Application of 3-Dimensional Printing Technology to Kirschner Wire Fixation of Adolescent Condyle Fracture

Application of optimized three-dimensional digital surgical guide plates for complex midfacial fractures

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of midfacial fractures is always difficult. The purpose of this study was to verify whether optimized three-dimensional (3D) digital surgical guide plates combined with preformed titanium plates improved the treatment effect in complex midfacial fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients with complex midfacial fractures were recruited and randomized into three groups: ten for Group A, eight for Group B, and eight for Group C. Group A was treated with a combination of preformed titanium plates and optimized 3D digital surgical guide plates. Group B was treated with preformed titanium plates only. Group C was treated conventionally. Clinical effects, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), midfacial contour, facial symmetry, surgical accuracy, △orbital volume (the absolute value of the bilateral orbital volume difference), and maximum deviation were evaluated in each of the three groups.

RESULTS

Group A had the best postoperative clinical effects and patient-reported outcomes. Significant improvements in midfacial contour (L1[0.72±0.29 mm, P = 0.001], L2[1.04±0.46 mm, P < 0.001]), facial symmetry (S1[0.71±0.30 mm, P < 0.001], S2[0.96±0.58 mm, P < 0.001], S3[0.86±0.40 mm, P < 0.001], S5[0.81±0.16 mm, P = 0.003], S8[0.95±0.30 mm, P < 0.001], S9[1.03±0.38 mm, P < 0.001], S11[0.64±0.46 mm, P < 0.001]) and surgical accuracy (M1[R, 0.82±0.31 mm, P < 0.001], M2[R, 0.87±0.44 mm, P < 0.001], M3[L, 0.88±0.22 mm, P = 0.004], M3[R, 1.06±0.31 mm, P = 0.003], M4[L, 0.96±0.45 mm, P = 0.008], M4[R, 1.11±0.57 mm, P = 0.003], M5[R, 0.76±0.26 mm, P < 0.001], M6[L, 1.00±0.46 mm, P = 0.003], M6[R, 1.00±0.58 mm, P = 0.001], M7[0.87±0.53 mm, P = 0.001], M8[R, 0.91±0.53 mm, P < 0.001], M9[R, 0.81±0.32 mm, P = 0.010], M10[R, 1.19±0.42 mm, P = 0.009], M11[L, 0.85±0.51 mm, P = 0.021], M11[R, 0.96±0.49 mm, P = 0.003]) were found in Group A compared with the other two groups. The results of △orbital volume and maximum deviation analysis showed an ideal surgical treatment effect in Group A.

CONCLUSION

Optimized 3D digital guide plates can accurately locate preformed titanium plates and effectively improve the treatment effect in complex midfacial fractures.

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios

Medical three-dimensional (3D) printing has expanded dramatically over the past three decades with growth in both facility adoption and the variety of medical applications. Consideration for each step required to create accurate 3D printed models from medical imaging data impacts patient care and management. In this paper, a writing group representing the Radiological Society of North America Special Interest Group on 3D Printing (SIG) provides recommendations that have been vetted and voted on by the SIG active membership. This body of work includes appropriate clinical use of anatomic models 3D printed for diagnostic use in the care of patients with specific medical conditions. The recommendations provide guidance for approaches and tools in medical 3D printing, from image acquisition, segmentation of the desired anatomy intended for 3D printing, creation of a 3D-printable model, and post-processing of 3D printed anatomic models for patient care.

Use of 3-D printing technologies in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a review

Three-dimensional (3-D) printing is a method of manufacturing in which materials like plastic or metal are deposited onto one another in layers to produce a 3-D object. Because of the complex anatomy of craniomaxillofacial structures, full recovery of craniomaxillofacial tissues from trauma, surgeries, or congenital malformations is extremely challenging. 3-D printing of scaffolds, tissue analogs, and organs has been proposed as an exciting alternative to address some of these key challenges in craniomaxillofacial surgery. There are four broad types of 3-D printing surgical applications that can be used in craniomaxillofacial surgery: contour models (positive-space models to allow preapplication of hardware before surgery), guides (negative-space models of actual patient data to guide cutting and drilling), splints (negative-space models of virtual postoperative positions to guide final alignment), and implants (negative-space 3-D printed implantable materials or 3-D printed molds into which nonprintable materials are poured). 3-D printing technology is being successfully used for surgeries for head and neck malignancies, mandibular reconstruction, orthognathic surgeries, for mandibulectomies after osteoradionecrosis, orbital floor fracture surgeries, nasal reconstruction, and cranioplasties. The excitement behind 3-D printing continues to increase and hopefully will drive improvements in the technology and its surgical applications, especially in craniomaxillofacial region. This present review sets out to explore use of 3-D printing technologies in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started

Three dimensional (3D) printing involves a number of additive manufacturing techniques that are used to build structures from the ground up. This technology has been adapted to a wide range of surgical applications at an impressive rate. It has been used to print patient-specific anatomic models, implants, prosthetics, external fixators, splints, surgical instrumentation, and surgical cutting guides. The profound utility of this technology in surgery explains the exponential growth. It is important to learn how 3D printing has been used in surgery and how to potentially apply this technology. PubMed was searched for studies that addressed the clinical application of 3D printing in all surgical fields, yielding 442 results. Data was manually extracted from the 168 included studies. We found an exponential increase in studies addressing surgical applications for 3D printing since 2011, with the largest growth in craniofacial, oromaxillofacial, and cardiothoracic specialties. The pertinent considerations for getting started with 3D printing were identified and are discussed, including, software, printing techniques, printing materials, sterilization of printing materials, and cost and time requirements. Also, the diverse and increasing applications of 3D printing were recorded and are discussed. There is large array of potential applications for 3D printing. Decreasing cost and increasing ease of use are making this technology more available. Incorporating 3D printing into a surgical practice can be a rewarding process that yields impressive results.