 but not 3 (p = 0.0127, p = 0.0472, p = 0.4556 respectively). They also consumed significantly less daily (p = 0.001 on day 1, p = 0.0231 on day 2, p = 0.0004 on day 3), accumulative (p = 0.001 on day 1, p<0.0001 on day 2 and p = 0.0064 on day 3) and total morphine (p = 0.03) when compared with the sevoflurane group. There were no differences in total duration of intravenous patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine use and patient satisfaction. No difference was found in reported side effects. Conclusion Patients anesthetized with propofol TIVA reported less pain during coughing and consumed less daily, accumulative and total morphine after liver surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Qiu Qiu
- Laboratory and Clinical Research Institute for Pain, Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Siu Wai Choi
- Laboratory and Clinical Research Institute for Pain, Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Stanley Sau Ching Wong
- Laboratory and Clinical Research Institute for Pain, Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Michael G Irwin
- Laboratory and Clinical Research Institute for Pain, Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Chi Wai Cheung
- Laboratory and Clinical Research Institute for Pain, Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ahiskalioglu A, İnce İ, Aksoy M, Yalcin E, Ahiskalioglu EO, Kilinc A. Effects of a Single-Dose of Pre-Emptive Pregabalin on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption After Double-Jaw Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74:53.e1-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Revised: 09/09/2015] [Accepted: 09/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
11
|
Olmedo-Gaya MV, Manzano-Moreno FJ, Galvez-Mateos R, González-Rodriguez MP, Talero-Sevilla C, Vallecillo-Capilla M. Oral pregabalin for postoperative pain relief after third molar extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 20:1819-26. [PMID: 26578119 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1657-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin administered pre- and postoperatively in patients with pain and swelling due to the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS The final study sample comprised 60 volunteers (23 males and 37 females). Group 1 (n = 30) received 75 mg oral pregabalin 1 h before surgery and 1 h after surgery. Group 2 (n = 30) served as a control group and received no pregabalin. Both groups were administered with 650 mg paracetamol every 8 h for 2 days. Postoperative pain intensity and swelling were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS); pain relief experienced was reported using a four-point verbal rating scale (VRS); the rescue medication requirement, adverse effects, and global impression of the medication were also recorded. RESULTS No significant difference in pain intensity (VAS) was observed between the groups. However, fewer rescue medication tablets were needed by pregabalin-treated patients than by controls (p = 0.021). The frequency and intensity of adverse effects were significantly higher in pregabalin-treated patients (p < 0.001), although no serious adverse events occurred. No significant difference in the degree of swelling was observed in any measurement except that from mandibular angle to lip junction, which showed lesser inflammation in the pregabalin group at 24 h post-surgery (p = 0.011). The global opinion on the medication received was more positive in the pregabalin group (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS The administration of pregabalin reduces the requirement for rescue medication after third molar surgery and results in a more constant pain level, with fewer peaks of pain intensity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE These findings suggest that pregabalin may be useful to control acute postoperative pain. Adverse effects are known to be reduced at the low pregabalin dose used in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Victoria Olmedo-Gaya
- Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo s/n, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, 18071, Granada, Spain
| | - Francisco J Manzano-Moreno
- Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo s/n, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, 18071, Granada, Spain. .,Biomedical Research Group (BIO277), Junta de Andalucía, Granada, Spain.
| | - Rafael Galvez-Mateos
- Department of Anesthesia, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain
| | - Maria Paloma González-Rodriguez
- Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo s/n, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, 18071, Granada, Spain
| | - Cristina Talero-Sevilla
- Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo s/n, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, 18071, Granada, Spain
| | - Manuel Vallecillo-Capilla
- Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo s/n, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, 18071, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Au AHY, Choi SW, Cheung CW, Leung YY. The Efficacy and Clinical Safety of Various Analgesic Combinations for Post-Operative Pain after Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0127611. [PMID: 26053953 PMCID: PMC4459961 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To run a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials aiming to answer the clinical question "which analgesic combination and dosage is potentially the most effective and safe for acute post-operative pain control after third molar surgery?". MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search of computer databases and journals was performed. The search and the evaluations of articles were performed by 2 independent reviewers in 3 rounds. Randomized clinical trials related to analgesic combinations for acute post-operative pain control after lower third molar surgery that matched the selection criteria were evaluated to enter in the final review. RESULTS Fourteen studies with 3521 subjects, with 10 groups (17 dosages) of analgesic combinations were included in the final review. The analgesic efficacy were presented by the objective pain measurements including sum of pain intensity at 6 hours (SPID6) and total pain relief at 6 hours (TOTPAR6). The SPID6 scores and TOTPAR6 scores of the reported analgesic combinations were ranged from 1.46 to 6.44 and 3.24 - 10.3, respectively. Ibuprofen 400mg with oxycodone HCL 5mg had superior efficacy (SPID6: 6.44, TOTPAR6: 9.31). Nausea was the most common adverse effect, with prevalence ranging from 0-55%. Ibuprofen 200mg with caffeine 100mg or 200mg had a reasonable analgesic effect with fewer side effects. CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis may help clinicians in their choices of prescribing an analgesic combination for acute post-operative pain control after lower third molar surgery. It was found in this systematic review Ibuprofen 400mg combined with oxycodone HCL 5mg has superior analgesic efficacy when compared to the other analgesic combinations included in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin Ho Yeung Au
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People Republic of China
| | - Siu Wai Choi
- Laboratory and Clinical Research Institute for Pain, Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People Republic of China
| | - Chi Wai Cheung
- Laboratory and Clinical Research Institute for Pain, Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People Republic of China
| | - Yiu Yan Leung
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Perioperative Pregabalin for Attenuation of Postoperative Pain After Eyelid Surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 31:132-5. [DOI: 10.1097/iop.0000000000000219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
14
|
Mishriky B, Waldron N, Habib A. Impact of pregabalin on acute and persistent postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114:10-31. [DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 222] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
|
15
|
Perioperative gabapentinoids: choice of agent, dose, timing, and effects on chronic postsurgical pain. Anesthesiology 2013; 119:1215-21. [PMID: 24051389 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0b013e3182a9a896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
This article summarizes the current evidence for the use of gabapentinoids in the perioperative setting and provides useful clinical recommendations regarding dosing, timing, and choice of agent.
Collapse
|