1
|
Miloro M, Han MD, Kwon TG, Xi T, Borba AM, Reyneke JP, Caminiti M. Predicting the Future Focus of Orthognathic Surgery: Outcome-Driven Planning and Treatment With Function, Esthetics, and Occlusion as Key Indicators. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024:S0278-2391(24)00576-7. [PMID: 38981579 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.06.168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
As an international group of orthognathic surgeons, we believe the next big thing in orthognathic surgery will be a clinical and research focus on patient-oriented outcomes and improved quality of life. We expect to see advances in diagnosis and treatment planning, materials development, and patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Miloro
- Daniel M. Laskin Professor and Department Head, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael D Han
- Associate Professor and Program Director, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Tae-Geon Kwon
- Professor, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Tong Xi
- Associate Professor and Research Coordinator, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Adjunct Associate Professor, Faculty of Health, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Alexandre M Borba
- Program Director, Research Program in Integrated Dental Sciences Department, Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Cuiabá, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil; Staff, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, General Hospital of Cuiabá, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil
| | - Johan P Reyneke
- Professor, Director, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Western Cape, The Centre for Orthognathic Surgery, Mediclinic, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Marco Caminiti
- Associate Professor, Head and Program Director, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ntovas P, Marchand L, Finkelman M, Revilla-León M, Att W. Accuracy of manual and artificial intelligence-based superimposition of cone-beam computed tomography with digital scan data, utilizing an implant planning software: A randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2024. [PMID: 38858787 DOI: 10.1111/clr.14313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the accuracy of conventional and automatic artificial intelligence (AI)-based registration of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with intraoral scans and to evaluate the impact of user's experience, restoration artifact, number of missing teeth, and free-ended edentulous area. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three initial registrations were performed for each of the 150 randomly selected patients, in an implant planning software: one from an experienced user, one from an inexperienced operator, and one from a randomly selected post-graduate student of implant dentistry. Six more registrations were performed for each dataset by the experienced clinician: implementing a manual or an automatic refinement, selecting 3 small or 3 large in-diameter surface areas and using multiple small or multiple large in-diameter surface areas. Finally, an automatic AI-driven registration was performed, using the AI tools that were integrated into the utilized implant planning software. The accuracy between each type of registration was measured using linear measurements between anatomical landmarks in metrology software. RESULTS Fully automatic-based AI registration was not significantly different from the conventional methods tested for patients without restorations. In the presence of multiple restoration artifacts, user's experience was important for an accurate registration. Registrations' accuracy was affected by the number of free-ended edentulous areas, but not by the absolute number of missing teeth (p < .0083). CONCLUSIONS In the absence of imaging artifacts, automated AI-based registration of CBCT data and model scan data can be as accurate as conventional superimposition methods. The number and size of selected superimposition areas should be individually chosen depending on each clinical situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Ntovas
- Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Laurent Marchand
- Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew Finkelman
- Department of Public Health and Community Service, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marta Revilla-León
- Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Faculty and Director of Research and Digital Dentistry, Kois Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Wael Att
- Center for Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, ,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Private Practice, The Face Dental Group, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cascales RF, Casolari F, Hernández-Alfaro F, Berdugo ML, Cascales ÁF. Surgery-first in interdisciplinary class II cases. J ESTHET RESTOR DENT 2024; 36:868-880. [PMID: 38289013 DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To present an interdisciplinary case treated with a surgery-first orthognathic approach, followed by orthodontic and prosthodontic treatment. CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS After an accurate pre-operative virtual planning, a young patient with skeletal class II, retrognathia, and an anterior open bite was treated with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery without pre-surgical orthodontic decompensation. Orthodontic treatment was carried out post-operatively. The treatment was completed with a prosthodontic phase to improve the final esthetic outcome of the smile. CONCLUSIONS A surgery-first approach allowed to achieve esthetic and functional results in a reduced treatment duration that remained stable over the course of 1 year. The outcomes were consistent with prior research in terms of advantages brought by following an accurately planned surgery-first protocol. Nevertheless, longer-term follow-up was required to evaluate the treatment stability. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE An accurately planned surgery-first approach significantly helped in shortening the duration of the treatment, while providing a stable, functional, and esthetic solution to the patient's problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raúl Ferrando Cascales
- Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, San Antonio de Murcia Catholic University (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| | - Francesca Casolari
- Faculty of Dentistry, San Antonio de Murcia Catholic University (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| | - Federico Hernández-Alfaro
- Maxillofacial Institute, Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mayra Lucero Berdugo
- Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, San Antonio de Murcia Catholic University (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| | - Álvaro Ferrando Cascales
- Department of Aesthetic and Adhesive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, San Antonio de Murcia Catholic University (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kusaibati AM, Sultan K, Hajeer MY, Gkantidis N. Digital setup accuracy for moderate crowding correction with fixed orthodontic appliances: a prospective study. Prog Orthod 2024; 25:13. [PMID: 38584176 PMCID: PMC10999400 DOI: 10.1186/s40510-024-00513-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the accuracy of a semi-automatic 3D digital setup process in predicting the orthodontic treatment outcome achieved by labial fixed appliances. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Twenty-five adult patients (18 to 24 years old) with class I malocclusion and moderate crowding were prospectively enrolled and received treatment on both jaws through the straight-wire technique. Prior to treatment commencement, a semi-automatic digital setup simulating the predicted treatment outcome was performed for each patient through Orthoanalyzer software (3Shape®, Copenhagen, Denmark) to obtain the prediction model. This was compared to the final outcome model through 3D superimposition methods. Metric variables and inspection of color-coded distance maps were used to detect how accurately the digital setup predicts the actual treatment outcome. RESULTS The mean absolute distances (MAD) between the superimposed dental arches of the predicted and the final models were: 0.77 ± 0.13 mm following superimposition on the palate, 0.52 ± 0.06 mm following superimposition on the maxillary dental arch, and 0.55 ± 0.15 mm following superimposition on the mandibular dental arch. The MAD at the palatal reference area was 0.09 ± 0.04 mm. Visualization of color-coded distance maps indicated that the digital setup accurately predicted the final teeth position in a few cases. Almost half of the cases had posteriorly wider upper and lower dental arches and palatally/lingually positioned or inclined anterior teeth, whereas the rest still showed errors within 2-3 mm, distributed over the entire dental arches with no distinct pattern. CONCLUSIONS The accuracy of semi-automatic prediction of the labial fixed appliance treatment outcome in Class I cases with moderate crowding is not yet sufficient. While average measures showed deviations less than 1 mm, examination of individual color-coded distance maps revealed significant disparities between the simulated and the actual results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kinda Sultan
- Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus, Syria
| | - Mohammad Younis Hajeer
- Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus, Syria
| | - Nikolaos Gkantidis
- Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barone S, Cevidanes L, Miranda F, Gurgel ML, Anchling L, Hutin N, Bianchi J, Goncalves JR, Giudice A. Enhancing skeletal stability and Class III correction through active orthodontist engagement in virtual surgical planning: A voxel-based 3-dimensional analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2024; 165:321-331. [PMID: 38010236 PMCID: PMC10923113 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgical correction of Class III malocclusion was investigated through a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the distal and proximal mandibular segments using a 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition among virtual surgical predictions performed by the orthodontist in close communication with the maxillofacial surgeon and 12-18 months postoperative outcomes. METHODS A comprehensive secondary data analysis was conducted on deidentified preoperative (1 month before surgery [T1]) and 12-18 months postoperative (midterm [T2]) cone-beam computed tomography scans, along with virtual surgical planning (VSP) data obtained by Dolphin Imaging software. The sample for the study consisted of 17 patients (mean age, 24.8 ± 3.5 years). Using 3D Slicer software, automated tools based on deep-learning approaches were used for cone-beam computed tomography orientation, registration, bone segmentation, and landmark identification. Colormaps were generated for qualitative analysis, whereas linear and angular differences between the planned (T1-VSP) and observed (T1-T2) outcomes were calculated for quantitative assessments. Statistical analysis was conducted with a significance level of α = 0.05. RESULTS The midterm surgical outcomes revealed a slight but significantly less maxillary advancement compared with the planned position (mean difference, 1.84 ± 1.50 mm; P = 0.004). The repositioning of the mandibular distal segment was stable, with insignificant differences in linear (T1-VSP, 1.01 ± 3.66 mm; T1-T2, 0.32 ± 4.17 mm) and angular (T1-VSP, 1.53° ± 1.60°; T1-T2, 1.54° ± 1.50°) displacements (P >0.05). The proximal segments exhibited lateral displacement within 1.5° for both the mandibular right and left ramus at T1-VSP and T1-T2 (P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS The analysis of fully digital planned and surgically repositioned maxilla and mandible revealed excellent precision. In the midterm surgical outcomes of maxillary advancement, a minor deviation from the planned anterior movement was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selene Barone
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
| | - Lucia Cevidanes
- Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Felicia Miranda
- Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcela Lima Gurgel
- Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Luc Anchling
- Chemistry and Chemical Engineering School - Digital Sciences School Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Nathan Hutin
- Chemistry and Chemical Engineering School - Digital Sciences School Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jonas Bianchi
- Department of Orthodontics, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, Calif
| | - Joao Roberto Goncalves
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentist, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Amerigo Giudice
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zou B, Kim JH, Kim SH, Choi TH, Shin Y, Kook YA, Lee NK. Accuracy of a surface-based fusion method when integrating digital models and the cone beam computed tomography scans with metal artifacts. Sci Rep 2022; 12:8034. [PMID: 35577911 PMCID: PMC9110746 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11677-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of maxillary digital dental model integration into cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) skeletodental models for orthognathic patients. This retrospective study consisted of CBCT and digital maxillary dentition images of 20 Class III orthognathic patients. After two repeated fusions of digital cast images with reconstructed CBCT images by a digital engineer and an orthodontist respectively, the 3D coordinate values of the canines, first molars, and central incisors were evaluated. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of 3D positions of maxillary teeth were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Intra-observer reliability of x-, y-, and z-coordinate values of maxillary teeth showed significant and excellent agreement in an engineer (0.946 ≤ ICC ≤ 1.000) and an orthodontist (0.876 ≤ ICC ≤ 1.000). The inter-observer reliability of the y- and z-coordinates of each tooth was significantly excellent or good, but that of the x-coordinates showed insignificantly poor to moderate agreement. This study showed that the integration of maxillary digital models into CBCT scans was clinically reliable. However, considering the low inter-observer reliability on the x-coordinates of dentition, clinical experience and repeated learning are needed for accurate application of digital skeletodental model in orthognathic patients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Current Trends in Skeletal Borderline Patients: Surgical versus Orthodontic Treatment Decisions—What Is the Evidence? APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12094636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: The aim is to assess the current evidence-based knowledge about treatment decisions for skeletal malocclusion in adult borderline patients. Methods: A literature search was conducted through three databases. Inclusion criteria were restricted to systematic reviews, prospective, retrospective, and control studies. Only articles comparing orthodontic camouflage and orthognathic surgical treatment for Class II and Class III malocclusions in adult patients were selected to be reviewed. Results: Seven articles concerning Class II and nine concerning Class III met the inclusion criteria. Scientific evidence was poor due to low methodological quality. Conclusions: Surgical treatment was found to better improve skeletal and soft-tissue cephalometric values, whereas camouflage treatment mainly involved dentoalveolar movements. Aesthetic changes, as perceived by the patient, were not significantly different in the two groups. Recently improved surgical techniques, differing from those described in the analyzed articles, may provide similar or more stable outcomes compared with orthodontic-only treatment. Although some cephalometric variables can be helpful, the most important parameters for treatment selection are the patient’s presenting complaint and their self-image perception. Further studies with larger sample sizes and similar pretreatment conditions, and considering patient self-evaluation of esthetics and function, should be undertaken.
Collapse
|
8
|
Physical Versus Digital Orthognathic Surgical Planning. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33:1816-1819. [PMID: 34999612 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000008462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Orthognathic occlusal repositioning wafers could be constructed virtually and 3D printed. This paper assessed the accuracy of a suggested virtual model to the conventionally established Glasgow model surgery. DESIGN Prospective study of the orthognathic surgery models digitally. PARTICIPANTS Seven patients who received bi-maxillary orthognathic surgeries for correction of dentofacial deformities. METHODS The patients were clinically assessed and their cone beam cmputerized tomography (CBCT) studied. Model surgery of each patient was performed conventionally using face-bow and semi-adjustable articulator. Same plan was executed virtually using Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) and 3Matic (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Conventionally fabricated acrylic wafers as well as 3D printed wafers were CBCT scanned with the casts reflecting the archived repositioning dictated by the wafers. Paired sample t test was performed to compare accuracy between intermediate and final occlusal repositioning wafers within conventional and virtual technique groups. RESULTS The mean deviation in intermediate wafer group was 0.64 ± 0.33 mm; whereas the mean deviation in final wafer group was 0.53 ± 0.10 mm. Paired sample t test showed that there was no statistically significant difference in mean deviation between both groups (P = 0.403). CONCLUSIONS This virtual surgical wafer achieves a similar level of accuracy to the conventional Glasgow model surgery.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ying X, Tian K, Zhang K, Ma X, Guo H. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach. BMC Oral Health 2021; 21:529. [PMID: 34654418 PMCID: PMC8518167 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01892-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to assess the accuracy of virtual surgical planning (VSP) in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach (SFA) by means of three-dimensional (3D) measuring and superimposition, so as to promote the application of digital technology in combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment. Methods 20 patients treated with segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with SFA from 2018 to 2020 were included. All of them acquired VSP performed by ProPlan CMF 3.0 software (Materialise Corporation, Belgium). The preoperative (T0) 3D model of VSP and the postoperative (T1) 3D model, reconstructed by the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data acquired one week after surgery, were compared by measuring the 3D coordinates of the landmarks as well as 3D model superimposition for deviation analysis. The deviation analysis was achieved by Geomagic Studio 2013 (3D Systems Corporation, USA). The differences which represented the accuracy of VSP were evaluated by the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and the Bland–Altman method. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the 3D coordinates of T1 and T0 (P > 0.05), and the mean overall RMSD was 1.37 mm, within the clinical relevance of 2 mm. The RMSD of sagittal direction (1.76 mm) was greater than that of coronal and vertical directions (1.09 mm and 1.24 mm), and the RMSD of maxillary and mandibular aspects were basically equal (1.30 mm and 1.45 mm). The Bland–Altman method showed the T0 and T1 measurements were in good agreement. The mean RMSD obtained from the deviation analysis was 1.85 mm, within the clinical relevance. Conclusions VSP in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with SFA proved to acquire accurate outcome in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaowu Ying
- Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Kaiyue Tian
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic and Trauma, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kaiyu Zhang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic and Trauma, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohui Ma
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic and Trauma, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongming Guo
- Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Quantitative Asymmetry Assessment between Virtual and Mixed Reality Planning for Orthognathic Surgery—A Retrospective Study. Symmetry (Basel) 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/sym13091614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Orthognathic surgical planning compromises three clinical needs: occlusal balancing, symmetry, and harmony, which may result in multiple outcomes. Facial symmetry is the ultimate goal for patients and practitioners. Pure virtual planning and mixed reality planning were two innovative technologies in clinical practices compared to conventional model surgery used for decades. We proposed quantitative asymmetry assessment methods in both mandibular contour (in 2D) and a midface and mandible relationship in 3D. A computerized optimal symmetry plane, being the median plane, was applied in both planning methods. In the 3D asymmetry assessment between two planning methods, the deviation angle and deviation distance between midface and mandible were within 2° and 1.5 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference, except the symmetry index of the anterior deviation angle between the virtual and mixed reality planning in the 3D asymmetry assessment. In the mandible contour assessment, there was no significant difference between the virtual and mixed reality planning in asymmetry assessment in the frontal and frontal downward inclined views. Quantitative outcomes in 3D asymmetry indices showed that mixed reality planning was slightly more symmetric than virtual planning, with the opposite in 2D contouring.
Collapse
|
11
|
Alavi S, Ahmadvand A, Mehraban S. An overview of surgery-first orthognathic approach: History, indications and limitations, protocols, and dentoskeletal stability. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.318942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
12
|
Palazzo G, Ronsivalle V, Oteri G, Lo Giudice A, Toro C, Campagna P, Patini R, Bocchieri S, Bianchi A, Isola G. Comparison between Additive and Subtractive CAD-CAM Technique to Produce Orthognathic Surgical Splints: A Personalized Approach. J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10040273. [PMID: 33322616 PMCID: PMC7768501 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10040273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of digitally designed surgical splints generated with milling technology (material subtractive procedure) and with 3D printing technology (material additive procedure) through a customized approach in the planning of surgical orthognathic splints. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations and scanned dental models of 10 subjects who had required surgical treatment of skeletal malocclusion were included. Simulation of the orthognathic surgery was performed according to dento-skeletal and aesthetic characteristics of the subjects and the visual treatment objective (VTO), using Dolphin3D software (Dolphin Imaging, version 11.0, Chatsworth, CA, USA). Afterward, the Appliance Designer software (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to digitally design the surgical splints that were generated twice using laser stereolithography technology (DWS 0.29D, DWS, Vicenza, Italy) and milling technology (Sirona inLab MC X5). Finally, each physical splint was digitalized using a desktop scanner (D500 3D, 3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) in order to perform deviation analysis using the original project as a reference. The relative percentage of matching (trueness) was calculated (Geomagic Control X software (3D Systems, version 2018.1.1, 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA). An Independent Student's t-test was used to statistically analyze the data. The milled splints showed a lower value of root to mean square (RMS) relative to the original project (0.20 mm ± 0.018) compared to the prototyped splints (0.31 ± 0.021) (p < 0.001). According to the present findings, surgical splints generated with milling technology present higher trueness compared with 3D printing technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Palazzo
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95124 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (V.R.); (A.L.G.); (C.T.); (P.C.); (S.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Vincenzo Ronsivalle
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95124 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (V.R.); (A.L.G.); (C.T.); (P.C.); (S.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Giacomo Oteri
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, School of Dentistry, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98123 Messina, Italy;
| | - Antonino Lo Giudice
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95124 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (V.R.); (A.L.G.); (C.T.); (P.C.); (S.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Corrado Toro
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95124 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (V.R.); (A.L.G.); (C.T.); (P.C.); (S.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Paola Campagna
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95124 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (V.R.); (A.L.G.); (C.T.); (P.C.); (S.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Romeo Patini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: (R.P.); (G.I.); Tel.: +39-06-3015-4286 (R.P.); +39-09-5743-5359 (G.I.)
| | - Salvatore Bocchieri
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95124 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (V.R.); (A.L.G.); (C.T.); (P.C.); (S.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95124 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (V.R.); (A.L.G.); (C.T.); (P.C.); (S.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Gaetano Isola
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 78, 95124 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (V.R.); (A.L.G.); (C.T.); (P.C.); (S.B.); (A.B.)
- Correspondence: (R.P.); (G.I.); Tel.: +39-06-3015-4286 (R.P.); +39-09-5743-5359 (G.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Barone S, Morice A, Picard A, Giudice A. Surgery-first orthognathic approach vs conventional orthognathic approach: A systematic review of systematic reviews. JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY, ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY 2020; 122:162-172. [PMID: 32898673 DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Surgery-first approach (SFA) has been introduced as an alternative for conventional orthognathic approach (COA) in the treatment of patients with dentoskeletal deformities. This review aimed to evaluate skeletal stability, treatment time, surgical complications, and quality of life in SFA and COA. Six databases were accessed up to May 2020 to obtain all systematic reviews (SRs). After title and abstract reading, data extraction was performed from eligible SRs. The methodological quality was calculated for the included SRs using the last version of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Review (AMSTAR-2). Ten SRs were included in this review. A good stability of the jaws was assessed both with SFA and COA by most of low- or critically low-quality SRs. Less treatment time was reported for SFA than COA with a moderate quality level. Slightly higher complications rate was recorded with SFA than COA by SRs with low or moderate quality. A better quality of life with SFA than COA was reported by moderate- or low-quality SRs. SFA may represent a reasonable alternative to COA. However, for the heterogeneity of the included SRs, well-designed studies with a long term follow-up are needed to clarify the findings of this analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selene Barone
- School of Dentistry, Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Anne Morice
- Descartes-Sorbonne Paris University, Paris, France; APHP, Department of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Picard
- Descartes-Sorbonne Paris University, Paris, France; APHP, Department of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Amerigo Giudice
- School of Dentistry, Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|