Using 3D Medical Modeling to Evaluate the Accuracy of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Bone Scintigraphy in Diagnosing Condylar Hyperplasia

Accuracy of skeletal scintigraphy for the evaluation of mandibular growth disorders: a systematic review

Bone scans, reflecting blood flow and metabolic activity in a region of interest, are frequently used to evaluate mandibular growth disorders. Increased uptake is a non-specific finding and can occur as a result of multiple causes. The correlation between radioactive tracer uptake and growth activity has not been consistently demonstrated. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of planar skeletal scintigraphy (SS), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and SPECT with computed tomography (CT) images (SPECT/CT) in detecting abnormal mandibular growth activity compared to clinical and radiographic/tomographic methods (reference standard) and histologic findings. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for planar SS, SPECT, and SPECT/CT. Compared to the reference standard, SPECT/CT had the best diagnostic accuracy (76.5% sensitivity, 90.4% specificity, 83.2% accuracy), followed by planar SS (81.8% sensitivity, 84.5% specificity, 83.0% accuracy) and SPECT (77.7% sensitivity, 72.4% specificity, 74.5% accuracy). The results of this study indicate that SPECT/CT has the best clinical correlation, but the certainty of the evidence is low. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between the three index tests were not clinically significant. The three tests can be useful, with only a small difference in their diagnostic value. Histopathology was found not to be satisfactory as a reference standard.

Diagnostic accuracy of bone SPECT and SPECT/CT imaging in the diagnosis of unilateral condylar hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Imaging with bone scans plays an important role in the diagnostic path of patients with unilateral condylar hyperactivity or unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH). The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of the diagnostic performance of the bone SPECT and SPECT/CT scan for the diagnosis of UCH. PubMed, SCOPUS and EMBASE were searched electronically to identify diagnostic accuracy studies that assessed the diagnostic value of bone SPECT and SPECT/CT for the diagnosis of UCH, Meta-analyses were performed with Metadisc 1.4 and 2.0. A total of 14 studies, with a total number of 887 patients, were included in the qualitative analysis and 11 studies qualified for meta-analyses. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for the SPECT scan were 0.814 (95 % CI: 0.639-0.915) and 0.774 (95 % CI: 0.655-0.861), for the SPECT/CT scan these were 0.818 (95 % CI: 0.749-0.874) and 0.901 (95 % CI: 0.840-0.945). The summary receiver operating characteristics of the SPECT scan showed an area under the curve of 0.847 (95 % CI: 0.722-0.972) and that of the SPECT/CT scan was 0.928 (95 % CI: 0.876-0.980). CONCLUSION: Both bone SPECT scan and SPECT/CT scan provide a high diagnostic accuracy for UCH. The added value of the SPECT/CT scan is questionable and given the potential disadvantages of the SPECT/CT scan, including the increased radiation dose and costs, the diagnostic modality of first choice in patients with UCH should be a SPECT scan.

Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) diagnostic accuracy in active unilateral condylar hyperplasia: Retrospective study

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of single photon emission tomography (SPECT) in unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH). To this end, 3D morphometric changes of the mandibles in one year were assessed (T0 vs. T1) and compared over SPECT results in T1, in a sample of 40 patients. A contingency table was constructed based on these results for SPECT diagnostic accuracy evaluation, classifying patients as SPECT true-positive, true-negatives, false positives and false-negatives. Additionally, the morphometric analysis was used to describe the presentation of mandibular changes using principal component analysis (PCA) and non-parametric statistics. We obtained diagnostic accuracy results of sensitivity 81%, specificity 63%, positive predictor value (PPV) 59%, negative predictor value (NPV) 83% and accuracy 70%, showing that SPECT yields poor results regarding accuracy diagnostic performance. The morphometric analysis showed that individuals without progress of asymmetry and those with more progress differ particularly in a group of landmarks representing the mental region and the right mandibular body. Based on these landmarks, difference among the four SPECT-accuracy groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001), where the landmark showing the largest change within a year had a mean increase of 1.13 + 0.66 mm. Within the limitations of the study, it seems that SPECT alone is not suitable for making surgical decisions regarding condylectomy in active UCH. Follow up with morphological assessment methods are recommended for confirming an active UCH in combination with SPECT.

Evaluation of optimal single-photon emission computed tomography reference value and three-dimensional mandibular growth pattern in 54 Chinese unilateral condylar hyperplasia patients

BACKGROUND

The research aimed to evaluate the optimal Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) cut-off value in differentiating condylar growth activeness, to observe 3-dimensional (3D) mandibular growth pattern, and to explore the potential correlation between 3D measurement parameters and SPECT uptake ratios in Chinese unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) patients.

METHODS

 Data of fifty-four Chinese UCH patients were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent SPECT within 1 month before or after the first CT examination (CT1); and received a second CT examination at least 12 months later (CT2). Data from CT scans were analyzed by comparing bilateral differences between CT1 and CT2. The sensitivity and specificity of SPECT were calculated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to investigate whether the mandibular growth was correlated with SPECT value.

RESULTS

SPECT had a sensitivity of 68.00% and a specificity of 72.41%, with an area under the ROC curve being 0.709. The optimal SPECT cut-off value for evaluating condylar activity has been determined to be 13%. In patients with an active growing condyle, there was a significant increase in Co-Gn and Co-Go, but not in Go-Gn, Go-MF, or MF-Gn. Pearson's correlation analysis revealed no correlation between 3D measurement parameters and differences in relative condylar uptake ratios.

CONCLUSION

SPECT showed good diagnostic performance in UCH with the cut-off value of 13%. For those with an active growing condyle, the mandible grows diagonally and vertically, while the relative condylar uptake ratio was not directly related to mandibular growth.