Outcomes of mandible fracture treatment at an academic tertiary hospital: a 5-year analysis

Current Strategies for Treatment of Mandibular Fractures With Plate Osteosynthesis: A European Prospective Study

PURPOSE

The training and preferences of surgeons influence the type of surgical treatment for mandibular fractures. This multicentre prospective study analyzed the current treatment strategies and outcomes for mandibular fractures with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study included patients aged ≥16 years who underwent ORIF for mandibular fractures in 12 European maxillofacial centers. Age, sex, pretrauma dental status, fracture cause, site and type, associated facial fractures, surgical approach, plate number and thickness (≤1.4 or ≥1.5 mm), duration of postoperative maxillomandibular fixation, occlusal and infective complications at 6 weeks and 3 months, and revision surgeries were recorded.

RESULTS

Between May 1, 2021 and April 30, 2022, 425 patients (194 single, 182 double, and 49 triple mandibular fractures) underwent ORIF for 1 or more fractures. Rigid osteosynthesis was performed for 74% of fractures and was significantly associated with displaced ( P =0.01) and comminuted ( P =0.03) fractures and with the number of nonsurgically treated fracture sites ( P =0.002). The angle was the only site associated with nonrigid osteosynthesis ( P <0.001). Malocclusions (5.6%) and infective complications (5.4%) were not associated with osteosynthesis type.

CONCLUSION

Rigid osteosynthesis was the most frequently performed treatment at all fracture sites, except the mandibular angle, and was significantly associated with displaced and comminuted fractures and the number of nonsurgically treated fracture sites. No significant differences were observed regarding postoperative malocclusion or infections among osteosynthesis types.

Factors contributing to non-union amongst dentate mandibular fractures treated by load-sharing miniplate osteosynthesis: A case-control study

The stability provided by load-sharing miniplate osteosynthesis (LSMO) in dentate mandibular fractures (DMF) is usually adequate for bony healing. Non-union following LSMO is an uncommon complication. We aimed to determine the incidence and identify contributing factors, if any, of non-union amongst DMFs that have undergone LSMO. This retrospective case-control study with an allocation ratio of 1:3 includes cases of non-union DMF following LSMO and controls with healed DMF following LSMO over a five-year period. Relevant sociodemographic data, mandibular fracture characteristics, and treatment variables were collected for both groups. Of the 381 patients who underwent LSMO for DMFs, 12 cases of non-union were identified. The control group included 36 patients with uncomplicated healing. A significant association was observed between non-union and teeth in the line of fracture, postoperative infections, and time from injury to LSMO. The odds ratio with chronic alcohol usage was 1.4. Vigilant follow up of patients with chronic alcohol use, those with teeth in the fracture line, and adherence to LSMO principles may help to minimise the non-union complication.

Patient outcomes and complications following various maxillomandibular fixation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Currently, there are several methods of achieving maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), each with its unique operative considerations and subsequent patient outcomes and complications. In this study, we reviewed the literature to evaluate and compare all MMF methods.

METHODS

A systematic review of all MMF types was conducted and post-operative outcome data were analyzed and compared among the different types. Conventional Erich arch bars were compared to hybrid arch bars, MMF screws, and eyelet interdental wiring. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to determine the mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a statistical significance of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Among the 4234 articles identified, 24 were included, and 17 were meta-analyzed. Time to achieve MMF (-43.38 min; 95% CI, -58.20 to -28.56; P < 0.001), total operative time (-30.33 min; 95% CI, -61.05 to 0.39; P = 0.05), incidence of wire puncture injuries and glove perforations (0.11; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.30; P < 0.001), and incidence of poor oral hygiene (0.08; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.28; P < 0.001) were lower for alternative MMF interventions compared to those of the conventional Erich arch bars.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternative MMF methods required shorter operative time to achieve MMF and demonstrated other increased efficiencies of practice such as shorter total operative time and decreased glove perforations, when compared to conventional Erich arch bars. If a patient is a candidate for MMF, the presented alternative MMF techniques should be considered depending on the clinical context and availability of institutional resources.

Mandible Fractures Undergoing Transfer Rarely Require Acute Intervention

Study Design

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with mandibular fractures who were evaluated by plastic surgery at a Level I trauma center between January 1, 2017 and May 1, 2020. Data including demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, type of presentation (e.g., primary or transfer), treatment plan, and time to intervention were recorded.

Objective

Mandibular fractures are common traumatic injuries. Because these injuries are managed by surgical specialists, these patients are often emergently transferred to tertiary care hospitals. This study aims to assess the benefits of emergent transfer in this patient group.

Methods

Variables were summarized using descriptive statistics. The relationship with initial disposition was assessed via tests of association, including Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test, or chi-square tests. Significance was set to p values less than 0.05. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to determine predictors of presentation to outside hospital followed by transfer to our institution.

Results

Records from 406 patients with isolated mandibular fractures were evaluated. 145 (36%) were transferred from an outside hospital specifically for specialty evaluation. One patient required intervention in the Emergency Department (ED). Of the 145 patients that were transferred to our facility, eight (5.5%) were admitted for operative management. Patients with open injuries and pediatric patients showed benefit from transfer.

Conclusions

Patients are frequently transferred to tertiary care facilities for specialty service evaluation and treatment. However, when isolated mandible fractures were evaluated, only one patient required intervention in the ED. Patients with grossly open fractures and pediatric patients were more frequently admitted specifically for operative management. This practice of acute interfacility transfer represents an unnecessary cost to our health system as isolated mandible fractures can be managed on an outpatient basis. We suggest that pediatric patients and patients with open fractures be transferred for urgent evaluation and management, whereas most patients would be appropriate for outpatient evaluation.

Factors Associated With Complications and Failure in Transoral, Mandible Fracture Repair

OBJECTIVE

Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the mandible has been a well-studied topic. However, there has not been a study investigating the relationship between suture type and complications.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained mandibular fractures was conducted at an urban level I trauma center (2010-2018). Descriptive statistics were used to categorize the sociodemographic data. χ2 and Mann-Whitney U testing were used to compare variables between the polyglactin 910 (vicryl) and chromic sutured groups.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 102 patients who underwent ORIF of the mandible through the transoral approach. Fifty-nine (57.8%) patients were closed with vicryl suture, whereas 43 (42.2%) with chromic gut suture. There were no differences in sociodemographics, immune status, substance abuse status, fracture type, time to repair, and managing care team between the two groups. Both groups had similar rates of wound dehiscence, infection, and revision surgery. Patients who were operated on earlier were more likely to experience a postoperative infection and dehiscence compared with patients operated on later (P = 0.029 and P = 0.008, respectively). Smokers were more likely to experience dehiscence compared with nonsmokers (P = 0.001). Females and immunocompromised patients were more likely to require revision surgery (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Suture type for transoral, ORIF of the mandible does not impact the rate of infection, wound dehiscence, and revision surgery. However, risk factors for complications can include early operative repair, smoking, female sex, and immunosuppression.

Analysis of Surgical Complications in Mandibular Fractures in the Center of Italy: A Retrospective Study

Mandibular fractures are the second most common maxillofacial fractures. The prevalent treatment for this kind of fractures is either a surgical procedure such as maxillomandibular fixation or open reduction and internal fixation or a combination of both. Sometimes the patients might develop locoregional postoperative complications. The most frequently reported complications are trigeminal V3 injury and surgical site infection. A 4-year retrospective study was performed at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Policlinico Umberto I of Rome, Italy, and the postoperative complications after mandibular fracture surgical treatment were collected. The authors studied the characteristics of each complication and the correlation with the type of mandibular fracture and the surgical treatment chosen.

Complications of Mandibular Fracture Repair

Mandible fracture management has evolved dramatically. Therefore, the variety of surgical complications associated with mandibular fractures, and their incidences, have continued to change as well. This article aims to assess the most common and most concerning complications that can occur secondary to management of mandibular fractures by examining categories of complication types. This article also explores factors and techniques associated with reduced rates of complications as well as the management of complications.

Risk factors associated with short-term complications in mandibular fractures: the MANTRA study-a Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC)

INTRODUCTION

Complications following mandibular fractures occur in 9-23% of patients. Identifying those at risk is key to prevention. Previous studies highlighted smoking, age and time from injury to presentation as risk factors but rarely recorded other possible confounders. In this paper, we use a collaborative snapshot audit to document novel risk factors and confirm established risks for complications following the treatment of mandibular fractures.

METHODS

The audit was carried out by 122 OMFS trainees across the UK and Ireland (49 centres) over 6 months, coordinated by the Maxillofacial Surgery Trainees Research Collaborative. Variables recorded included basic demography, medical and social history, injury mechanism and type, management and 30-day outcome.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and forty-seven (947) patients with fractured mandibles were recorded. Surgical management was carried out in 76.3%. Complications at 30 days occurred 65 (9%) of those who were managed surgically. Risk factors for complications included male sex, increasing age, any medical history, increasing number of cigarettes smoked per week, increasing alcohol use per week, worse oral hygiene and increased time from injury to presentation.

DISCUSSION

We have used a large prospective snapshot audit to confirm established risk factors and identify novel risk factors. We demonstrate that time from injury to presentation is confounded by other indicators of poor health behaviour. These results are important in designing trial protocols for management of mandibular fractures and in targeting health interventions to patients at highest risk of complications.

Prevalence of Frey syndrome following extraoral surgical treatment for mandibular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Our study aims to estimate the prevalence of Frey syndrome following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for mandibular fractures. Two reviewers independently conducted a systematic literature search in the Medline and Scopus databases. The pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was estimated, and quality assessment, outlier analysis, and influential analysis were performed. In total, fifteen eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. One study was identified as critically influential. The overall prevalence of Frey syndrome following extraoral surgical treatment for mandibular fractures was estimated as 0.01% (95%CI 0%-0.7%) with moderate heterogeneity observed between studies. In the meta-regression analysis with continuous variables, no statistically significant association was observed. Despite the relatively low prevalence, the impact of Frey syndrome on affected individuals should not be underestimated. Additional research will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying factors contributing to Frey syndrome, leading to improved preventive measures and treatment strategies. A better grasp of the prevalence and associated risk factors will aid in the development of guidelines to minimize the occurrence of this syndrome.

The risk of osteomyelitis after mandibular fracture is doubled in men versus women: analysis of 300,000 patients

Postoperative complications following mandibular fracture treatment vary from local wound infections to severe conditions including osteomyelitis and impaired fracture healing. Several risk factors have been associated with the development healing disorders, including fracture localisation, treatment modality and substance abuse. However, limited research on the sex-specific influence of these complications exists. A total of about 300,000 female and male patients with mandibular fractures were examined in two cohorts. After matching for confounders (age, nicotine and alcohol dependence, malnutrition, overweight, anaemia, diabetes, osteoporosis and vitamin D deficiency), two cohorts were compared with propensity-score-matched patients according to outcomes (osteomyelitis, pseudoarthrosis and disruption of the wound) within 1 year after fracture. There were significant differences between female and male patients regarding the occurrence of osteomyelitis (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval]: 0.621 [0.563; 0.686]) and disruption of the wound (OR [95% confidence interval]: 0.703 [0.632; 0.782]). Surprisingly, matching for the expected confounders did not change the results substantially. Sex plays a dominant role in determining the risk stratification for postoperative osteomyelitis and disruption of the wound, after accounting for other potential confounding factors. Additional research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and to develop sex-specific strategies to prevent these complications.

Postoperative wound dehiscence in mandibular fractures

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the occurrence and causes of non-infection-related surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) in intraorally treated mandibular fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with one or two fractures of the dentate part of the mandible treated surgically via an intraoral approach were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome variable was SWD. Associations between patient-, fracture- and surgery-related variables and SWD were evaluated.

RESULTS

Altogether 232 patients with 270 mandibular angle, body, symphysis and/or parasymphysis fractures were included in the analysis. In all, 22 SWDs were detected. These occurred in 9.5% of patients and in 8.1% of fractures. Surgery performed at night-time showed a significantly higher SWD rate than daytime surgeries (p = .012). Additionally, a significantly greater SWD rate was found among smokers (p = .041). Other studied variables remained statistically non-significant for SWD. In a multivariate analysis, night-time was the only significant independent variable with an odds ratio of 3.297 (95% CI 1.238 - 8.780, p = .017) for SWD.

CONCLUSION

The approach or closure technique used and the fracture type had only a minor effect on non-infection-related SWD in patients with mandibular fractures. To avoid SWDs, mandibular fracture surgeries should be conducted during the daytime with adequate support from an experienced surgeon.

Prevalence of surgical site infections after open reduction and internal fixation for mandibular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Our study aims to estimate the prevalence of surgical site infections (SSI) following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for mandibular fractures and to determine the effect of potential moderators on it. A systematic literature search (Medline and Scopus databases) was conducted independently by two reviewers. The pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals was estimated. Quality assessment as well as outlier and influential analysis were performed. Additionally, subgroup and meta-regression analysis were conducted in order the effect of categorical and continuous variables on the estimated prevalence to be investigated. In total, seventy-five eligible studies (comprising a sum of 5825 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of SSI following ORIF for mandibular fractures was estimated as high as 4.2% (95% CI 3.0-5.6%) with significant heterogeneity between studies. One study was identified to be critically influential. In the subgroup analysis, the prevalence was 4.2% (95% CI 2.2-6.6%) among studies conducted in Europe, 4.3% (95% CI 3.1-5.6%) among studies conducted in Asia and higher among those conducted in America (7.3%) (95% CI 4.7-10.3%). It is important for healthcare professionals to be aware of the etiology of these infections, despite the relatively low rate of SSI in these procedures. However, further, well-designed prospective and retrospective studies need to be conducted in order this issue to be fully clarified.

The impact of patient-related factors on complications when treating mandible fractures by load-sharing and load-bearing osteosynthesis

The decision about the choice of load-sharing (LS) or load-bearing (LB) osteosynthesis is determined by an interplay of fracture-related and patient-related factors. In some situations a similar fracture in two different patients may be treated successfully by either of these methods. Our aim was to identify preoperative patient-related factors that may assist in deciding which form of osteosynthesis is employed. All adult patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures (excluding condyle) between 1 October 2018 and 1 June 2021 were retrospectively identified. The odds of developing postoperative complications and requiring a return to theatre (RTT) were calculated for each method of fixation together with the following patient factors: smoking, excess alcohol, substance misuse, and severe mental health issues. Of 337 fractures treated using LS principles, 27 (8%) developed complications, of which 20 (6%) required a RTT for repeat osteosynthesis. Of 74 fractures treated using LB principles, seven (10%) developed complications and two (3%) required a RTT for repeat osteosynthesis. The only patient factor that had statistically significant increased odds of a complication requiring RTT was LS osteosynthesis in patients who admitted drinking excess alcohol (OR = 7.83, p = 0.00, 95% CI = 3.13 to 19.60). Complications when treating mandibular fractures are rarely reported in the literature, and lack standardisation in their clinical significance. Figures generally represent overall numbers of patients, whereas the number of individual fractures treated is more accurate. In our study complications occurred in 8% of treated fractures and 10% of patients. The RTT rate was 7% of patients, which compares favourably with a recently stated standard of 10% of patients, as suggested by the Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) report.

INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN COMPOUND MANDIBULAR FRACTURES UNDERGOING A DELAYED SURGICAL INTERVENTION - A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

The aim of this prospective study was to analyse if a delay in the time from injury to definitive surgical intervention of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of compound mandibular fractures predisposed to an increase in postoperative infectious complications. ORIF beyond 72 hours from injury was considered to be delayed intervention. Postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) and non-infectious complications (NIC) were recorded. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the delay in ORIF with SSI. The chi squared test/Fisher's exact test was used to find the association of the infectious complication status with predetermined risk factors. Eighty-three patients underwent a delayed ORIF with a median (range) of 8 (4-19) days. SSI was documented in eight patients (9.6%) and could be managed as outpatient medical and surgical intervention. Two patients needed repeat surgical intervention due to non-union of the fracture. The median (range) time to ORIF was 6.5 (5-12) days in patients who developed SSI; the Mann-Whitney U test did not show a statistically significant association between delayed ORIF and SSI (p = 0.7). The univariate analysis did not establish a significant relationship between SSI and predetermined risk factors. The delay to definitive surgical intervention was not observed to be an independent attributing factor in postoperative infectious complications of compound mandibular fractures.

Impact of Age on Surgical Outcomes Following Mandible Fracture Repair

OBJECTIVES

Open repair of mandibular fractures are frequently performed surgical procedures. Increasing rates of such fractures are seen in older adults following falls. This study assesses the impact of older age on early complications following mandible fracture repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of national registry.

METHODS

The 2013-2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all cases of open mandible fracture repair and cases were categorized into younger (18-40), middle (41-65), and older (>65) age cohorts. Demographics and comorbidities were compared between the age groups. Rates of surgical, medical, and wound complications within 30-days of surgery were determined. Multivariable logistic analyses were performed to assess the relationship between age and complications.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1818 cases were included for analysis, of which 1269 (69.8%) were younger, 459 (25.2%) were middle, and 90 (5.0%) were older age. Increased rates of complications were seen in the older groups, including unplanned reoperation, unplanned readmission, wound disruption, and medical complications (p < 0.01). On unadjusted analysis, the older (>65) age group had an increased odds of experiencing a complication compared to the younger (18-40) group (OR: 4.19, p < 0.001). The older age group continued to have a significantly increased odds of medical complications after multivariable adjustment (adjusted OR: 8.64, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

On this analysis of a national database, advanced age was associated with an increased frequency of early postoperative complications following open mandibular fracture repair. Following multivariable adjustment, advanced age continued to be associated with increased odds of postoperative medical complications within 30 days of surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:287-293, 2023.

Pediatric mandibular fractures: Surgical management and outcomes in the deciduous, mixed and permanent dentitions

BACKGROUND/AIM

Mandibular fractures are the most frequent type of pediatric facial traumatic injury, but their treatment remains controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the surgical treatment and long-term outcomes of dentate mandibular fractures in children and adolescents.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with mandibular fractures in the dentate area who were surgically treated in the period from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2020, were included. The following data were collected: age, gender, cause and mechanism of injury, fracture site and type, associated maxillofacial fractures, the timing of surgical treatment, Facial Injury Severity Scale (FISS) score, surgical approach, number and thickness of plates, hospitalization stay and outcome. Patients were divided into three groups: deciduous (≤6 years, group A), mixed (7-12 years, group B), and permanent (13-18 years, group C) dentitions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

During the study 91 patients (male: female ratio, 3.8:1), 4 in group A, 12 in group B, and 75 in group C, with 65 single and 52 double fractures were included. An intraoral approach was used in 87% of patients. In group C, 90% of patients were treated with fixation schemes consistent with those suggested in the literature for adults, versus 75% in groups A and B. Median follow-up time was 20 months. No tooth germ injury or facial asymmetry was observed and only six group C patients had post-operative malocclusions. Hardware removal occurred in 22% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This 20-year retrospective study shows that open reduction and internal fixation of pediatric dentate mandibular fractures caused no tooth germ damage or disturbances of mandibular growth in any dentition stage. Internal fixation schemes were similar to those used for adults, although it was necessary to adapt hardware size and position according to tooth and patient age.

Periodontal disease as a primary cause of surgical site infection in fractures of the mandible: is smoking a confounding variable?

Fractures of the mandible are common in contemporary oral and maxillofacial practice. Wound infection is the most common complication after open reduction and internal fixation, and the management of these is complex and costly in terms of morbidity to the patient, and in fiscal terms. Whilst numerous epidemiological studies implicate smoking, alcohol, drug use, and adverse behaviour, as well as fracture complexity and diabetes, as important risk factors, the role of periodontal disease is only occasionally mentioned and not formally investigated. The aim of this study therefore was to assess the presence of periodontal disease and its severity according to the 2018 EFP/AAP periodontitis case classification in patients with fractured mandibles who presented to a single level 1 trauma centre, and to look for a possible association with surgical site infection. A total of 305 patients were assessed retrospectively following open reduction and internal fixation via transoral incisions with load-sharing osteosynthesis. The postoperative infection rate was 22.95%. Multivariate and multiple logistic regression revealed that there was a strong association between periodontal staging and postoperative surgical site infection. Crucially, the study predicts that patients with severe periodontal disease (periodontal stage III and IV) are over seven times more likely to develop a wound infection than disease-negative individuals. This has implications for risk adjustment, prognostication, treatment planning, and postoperative care. Surprisingly in this study, cigarette smoking, an established risk factor in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease, did not achieve statistical significance, potentially conflicting with the established literature.

Rehabilitation and Management of Complex Multiple Para-Symphysis Mandible Fracture: A Case Report

Fractures of the parasymphysis occur in 15% of all cases of mandibular fracture. The mandible occupies the lowest portion of the face. The prominent bone of the face is severely injured when the lower face is hit by high impacts with upward or obliquely directed force. In this case study, we discussed the alleged trauma case of a 20-year-old man who fell from a height on August 27, 2022, at about 9:00 p.m. near Wardha. His family took him to the hospital in Wardha due to pain that was aggravated during chewing and swelling in his jaw. On investigation, an X-ray was done, and a left parasymphysis and right-side body fracture were noticed. Later, the patient underwent surgery, where open reduction and internal fixation of the left parasymphysis and the right-side body fracture with plating and intermaxillary fixation (IMF) were done. Then he was referred to the physiotherapy department for therapeutic intervention. Rehabilitation was given to reduce pain and swelling, regain full range of motion, gradually increase mobility, and keep associated muscles strong. A six-week protocol was administered to the patient. It was found that the therapeutic approach was quite effective for the patient.

Long-term Complications of Isolated and Combined Condylar Fractures: A Retrospective Study

Study Design

Fractures of the mandibular condyle are a common injury in maxillofacial trauma. Both conservative treatment (i.e., analgesic therapy and soft diet) and intermaxillary fixation (IMF) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) have satisfactory and functional outcomes, though severe late-onset complications have been reported.

Objective

We compared the long-term complications of patients with condylar fractures treated conservatively, with IMF, or with combined ORIF and IMF.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all patients diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral condylar fracture, isolated or combined with a fracture of the mandibular body, admitted to the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery at UZ Leuven between January 2013 and January 2020. We collected data on age, gender, side of condylar fracture, presence of associated fracture of the mandibular body, referrals, initial treatment, long-term complications and secondary treatment. Long-term complications were defined as sequelae still present 6 weeks after initial treatment.

Results

Among 192 patients, 68.8% had unilateral and 31.2% bilateral condylar fractures; an associated fracture of the mandibular body was seen in 45.8%, 31% received conservative treatment, 51% IMF only, and 18% combined ORIF and IMF. Forty-eight percent of all patients suffered from 1 or more long-term complications, most frequently malocclusion (24%), reduced mouth opening (15.1%), nerve disturbances (13.5%), pain (8.9%), and facial asymmetry (2.6%). Surgery as a secondary treatment was necessary in 25% of all cases.

Conclusions

The presence of bilateral condylar fractures or associated fracture of the mandibular body is a risk factor for developing long-term complications. Most patients with long-term complications were initially treated with combined ORIF and IMF, but long-term complications after initial conservative or IMF treatment were treated with secondary surgery.

Do Postinjury Prophylactic Antibiotics Reduce Infection for Isolated Midface Fractures: A Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Fractures of the midface are a core component to the practice of contemporary oral and maxillofacial trainees and surgeons. As such, in an era where antibiotic resistance is increasing it is important to investigate if antibiotics are required after midface fractures to prevent infections before follow-up in an outpatient setting. The purpose of this study is to determine whether postinjury prophylactic preoperative antibiotics reduce rates of infection after midface fracture.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in Queensland, Australia. Patients who presented to Royal Brisbane Hospital and Townsville Hospital with isolated midface fractures between January 2017 and January 2019 were included. Clinical and demographic data of patients who received postinjury prophylactic antibiotics were compared to those who did not using the χ² test. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with increased odds of postinjury prophylactic antibiotic prescription.

RESULTS

In total, 1,353 patients with midfacial fractures over the 2-year period were included. In addition, 724 (53.5%) patients received postinjury antibiotics and 629 (46.5%) patients did not. The overall rate of infection was very low: 1 patient who received postinjury prophylactic antibiotics (0.1%) developed infection compared to 2 patients (0.3%) who did not receive postinjury prophylactic antibiotics, and this difference was not significant (χ² = 0.49; P = .48). Male sex (odds ratio 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.7; P = .02) and tobacco use (odds ratio 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.7; P = .008) were associated with an increased odds of postinjury prophylactic antibiotic prescription in the univariate analyses, but were no longer significant once site, age, and fracture type were adjusted for in the multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of infection after midface fracture was low and there was no significant difference in infection rates for patients who received postinjury prophylactic antibiotics compared to those who did not. Use of postinjury prophylactic preoperative antibiotics for midfacial fractures should be reconsidered.

Comprehensive analysis of patients with failure of mandibular hardware

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to characterize patients who had failure of mandibular hardware (FMH).

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study consisted of patients with mandible fractures (MFs) that required surgical intervention from 2012 to 2020. Patients were included when mandibular hardware failed. Descriptive variables were collected.

RESULTS

During the study period, 57 patients (47 male, average age 38.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Incidence of FMH was 7.4%. Most patients were African American (n = 45, 78.9%) with American Society of Anesthesiologists classification II (n = 40, 70.2%). Tobacco use (n = 31, 54.4%) and/or alcohol (n = 33, 57.9%). The most common etiology was assault (n = 28, 49.1%). The most common location was the angle of the mandible. Most mandibles had fracture at 1 location (n = 31, 54.4%) and a tooth was involved in the fracture line (n = 44, 77.2%). More than half of patients were treated with transoral surgical approach (n = 35, 61.4%). The majority of patients received preoperative antibiotics (n = 51, 89.4%). Patients had varying levels of compliance with postoperative care, and most were not compliant. Infection (n = 45) was the most common presentation of FMH.

CONCLUSION

High American Society of Anesthesiologists score, smoking, excessive alcohol use, parafunctional habits, and compliance with postoperative instructions may affect surgical outcome.

Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Scoping Review and Critical Appraisal

Infection after maxillofacial trauma remains an important complication, with a significant socio-economic impact. While consensus exists that systemic antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the risk of infection in the management of maxillofacial fractures, the type, and duration remain controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the current evidence that supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of maxillofacial fractures. A comprehensive literature search on 1 January 2022, in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane, revealed 16 articles. Most studies focused on the duration of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis and compared a one-day to a five-day regimen. Included studies showed considerable variability in design and research aims, which rendered them difficult to compare. Furthermore, a variety of antibiotic regimens were used, and most studies had a short follow-up period and unclear outcome parameters. This scoping review demonstrates the lack of well-constructed studies investigating the type and duration of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in the treatment of maxillofacial trauma. Based on the included articles, prolonging antibiotic prophylaxis over 24 h for surgically treated fractures does not appear to be beneficial. Furthermore, there is no evidence for its use in conservatively treated fractures. These results should be interpreted with caution since all included studies had limitations.

Simple dentate area fractures of the mandible - can we prevent postoperative infections?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the occurrence of surgical site infections and predisposing factors for these in simple mandibular fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with fractures of the dentate part of the mandible included patients with intraorally treated simple fractures of the mandibular body, symphysis, and parasymphysis. The primary outcome variable was postoperative surgical site infection. Use of antibiotics, injury mechanism, fracture and surgery-related explanatory variables, patient-related variables and level of oral hygiene according to the modified Total Dental Index were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 254 patients with mandibular fractures, 107 were included in the final analysis. The infection group consisted of 18 patients (16.8%). Despite the high infection occurrence, significant differences were not found between antibiotic use or other studied variables and infection occurrence. Infections occurred mainly in patients without any specific explanatory factor for infection.

CONCLUSION

The notably high occurrence of surgical site infections despite antibiotic use after simple mandibular fracture surgery highlights the importance of perioperative tissue handling and local oral circumstances. It is also necessary to consider whether we generally accept the high risk of infection associated with the intraorally treated simple mandibular fractures.

Radiological investigation of acute mandibular injury

This article focuses on the different imaging modalities used to evaluate acute mandibular fractures and explores important concepts relating to their diagnosis, investigation, and treatment. Significant focus will be given to exploring general management principles, considerations regarding first-line imaging, and recent technological advancement. Computed tomography (CT) is the preferred method when attempting to identify acute mandibular fractures, particularly in trauma patients, and has very high specificity and sensitivity. Multidetector CT now represents the standard of care, enabling fast scan times, reduced artifact, accurate reconstructed views, and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions. Cone-beam CT is a newer advanced imaging modality that is increasingly being used worldwide, particularly in the ambulatory and intraoperative setting. It produces high-resolution images with submillimeter isotropic voxels, 3D and multiplanar reconstruction, and low radiation dose, however is less widely available and more expensive. Ultrasound is a valuable method in identifying a fracture in unstable patients, but is limited in its ability to detect nondisplaced fractures. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful in determining the presence of soft-tissue injury. CT angiography is invaluable in the assessment of potential vascular injury in condylar fracture dislocations.

Mandibular Body Fractures

Fractures of the mandibular body most commonly occur after interpersonal violence or motorized vehicle accident but can occur in athletes. Mandibular body fractures are often associated with additional mandibular fractures. The treatment goal is to achieve preinjury occlusion and facial appearance, and this can be done via a closed reduction and maxillomandibular fixation or open reduction and fixation with or without maxillomandibular fixation. The authors present 3 cases in this article.

What Are the Risk Factors of Incurring Maxillofacial Fractures From Unarmed Hand-To-Hand Combat?

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to determine the risk factors of incurring maxillofacial fractures among individuals who engage in unarmed hand-to-hand combat.

METHODS

The following retrospective cohort study was competed using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The primary predictor variable was blood alcohol level. The primary outcome variable maxillofacial fracture. We used SPSS to conduct all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Our final sample consisted of 9,441 patients injured from unarmed hand-to-hand combat. The mean age of the sample was 38.7 years. The most common age group was young adults (42.9%), followed closely by middle-aged adults (41.9%). The number of males was nearly 4 times that of females. The mandible was the most frequently fractured maxillofacial bone. Concerning the mandible per se, the angle (37.1%) was the most frequently fractured site, while the coronoid process (0.2%) was the least frequently fractured site. Relative to females, males were 2.7 times more likely to incur a craniomaxillofacial fracture (P < .5).

CONCLUSIONS

Males had an increased risk of maxillofacial fracture relative to females. The mandible, particularly the angle, was the most frequently fractured maxillofacial bone. We speculate this is because hooks are frequently thrown in unarmed hand-to-hand combat.

Is Open Reduction Internal Fixation Using Titanium Plates in the Mandible as Successful as We Think?

ABSTRACT

Titanium plats are the gold-standard for fracture fixation. Titanium is considered biocompatible, corrosion resistant with an elasticity-modulus closest to bone. Nonetheless, titanium plates are not always as inherent as hoped. The authors investigated morbidity associated with titanium plates in mandibular fractures. A retrospective study of mandibular fractures treated between 2000 and 2018 using internal-fixation was conducted. Data included age, gender, complications, and location. Predictor-variable was location. Outcome-variable was plate removal. A total of 571 patients were included, 107 resulted in plate removal (18.7%). Body was the most prevalent location of fracture (29.3%). Symphysis/para-symphysis showed the highest removal rate (24.1%), followed by body and angle (21.3/19.8%). A total of 23.4% of double-plating cases resulted in plate removal, upper-border in 15% and lower-border in 8.8%, all reconstruction-plates. Exposure was the most frequent complication leading to removal. Although titanium plates are the gold standard, almost every fifth patient returns for plate removal. Age-distribution emphasizing 41 to 50 with decrease towards extremities may imply better healing in the young and soft-tissue elasticity and less complaints in the elderly. Significantly more complications in double-plating compared to lower border suggests proximity to the oral-cavity as a risk-factor for removal. Complication rates and patterns are not negligible and perhaps should encourage clinicians to consider using biodegradable-systems for upper-border plates.

The Impact of Treatment Delay on Malunion and Nonunion After Open Reduction of Mandible Fractures

Importance: Time to surgical intervention is an oft-investigated potentially modifiable risk factor for complications after mandible fracture. Objective: To identify novel risk factors for malunion/nonunion after mandible fracture and determine the impact of treatment delay on malunion and nonunion after open reduction of mandible fractures. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting and Participants: Encounter billing records from the New York State Inpatient Databases, State Emergency Department Databases, and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases. Patients aged 18 years and older with isolated mandible fracture in the emergency department or inpatient setting from January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mandibular Malunion/Nonunion. Results: A total of 19,152 adults were diagnosed with isolated mandible fracture. After fracture, 247 patients (1.3%) developed mandibular malunion or nonunion. In multivariable analysis, patients with open fractures (odds ratio [OR] 1.93, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.40-2.65), body fractures (OR 2.00, 1.50-2.65), alcohol abuse (OR 1.61, 1.22-2.11), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.57, 1.02-2.42), and Medicaid insurance (OR 1.46, 1.03-2.07) had increased risk, whereas patients with subcondylar fractures had reduced risk (OR 0.45, 0.28-0.72) of mandibular malunion/nonunion. The risk of mandibular malunion/nonunion after open reduction increased with treatment delay until 6-7 days after presentation (OR 1.84, 1.11-3.06). Conclusion and Relevance: Although treatment delay is often unavoidable, these findings suggest that physicians should consider early intervention in patients requiring open reduction of mandible fractures when able.

Potentially modifiable patient factors in mandible fracture complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The mandible is the most common bone to develop complications following treatment of facial fractures. This is due to a complex interaction of both fracture specific and patient factors. Our aim was to identify those patient factors, with a specific focus on those that may be potentially modifiable to reduce the incidence of complications. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology to identify patient factors ascribed to an increased risk of complications following the treatment of mandibular fracture. These were divided into non- modifiable and potentially modifiable factors. A meta-analysis was performed to weight those factors for which statistical analysis had been performed. Twenty-two pertinent papers were identified, of which eight described non-modifiable and seven potentially modifiable factors. The most common potentially modifiable factor identified was smoking. Meta-analysis established that tobacco smoking demonstrated an increased risk of complications in three studies (Odds Ratio: 4.04 - 8.09). Division of patient factors into those that are potentially modifiable and those that are not will enable clinicians to focus on those in which change within the immediate postoperative period can be instigated. This includes smoking cessation assistance, education as to the need for a soft diet, and facilitating postoperative clinic attendance. It also enables stratification of risk in terms of consent, and choice of treatment. Further research should use standardised terminology, particularly in stopping the use of generalisable terms such as patient compliance and instead describing its individual components.

A new classification of mandibular fractures

There is no accepted method of reporting mandibular fracture that reflects incidence, treatment and outcome for individual cases. As most series include anatomical site only for all fractures, the aim was to establish a new method to report fractures based on a systematic review of the literature and an internal audit. The classification proposed is: Class I; condyle, II; angle, IIc; II+condyle, III; body/symphysis, IIIc; III+condyle, IV; multiple fractures not including condyle, IVc; IV+condyle, V; bilateral condyle±other fracture(s). A total of 10,971 adult and 914 paediatric cases were analyzed through systematic review, and 833 from the regional audit. Only 32% (14/44) of reported series could be reclassified which, when added to the audit data, showed Class IV was most common (29%), with similar proportions of Class III, Class IIIc and Class II (18-23%). External validation (literature review) in terms of treatment and outcome was non-informative, but the internal validation (audit) demonstrated an increasing requirement for adding maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) as class increased. The heterogeneity of data reporting found in the systematic review confirms the need for a classification such as this, likely to enhance comparison of varying management protocols.

Mandibular Fractures Epidemiology and Treatment Plans in the Center of Italy: A Retrospective Study

ABSTRACT

The epidemiology of maxillofacial fractures is variable in different geographic regions. Economic and social conditions, laws and types of behavior can be considered the most important factors influencing these differences.Mandibular fractures were first cited in 1650 BC in an Egyptian papyrus. Today, these fractures are one of the most prevalent facial skeletal injuries.A 4-year retrospective study was performed and the trauma - related data were collected from medical and radiological archives. The analysis comprised patients admitted for mandibular fracture at Sapienza University of Rome - Policlinico Umberto I between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019. The data include age, sex, etiology, anatomical sites of the fractures, eventual maxillofacial associated fractures and treatment.We collected 172 patients, 138 males (80.2%) and 34 females (19.8%) with 270 mandibular fractures. The average age was 35.4 years. The youngest and oldest patients were aged 6 and 90 years, respectively. The age group 20 to 29 years was the most represented with 52 patients (30.2% of the total sample). Assaults were the most common etiology (n = 53, 30.8%), followed by falls (n = 45, 26.2%). The condyle was the most involved region (n = 86, 32%), followed by parasymphysis region (n = 72, 26.6%) and angle (n = 62, 23%).154 patients (89.5%) reported only mandibular fractures. Eighteen patients (10.5%) had other associated maxillofacial fractures; the most frequently encountered maxillofacial fractures associated with mandibular fractures were the zygomatic complex fractures (n = 9, 5.2%). Open reduction and internal fixation was the most preferred surgical treatment (n = 115, 66.9%).This study showed that mandibular fractures predominate in 20 to 29 years group and in the male sex. Assaults are the most frequent cause. The prevalent fracturing site is condylar process. Orbital - maxillary - zygomatic complex fractures were the most common associated maxillofacial fractures and open reduction and internal fixation was the preferred surgical strategy.The results of this analysis agree to other studies and provide important clinical information that will help in study of these injuries.

Comparison of lag screws and double Y-shaped miniplates in the fixation of anterior mandibular fractures

BACKGROUND

Mandibular fractures constitute about 80.79% of maxillofacial injuries in Alexandria University, either as isolated mandibular fractures or as a part of panfacial fractures. The combination of symphyseal and parasymphyseal fractures represent 47.09% of the total mandibular fractures.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of lag screws vs double Y-shaped miniplates in the fixation of anterior mandibular fractures.

METHODS

This study is a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, performed on sixteen patients with anterior mandibular fractures. Patients were divided equally into two groups, each consisting of eight patients. Group 1: Underwent open reduction and internal fixation using two lag screws. Group 2: Underwent open reduction and internal fixation using double Y-shaped plates. The following parameters were assessed: operating time in minutes, pain using a visual analog scale, edema, surgical wound healing for signs and symptoms of infection, occlusion status and stability, maximal mouth opening, and sensory nerve function. Cone beam computed tomography was performed at 3 and 6 mo to measure bone density and assess the progression of fracture healing.

RESULTS

The study included 13 males (81.3%) and 3 females (18.8%) aged 26 to 45 years (mean age was 35.69 ± 6.01 years). The cause of trauma was road traffic accidents in 10 patients (62.5%), interpersonal violence in 3 patients (18.8%) and other causes in 3 patients (18.8%). The fractures comprised 10 parasymphyseal fractures (62.5%) and 6 symphyseal fractures (37.5%). The values of all parameters were comparable in both groups with no statistically significant difference except for the mean bone density at 3 mo postoperatively which was 946.38 ± 66.29 in group 1 and 830.36 ± 95.53 in group 2 (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Both lag screws and double Y-shaped miniplates provide favorable means of fixation for mandibular fractures in the anterior region. Fractures fixed with lag screws show greater mean bone density at 3 mo post-operation, indicative of higher primary stability and faster early bone healing. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to verify these conclusions.

Biomechanical Assessment of the Validity of Sheep as a Preclinical Model for Testing Mandibular Fracture Fixation Devices

Mandibular fracture fixation and reconstruction are usually performed using titanium plates and screws, however, there is a need to improve current fixation techniques. Animal models represent an important step for the testing of new designs and materials. However, the validity of those preclinical models in terms of implant biomechanics remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigate the biomechanics of the sheep mandible as a preclinical model for testing the mechanical strength of fixation devices and the biomechanical environment induced on mandibular fractures. We aimed to assess the comparability of the biomechanical conditions in the sheep mandible as a preclinical model for human applications of fracture fixation devices and empower analyses of the effect of such defined mechanical conditions on bone healing outcome. We developed 3D finite element models of the human and sheep mandibles simulating physiological muscular loads and three different clenching tasks (intercuspal, incisal, and unilateral). Furthermore, we simulated fractures in the human mandibular body, sheep mandibular body, and sheep mandibular diastema fixated with clinically used titanium miniplates and screws. We compared, at the power stroke of mastication, the biomechanical environment (1) in the healthy mandibular body and (2) at the fracture sites, and (3) the mechanical solicitation of the implants as well as the mechanical conditions for bone healing in such cases. In the healthy mandibles, the sheep mandibular body showed lower mechanical strains compared to the human mandibular body. In the fractured mandibles, strains within a fracture gap in sheep were generally not comparable to humans, while similar or lower mechanical solicitation of the fixation devices was found between the human mandibular body fracture and the sheep mandibular diastema fracture scenarios. We, therefore, conclude that the mechanical environments of mandibular fractures in humans and sheep differ and our analyses suggest that the sheep mandibular bone should be carefully re-considered as a model system to study the effect of fixation devices on the healing outcome. In our analyses, the sheep mandibular diastema showed similar mechanical conditions for fracture fixation devices to those in humans.

Is Outpatient Management of Mandibular Fractures Associated With Inflammatory Complications? An ACS-NSQIP Study

PURPOSE

Timing of mandibular fracture repair has long been debated. The purpose of the present study was to assess the incidence of postoperative inflammatory complications (POICs) following open repair of mandibular fractures managed non-urgently in the outpatient setting versus urgently in the inpatient setting.

METHODS

The authors utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to enroll a sample of patients with mandibular fractures who underwent open repair. The primary independent variable was treatment protocol: outpatient (elective) versus inpatient (urgent/non-elective). The primary dependent variable was POIC (yes/no). Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were utilized to evaluate the relationship between treatment protocol and POICs.

RESULTS

The study cohort was comprised of 1,848 subjects with 1,134 outpatients and 714 inpatients. The incidence of POICs was 6.53% for the outpatient group compared to 8.96% for the inpatient group, with no significant difference between groups (P= .052). However, subjects treated as inpatients were 1.51 times more likely to experience any complication (P = .008) due to an increase in non-POICs (P = .028), in particular urinary tract infections (P = .035). After adjusting for age, hypertension requiring medical treatment, and smoking, classification as ASA II (P = .046, OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.83), ASA III (P = .020, OR = 2.88, 95% CI 1.18 to 7.02), diabetes (P = 0.004, OR = 3.11, 95% CI 1.43 to 6.74), and preoperative hematocrit (P = 0.010, OR = 0.950, 95% CI 0.913 to 0.988) were independent predictors of POICs. Length of stay was 0.83 ± 2.61 days compared to 2.36 ± 3.63 days for the outpatient and inpatient groups, respectively (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in POICs between patients treated as outpatients versus inpatients, though outpatients had fewer non-POICs and a shorter length of hospital stay.

Use of antibiotics in traumatic mandibular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The treatment of traumatic mandibular fractures constitutes a significant part of the oral and maxillofacial trauma service's workload. There are potential variations in how they are managed. Patients are often admitted and given intravenous antibiotics prior to their definitive treatment. The evidence behind this is inconclusive. We performed a systematic review as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance/ PROSPERO Registered (CRD:42020201398) on the use of antibiotics in the management of mandibular fractures. We identified studies using a search algorithm within the OVID Gateway (including MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Collaborative). Studies analysing the possible impact of prophylactic antibiotics on traumatic mandibular fractures were eligible. The primary outcome was surgical site infection requiring any treatment beyond the normal postoperative protocol. Secondary outcomes included any complication requiring further intervention. From the 16 studies identified (3,285 patients), seven were randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and nine were retrospective observational studies. We have identified significant between-study variation in choice of antibiotic regimen (timing, dosage, duration) and in reporting both primary and secondary outcomes. There was significant between-study heterogeneity (p = 0.02, I² = 69%) and none of the assessed interventions was found to be superior. The evidence behind the use of prophylactic antibiotics in mandibular fractures is weak. A properly designed and powered RCT is needed, in order to standardise practice for the benefit of patients and healthcare systems.

Return to normal diet following mandibular fractures - how long is long enough?

Mandibular fractures are a common injury managed by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Current open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) treatment strategies are based on Champy's ideal line of osteosynthesis with the use of miniplate and load-sharing fixation techniques. Postoperative instructions for the duration of a soft diet have varied. This prospective, randomised study reviewed the outcomes of a patient led return to diet at 2 weeks and 4 weeks compared with 6 weeks (control group) following an ORIF of mandibular fractures. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between a graduated return to diet at 2, 4, or 6 weeks following an ORIF of the mandible, nor was there a difference in the quality of life during the postoperative period. Smoking has a notable risk factor for complications. The findings of this study suggest that strict adherence to a softened diet may not be necessary, and that patients identified at being of low risk of complications may be able to return to a normal diet from as early as two weeks.

Treatment of Mandible Fractures Using a Miniplate System: A Retrospective Analysis

Three-dimensional (3D) mini plate systems are used in the treatment of mandibular fractures. The system is advantageous in comparison to conventional plates due to the stabilization of tension and compression areas, improved initial stability, and biomechanical behavior. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the use of a 3D miniplate system for the treatment of patients with mandibular fractures. Patients with mandibular fractures treated with a 3D plate system at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Münster, during a period of 5 years, were included in this study. Mandibular fracture conditions and minor and major post-operative complications were reported. In total, 336 patients and 391 mandibular fractures were assessed. The most common fracture site was anterior mandible, and 155 cases involved a tooth-bearing area. Minor complications were seen in 8.03% of cases, whereas only 1.49% of patients suffered from major complications. The treatment of mandible fractures using 3D miniplates resulted in fracture reduction with a low complication rate.

Management of Nonunion and Malunion After Primary Mandibular Condylar Fracture Treatment: A Review and Recommendations

PURPOSE

After primary treatment of mandibular condylar fractures, nonunion and malunion can result in considerable malocclusion and temporomandibular joint dysfunction owing to the integral role the condylar head plays in the temporomandibular joint. At present, the choice and timing of treatment are highly heterogeneous. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current literature to identify possible pitfalls, discuss available treatment options, and make recommendations.

METHODS

The electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, PROSPERO, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Embase were searched for content matching mandibular condylar fracture "revision surgery," "secondary surgery," "refracture," "malunion," and "malunion osteotomy." Articles in English, limited to human adults, published in the past 10 years, with abstracts and full text available and appropriate study designs, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 101 articles were retrieved for analysis, and 4 articles were included. Because of heterogeneity in these studies, a pooled analysis could not be performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery can be considered as primary treatment of condylar fractures, and early detection of complications allows for early intervention, leading to better outcomes. Treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction is highly heterogeneous and ranges from nonsurgical measures to joint reconstruction. Unilateral malocclusion can often be corrected with unilateral surgery, but bilateral surgery may be indicated in select cases. Bilateral deformities often require bilateral mandibular surgery, but in cases with preserved symmetry, maxillary surgery can be performed.

The Implications of Titanium Alloys Applied in Maxillofacial Osteosynthesis

Titanium alloys are known for their biological, mechanical and chemical properties, which have successfully expanded their use in the maxillofacial field. The internal fixation using titanium miniplates and screws offer a new perspective for the treatment of trauma and in orthognathic surgery and maxillofacial oncology. Although, titanium is highly recommended for its excellent biocompatibility, recent research has focused on identifying the potential local and general implications of the interactions between the human tissue and the metallic particles. This present review aims to outline the existing tissue changes, cellular alterations and future perspectives regarding the use of titanium-based alloys as osteosynthesis materials, taking into consideration the existing present debate whether the routinely removal of these materials should be an indication.

Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Treatment of Mandible Fractures

Importance

Complications that arise after treatment of mandible fractures can result in significant morbidity. Identifying modifiable risk factors associated with these complications is valuable in guiding clinical practice for improved patient outcomes.

Objective

To describe the risk factors associated with complications in patients undergoing treatment for mandible fracture.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective review was conducted of 137 patients presenting to a tertiary care, level 1 trauma center with mandible fractures between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2017. Outcomes and demographic characteristics for patients with at least 3 weeks of follow-up were compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

Of the 137 patients meeting inclusion criteria, there were 113 males (82.5%) and 24 females (17.5%), with a mean (SD) age at presentation of 32.3 (15.7) years. Median follow-up was 71 days (range, 22-1189 days). Postoperative complications were identified in 29 patients (21.2%); complications included wound dehiscence or surgical site infection (n = 17), bony nonunion (n = 5), and hardware exposure (n = 13). Complications were managed surgically in 19 patients and nonsurgically in 10 patients. On univariate analysis, the initial surgery was completed later (mean [SD], 5.9 [6.6] days after injury) in patients who developed complications than in those who did not (mean [SD], 3.8 [4.0] days). On multivariate analysis, complications were associated with increased time from injury to treatment (odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.02-2.53; P = .04), tobacco use (OR, 8.10; 95% CI, 1.26-52.00; P = .03), and dental extraction (OR, 93.00; 95% CI, 1.19 to >999.00; P = .04). Residence in the same city as the medical center was associated with fewer complications (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.69; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

In a 3-year review of mandible fractures managed at a single academic center, complications were associated with an increased time to treatment, tobacco use, dental extraction, and living farther from the treatment facility. On a systems level, the results of this study suggest that expediting intervention for mandible fractures may improve outcomes.

Level of Evidence

3.

Management of jaw fractures in oral surgery in public and private practice: a retrospective study from 2006 to 2017

Introduction: To date, no epidemiological studies on jaw fracture have examined its characteristics according to hospital status (public vs private). The aim of this study was to examine their differences in terms of patient- and injury-related variables. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using patients' medical records in 2 types of hospital located in the northern area of Brittany (France). All patients hospitalized for jaw fracture between 2006 and 2017 were eligible. Comparisons between centres according to age, gender, anatomic location of fracture, mechanism of injury, and length of stay were undertaken using χ2, Fisher exact test, t-test, and Cochrane-Armitage trend test. Results: A total of 142 patients were included: 45.1% in the public and 54.9% in the private hospitals. Of them, 84.5% were men and the mean age was 32.0. Main causes of fractures were assault (56.3%), fall (30.3%) and road traffic accident (10%). A small number of patients had polytrauma (4.2%). The mean duration of stay was less than 2 days. Compared to patients who were admitted in private hospital, those who were likely to be admitted in public hospital were those: who had a jaw fracture in context of road traffic accident (18.8% vs 2.6%), with polytrauma (9.4% vs 0.0%) and maxilla fracture (9.4% vs 1.3%), and who had a longer stay (2.2 vs 1.1 days). Conclusion: This study showed that differences observed in characteristics of jaw fractures between public and private hospitals may be due to recruitment process: more severely affected patients are likely to be admitted in the public hospital.

Resorbable Implants for Mandibular Fracture Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mandibular fractures in adults commonly require rigid fixation to ensure proper occlusion while minimizing infection risks. Numerous centers have assessed the efficacy of resorbable materials as a potential alternative to metallic plates. The purpose of the current systematic review and meta-analysis is to shed light on overall outcomes for resorbable implants and to compare these results to those for metallic counterparts.

The Healthcare Cost of Mandibular Nonunions

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the costs and characteristics between isolated mandible fractures and mandibular nonunions. From October 2015 to December 2016, the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was searched for patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of a mandible fracture. The sample was divided between those admitted for an initial evaluation of an isolated fracture and a fracture nonunion. Demographic descriptors, injury characteristics, and inpatient factors were recorded. A total of 1432 patients were included in the final sample, of whom 51 (3.6%) were admitted for a nonunion. Nonunion patients were significantly older (P < 0.01), and nonunions were more often localized to the body (24 vs 11%; P = 0.02). Compared to that of isolated fractures, a greater proportion of nonunions required open reduction and internal fixation (86 vs 59%; P < 0.01) and bone grafting (37 vs 1.4%; P < 0.01), and nonunions imparted +32.6% greater hospitals costs (median: $10,680 vs 14,162; P < 0.01). In conclusion, compared to isolated mandible fractures, mandibular nonunions occurred in older patients, had a higher frequency in body of the mandible, and utilized significantly more hospital resources per admission.

Epidemiological Study of the Socioeconomic Impact of Mandible Fractures in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital: Review of the Literature

Introduction

Mandibles fractures are one of the most frequent pathologies treated in an Oral and Maxillofacial Department and represent a serious public health problem.

Materials and Methods

We present a retrospective study of patients treated for mandible fractures by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department in a Spanish tertiary hospital during 2010-2012.

Results

One hundred and thirty-nine patients with 201 mandible fracture sites were assisted in our department; 15% were female and 85% were male, with a male-to-female ratio of 5.5:1. The observed mean age was 35 years with a range between 15 and 89 years. The most frequent etiology of fractures was the assault (43%) followed by falls (32%). The most common fracture site was the mandibular angle (35%), followed by the parasymphysis (30%). Concerning combined fractures (60%), the most repeated association was the angle and the parasymphysis. The principal imaging test for diagnosis was the orthopantomography. The intermaxillary fixation was performed in the 25% of cases, and the rest of mandible fractures were fixed by osteosynthesis. The surgical treatment had an average of 4.2 days after the trauma, and the mean time of hospitalization was 6.5 days.

Conclusion

The principal aim of the treatment of mandible fractures is to restore the function of the patient occlusion. A malocclusion after surgery may decrease the patient quality of life, so a correct fracture reduction could shrink health spending. After the result shown in the present study, the social education should be improved in the developed countries with the objective of decline in the amount of aggressiveness.