Arthroscopic discopexy is effective in managing temporomandibular joint internal derangement in patients with Wilkes stage II and III

Arthroscopic management and recent advancements in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders

In oral and maxillofacial surgery, the evolution of minimally invasive techniques has revolutionised the management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. At the forefront of this advancement lies TMJ arthroscopy, a procedure that offers a precise approach to diagnosing and treating joint issues. TMJ arthroscopy is indicated in various clinical scenarios where a detailed evaluation and targeted interventions within the TMJ are required to alleviate symptoms, improve joint function, and enhance the overall quality of life of patients suffering from TMJ disorders.

A guide for temporomandibular joint surgery using a simple surgical classification - A narrative-style review

The aim of this narrative style review is to clarify the role of TMJ surgery in the management of specific TMJ disorders by introducing a simple and practical surgical classification. A decade ago, a new surgical classification was published which, like the Wilkes classification, included the five escalating degrees of joint pathology, but with more practical definitions and proposed surgical options for each of the disease categories. The classification begins with Category 1 - painful but otherwise structurally normal joints, which are largely managed nonsurgically. Categories 2 and 3 denote reducing and nonreducing disc displacement of the TMJ, respectively, with the former treated by TMJ arthrocentesis or level 1 arthroscopy and the latter best managed with disc repositioning or discopexy. Category 4 describes degenerative changes to the disc itself, where the disc cannot be salvaged and is thus removed with TMJ discectomy. Lastly, Category 5 refers to end-stage joint disease, where none of the joint components can be salvaged; both the disc and condylar head are sacrificed, and the TMJ is reconstructed with a prosthetic total joint replacement. In the decade since its publication, various studies have served to validate the usefulness of the TMJ surgical classification, and how it can be applied to better understand the role of TMJ surgery in everyday clinical practice.

Comparison of the TMJ arthroscopy discopexy techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This article aims to analyze which of the main arthroscopic discopexy techniques has the best results and if there are differences between the techniques for both pain and maxillary intercuspid opening. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA statement. An electronic search was performed with no publication date restriction in PubMed, Ovid and Embase. The PICO criteria: (P) Patients: With temporomandibular internal disorders with discopexy indication. (I) Intervention: Temporomandibular joint arthroscopic discopexy. (C) Comparison: Arthroscopic discopexy among different techniques classified as non-rigid, semi-rigid and rigid. (O) Outcomes: Impact in clinical conditions such as pain and maximum mouth opening. The inclusion criteria were Patients with temporomandibular internal disorders with discopexy indication performed with different techniques classified as non-rigid, semi-rigid and rigid. The outcomes evaluated were pain and maximum mouth opening. Case series, cohort studies, quasi-experimental studies, and randomized clinical trials with at least 3 months of follow-up were included. The exclusion criteria considered were patients with related concomitant surgeries, patients with associated neoplastic disease or connective tissue disease. A total of 1515 joints where 1400 discopexies were performed including 849 females and 204 males. The most common diagnostic was Wilkes stage III in 257 joints. For pain and oral opening, the semi-rigid technique shows the best results median (MD) 4.84 (CI 2.52-7.16; p = 0.001, I2:100%), MD -2.78 (CI -4.34, -1.21; p = 0.001, I2:99%), respectively. The rigid technique has the greatest probability for complications MD 0.14 CI 95% (0.00, -0.28). Although the semi-rigid technique showed better results, there is no statistically significant difference. However, due to the heterogeneity of the studies, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Recent Advances in Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) affect a high percentage of children and adults worldwide. Surgery may be indicated in severe or recalcitrant cases. Several recent advancements in TMD and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) surgery have elevated understanding and the ability to treat affected patients. We discuss recent advances in TMD epidemiology, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) of the TMJ, and surgical techniques and technologies. Technical advancements have been identified in TMJ arthroscopy, the treatment of TMJ subluxation and dislocation, and extended prosthetic total TMJ reconstruction (eTMJR). Overall, this review provides valuable insights into significant recent advancements in TMJ disorders and their surgical management.

Surgical Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Derangement: 30-Year Follow-Up of Temporomandibular Joint Discectomy, a Case Report and Literature Review

The improvement in diagnostic accuracy, improvement of the endoscopic equipment, better selection of patients for open TMJ surgery, and increased focus on research and education are promising for the treatment of the group of patients with TMJ derangements. In the future, prospective randomized clinical trials need to be performed to give the clinician guidelines as to which type of intervention should be chosen in a particular patient base on accepted criteria for diagnosis and treatment of TMJ derangement.

Arthroscopic discopexy versus natural course of temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement: a longitudinal study of clinical and radiological outcomes

The aim of this study was to assess the various outcomes of arthroscopic discopexy compared to the natural course of anterior disc displacement (ADD) longitudinally in the same patients. A retrospective review was performed of 108 patients (152 joints) who experienced the natural course of ADD for a period of time and then underwent arthroscopic discopexy. The outcome was evaluated clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging. The natural course of ADD showed significant deterioration in pain, diet, and quality of life, and also a significant reduction in inter-incisal opening (all P < 0.001), while significant improvements in all clinical parameters were observed at the final postoperative follow-up (all P < 0.001, compared to the last preoperative visit). During the natural course, there was a significant shortening of condylar height, mandibular height, and disc length, and an increase in disc displacement distance (all P < 0.001). Postoperative follow-up revealed the restoration of condylar height and mandibular height, and all discs were significantly repositioned with an increased disc length (unfolded) (all P < 0.001). Bearing in mind the assumption of a low evidence base due to bias resulting from the retrospective non-double-blinded study design and the variable duration of the natural disease course prior to surgery, this study found that the natural course of ADD led to degenerative changes in the joint structures and clinical symptoms, whereas arthroscopic discopexy led to a restoration of the bony structures and the alleviation of clinical symptoms.

Different intra-articular injection substances following temporomandibular joint arthroscopy and their effect on early postoperative period: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), hyaluronic acid (HA), and saline intra-articular injections following temporomandibular joint arthroscopy on decreasing pain and increasing maximal mouth opening.

METHODS

Included patients were randomized into three groups: PRGF group, hyaluronic acid group, and control group. Intra-articular injections were done at the end of the arthroscopy. Pain was measured using the VAS scale preoperatively, 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. Maximal mouth opening was measured preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant decrease in pain in all groups, although, the decrease was significantly greater in the HA group following surgery.

CONCLUSION

A hyaluronic acid injection following temporomandibular joint arthroscopy can decrease pain better than saline and platelet-rich plasma during the first postoperative week. However, the results do not differ in later postoperative periods.

The Efficiency of Different Arthroscopic Discopexy Techniques Based on Clinical and Radiographic Findings: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of different temporomandibular joint arthroscopic discopexy techniques.The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and an electronic search was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), The Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect databases using a combination of the terms "discopexy," "disc recapture," "disc fixation," and "temporomandibular joint" to identify clinical trials published from 2010.In total, 493 records were screened, of which only 9 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in qualitative data synthesis.The results of clinical findings evaluation showed that arthroscopic discopexy statistically significantly improved levels of pain (VAS) and maximum interincisal opening whereas magnetic resonance imaging evaluation showed disc position improvement of up to 90% to 100%.In conclusion, this review provides the evidence of the potential benefits of arthroscopic disc fixation in the treatment of patients with internal derangements : reduced pain, increased maximum interincisal opening, and improved disc position evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging, whereas disc fixation using suturing techniques seems to be the most appropriate method.

Current Treatment Strategies for the Management of the Internal Derangements of the Temporomandibular Joint: A Global Perspective

Internal joint derangement is a disruption of the internal aspects of the TMJ-disc displacements/adhesions/impingements, causing alterations in the normal dynamic motions of the joint. Clinicians must be diligent in establishing the correct diagnosis and cause of TMJID, which ultimately leads to the appropriate management of such patients. While many patients adapt over time or with non-surgical treatment, surgery may be indicated for those with ongoing problems. The surgical pyramid provides a stepwise progression for TMJ surgical patients. This paper aims to review TMJID and its management with special emphasis on arthroscopic minimally invasive surgery, as practised in other countries around the world, and compare this to current education, understanding and practice in India. Currently, India is lagging behind in providing the full scope of TMJ services as there are very few surgeons trained in the skill of arthroscopic techniques. There needs to be continued expansion of our understanding of TMJID treatment in India to bring it level with the rest of the world.

Prognostic indicators of arthroscopic discopexy for management of temporomandibular joint closed lock

In order to optimize patient selection for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthroscopic discopexy to achieve favorable outcomes, prognostic indicators impacting the results are important to analyze. This longitudinal retrospective study aimed to analyze various prognostic factors impacting surgical outcomes following arthroscopic discopexy for management of TMJ closed lock using success criteria based on pain, maximal interincisal opening, diet, and quality of life. Furthermore, a quantitative MRI assessment was performed pre- and post-operatively. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate various prognostic variables including gender, age, side, duration of illness, Wilkes staging, parafunctional habits, splint therapy and orthodontic treatment. A total of 147 patients (201 joints) were included. The outcome was categorized as excellent (n = 154/76.61%), good (n = 34/16.91%), or poor (n = 13/6.46%) with a success rate of 93.54%. Patients aged > 30 years old (p = 0.048), longer duration of illness (12–24 months: p = 0.034) and (> 24 months: p = 0.022), and patients with Wilkes stage IV (p = 0.002) were all significantly more likely to be in the poor outcome group. Finally, orthodontic treatment showed a significant association with excellent outcomes (p = 0.015). Age, duration of illness, Wilkes staging, and orthodontic treatment are considered significant prognostic factors that can predict the outcomes following the arthroscopic discopexy for management of TMJ closed lock.

Functional outcomes after using the glenoid fossa as a fixed anchorage for the temporomandibular joint discopexy in patients with disc displacement without reduction

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of the glenoid fossa as an anchorage for the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc repositioning in patients with a disc displacement (DD) without reduction. A prospective case series study included patients with DD without reduction. According to the Wilkes staging system for the TMJ internal derangement, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and clinical examinations determine the stage of the DD. The discopexy treatment consists of combined endaural/preauricular incision on the tragus, and freeing the anteromedial displaced disc from its attachments. An intra bony hole was drilled 2 mm away from the postero-lateral lip of the glenoid fossa and perpendicular to it. The disc was securely fixed to the roof of the fossa via a Prolene 0 suture in a double-pass suture fashion. The functional assessment was based on the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and measurements of the maximum inter-incisal opening (MIO) after 1, 6, 12, and 18 months. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. Thirteen of 25 joints were diagnosed with Wilkes stage III. The mean VAS score significantly decreased to 2.2 ± 1.0 and the MIO also significantly improved with a mean of 35.9 ± 3.5 mm after 18 months (P < 0.001). The rest of the cases (12 joints) were diagnosed with Wilkes stage IV, and the VAS score decreased to 1.6 ± 0.7. The MIO increased to 34.2 ± 3.3 mm at the end of the follow-up (P < 0.001). Within the limitations of the study, it seems that using the glenoid fossa as anchorage for the TMJ disc might have some clinical relevance and therefore might be taken into consideration whenever it is deemed appropriate.

Clinical Effects of the Combination of Rhytidectomy and Temporomandibular Joint Disc Repositioning Surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the clinical effects of the combination of rhytidectomy and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc repositioning surgery in internal derangement (ID) stage IV-V and facial aging patients.

METHODS

Eighteen facial aging with bilateral ID IV-V patients were enrolled in this study. All of them had undergone temporomandibular disc repositioning surgery and rhytidectomy by the same surgeon (Yao Min Zhu). Pre-/post-surgical clinical manifestations, facial photography, radiographic data were recorded and analyzed, as well as doctor, patient, third-party evaluation of postsurgical facial appearance satisfaction.

RESULTS

The average age of 18 female patients was 52.9. The average of presurgical visual analog pain scale score was 5.94, ranged from 4 to 8. After 6 months, the average of postsurgical visual analog pain scale score was 0.28, ranged from 0 to 1 (P > 0.05). The average maximal mouth opening of presurgical and postsurgical was 2.19 and 3.29 cm, ranged from 1.2 to 2.8 cm and 3.0 to 3.5 cm, respectively (P < 0.05). Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed the location of the bilateral TMJ discs directly above the mandibular condyle. The satisfaction rate of doctors, patients and third-party with facial appearance was 95% to 98%, 96% to 99% and 96% to 99%, respectively, with an average of 95.72%, 98.11%, and 97.50%.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with bilateral ID IV-V and facial aging, the combination of disc repositioning surgery and rhytidectomy is a very feasible procedure to treat TMJ disorders and improve patients' facial appearance and satisfaction.

An International Survey on Temporomandibular Joint Surgeon's Implementation and Management of Discectomy in Treating Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement

PURPOSE

To survey temporomandibular joint (TMJ) surgeons to determine current practice trends and perceptions regarding the role of discectomy for the treatment of TMJ internal derangements.

METHODS

An anonymous 5-part web-based survey was sent to TMJ surgeons. The survey was created and distributed, and the data were collected with the University of Michigan Qualtrics platform. Responses were compared based on operative volume, tendency to replace the disc, and likelihood of requiring temporomandibular joint replacement (TJR) after discectomy. Spearman correlations were used to test statistically significant differences. Domain-level analyses were also performed by summarizing items into 3 domain scores. Analyses were performed in SAS V9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine surgeons (33.9%) completed the survey. Discectomy was not considered to be a useful procedure by 85% of respondents, and 74% would not consider discectomy as a first surgical option. Most would consider discectomy (64%) before alloplastic total joint replacement. Discectomy was preferred over discopexy for the management of anterior disc displacement with reduction by high volume surgeons (89%), but most (72%) did not feel that discectomy was beneficial over arthroscopy in the treatment of anterior disc displacement without reduction and concomitant degenerative bony changes. In managing symptomatic disc perforation, 66% agreed that discectomy is the procedure of choice and 49% felt that interpositional tissue is indicated in most cases after discectomy. Respondents who reported fewer re-operations requiring alloplastic TJR after discectomy had, on average, more positive perceptions of discectomy on the benefits domain (P = .03), better than alternatives domain (P = .03), and fewer concerns on the perceived adverse effects domain (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

TMJ surgeons do not employ TMJ discectomy in most cases of TMJ internal derangement. However, discectomy is considered useful in cases of disc perforation or for persistent symptomatic disc displacement without reduction, in an attempt to avoid alloplastic TJR. Common adverse effects included joint noises and osteoarthrosis, and the use of interpositional disc replacement tissue did not alter the incidence of adverse effects or complications reported.

Temporomandibular Disorders: Current Concepts and Controversies in Diagnosis and Management

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a group of orofacial pain conditions which are the most common non-dental pain complaint in the maxillofacial region. Due to the complexity of the etiology, the diagnosis and management of TMD remain a challenge where consensus is still lacking in many aspects. While clinical examination is considered the most important process in the diagnosis of TMD, imaging may serve as a valuable adjunct in selected cases. Depending on the type of TMD, many treatment modalities have been proposed, ranging from conservative options to open surgical procedures. In this review, the authors discuss the present thinking in the etiology and classification of TMD, followed by the diagnostic approach and the current trend and controversies in management.

Effectiveness of disk repositioning and suturing comparing open-joint versus arthroscopic techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present a systematic review of the effectiveness of discopexy in managing internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).

STUDY DESIGN

We searched MEDLINE through PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and grey literature accessed through Google Scholar, Openthesis, and hand-searching from inception to July 2020. The search strategy yielded 363 potentially relevant studies. After screening titles and abstracts, 41 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

There was an overall decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) pain score of 4.59 cm (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-7.16; P < .001) during the follow-up time and an overall increase of 10 mm (95% CI, 6.93-13.01; P < .001) in mouth opening after TMJ surgeries with discopexy.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence showed an overall decrease in VAS pain score and an improvement in mouth opening after TMJ surgeries with discopexy. Changes in maximal interincisal opening were greater after arthroscopic disk repositioning compared to open-joint procedure.

Is Arthroscopic Disk Repositioning Equally Efficacious to Open Disk Repositioning? A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Temporomandibular joint disc repositioning surgery is 1 of the treatment modalities used for treating anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint. The procedure can be arthroscopic disc repositioning or open disc repositioning. This systematic review measured and compared the efficacy of arthroscopic and open disc repositioning procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic review without meta-analysis by performing a literature search electronically and manually covering arthroscopic and open disc repositioning studies published up to July 2020 in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Surgical outcomes such as changes in maximal incisal opening (MIO) and pain scores, temporomandibular joint noises, diet consistency, malocclusion, and postoperative complications were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies were included in the review and split into those assessing open disc repositioning (n = 13) and those assessing arthroscopic disc repositioning (n = 15). The average age of the study patients in the included studies was 31.5 ± 6.8 years, and women represented 83.3% of the study population. Both arthroscopic and open disc repositioning showed to be efficacious in reducing pain and increasing MIO. Due to heterogeneity in study designs and data reporting between the studies, no quantitative analysis was performed, and the groups were not directly compared.

CONCLUSIONS

Both arthroscopic and open disc repositioning led to significant improvements in clinical outcomes based on pain scores and MIO. This study highlights the need for comparative studies of the 2 techniques with well-documented case selection including standardized diagnosis based on Wilkes stages and rigorous outcomes assessment including patient reported outcomes.

Long-term clinical outcomes of arthroscopic discopexy with resorbable pins

INTRODUCTION

Discopexy using resorbable pins is an arthroscopic technique to treat internal derangement of the TMJ, restoring the normal relationship between disc, condyle, and temporal bone. The objective of our study was to assess the 5-year clinical outcome of a series of patients treated with this technique.

METHODS

A study was conducted on a series of patients who underwent arthroscopic discopexy using resorbable pins between January 2007 and February 2018. All the patients were refractory to conservative treatment and classified as Wilkes stage III. Clinical data were recorded at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year visits. Pre- and postoperative evaluation parameters were: joint pain (VAS scale), mandibular movements (mm), and articular locking and clicking.

RESULTS

The study included 33 patients and the technique was performed in 38 joints. Mouth opening increased significantly with each visit after surgery compared with preoperative scores (mean value of 10.65 mm, p < 0.001), with the mean value increasing significantly at the 5-year visit in relation to the mean value obtained at the 3-year visit. Patients reported significant decreases in pain after surgery, obtaining VAS values of under 10 at the 5-year visit (mean improvement of 56.95 points, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Discopexy using resorbable pins resulted in a good and stable clinical outcome at the long-term follow-up.

In vivo investigation of temporomandibular joint regeneration: development of a mouse model

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction is traditionally invasive. Several investigators have developed animal models, including mouse models, to study the TMJ. However, there are no detailed descriptions of a mouse model to be followed for additional research. The goal of this project was to study minimally invasive TMJ regeneration using tissue engineering in mice. As part of the project, a detailed mouse model was developed, which is described in this article. Eight carcasses were used to study the anatomy of the TMJ of the mouse and 36 mice were used to describe the surgical approach and perioperative management. The study showed similarities and differences when compared to humans. One mouse died suddenly 10 days postoperatively, while 35 mice survived the operation. Keratitis and wound dehiscence were the most common complications. Investigators reviewing this paper should be able to use this mouse model to further study TMJ regeneration in mice.

Evaluation of success criteria for temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis

Objectives

The aim of this study was to use four sets of success criteria to evaluate the outcomes of arthrocentesis treatment with hyaluronic acid injection in patients with internal derangement (ID) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).

Materials and Methods

The study included 40 patients diagnosed with unilateral Wilkes stage III TMJ dysfunction. Clinical parameters, including maximum mouth opening (MMO) and pain during function, were evaluated preoperatively, 6 months, and 1 year after TMJ arthrocentesis. Outcomes were assessed and compared using four sets of success criteria from the following: the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS; MMO ≥35 mm and visual analogue scale [VAS] score ≤3), Murakami et al.'s criteria (MMO >38 mm and VAS score <2), Emshoff and Rudisch criteria (MMO ≥35 mm and >50% pain reduction), and patient self-reports (self-evaluation of treatment as successful or unsuccessful).

Results

Significant improvements in MMO and pain reduction during function were observed between the preoperative period and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively (P<0.01). The success rates of treatment determined using AAOMS (52.5%), Emshoff and Rudisch criteria (57.5%), and self-reported patient criteria (40.0%) were similar. Application of the Murakami et al. criteria reported the lowest success rate (12.5%).

Conclusion

The AAOMS and Emshoff and Rudisch criteria are consistent with patient expectations and can be used to assess treatment efficacy.

Anterior pedicle temporalis muscle flap interposition in the treatment of TMJ disorders

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders are a common reason for consultation. Failure of medical treatments sometimes leads to the need for one of many surgical alternatives. Our purpose was to evaluate the results of anterior pedicle temporalis muscle flap interposition in the treatment of TMJ disorders.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For this prospective study, we selected 18 patients who underwent TMJ surgery involving the interposition of a temporalis muscle flap according to a standardized technique, between January 1, 2009 and August 31, 2014. CT imaging was performed on all patients prior to surgery. We documented the etiology of TMJ dysfunction, pre and postoperative pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS), pre and postoperative (last consultation) mouth opening, and complications. We used the Wilcoxon test for our statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We observed a significant variation in preoperative and postoperative pain and mouth opening, with an average decrease in VAS values of 4.9/10 and an average increase of mouth opening of 11.1mm. No major complications were observed.

DISCUSSION

The interposition of an anterior pedicle temporalis muscle flap in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder is a simple and effective technique.

[Temporomandibular joint disc surgery]

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders are a common disease and may be responsible for major functional and painful repercussions. Treatment is not consensual. The literature highlights the role of conservative treatments (physiotherapy, analgesics, splints) in a first attempt. Minimally invasive surgical techniques (arthroscopy, arthrocentesis) have developed rapidly in recent decades. They have proven effective and reliable, especially in patients suffering from irreducible or reducible anterior disc dislocation or presenting with arthopathies. The goal of our work was to make an update about disk surgery.

[TMJ arthroscopy. A review]

INTRODUCTION

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction associates pain, limited mouth opening and joint noise. Failures of conservative treatments may lead to arthroscopy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the current interest of arthroscopy in the treatment of TMJ dysfunction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using the keywords "TMJ" and "Arthroscopy", 1668 articles were found in the Sciencedirect database. We selected 17 papers published between September 2012 and May 2016. Six questions were asked: (1) what treatment should be given to patients suffering from TMJ dysfunction? (2) What treatment should be performed for TMJ disorders when conservative treatments failed? (3) Does Wilkes staging change the surgical indication? (4) What has to be done in case of arthroscopy failure? (5) Can disc position be improved after surgery? (6) Should the disc position be improved?

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

(1) Conservative treatment should always be considered in first intention (2) In case of conservative treatment failures, surgery can be proposed, beginning with the less invasive one (3) Whatever the Wilkes stage, treatment should begin by the less invasive one (4) In case of arthroscopy failure, TMJ arthrotomy can be indicated (5) Disc position may be improved in the long term but it is complex to obtain (only one paper) (6) there is no evidence that disk has to be repositioned.

Imaging Approach to Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Internal derangement is the most common temporomandibular joint disorder. Degenerative osteoarthritis and trauma are next in frequency. Less common pathology includes rheumatoid arthritis, synovial chondromatosis, calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate deposition disease, pigmented villonodular synovitis, tumors, infection, and osteonecrosis. We provide a systematic approach to facilitate interpretation based on major anatomic structures: disc-attachments, joint space, condyle, and lateral pterygoid muscle. Relevant graphic anatomy and state of the art imaging are discussed in correlation with current clinical and therapeutic highlights of pathologic entities affecting the joint.