Skull Base Erosion Resulting From Primary Tumors of the Temporomandibular Joint and Skull Base Region: Our Classification and Reconstruction Experience

Introduction of temporomandibular joint and skull base combined reconstruction by autogenous bone graft

OBJECTIVE

This study introduces the application of autogenous bone graft for the reconstruction of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and skull base combined defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with autogenous bone grafts for reconstruction of the TMJ and skull base were reviewed. All patients underwent virtual surgical design to confirm the osteotomies of the combined lesion and the selections of autogenous bone graft, fabrication of surgical templates to transfer the plan to actual operation, and reconstruction of autogenous bone graft for the TMJ and/or skull base. Surgical outcomes were assessed by clinical examinations and radiological data.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were involved in this study. Ten patients underwent reconstruction of the skull base by a free iliac or temporal bone graft and preservation of the TMJ. Twelve patients underwent skull base reconstruction by the same methods and total reconstruction of the TMJ by half sternoclavicular joint flap or costochondral bone graft. No severe complications occurred after surgery. The occlusion relationship was stable and similar to that of the preoperative state. The pain and maximal interincisal opening were significantly improved by the 101.2-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Autogenous bone graft is a good alternative for repairing the TMJ and the skull base structure and function.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The study introduced the application of autogenous bone graft for the reconstruction of temporomandibular joint and skull base combined defect, which is a good way to repair the defect and restore the function.

Role of craniofacial surgery in oral and maxillofacial tumors involving the skull base: A retrospective analysis of 126 patients

OBJECTIVES

Oral and maxillofacial tumors involving the skull base (SB) are rare and complex, making treatment difficult and controversial. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the treatment efficacy of craniofacial surgery (CFS).

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent CFS for these tumors between May 2000 and November 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathologic and treatment modality data were collected and follow-up was recorded. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests and Cox-regression model were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 126 patients were enrolled (70 males and 56 females; 97 malignant tumors). Squamous cell carcinoma accounted for the majority of tumors. The lip-submandibular-neck approach was most frequently applied. Through-and-through SB bone or partial dura resection was performed in 42 cases. A pathologic positive margin was found in 18 cases. Of the included patients, 80 underwent simultaneous craniofacial reconstruction. The postoperative complications rate was 11.1%. Estimated 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 78.8%, 68.2%, and 54.4% respectively; and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 77.4%, 66.8%, and 63.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated postoperative complications, radiotherapy, recurrence, and metastasis status had a negative impact on survival (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although tumors involving the SB had various clinicopathologic characteristics, with interdisciplinary cooperation, CFS is an optimal option.

A review on computer-aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific maxillofacial implants

Introduction: Various prefabricated maxillofacial implants are used in the clinical routine for the surgical treatment of patients. In addition to these prefabricated implants, customized CAD/CAM implants become increasingly important for a more precise replacement of damaged anatomical structures. This paper reviews the design and manufacturing of patient-specific implants for the maxillofacial area.Areas covered: The contribution of this publication is to give a state-of-the-art overview in the usage of customized facial implants. Moreover, it provides future perspectives, including 3D printing technologies, for the manufacturing of patient-individual facial implants that are based on patient's data acquisitions, like Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).Expert opinion: The main target of this review is to present various designing software and 3D manufacturing technologies that have been applied to fabricate facial implants. In doing so, different CAD designing software's are discussed, which are based on various methods and have been implemented and evaluated by researchers. Finally, recent 3D printing technologies that have been applied to manufacture patient-individual implants will be introduced and discussed.