Pharyngeal Airway Modifications in Skeletal Class III Patients Undergoing Bimaxillary Advancement Surgery

Three-Dimensional Comparative Changes in the Pharyngeal Airway of Patients with Cleft after Two-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The present study evaluated the three-dimensional changes of the pharyngeal airway after orthognathic surgery (OGS) in patients with unilateral and bilateral clefts, and in unilateral cleft patients with and without pharyngeal flap (PF).

METHODS

Forty-five patients with unilateral or bilateral clefts undergoing OGS were enrolled. Cone-beam computed tomographic images were obtained before and after OGS. We measured the pharyngeal airway volumes, minimal cross-sectional area, and the horizontal displacement of facial landmarks.

RESULTS

The patients with bilateral cleft exhibited smaller initial velopharyngeal volume (unilateral, 8623 mm 3 ; bilateral, 7781 mm 3 ; P = 0.211), whereas the velopharyngeal volume increased significantly with a median of 744 mm 3 after OGS ( P = 0.031). The median horizontal displacement of A point was 2.9 and 2.6 mm among the patients with unilateral and bilateral clefts, respectively ( P = 0.276), and the median horizontal displacement of B point was -2.9 and -3.3 mm among patients with unilateral and bilateral clefts, respectively ( P = 0.618). The unilateral cleft patients with PF exhibited lower initial velopharyngeal volume (patients with a history of PF surgery, 7582 mm 3 ; patients without a history of PF surgery, 8756 mm 3 ; P = 0.129) and a lower increase in velopharyngeal volume (patients with a history of PF surgery, 437 mm 3 ; patients without a history of PF surgery, 627 mm 3 ; P = 0.739) after OGS.

CONCLUSIONS

Midface hypoplasia and the decrease in the velopharyngeal volume were more prominent among the bilateral cleft patients and the unilateral cleft patients with PF. After OGS, the velopharyngeal volume increased considerably among the bilateral cleft patients, but no considerable differences were noted among the unilateral cleft patients with PF.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Upper Airway Changes in Diverse Orthodontic Looms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Upper airway assessment is particularly important in the daily work of orthodontists, because of its close connection with the development of craniofacial structures and with other pathologies such as Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS). Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images provide a more reliable and comprehensive tool for airway assessment and volumetric measurements. However, the association between upper airway dimensions and skeletal malocclusion is unclear. Therefore, the current systematic review evaluates the effects of different surgical movements on the upper airway. Materials and Methods: Medline (PubMed, OVID Medline, and EBSCO), Cochrane Library (Cochrane Review and Trails), Web of Knowledge (social science, and conference abstracts), Embase (European studies, pharmacological literature, and conference abstracts), CINAHL (nursing and allied health), PsycInfo (psychology and psychiatry), SCOPUS (conference abstracts, and scientific web pages), and ERIC (education) databases were searched. Two authors independently performed the literature search, selection, quality assessment, and data extraction. Inclusion criteria encompassed computed tomography evaluations of the upper airway spaces with retrospective, prospective, and randomised clinical trial study designs. To grade the methodological quality of the included studies a GRADE risk of bias tool was used. Results and conclusion: In total, 29 studies were included. Among these, 17 studies had a low risk of bias, whereas 10 studies had a moderate risk of bias. A meta-analysis was performed with the mean differences using a fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Q-test and the I2 index. The meta-analysis revealed significant (p ≤ 0.001, 95% confidence interval) increases in upper airway volume after rapid maxillary expansion and surgical advancement for the correction of Class II.