1
|
Kalluri MH, Edalatpour A, Thadikonda KM, Blum JD, Garland CB, Cho DY. Patient outcomes and complications following various maxillomandibular fixation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 92:151-176. [PMID: 38520780 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Currently, there are several methods of achieving maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), each with its unique operative considerations and subsequent patient outcomes and complications. In this study, we reviewed the literature to evaluate and compare all MMF methods. METHODS A systematic review of all MMF types was conducted and post-operative outcome data were analyzed and compared among the different types. Conventional Erich arch bars were compared to hybrid arch bars, MMF screws, and eyelet interdental wiring. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to determine the mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a statistical significance of P < 0.05. RESULTS Among the 4234 articles identified, 24 were included, and 17 were meta-analyzed. Time to achieve MMF (-43.38 min; 95% CI, -58.20 to -28.56; P < 0.001), total operative time (-30.33 min; 95% CI, -61.05 to 0.39; P = 0.05), incidence of wire puncture injuries and glove perforations (0.11; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.30; P < 0.001), and incidence of poor oral hygiene (0.08; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.28; P < 0.001) were lower for alternative MMF interventions compared to those of the conventional Erich arch bars. CONCLUSIONS Alternative MMF methods required shorter operative time to achieve MMF and demonstrated other increased efficiencies of practice such as shorter total operative time and decreased glove perforations, when compared to conventional Erich arch bars. If a patient is a candidate for MMF, the presented alternative MMF techniques should be considered depending on the clinical context and availability of institutional resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manasa H Kalluri
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Armin Edalatpour
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Kishan M Thadikonda
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jessica D Blum
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Catharine B Garland
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Daniel Y Cho
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bede S, Hamid S. The use of screw retained hybrid arch bar for maxillomandibular fixation in the treatment of mandibular fractures: A comparative study. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2021; 11:247-252. [PMID: 35265493 PMCID: PMC8848701 DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_35_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The use of screw-retained hybrid arch bars (HABs) is a relatively recent development in the treatment of mandibular fractures. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcome between HAB and the conventional Erich arch bar (EAB) in the closed treatment of mandibular fractures. Materials and Methods: This study included 18 patients who were treated for mandibular fractures with maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), patients were randomly assigned into a control group (n = 10) in which EAB was used and study group (n = 8) in which HAB was used. The outcome variables were time required for application and removal, gingival inflammation scores, postoperative complications, and incidence of wire-stick injury or gloves perforation. The groups were compared using unpaired t-test, Mann–Whitney test, Chi-square test, or Fisher test. The differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. Results: The mean application time was significantly more in EAB than HAB (61.6 ± 11.4 vs. 41.6 ± 6 min, respectively). The mean time of removal for EAB was significantly less than HAB (11.1 ± 2 vs. 14.2 ± 3 min, respectively). There was nonsignificant difference in gingival inflammation between the groups. No major complications were recorded. Screw loosening and mucosal overgrowth were recorded in 12.5% and 31.2% of the screws, respectively, in HAB group. The incidence of gloves tear in EAB group was 70%. Discussion: HAB can be used as an alternative to EAB for MMF in patients with mandibular fracture, it requires less time for application and provides more safety for the surgeons.
Collapse
|
3
|
Venugopalan V, Satheesh G, Balatandayoudham A, Duraimurugan S, Balaji TS. A Comparative Randomized Prospective Clinical Study on Modified Erich Arch Bar with Conventional Erich Arch Bar for Maxillomandibular Fixation. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2020; 10:287-291. [PMID: 33708569 PMCID: PMC7943981 DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_20_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Erich arch bar used for maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) since decades has several disadvantages such as risks of injury, additional operating room time, and gingival trauma. To overcome these downsides, modified Erich arch bar was introduced; however, there is not much available literature, indicating the efficacy of modified Erich arch bar over that of conventional arch bar wire. Therefore, the present study focuses on comparing efficiency of modified arch bar with conventional arch bar. Materials and Methods This comparative randomized study was conducted on 32 patients that required MMF and were divided into Group A patients who received intermaxillary fixation (IMF) with modified Erich arch bars and Group B patients with conventional Erich arch bars. The parameters recorded were average surgical time required, wire prick injuries, IMF stability, occlusal stability, screw loosening, oral hygiene status, and vitality response of the teeth. The variables were statistically analyzed using Student's t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results The wire prick injury, intraoperative time noted in Group A was significantly reduced in comparison to Group B (P < 0.0001). Debris indices were significantly good in Group A in comparison to Group B (P < 0.0001). Nonvitality response of tooth was significantly more in Group B than in Group A patients (P < 0.05). Discussion The efficiency of modified Erich arch bar group was superior to the conventional arch bar with very limited restrictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Venugopalan
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry, India
| | - G Satheesh
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry, India
| | - A Balatandayoudham
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry, India
| | - S Duraimurugan
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry, India
| | - T S Balaji
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pabst AM, Blatt S, Epperlein P, Schmidtmann I, Krüger M, Schiegnitz E, Goetze E, Ziebart T, Al-Nawas B. The risk of tooth root injuries using cortical screws for intermaxillary fixation and osteosynthesis plates - A retrospective analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019; 47:1767-1778. [PMID: 31711997 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 07/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Intermaxillary fixation (IMF) and osteosynthesis plates (OP) are widely used for the non-surgical and surgical treatment of mandible and condyle fractures. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the frequency of tooth root injuries by IMF and OP screws. Electronic patient reports (2004-2013) were screened for patients treated with either IMF screws and/or OP in the Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany. The frequency and the position of endangered and injured teeth were analyzed by orthopantomogram (OPTG) and cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Next, possible predictive factors for tooth root injuries, namely interdental- and crestal distance, screw length and distance between tooth root and screw were evaluated. Further, the accuracy of OPTG vs. CBCT concerning the diagnosis of tooth root injuries was analyzed. Three-hundred sixty-six patients were included and 3388 teeth were defined as endangered by IMF- and OP screws. Overall, 16 injured teeth (0.5%) in 13 patients (3.55%) were detected. Nine injuries (56.3%) were caused by IMF- and seven injuries (43.8%) by OP screws. Three teeth were non-vital, one tooth had to be extracted. No correlation between the predictive factors crestal distance, screw length and tooth root injuries was found. If tooth injury occurred, a significant correlation between the interdental distance and the distance between tooth root and screw was found (κ = 0.48; p < 0,0001). Comparison between OPTG vs. CBCT demonstrated that many of the injuries that were seen in the OPTG (n = 230) could not be verified in the CBCT scans (n = 16) (κ = 0.12). To conclude, screws for IMF and OP can be considered as a safe procedure concerning the risk of tooth root injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Max Pabst
- Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Federal Armed Forces Hospital, (Head: Prof. Dr. Dr. R. Werkmeister), Rübenacherstrasse 170, 56072 Koblenz, Germany; Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center, (Head: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. B. Al-Nawas), Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Blatt
- Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center, (Head: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. B. Al-Nawas), Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Pia Epperlein
- Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center, (Head: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. B. Al-Nawas), Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Irene Schmidtmann
- Institute for Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center, (Head: Prof. Dr. S. Singer), Obere Zahlbacherstr. 69, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Maximilian Krüger
- Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center, (Head: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. B. Al-Nawas), Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Eik Schiegnitz
- Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center, (Head: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. B. Al-Nawas), Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Goetze
- Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center, (Head: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. B. Al-Nawas), Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Ziebart
- Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, (Head: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Neff), Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Bilal Al-Nawas
- Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center, (Head: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. B. Al-Nawas), Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Comparison Between Intermaxillary Fixation With Screws and an Arch Bar for Mandibular Fracture. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30:1787-1789. [DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000005488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
6
|
FAMI Screws for Mandibulo-Maxillary fixation in mandibular fracture treatment - Clinico-radiological evaluation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018; 46:566-572. [PMID: 29459185 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2017] [Revised: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Mandibulo-maxillary fixation (MMF) is indispensable for mandibular fracture treatment. Various means for MMF have been proposed, of which arch bars are widely considered to be the mainstay. However, disadvantages to this method have initiated a quest for an alternative, leading to the introduction of MMF screws. MMF screws have frequently been criticized for poor stability of fracture sites, root damage, hardware failure, and nerve damage. We retrospectively evaluate the FAMI (Fixation and Adaptation in Mandibular Injuries) screw in mandibular fracture treatment by scanning for clinically and radiologically visible complications. In total, 534 FAMI screws were used in the successful treatment of 96 males and 34 females. Condylar fractures were most commonly encountered, representing 120 of 241 fracture sites. 15 general fracture-related complications occurred, with the most common being nerve function impairment (3.8%) and postoperative malocclusion (4.6%). In nine cases (7%), clinically visible FAMI-screw-related complications occurred, with the most prevalent being screw loosening (2.3%) and mucosal signs of inflammation (3.1%). Duration of FAMI screws was associated with the occurrence of clinically visible complications (p = 0.042). Radiologically, clinically invisible dental hard tissue damage was noted in 21 individuals (16%). Therefore, FAMI screws seem to be a reliable and safe method for mandibulo-maxillary fixation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) can be performed using various techniques. Two common approaches used are arch bars and bone screws. Arch bars are the gold standard and inexpensive, but often require increased procedure time. Bone screws with wire fixation is a popular alternative, but more expensive than arch bars. The differences in costs of care, complications, and operative times between these 2 techniques are analyzed. METHODS A chart review was conducted on patients treated over the last 12 years at our institution. Forty-four patients with CPT code 21453 (closed reduction of mandible fracture with interdental fixation) with an isolated mandible fracture were used in our data collection. The operating room (OR) costs, procedure duration, and complications for these patients were analyzed. RESULTS Operative times were significantly shorter for patients treated with bone screws (P < 0.002). The costs for one trip to the OR for either method of fixation did not show any significant differences (P < 0.840). More patients with arch bar fixation (62%) required a second trip to the OR for removal in comparison to those with screw fixation (31%) (P < 0.068). This additional trip to the OR added significant cost. There were no differences in patient complications between these 2 fixation techniques. CONCLUSIONS The MMF with bone screws represents an attractive alternative to fixation with arch bars in appropriate scenarios. Screw fixation offers reduced costs, fewer trips to the OR, and decreased operative duration without a difference in complications. Cost savings were noted most significantly in a decreased need for secondary procedures in patients who were treated with MMF screws. Screw fixation offers potential for reducing the costs of care in treating patients with minimally displaced or favorable mandible fractures.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hartwig S, Boettner A, Doll C, Voss JO, Hertel M, Preissner S, Raguse JD. Drill-related root injury caused by intraoperative intermaxillary fixation: an analysis of 1067 screw applications. Dent Traumatol 2016; 33:45-50. [PMID: 27681036 DOI: 10.1111/edt.12305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Intermaxillary fixation is a standard procedure for the treatment of mandibular fractures or in orthognathic surgery. Predrilling for screws poses the risk of accidental tooth root injury, potentially leading to further pathological processes. Limited evidence about accidental tooth injury during intermaxillary fixation is available due to heterogenous study designs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of root trauma using predrilled transgingival fixation screws and the clinical consequences for the affected teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, the data of open reduction and internal fixation surgery files with intraoperative application of predrilled intermaxillary fixation screws were analysed. The postoperative radiographic images were evaluated for the occurrence of tooth root injury. Patients diagnosed with root injury were clinically followed up with respect to the dental health for the affected teeth. RESULTS A total of 133 radiologically diagnosed tooth root injuries were recorded (12.5% of screws). The median follow-up interval was 16 months (range: 3-77 months). The return rate was 49.5% for all patients. Of these, four of the injured teeth (3%) needed endodontic treatment. No toothache was reported, no tooth was lost, and no negative impact on periodontal health was clinically evident. CONCLUSION Intermaxillary fixation with predrilled transgingival screws is a safe way to manage mandibular fractures. The incidence of tooth root injury is not uncommon, but the adverse side effects are rare and the health of the affected teeth is mostly not compromised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Hartwig
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Boettner
- Department of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Campus Benjamin-Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Doll
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan O Voss
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Hertel
- Department of Oral Medicine, Dental Radiology and Oral Surgery, Campus Benjamin-Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Saskia Preissner
- Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Campus Benjamin-Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan D Raguse
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Andrei Florescu V, Kofod T, Pinholt EM. Intermaxillary Fixation Screw Morbidity in Treatment of Mandibular Fractures-A Retrospective Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74:1800-6. [PMID: 27206626 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2015] [Revised: 04/16/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the present retrospective study was to investigate the morbidity of screws used for intermaxillary fixation (IMF) in the treatment of mandibular fractures. A review of the published data was also performed for a comparison of outcomes. Our hypothesis was that the use of screws for IMF of mandibular fractures would result in minimal morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients treated for mandibular fractures from 2007 to 2013, using screws for IMF, using the international diagnosis code for mandibular fracture, DS026, were anonymously selected (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark). The fracture type, radiographic findings, treatment modality, screw type and number, and root damage were recorded. For the outcome comparison, a review of the published data regarding iatrogenic dental root damage caused by screw fixation was performed in May 2015. RESULTS A total of 156 patients had undergone IMF with screws. The total number of screws was 793. The incidence of root lesions was 0.25% centrally and 0.88% peripherally. The incidence of screw loss was 0.13% and that of screw loosening was 1.89%. In the review, 737 related reports were identified in a search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Of these, 25 were considered suitable for inclusion. A lack of valid evidence resulted in a descriptive analysis, because a meta-analysis of the data was not possible. CONCLUSIONS The results of the present retrospective study have shown that the use of screws is a valid choice for IMF in mandibular fracture treatment with minimal morbidity. The 793 screws used for IMF resulted in a negligible amount of central and peripheral tooth root trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlad Andrei Florescu
- PhD Fellow, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Thomas Kofod
- Department Head and Consultant Maxillofacial Surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Else Marie Pinholt
- Professor, University of Southern Denmark, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute for Regional Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark Hospitals, Hospital of South West Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bins A, Oomens MAE, Boffano P, Forouzanfar T. Is There Enough Evidence to Regularly Apply Bone Screws for Intermaxillary Fixation in Mandibular Fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73:1963-9. [PMID: 25930955 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.03.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2015] [Revised: 03/24/2015] [Accepted: 03/29/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intermaxillary fixation (IMF) is traditionally achieved with arch bars; however, this method has several well-known disadvantages and other techniques, such as bone screws, are available. This study evaluated current evidence regarding these IMF screws (IMFSs) for mandibular trauma and to assess whether this allows a change of treatment protocol for IMF. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic electronic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Titles and abstracts retrieved from the search were screened and evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The full text of all relevant articles was read and citation lists were checked for any missing references. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were subjected to a quality assessment. Included articles were checked for outcome measurements concerning occlusion, operative time, oral hygiene, root trauma, wire-stick injuries, and mucosa overgrowth. RESULTS Twenty-two articles (17 case series, 4 RCTs, and 1 cohort study) were included. None of the RCTs scored high methodologic results in the quality assessment. The results suggest IMFSs have similar malocclusion rates as arch bars, fewer wire-stick injuries, improved oral hygiene, and shorter operative time. Root damage is less likely to occur with self-drilling screws and seldom requires treatment. CONCLUSIONS Although the methodologic quality of the included studies is poor, self-drilling IMFSs are recommended for temporary per-operative IMF of noncomminuted mandibular fractures. More high-quality studies are required to allow an evidence-based change of protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjan Bins
- Ph.D. Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marjolijn A E Oomens
- Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, VU University Medical Center/Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Boffano
- Research Associate, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, VU University Medical Center/Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands
| | - Tymour Forouzanfar
- Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, VU University Medical Center/Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gazal G. Evaluation of the effectiveness of early or delayed treatment upon healing of mandibular fractures: A retrospective study. Eur J Dent 2015; 9:87-91. [PMID: 25713490 PMCID: PMC4319306 DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.149650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: This study was aimed to assess the impacts of delay treatment of mandibular fracture and its complications. In addition risk variables related such as time to repair, fracture types, substance abuse, causes, surgical management, muddling or complications and duration of clinic stay were also evaluated. Materials and Methods: The data of patients attending the Newcastle General Hospital, UK for the management of mandibular fractures were probed. This retrospective clinical trial conducted over 6 months, included 91 patients attending trauma operating theatre during weekdays or weekends. Data were analyzed for time to admission and treatment and its relationships to various factors using SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Results: Time to treatment from the point of admission was 31.50 ± 3.83 h during week days that has been significantly more for patients attending the hospital at weekends or nights. Similar trend was observed for total summative time from the incident to treatment analysis. Conclusions: This investigation has demonstrated that the rate of infection and postoperative complications following surgical treatment of mandible fractures can be eased off by reducing the waiting time from presentation to the emergency and to the operating theater.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giath Gazal
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawwarah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chao AH, Hulsen J. Bone-Supported Arch Bars Are Associated With Comparable Outcomes to Erich Arch Bars in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures With Intermaxillary Fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73:306-13. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2014] [Revised: 08/13/2014] [Accepted: 08/19/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|