Does Maximum Voluntary Clenching Force Pose a Risk to Overloading Alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint Replacement?-A Prospective Cohort Study

Muscle and joint mechanics during maximum force biting following total temporomandibular joint replacement surgery

Total temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) surgery is the established treatment for severe temporomandibular joint disorders. While TMJR surgery is known to increase mouth-opening capacity, reduce pain and improve quality of life, little is known about post-surgical jaw function during activities of daily living such as biting and chewing. The aim of this study was to use subject-specific 3D bite force measurements to evaluate the magnitude and direction of joint loading in unilateral total TMJR patients and compare these data to those in healthy control subjects. An optoelectronic tracking system was used to measure jaw kinematics while biting a rubber sample for 5 unilateral total TMJR patients and 8 controls. Finite element simulations driven by the measured kinematics were employed to calculate the resultant bite force generated when compressing the rubber between teeth during biting tasks. Subject-specific musculoskeletal models were subsequently used to calculate muscle and TMJ loading. Unilateral total TMJR patients generated a bite force of 249.6 ± 24.4 N and 164.2 ± 62.3 N when biting on the contralateral and ipsilateral molars, respectively. In contrast, controls generated a bite force of 317.1 ± 206.6 N. Unilateral total TMJR patients biting on the contralateral molars had a significantly higher lateral TMJ force direction (median difference: 63.6°, p = 0.028) and a significantly lower ratio of working TMJ force to bite force (median difference: 0.17, p = 0.049) than controls. Results of this study may guide TMJ prosthesis design and evaluation of dental implants.

Is the risk of chronic pain after total temporomandibular joint replacement independent of its indications? A prospective cohort study

Chronic pain is a possible long-term complication after alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction (TMJR). This study was developed to evaluate various subjective and objective measurements to determine the presence and degree of TMJ pain in patients treated with TMJR regardless of the indication for the operation. A prospective, single-centre study was performed. Data on 36 patients (56 TMJR) were collected preoperatively and at follow up two to three years postoperatively. The primary outcome variable was subjective TMJ pain (none/mild, moderate/severe) at follow up. The predictor variables were objective pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) at the ipsilateral joint(s) and muscle(s), functional parameters (incisal range of motion, maximum voluntary clenching), subjective oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and demographic and surgical variables. The number of patients with moderate/severe pain decreased from 17 preoperatively to 10 at follow up. Self-reported TMJ pain was significantly reduced in the entire group (p = 0.001). Patients with moderate/severe pain at follow up were more restricted in their OHRQoL but did not differ in PPT and functional parameters from the no/mild pain group. Moderate/severe TMJ pain at follow up was associated with unilateral TMJR and more preoperative pain. This study provides preliminary evidence that despite good pain reduction in most patients, persistent pain after TMJR is common and, in rare cases, may even worsen regardless of the original diagnosis. At follow up there was a close relation between OHRQoL and TMJ pain. TMJ pain after TMJR cannot be confirmed by objective measurement methods (PPTs and functional parameters).

Biomechanical analysis of a temporomandibular joint prosthesis for lateral pterygoid muscle reattachment

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the biomechanical properties of a novel temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prosthesis with an attachment area for the lateral pterygoid muscle (LPM).

STUDY DESIGN

Three prosthesis models were created and compared using finite element analysis for the displacement, stress, and strain when simulating the maximum bite force loading. A verification experiment and a compression test were conducted.

RESULTS

The displacement, stress, and strain of the novel TMJ prosthesis were larger than the solid condylar neck prosthesis and similar to the slotted condylar neck prosthesis, but the values were far less than the yield strength of titanium alloy. The maximum stress and strain in the novel TMJ prosthesis was concentrated in the inner and boundary areas of the LPM reattachment region beside the thinnest part of the prosthesis neck. The difference in the strain values measured using the verification test and those using finite element analysis was <20%. Compression testing of the novel TMJ prosthesis revealed that the mandible fractured when the force reached 588.97 N, whereas the prosthesis itself did not break or deform.

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanical distribution of the novel prosthesis was feasible under maximum bite force for potential clinical application.