Jansen MS, Dekkers OM, Groenwold RHH, Siegerink B. Publication rates in small German trials remained low five years after trial completion.
Contemp Clin Trials 2022;
121:106899. [PMID:
36038002 DOI:
10.1016/j.cct.2022.106899]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To investigate publication rates in small trials and to explore which factors are associated with publication rates in small trials, including sample size, the type and number of primary and secondary outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING
We studied a subgroup of 'small' trials from a pre-existing dataset (IntoValue), containing German trials completed between 2009 and 2017. Small trials were defined as phase II-III, III and IV trials with 150 or fewer participants. We performed an updated publication search and collected additional data from online trial records.
RESULTS
Out of 499 trials, 325 (65%) trials published their results in a journal article or dissertation. Median time-to-publication was 3.41 years (95% CI: 3.04-4.10). Planned sample size was not associated with publication rates, but the difference between planned and achieved sample size was (per 10% unsuccessfully recruited participants, HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-1.00). Phase III vs. II-III trials, studied intervention (device vs. other) and clearly vs. unclearly defined primary outcomes predicted a higher likelihood of earlier publication.
CONCLUSION
About 35% of small trials in Germany remain unpublished, even after an extensive follow-up period of over 9 years. Publication rates are low and were associated with sample size, trial phase and type of intervention.
Collapse