Histological Assessment of the Carotid Sheath in Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The carotid sheath: Anatomy and clinical considerations

Objectives

The distinctive bilateral carotid sheaths (CS) reside in the neck region and form part of the deep cervical fasciae. Aspects of the CS anatomy are controversial, most notably its specific attachment sites and fascial makeup, which are key determinants for the spread of tumours and infections and surgical planning. This review aimed to organise the pertinent aspects relating to CS anatomy and pathology, explore their clinical relevance and highlight areas of disagreement in the literature.

Methods

A narrative review identified key papers relating to CS anatomy, histology, embryology, pathology and clinical and surgical significance using PubMed and Google Scholar. This was supported by a systematic review focused on the fascia forming the CS which was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science and Core Collection which yielded 22 papers.

Results

and Discussion: The CS surrounds the internal carotid artery, internal jugular vein, cranial nerves IX - XII, lymph nodes and nervous plexuses as they course from the jugular foramen superiorly down along into the mediastinum inferiorly. There are contradicting descriptions regarding the CS attachments at the extracranial skull base and within the mediastinum. Author descriptions of the CS fasciae are complex, varied and incongruent. Pathologies affecting the CS include malignancies of the nerves, vascular lesions and utilisation of the CS space as a corridor for the spread of deep neck infections.

Conclusion

This paper collates and presents pertinent anatomical and clinical aspects regarding the CS. A proper knowledge of the CS anatomy and structural relationships will optimise surgical approaches and orientation when operating within the region.

Understanding fascial anatomy and interfascial communication: implications in regional anesthesia

With the extensive application of ultrasound in regional anesthesia, there has been rapid development of interfascial plane block techniques recently. Compared with neuraxial anesthesia or nerve plexus blocks, the interfascial plane blocks have many advantages, such as technical simplicity, fewer complications and comparable or better analgesia. The concept of fascial interconnectivity is fundamental in understanding the effects and complications of interfascial plane blocks. Many fascial planes are continuous and communicate with each other without a clear anatomical boundary. The prevertebral fascia of the neck, endothoracic fascia of the chest, transversalis fascia of the abdomen, and the fascia iliaca of the pelvic cavity form a natural fascial continuation. This anatomical feature suggests that the space beneath the cervical prevertebral fascia, the thoracic paravertebral space, the space between transversalis fascia and psoas muscles (psoas major and quadratus lumborum), and the fascia iliaca compartment are a confluent potential cavity. Additionally, the permeability of the fascia at different anatomical locations to local anesthetics is different, which can also influence the block effect and the incidence of complications. This article summarizes the anatomical characteristics and communication relationships of the major fascia which are related to regional anesthesia, and their relationships with block effects and complications.

MRI of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: parapharyngeal subspace involvement has prognostic value and influences T-staging in the IMRT era

OBJECTIVES

To identify the prognosis of parapharyngeal space involvement (PPSI) based on the number of subspaces involved (pre-styloid space, carotid space (CS), areas outside the CS) and explore its significance for current T-staging in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

PPSI was retrospectively identified in 1224 patients with non-disseminated NPC at two centers on MRI and separated into four invasion patterns: pattern A (only post-styloid space), pattern B (post-styloid space, CS extension), pattern C (post-styloid space, pre-styloid space extension), and pattern D (all spaces). The Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression models were used.

RESULTS

PPSI was diagnosed in 63.4% of cases, with patterns A, B, C, and D in 14.3%, 3.8%, 25.3%, and 18.6% of cases, respectively. No prognostic heterogeneity was observed between pattern B and pattern C (p > 0.05). Thus, the degree of PPSI was based on the number of subspaces involved: grade 0 (none), grade 1 (one), grade 2 (two), and grade 3 (three), which could independently predict overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001). T3 patients with grade 0/1 PPSI (slight-T3) had a better prognosis than those with grade 2/3 PPSI (severe-T3) in terms of OS, locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) (all p < 0.001), whose hazard ratios were higher and lower than those with T1 and T2, respectively. Combining the T2 and slight-T3 groups as the proposed T2 provided significant differences in OS, LRFS, and PFS between T2 and T3 (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of death increased with the number of parapharyngeal subspaces involved. The degree of PPSI is recommended to optimize T3 heterogeneity.

KEY POINTS

• Parapharyngeal space involvement was proposed to differentiate patient risk groups based on the number of involved subspaces: grade 0 (none), grade 1 (one), grade 2 (two), or grade 3 (three). • The degree of parapharyngeal space involvement was an independent negative prognosticator for OS. • The degree of parapharyngeal space involvement may influence T-staging in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Cervical plexus block

Cervical plexus blocks (CPBs) have been used in various head and neck surgeries to provide adequate anesthesia and/or analgesia; however, the block is performed in a narrow space in the region of the neck that contains many sensitive structures, multiple fascial layers, and complicated innervation. Since the intermediate CPB was introduced in addition to superficial and deep CPBs in 2004, there has been some confusion regarding the nomenclature and definition of CPBs, particularly the intermediate CPB. Additionally, as the role of ultrasound in the head and neck region has expanded, CPBs can be performed more safely and accurately under ultrasound guidance. In this review, the authors will describe the methods, including ultrasound-guided techniques, and clinical applications of conventional deep and superficial CPBs; in addition, the authors will discuss the controversial issues regarding intermediate CPBs, including nomenclature and associated potential adverse effects that may often be neglected, focusing on the anatomy of the cervical fascial layers and cervical plexus. Finally, the authors will attempt to refine the classification of CPB methods based on the target compartments, which can be easily identified under ultrasound guidance, with consideration of the effects of each method of CPB.