Evaluation of dynamic serum thiol/disulfide homeostasis in locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer

Diagnostic significance and utility of circulating redox biomarkers in patients with gastric cancer - preliminary study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the redox status, antioxidant barrier, and oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA in patients with gastric cancer (GC). We are also the first to assess the diagnostic utility of redox parameters in patients with GC with respect to histopathological parameters.

METHODS

Fifty patients with gastric cancer and 50 healthy controls matched for sex and age were included in the study. The antioxidant barrier, redox status, and oxidative damage products were measured in serum/plasma samples using colorimetric or spectrophotometric methods.

RESULTS

The activity of superoxide dismutase - SOD (p < 0.05) was significantly higher, whereas the activities of catalase - CAT (p < 0.0001), glutathione peroxidase - GPx (p < 0.0001), glutathione reductase - GR (p < 0.0001), and reduced glutathione - GSH (p < 0.05) were considerably lower in GC patients than in the control group. The levels of total oxidant status - TOS (p < 0.0001), oxidative stress index - OSI (p < 0.0001), advanced oxidation protein products - AOPP (p < 0.0001), ischaemia modified albumin - IMA (p < 0.01), lipid hydroperoxides - LOOH (p < 0.0001), 8-IsoProstane - 8-Iso-P (p < 0.0001), and DNA/RNA (p < 0.0001) were significantly higher, and the levels of total antioxidant capacity - TAC (p < 0.0001) and total thiols (p < 0.0001) were considerably lower in patients compared to the healthy controls. Some redox parameters are characterized by high AUC values in patients with differentiated GC according to histopathological parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric cancer is strongly linked to a systemic redox imbalance and increased oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA. Redox biomarkers are potential diagnostic indicators of gastric cancer advancement.

Firefighters' occupational exposure: Contribution from biomarkers of effect to assess health risks

Firefighting is physically and physiologically exhausting besides encompassing exposure to toxic fire emissions. Biomonitoring studies from the past five years have been significantly contributing to characterize the occupational-related health effects in this group of professionals and to improve risk assessment. Therefore, this study gathers and critically discusses the most characterized biomarkers of effect (oxidative stress, DNA and protein damage, stress hormones, inflammation, and vascular, lung, and liver injury), including those potentially more promising to be explored in future studies, and their relation with health outcomes. Various studies proved an association between exposures to fire emissions and/or heat and significantly altered values of biomarkers of inflammation (soluble adhesion molecules, tumor necrosis factor, interleukins, and leucocyte count), vascular damage and tissue injury (pentraxin-3, vascular endothelial growth factor, and cardiac troponin T) in firefighting forces. Moreover, preliminary data of DNA damage in blood, urinary mutagenicity and 8-isoprostaglandin in exhaled breath condensate suggest that these biomarkers of oxidative stress should be further explored. However, most of the reported studies are based on cross-sectional designs, which limit full identification and characterization of the risk factors and their association with development of work-related diseases. Broader studies based on longitudinal designs and strongly supported by the analysis of several types of biomarkers in different biological fluids are further required to gain deeper insights into the firefighters occupational related health hazards and contribute to implementation of new or improved surveillance programs.

Thiol Groups as a Biomarker for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer

Oxidative stress (OS) is associated with the onset of prostate cancer (PCa). The aims of this study are to examine whether OS biomarkers may be employed as external validating criteria for the diagnosis PCa. This case-control study recruited 204 subjects, 73 patients with PCa, 67 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), and 64 healthy controls (HC) and assayed plasma prostate-specific antigen (PSA), protein thiol (−SH) groups, lipid hydroperoxides, carbonyl proteins (PCB), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), and total radical-trapping antioxidant parameter (TRAP). -SH groups were significantly and inversely associated with PSA levels. PCa was characterized by lowered -SH groups and red blood cell TRAP levels, and higher PSA, AOPP and PCB levels as compared with BPH and HC. Support vector machine with 10-fold cross-validation showed that PSA values together with -SH groups, PCB and AOPP yielded a cross-validation accuracy of 96.34% for the differentiation of PCa from BPH and HC. The area under the ROC curve using PSA and -SH differentiating PCa from BPH and controls was 0.945. Moreover, lowered -SH, but not PSA, are associated with PCa metastasis and progression. Inflammatory biomarkers were not associated with PCa or BPH. PCa, its progression and metastatic PCa are characterized by lowered antioxidant defenses, especially lowered thiol groups, and increased oxidative stress toxicity, suggesting that these processes play a key role in the pathophysiology of PCa. An algorithm based on -SH and PSA values may be used to differentiate patients with PCa from those with BPH and controls.