What Are the Effects of Methylprednisolone Injection Into the Masseter and Gluteal Muscle on Pain, Edema and Trismus After Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery? A Randomized Clinical Trial

Comparing pre- and postoperative etoricoxib administration versus only postoperative on third molar extraction sequelae and oral health quality of life: a prospective quasi-experimental study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the impact of pre- and postoperative etoricoxib administration versus only postoperative on third molar extraction sequelae and oral health quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective quasi experimental study involved 56 patients, divided into a study group receiving preemptive etoricoxib 120 mg before surgery and postoperative etoricoxib 120 mg (n = 28), and a control group receiving preemptive placebo before surgery and postoperative etoricoxib 120 mg (n = 28). Follow-up assessments were conducted at 3- and 7-days post-surgery, recording swelling, trismus, and adverse events. Patients rated perceived pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) and completed an oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) questionnaire at specified intervals. Statistical analysis employed non-parametric tests (i.e., the Mann-Whitney test, Friedman test, and Wilcoxon sign test) with P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Significantly lower VAS scores were reported in the study group throughout the follow-up period (P < 0.05). Pharmacological protocol did not have a significant impact on postoperative edema and trismus (P > 0.05). However, double etoricoxib intake significantly improved postoperative quality of life on day 3 after surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre- and postoperative etoricoxib 120 mg intake in third molar surgery reduced postoperative pain and enhanced postoperative quality of life on day 3 after surgery. Importantly, it was equally effective in managing swelling and trismus compared to exclusive postoperative intake.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Preemptive etoricoxib use may decrease patient discomfort following impacted mandibular third molar extraction.

The Influence of Bolus of Methylprednisolone on Postorthognathic Surgery Symptoms: A Controlled Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

Despite improvements in maxillary and mandibular osteotomy, complications still result in around 20%. Post and intraoperative standard therapies, based on the use of betamethasone and tranexamic acid, could help to minimize the onset of side effects. The aim of the study was to compare the role of a supplementary bolus of methylprednisolone rather than the standard therapy in the onset of postoperative symptoms.

METHODS

The authors enrolled 10 patients, affected by class 2 and 3 Dentoskeletal, submitted to the institution for maxillomandibular repositioning osteotomy between October 2020 and April 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups as follows: 5 patients (group A ) received standard therapy consisting of the administration of 4 mg of betamethasone, intraoperatively, and 1 g of tranexamic acid in 2 administrations. The remaining 5 patients (group B ) received a supplementary bolus of 20 mg methylprednisolone before the end of the surgery.All patients received, in the postoperative period, 4 mg of betamethasone every 12 hours, for 3 days. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated with a questionnaire evaluating speaking discomfort, pain when swallowing, feeding discomfort, drinking discomfort, swelling, and ache. Each parameter was associated with a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 5.

RESULTS

The authors observed that patients treated with a supplementary bolus of methylprednisolone (group B ) had a statistically significant reduction of all postoperative symptoms as compared with patients of group A (* P < 0.05, ** P <0.01 Fig. 1 ).

CONCLUSION

The study highlighted that the additional bolus of methylprednisolone improved all of the 6 parameters investigated by the questionnaire submitted to patients, resulting in a faster recovery and improvement of the patient's compliance with surgery. Further studies with a larger population are needed to confirm preliminary results.

Corticosteroids for managing acute pain subsequent to surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are used to manage pain after surgical tooth extractions. The authors assessed the effect of corticosteroids on acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing surgical tooth extractions of mandibular third molars.

TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED

The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. The authors searched the Epistemonikos database, including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the US clinical trials registry (ClinicalTrials.gov) from inception until April 2023. Pairs of reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, then full texts of trials were identified as potentially eligible. After duplicate data abstraction, the authors conducted random-effects meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using Version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and certainty of the evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Forty randomized controlled trials proved eligible. The evidence suggested that corticosteroids compared with a placebo provided a trivial reduction in pain intensity measured 6 hours (mean difference, 8.79 points lower; 95% CI, 14.8 to 2.77 points lower; low certainty) and 24 hours after surgical tooth extraction (mean difference, 8.89 points lower; 95% CI, 10.71 to 7.06 points lower; very low certainty). The authors found no important difference between corticosteroids and a placebo with regard to incidence of postoperative infection (risk difference, 0%; 95% CI, -1% to 1%; low certainty) and alveolar osteitis (risk difference, 0%; 95% CI, -3% to 4%; very low certainty).

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Low and very low certainty evidence suggests that there is a trivial difference regarding postoperative pain intensity and adverse effects of corticosteroids administered orally, submucosally, or intramuscularly compared with a placebo in patients undergoing third-molar extractions.