Knowledge, Practices, and Opinions of Ontario Dentists When Treating Patients Receiving Bisphosphonates

Knowledge of Dental Students and Practitioners About Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in the Central Region of Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are often used in treating benign and malignant disorders. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a significant problem that arises from the long-term use of BPs.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we assessed the knowledge of students and dentists about MRONJ in the central region of Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted to collect information from dental students and practitioners from the central region of Saudi Arabia. A valid, reliable, and structured questionnaire was used to gather data using a non-probability convenient sampling technique. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (Released 2013; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) was used to analyse the data. The descriptive data were expressed as frequencies and percentages to evaluate the association between dentists and students concerning overall knowledge related to osteonecrosis of the jaw, and a chi-squared test was applied.

RESULTS

In total, 250 individuals completed the questionnaire. The general knowledge of antiresorptive/antiangiogenic medications showed that most dentists (87.5%) and students (68.4%) knew about BP medications. A general lack of understanding about the therapeutic uses of antiangiogenic and antiresorptive medications was demonstrated by the participants. A significant proportion of dentists (58.8%) and students (50.9%) were not convinced that invasive dental procedures can be safely performed on patients receiving intravenous BP therapy. A significant proportion of the participants in the sample were unclear of the principal diseases that antiresorptive and antiangiogenic medications target. A mere 22% of respondents were aware of the accurate definition of medications-related MRONJ.

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient knowledge about MRONJ among students and practitioners. Therefore, these findings suggest increased emphasis should be placed on educating dentists and students about this condition to ensure patients receive the best possible care.

Effect of agents affecting bone homeostasis on short- and long-term implant failure

OBJECTIVES

To review the current evidence on the relationship between agents that affect bone homeostasis and dental implant failures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic searches for bisphosphonates, denosumab, methotrexate, corticosteroids, romosozumab, sunitinib, and bevacizumab were performed using PubMed, MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library), Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (Cochrane Library) and Web of Science (Thomson Reuters). Manual searches were also conducted to complement the digital searches for recent issues.

RESULTS

Previous publications suggested that bisphosphonates do not compromise the survival of dental implants. However, one study documented an increased risk of implant failure in patients who had received high-dose of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy after implant rehabilitation. There has been an issue of MRONJ around implants in patients who have successfully received implant therapy before and after antiresorptive therapy, leading to late implant failure. Despite evidence on the detrimental effects of denosumab, methotrexate and corticosteroids on bone metabolism, their role in implant survival is not conclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, there is insufficient evidence to establish a potential connection between agents that affects bone homeostasis and implant failure. However, some studies have reported negative results for implant therapy. In addition, implant-related sequestration in patients who received anti-resorptive therapy, despite of successful osseointegration, is also noticeable. Although limited studies are available at present, clinicians should still carefully consider the potential hazards and take appropriate precautions to minimize the risks associated with the medications and implant therapy.

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of physicians and dentists on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a cross-sectional survey

Background Bisphosphonate medication can cause osteonecrosis of the jaw, which is an uncommon but serious complication. This survey explores the knowledge, attitudes and practices of dentists and physicians regarding medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians and dentists of Pakistan's secondary and tertiary care hospitals between March and June 2021. Data were collected through a web-based questionnaire distributed among the eligible clinicians involved in prescribing bisphosphonates to patients or management of osteonecrosis. SPSS Statistics 23.0 was used for the data analysis. The frequencies and proportions of the descriptive variables were reported.Results A response rate of 29% was achieved. Only six dentists (n = 6/61; 9.8%) were aware that mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors could lead to osteonecrosis. Only one-third (n = 9/26; 34.6%) of physicians informed their patients about the possible side effects of bisphosphonates. The most commonly identified risk factor among them was the duration of the drug (n = 77/87; 88.5%) and the least identified was gender (n = 34/87; 39.0%).Conclusions Our study revealed insufficient knowledge among the respondents about the recently updated established guidelines available on MRONJ. The majority of physicians don't refer patients to dentists before prescribing bisphosphonates and other associated medications.

A survey on brazilian dentists’ awareness, perception, and knowledge of bisphosphonates

Aim: The purpose of the study was to analyze the knowledge of dentists in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, about bisphosphonates and their clinical implications. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted with a convenience sample of dentists in Belo Horizonte, in a period of 8 weeks. The questionnaire was self-applied and was structured with 10 items about the dentists’ demographic characteristics, professional profile, and knowledge about bisphosphonates. Associations in the data were analyzed by with the Fischer’s exact test with a significance level of 5%. Results: Of the 214 participating dentists, 163 (76.17%) were women, and 51 (23.83%) were men, with age ranged for 21 to 73 years (mean of 30 years) and mean of 6 years of professional activity. Nearly half (106/49.53%) reported having knowledge about bisphosphonates, and undergraduate courses were the primary source of such information (73/34.11%). Osteoporosis was the most identified indication for use (75/35.04%), although no participants correctly identified all indications. Regarding the drugs’ side effects, only three dentists (1.40%) could correctly identify all responses, with bone necrosis being recognized by the majority (88/41.12%). Sodium alendronate (54/25.23%) and sodium ibandronate (15/7.01%) were the most identified examples of bisphosphonates. Last, only nine dentists (4.20%) could identify all examples of the drugs, and their capacity was associated with self-reported knowledge (p<0.05). Conclusions: More information about bisphosphonates should be disseminated in Belo Horizonte, ideally via better approaches in local undergraduate and postgraduate courses. Until then, knowledge of the basic aspects of bisphosphonates will remain limited.

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Dental Practice: A Retrospective Analysis of Data from the Milan Cohort

A retrospective analysis was performed with the aim of understanding whether the risk factors showed in the literature for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in cancer patients are also relevant in osteoporotic patients taking antiresorptive drugs (ARDs). Data were retrospectively pooled from health records of patients on ARDs who requested a dental visit between January 2006 and April 2020 in the Dental Unit at Fondazione Ca’ Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan. A total of 434 patients were included. The following variables were collected: sex, age, smoking habit, type of ARD, duration of treatment, route of administration, therapeutic indication, concurrent systemic therapies and pathologies. Statistical analysis confirmed the relevance of chemotherapy, smoking, and immunosuppressive drugs as risk factors. In addition, a higher frequency of MRONJ in osteoporotic patients was reported in our cohort in association with an immunodeficiency disorder of variable origin. In conclusion, the identification of individual risk-profile before dental treatments is crucial for prevention. Anamnesis should include main risk factors, such as immunosuppression, dental extractions, smoking, trauma, and poor dental health. Nevertheless, our suggestion for dental professionals is to conduct a complete medical history of patients who mention long-term per oral therapies with ARDs for osteoporosis. Osteoporotic, as well as cancer patients, may also benefit from periodic monitoring of the ARDs therapy in order to prevent MRONJ.

Knowledge and attitudes of French dentists on bone resorption inhibitors (bisphosphonates and denosumab): A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

A cross-sectional study by questionnaire was performed to evaluate the knowledge of French dentists about bone resorption inhibitors (BRIs) and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

498 digital questionnaires were collected and 358 complete responses of French dental practionners in active practice except for orthodontists were analyzed. Descriptive analysis was computed and categorical variables were compared by Z test. The independence of the compared variables was tested by χ2 test. The scores obtained to the knowledge questions were compared by Mann-Whitney's tests depending on age, gender and year of graduation.

RESULTS

84% of the respondents routinely record antiresorptive medication history in the medical chart. Therefore, almost all the practitioners know the importance to report in anamnesis the use of BRIs, but we noticed some contradictions: Less than half of the respondents recognized the brand names of BRIs and their indications. The combination of BRIs with other drugs like antiangiogenic or corticosteroid therapies is identified as a MRONJ systemic risk factor by respectively 46,3% and 29,7% of the respondents. Likewise, only 43,2% of the practitioners identified removable dentures as a local risk factor. We showed that practitioners under 30 years old and/or who graduated for less than 10 years reached a significantly higher score putting university as the main source of information on that subject.

CONCLUSION

According to our results, it is evident that there is a lack of knowledge about BRI, the risk of MRONJ, and the methods and means of preventing this complication.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: knowledge and perceptions of medical professionals on the usage of bone modifying agents and dental referrals

Bone modifying agents (BMA) like bisphosphonates, antiangiogenic, and antiresorptive agents are widely used to manage bone diseases and cancer. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a potentially serious complication seen in patients on BMA therapy. Dental infection is one of the primary risk factors for MRONJ manifestation; hence its complete removal before initiation of BMA is significant. This can be achieved when a medical professional understands MRONJ and its risk factors and implements timely and regular dental referrals. This multicentre study was performed to assess the knowledge about MRONJ and awareness about the implementation of dental referrals among medical professionals. A custom-designed questionnaire tool was designed and validated by a pilot study. 450 practitioners from 6 medical schools and private practitioners in and around the district were surveyed. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. 63.5% (n=80) of the respondents prescribed bisphosphonates at a frequency of 0–5 times in a month. However, 62% (n=78) of the practitioners could correctly indicate the most appropriate definition of MRONJ. Only 49.2% (n=62) of them considered dental consultation mandatory. 73% (n=92) of the practitioners were unaware of management guidelines. There exists a significant gap in the knowledge-based applications in the management of MRONJ. Lack of referrals to dentists before BMA therapy can be a pivotal factor in patient morbidity. Practitioners prescribing BMA should advise patients about regular dental visits and monitor for symptoms of MRONJ.

Teledentistry as a Supportive Tool for Dentists in Diagnosing MRONJ in Northern Cyprus

Objective

This web-based survey, as a tool of teledentistry, is aimed at assessing the level of knowledge, attitudes, and awareness regarding MRONJ among dental professionals in Northern Cyprus.

Methods

An online self-administered questionnaire about MRONJ was sent to all dentists in Northern Cyprus through Google Forms. The first part of the questionnaire consists of demographic and professional information, and the second part included questions about knowledge and awareness questions about MRONJ. The SPSS software was used for statistical data analysis. A Chi-square test was performed to compare between the groups. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 112 dentists participated in this survey. The participants showed an insufficient level of knowledge regarding MRONJ, as only 56.6% of the participants stated that they had general knowledge about MRONJ. Regarding the practical questions of the survey, the participants showed poor knowledge about implant and tooth extraction procedures while a patient is using antiresorptive or antiangiogenic drugs, particularly the usage of oral antiresorptive or antiangiogenic drugs for less than 3 years. Participants showed adequate knowledge in terms of usage area of medications and administration of them.

Conclusion

Teledentistry can be used as a supportive tool for dentists in diagnosing MRONJ. Similar to previous studies, the knowledge and awareness of MRONJ of dentists in Northern Cyprus were found to be inadequate. There is a significant need to provide more professional information as part of undergraduate programs so that the next generation of dentists can practice more confidently.

Knowledge and attitude regarding bisphosphonates and related osteonecrosis among Turkish dentist: A cross sectional study

Background and Aims

Bisphosphonates (BPs), the antiresorptive drugs, can cause osteonecrosis of the jaws. Having adequate knowledge about BPs and bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is very important to prevent complications. In this study, we aimed to determine the level of knowledge of dentists about BPs and BRONJ in Turkey and also aimed to share the results with health authorities to plan new education strategies.

Materials and Methods

A questionnaire consisting of 20 questions and two parts was used to determine the knowledge level, attitude, and training needs of the dentists. Answers to all questions were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and using Pearson Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 620 general and specialist dentists working in three different sectors and four different cities agreed to participate in the study. Statistically, more knowledge about BPs and BRONJ was observed in dentists who have less than 10 years of experience than those who have over 10 years, specialist dentists than general dentists, and those who working in university hospitals than in other sectors. In general, the rate of those who know BPs is 16.8%, the rate of those who know BRONJ is 20.2%.

Conclusions

Although the use of BPs increases day by day, the awareness of BPs and BRONJ among the dentists is insufficient. However, periodically organizing postgraduate training programs on this subject will increase the awareness and level of knowledge.

Dentists' knowledge about osteoporosis and their ability to identify the disease

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is an underdiagnosed condition, and its seriousness is not considered until severe complications arise. This study aimed to evaluate general dentists' knowledge about osteoporosis and their ability to identify patients with this disease by assessing mandibular cortical width (MCW) and mandibular cortical index (MCI) on panoramic dental radiographs using a visual method.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, an email questionnaire regarding the diagnosis and prevention of osteoporosis was sent to 20,773 dentists in 2016. Those who completed the questionnaire were invited to participate in radiomorphometric training and then to analyze the MCI and MCW of 114 panoramic radiographs of postmenopausal women who underwent both panoramic radiography and bone densitometry. Based on the radiomorphometric indices and while blinded to the densitometry results, the dentists determined whether they would indicate densitometry for these patients.

RESULTS

The response rate was 2.3%: 485 dentists completed the questionnaire, and 50 evaluated panoramic radiographs using the MCW and MCI. All of them reported some knowledge about osteoporosis, but 41.6% demonstrated a misleading conceptualization of the disease. Approximately 90% reported minimal access to this information during graduation, and only 27.0% were exposed to the topic during their postgraduate studies. Interest in osteoporosis prevention was expressed by 70.7% of the respondents, and interest in learning the radiomorphometric indices was expressed by 99.0%. The sensitivity in the detection of low bone mineral density through the MCW and MCI was 52.9%, and the specificity was 64%.

CONCLUSIONS

Brazilian dentists demonstrated insufficient knowledge about osteoporosis and a low ability to detect osteopenia or osteoporosis by applying radiomorphometric indices.

Choosing the Right Partner for Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: What Central European Dentists Know

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a side effect of antiresorptive drugs. In this online survey, the awareness and knowledge of dentists regarding MRONJ was evaluated, and potential implications for oncologists are discussed. Questionnaires were emailed to dentists from Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and South Tyrol to evaluate disease-related knowledge and management. In addition to the overall score, a separate score was calculated for knowledge (maximum score: 15 points) and management (maximum score: 6 points) questions, and 1197 valid replies with completed questionnaires were received. The mean overall score was 10.45 ± 3.97 points, the mean knowledge score was 7.68 ± 3.05 points, and the mean management score was 2.76 ± 1.77 points. Factors influencing the outcome of the overall score were age, specialization, continuous professional education, and the number of dental screening exams in patients before antiresorptive therapy. Due to the considerable lack of knowledge regarding MRONJ among dentists, MRONJ patients and subjects at risk should be guided towards specialists for dental screening, treatment, and follow-up. This is important from an oncologic point of view to avoid any delay for treatment start of antiresorptives, and to reveal a potentially emerging osteonecrosis at an early stage, thus, avoiding the need for interruption or even cancellation of antiresorptive therapy.

Knowledge, Attitude, and Management of General Dentist toward Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws

Background:

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is an intense negative drug response causing increasing bone destruction in the maxillofacial area of patients.

Aims and Objectives:

To evaluate the knowledge and attitude of dental practitioner regarding risk factors of MRONJ in Saudi Arabia.

Materials and Methods:

A cross-sectional, questionnaire survey was carried out in King Khalid Hospital, Al-Kharj among dental practioners.

Results:

Approximately 60% of the practioners had a poor knowledge and there was a weak positive correlation with work experience.

Conclusion:

Poor knowledge regarding the MRONJ invites a continuing dental education specially to focus on general practioners.

Awareness of the risk of developing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw among bisphosphonate users

Objective

In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated awareness among patients using bisphosphonates (BPs) regarding the risk of developing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and whether they received appropriate dental screening and treatment prior to commencing medication.

Methods

Patients using BPs who attended the endodontics clinic at Jordan University Hospital in 2019 were interviewed using a pre-designed questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests.

Results

In total, 110 patients were interviewed (84 women, 26 men; age 40–78 years). A total of 94 patients were using oral BP and 16 received intravenous (IV) BP. We found that only 12.4% of participants were aware about the risk of MRONJ following BP use, and only one third of them has received information from their prescribing physicians. In total, 5% of participants were referred to a dentist for screening prior to initiating BP treatment. Patients receiving IV BP and those with a university-level education had better awareness about the risk of MRONJ than oral BP users and those with a high school education level.

Conclusion

Patients’ awareness about MRONJ risk was low in our population. Better patient education and collaboration among physicians and dentists are needed prior to starting BP treatment.

Medical students' knowledge of medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to assess medical students' knowledge of "medication related osteonecrosis of the jaws" (MRONJ).

METHODS

A questionnaire survey was administered to all the medical students in the last two years of school of medicine at the University of Eastern Piedmont between January 2019 and March 2019. The questionnaire contained a first section regarding demographic and personal data of the student and a second section regarding the knowledge on MRONJ.

RESULTS

On the whole, 72 medical students agreed to participate to this study and filled in the questionnaire. As for indications for the use of bisphosphonates 45 students correctly answered "osteoporosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, multiple myeloma, or metastasis of some malignant tumors". Almost all students (71 out of 72) answered that a thorough examination of oral cavity and a dentist screening is needed and fundamental before starting bisphosphonate assumption. As for drugs responsible for MRONJ, only 12 students out of 72 correctly answered "bisphosphonates, denosumab, and antiangiogenic drugs".

DISCUSSION

A better level of knowledge and awareness by medical doctors and young physicians may lead, in future, to minimize incidence of MRONJ as well as to a better resolution of ONJ cases. Theoretical and practical initiatives could be promoted to improve and consolidate the knowledge of future physicians about this important issue.

Dentists' knowledge about medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and its management

Objectives

To assess the knowledge of dentists regarding medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 74 dentists from governmental hospitals in Riyadh (Dental University Hospital in King Saud University, Military Hospital, National Guard Hospital), Jeddah (King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Ministry of Health Hospital), and the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia (Ministry of Health Hospitals in Dammam and Al-Ahsa) completed a two-part questionnaire. The first part gathered demographic data, such as sex and specialty. The second part included questions about bisphosphonate drugs and their indications; the identification of patients at risk of MRONJ; other medications associated with jaw necrosis; as well as the definition of MRONJ and its clinical features, risk factors, and preventive methods.

Results

Of the participating dentists, 60.8% knew about MRONJ, but only 35.1% were able to define it correctly. Most (79.7%) had never encountered MRONJ patients. Only 18.9% knew of the relationship between the risk of MRONJ in osteoporotic patients and long-term (>4 years) use of oral bisphosphonates or intravenous zoledronate, while 68.9% were unaware, and others answered incorrectly. Most participants did not know of MRONJ-predisposing medications, and 59.5% cited radiotherapy as the cause. Most participants identified dentoalveolar surgery as a major local factor, and the mandible as a common anatomic location.

Conclusion

Dentists at the surveyed institutions had poor knowledge of MRONJ, although their knowledge of preventive measures was good. There is an urgent need for the optimization of educational programs pertaining to MRONJ, and its related dental management considerations.

Clinical significance

Dentists in the surveyed institutions in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia have poor knowledge of MRONJ management; thus, greater effort should be taken to educate undergraduate and postgraduate students regarding this pathology.

Awareness among patient at risk of developing Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) - A primary prevention strategy

The quality of life, in itself, in cancer patients or in osteoporotic individuals, without even considering the side effects of the medication in the first place, has a considerable negative impact on the clinical outcome. The Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ), in the maxillofacial region, although rare, needs to be addressed with the prime importance. One of the key components of any given preventive treatment strategy is to, create awareness about the medication related unwanted effects, among health care professionals and patients.

Objective

This study is aimed to explore and assess the awareness level among dental patients about MRONJ, the risk factors, and the high-risk category (who are prone to develop MRONJ).

Material and methods

This is a prospective interviewer administered research electronic data capture (REDCap) survey. The sample included 68 patients, who are currently taking or will be taking Bisphosphonate (BP), and/or Denosumab, and anti-Angiogenic agent. Data have been analyzed using IBM SPSS software,

Results

Sixty-eight patients (18 males and 50 females), participated in this study. Only 23 subjects (33.82%) were aware about the MRONJ. Females were more aware about the complications than males. The awareness among the subjects with education at college level appears to be higher than the subjects having education less than high school level. Even though, a dental check- up, is mandatory, prior to starting these medications, to see if any dental treatment is required, only slightly more than half of the patients (54.72%) had a dental checkup.

Conclusion

This is a novel study in the Middle- East, used to assess awareness about the MRONJ including three type of related medications. Low awareness of MRONJ is alarming. The results of the study will help to initiate the process of providing the education materials, about the side effects and importance of oral hygiene maintenance, giving priority to improve the quality of life in such patients. Awareness of patients regarding the complications must be an important part of health care practice guidelines.

Current knowledge regarding medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw among different health professionals

PURPOSE

To assess the current knowledge regarding medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ); the adverse effects of anti-resorptive (AR) and anti-angiogenic (AA) drugs; strategies for MRONJ prevention and treatment; and perception of the dentist's role in assisting patients who use these drugs among physicians, dentists, and nurses.

METHODS

Using questionnaires, the current knowledge of MRONJ was assessed among dentists, physicians, and nurses, who were divided into group I, which included specialties that directly assist cancer patients, and group II, which included other specialties. The questionnaires assessed the characteristics of the health professionals, training time, and specialties; their knowledge of AR and AA drugs; and their knowledge of MRONJ.

RESULTS

A total of 1370 health professionals participated in the study, including 1032 dentists, 239 physicians, and 99 nurses. Among dentists and physicians, the training time (p = 0.036 and p < 0.001, respectively) and specialization in group I domains (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) had a significant impact on MRONJ knowledge, while nurses showed no significant impact regardless of the training time and specialty. Less than 10% of the physicians and dentists could correlate the signs and symptoms of all stages of MRONJ.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicated a notable lack of knowledge regarding MRONJ among dental surgeons and physicians, and especially among nurses. More experienced professionals and specialists in the areas that assist cancer patients usually have a greater understanding of the dentist's role in MRONJ prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and patient care and will introduce or are already using AR and AA drugs.

Uncertainty managing patients treated with antiresorptive drugs: a cross-sectional study of attitudes and self-reported behavior among dentists in Sweden

Objective: To evaluate the level of knowledge and attitudes among Swedish general dentists regarding the behavior and management of patients treated with bisphosphonates and denosumabMaterials and Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 656 dentists. The web-based survey included questions on demographics, risk perception of osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ), the experience of managing patients treated with bisphosphonates and denosumab and requests to acquire new knowledge. Independence and associations were tested using Fisher's exact test and the chi-square test function.Results: The overall response rate was 57.6%. Most of the dentists, 69.7%, had been in the profession for more than 5 years. The criteria for ONJ were not known by 43.2% and 86.9% did not feel comfortable with their current level of knowledge when managing the patients in question. The rest of the respondents felt uncertain and more than 70% were unaware of the different stages of ONJ, when to refer a patient to a specialist and when to prescribe antibiotics.Conclusion: Dentists practicing in Sweden express a strong need for an improved level of knowledge when managing patients treated with bisphosphonates and denosumab. The results demonstrate a need for the necessary advancement of education and clinical training at dental schools in order to prepare dentists to provide safe, modern care within the healthcare sector.

Knowledge and Opinions of Saudi Dentists Regarding Dental Treatment of Patients Undergoing Bisphosphonates

OBJECTIVES

 Bisphosphonates (BPs) are used for treatment of various benign and malignant medical conditions. Medications-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a very serious complication of prolonged therapy with BPs. This study aimed to assess the level of knowledge among dental professionals in Saudi Arabia regarding MRONJ.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 This was a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study. A self-administered questionnaire comprising close-ended questions about BPs and MRONJ was sent to a convenience sample of dentists in Saudi Arabia.Statistical Analysis SPSS software was used for data analysis. Chi-square test was used to compare between the groups. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

 A total of 607 dentists participated in this survey. Overall, the respondents showed insufficient level of knowledge regarding BPORNJ, with only 70% of the respondents had heard about BPORNJ, and less than 50% recognized the risk factors and clinical features of the disease. Additionally, while two-thirds of the respondents recognized the importance of taking BPs history, the majority did not know the correct treatment approach. Respondents with higher degrees (specialists) showed far better knowledge than general dentists.

CONCLUSION

 The knowledge regarding BPs therapy and its complications among Saudi dentists is unsatisfactory. Hence, interventions are highly required to improve dentists' knowledge regarding BPs and MRONJ.

Patients' knowledge and opinions regarding osteoporosis, osteoporosis treatment, and oral health care

BACKGROUND

In this study, the authors assessed the knowledge and opinions of patients regarding osteoporosis and the associations among osteoporosis, osteoporosis treatments, and oral health care use.

METHODS

Outpatients with osteopenia or osteoporosis completed a questionnaire, including sociodemographic data, internet use, osteoporosis status, oral health care use status, and knowledge regarding the effect of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy on dental procedures.

RESULTS

Among 258 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 68.5 [9.3] years; 93% female), 83.9% had osteoporosis, one-third had previous osteoporotic fracture, and 74.4% took osteoporosis medication, mostly antiresorptive agents. In addition, 66.3% had more than 12 years of education, and 53.9% used the internet daily. A total of 79.9% visited a dentist during the past year, and 29.0% had undergone an invasive procedure. Yet 46.5% estimated that their dentist did not know that they had osteoporosis. Approximately one-half of the participants responded that they did not know the answers to knowledge questions regarding associations between osteoporosis, its pharmacotherapy, and oral health care. Of the patients who answered questions about associations between osteoporosis and oral health care, 70% incorrectly believed osteoporosis increased gingival disease, and 30% incorrectly thought medications should be discontinued before caries restoration.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatients with osteoporosis or osteopenia who responded to a questionnaire had limited knowledge about associations among osteoporosis, osteoporotic treatment, and oral health care.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Dentists should review previous and current medical treatments with their patients, including osteoporosis diagnoses. The medical community should make more efforts to provide balanced, accurate information to help patients prioritize health care treatment and avoid unnecessary interruptions in osteoporosis treatment.

Viewpoints of dentists on the use of bisphosphonates in rheumatology patients

OBJECTIVES

Alhough typically prescribed in oncology, bisphosphonates (BPs) are also employed in rheumatology, particularly for the treatment of osteoporosis, sometimes resulting in complications, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw. Because of different opinions between rheumatologists and dentists on BP use, this study aimed to assess the views of dentists regarding administration of BPs in rheumatology.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to 880 dentists from the Auvergne region of France to determine their views on BP treatment.

RESULTS

We obtained 382 (43.4%) responses and analysed 376 (58.7% men). In total, 156 (41.5%) of the responders analysed had attended an in-service training course (ISTC) on the topic. A total of 237 (63.0%) systematically inquired as to whether their patients were undergoing BP treatment; this proportion was higher among those who had been practicing for fewer than 10 years (P < 0.004). For patients receiving BPs, 84.5% of practitioners felt ill at ease about performing dental surgery (n = 318) and 11% felt ill at ease about performing nonsurgical dental care (n = 41); 67% stated that their practice differed depending on the method of BP administration (per os or intravenously). Overall, 53.7% of practitioners felt uncomfortable when asked by a rheumatologist whether a given patient's dental status permitted prescription of BP (n = 202). This proportion was higher among those who had never attended an ISTC (62.6% vs. 50.7%; P < 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Dentists feel ill at ease providing dental surgery to patients receiving BPs. Closer collaboration and better information-sharing between rheumatologists and dentists is necessary to facilitate the administration of BPs in rheumatology.

Influence of the teaching program on the learning in knowledge and practice of osteonecrosis of the jaws produced by antireasorptives in dental students of the Principality of Asturias (Spain)

Background

This study aims to evaluate the influence of changes in the teaching contents on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw may have on the knowledge and the capacity for practical case resolution about this pathology.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted through a survey divided into four sections: degree of means of knowledge acquisition, habitual practice and ability to solve clinical cases. The total number of respondents (n = 225) was divided into two groups: Group A (Year 2015-2016) and Group B (Year 2016-2017). The students in Group B received more teaching content on the subject than group A.

Results

A total of 175 survey responses were collected. The internet was the preferred tool for continuing education in both groups. The best known bisphosphonates (BPs) were Alendronate (Fosamax®: 56.9% Group A, 67.5% Group B) and Zoledronic Acid (Zometa®: 56.9% Group A, 51.8% Group B). A low percentage of students (37.9% Group A, 43.4% Group B) acknowledged the existence of other drugs that could also cause osteonecrosis of the jaws. Regarding the correct resolution of practical cases, the respondents of Group B reached a significantly higher score (5.67) than the score observed in Group A (4.04).

Conclusions

Training on medication-related osteonecrosis among dental students is susceptible to improvement. Introducing minor changes in the teachings allows this goal to be successfully achieved.

Key words:Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ), medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), dental education.

Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporosis patients from Asian countries

Bisphosphonate (BP)-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was first reported in oncology patients in 2003 and subsequently in osteoporosis patients in 2004. Since oral surgical procedures, such as tooth extraction, are also considered one of the major risk factors for ONJ, there is confusion among physicians, dentists, and patients—particularly osteoporosis patients currently taking BPs—regarding the safety of remaining on therapy surrounding these procedures. Many papers about BP-related ONJ (BRONJ) have been published to date. In addition to BRONJ, recent studies have reported an association between ONJ and the antiresorptive therapy denosumab (Dmab; a RANKL-inhibitor). BRONJ and Dmab-related ONJ are together referred to as antiresorptive agent-related ONJ (ARONJ). The pathogenesis of ARONJ still remains unknown. It is forecasted that there will be an increased incidence of patients with osteoporotic fractures and an increased number of prescriptions for antiresorptive agents in Asia in the future. However, prescriptions for antiresorptives for osteoporosis may be restricted in the Asian population as the occurrence of ARONJ may be higher as compared with those in other countries. In this review, we focused on the following topics as it pertains to the Asian osteoporotic population: the oral condition specific for osteoporosis patients; definition, staging, prevalence and incidence of ARONJ; imaging modalities for ARONJ; specific risk factors for ARONJ; prevention strategies for ARONJ, and; cooperation between physicians and dentists in the prevention of ARONJ. Ideally, the Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies would cooperate with one another and find more population-specific evidence for the prevention of ARONJ.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in Osteoporosis Patients: Report of Delayed Diagnosis of a Multisite Case and Commentary about Risks Coming from a Restricted ONJ Definition

Osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ) in osteoporosis patients has been defined as rare, but the number of reported cases is increasing. We report a case of delayed ONJ diagnosis in a patient, who was being treated with alendronate, developing bone alterations both in maxilla and in mandible. Underestimation of ONJ incidence and missed or delayed ONJ diagnosis in osteoporosis patients might derive from lack of awareness of health providers as well as from an ONJ definition that is too restricted. The more recent definition of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) released in 2014 by the American Association of Oral Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) accept fistula, besides bone exposure, as a major sign of disease, but it seems to be insufficient since it excludes all cases of ONJ disease without bone exposure. A new MRONJ definition is needed to avoid missing or delayed diagnosis.

Knowledge of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the Jawsamong Mexican dentists

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis is an infrequent but potentially serious complication. Its treatment remains complex, and in some cases can be mutilating. Prevention, a correct diagnosis and opportune management are crucial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was made, interviewing 410 dentists with the aim of assessing their knowledge of the subject.

RESULTS

Practically all of the dental professionals (99.7%) were found to lack sufficient knowledge of the prevention, diagnosis and management of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Actions including increased diffusion in the professional media and inclusion of the subject in training programs are needed in order to enhance the knowledge of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis among dentists and thus prevent complications in this group of patients.

Extensive Surgical Procedures Result in Better Treatment Outcomes for Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients With Osteoporosis

PURPOSE

To identify the risk factors associated with relapse or treatment failure after surgery for bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) in patients with osteoporosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of BRONJ in patients with osteoporosis who had undergone surgical procedures from 2004 to 2016 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Dental Hospital. The predictor variables were a set of heterogeneous variables, including demographic (age, gender), anatomic (maxilla or mandible, or both, affected location), clinical (disease stage, etiology, comorbidities, history of intravenous bisphosphonate intake), time (conservative treatment before surgery, bisphosphonate treatment before the development of BRONJ, discontinuation of the drug before surgery, interval to final follow-up, interval to reoperation in the case of relapse or treatment failure), and perioperative variables (type of anesthesia, type of surgical procedures). The primary outcome variable was relapse after surgery that required reoperation (yes vs no). The descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed to assess the relationships between the study variables and the outcome. To determine the risk factors, we conducted a survival analysis using the Cox model.

RESULTS

The final sample included 325 subjects with a median age of 75 years, and 97% were women. After surgery, 30% of patients did not completely recuperate and underwent repeat surgery. The interval from the first surgery to reoperation ranged from 10 days to 5.6 years. Relapse or treatment failure most often occurred immediately after surgery. The type of surgical procedure and mode of anesthesia were the most important factors in the treatment outcome. A drug holiday did not appear to influence the likelihood of relapse after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of BRONJ in patients with osteoporosis might benefit from more careful and extensive surgical procedures rather than curettage performed with the patient under local anesthesia.