Clinical practice and routines for day surgery in Sweden: implications for improvement in nursing interventions

The Quality of Patient Education in Day Surgery by Adult Patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to describe the quality of patient education in day surgery as evaluated by adult patients.

DESIGN

Descriptive design using survey methodology.

METHODS

The data were collected by questionnaire and measured the quality and implementation of education resources for day surgery patients (n = 600) in a university hospital. The data were analyzed statistically using basic and multivariate methods.

FINDINGS

The implementation of patient education has been done in a patient-centered and goal-oriented way by half of respondents. Most respondents (81%) were satisfied with the interaction in patient education. The education resources were reported as good by 77% of respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care staff should assess for the presence of anxiety as a barrier to the comprehension of information. In developing patient education, the professional expertise and skills of health care staff in educating patients should be used.

Quality of counselling for knee and shoulder arthroscopy patients during day surgery

BACKGROUND

Counselling for day surgery patients is one of the core components for a knee or shoulder arthroscopy patient to succeed in self-care.

AIM

This cross-sectional study examined the quality of counselling given to patients (n = 86) during their day surgery, using the Counselling Quality Instrument (CQI).

METHODS

The data were analysed using basic and multivariate statistical methods.

RESULTS

Most respondents were male and aged over 50 years. Almost all knee and shoulder arthroscopy patients were satisfied with the counselling given on follow-up and rehabilitation as well as the counselling given relating to wound and pain treatment. There was a lack of patient-centred and goal-oriented counselling, although interaction during counselling was good. Counselling was perceived as providing benefit in regard to a patient's self-care, emotions and knowledge. Respondents aged below 40 years were more dissatisfied with counselling for day surgery than those aged 40 years and over.

CONCLUSION

This study identified a need to train healthcare staff in patient-centred and goal-oriented counselling. Counselling with people who are aged below 40 years should take account of patients' specific concerns.

Preoperative education for lumbar radiculopathy: A survey of US spine surgeons

Background

We sought to determine current utilization, importance, content, and delivery methods of preoperative education by spine surgeons in the United States for patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

Methods

An online cross-sectional survey was used to study a random sample of spine surgeons in the United States. The Spinal Surgery Education Questionnaire (SSEQ) was developed based on previous related surveys and assessed for face and content validity by an expert panel. The SSEQ captured information on demographics, content, delivery methods, utilization, and importance of preoperative education as rated by surgeons. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the current utilization, importance, content, and delivery methods of preoperative education by spine surgeons in the United States for patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

Results

Of 200 surgeons, 89 (45% response rate) responded to the online survey. The majority (64.2%) provide preoperative education informally during the course of clinical consultation versus a formal preoperative education session. The mean time from the decision to undergo surgery to the date of surgery was 33.65 days. The highest rated educational topics are surgical procedure (96.3%), complications (96.3%), outcomes/expectations (93.8%), anatomy (92.6%), amount of postoperative pain expected (90.1%), and hospital stay (90.1%). Surgeons estimated spending approximately 20% of the preoperative education time specifically addressing pain. Seventy-five percent of the surgeons personally provide the education, and nearly all surgeons (96.3%) use verbal communication with the use of a spine model.

Conclusions

Spine surgeons believe that preoperative education is important and use a predominantly biomedical approach in preparing patients for surgery. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

Postoperative recovery and its association with health-related quality of life among day surgery patients

Background

Day surgery holds advantages for both the patient and the health care organization. However, recovery beyond the first postoperative week and following different types of surgery has not been explored to any greater degree. The current aims were to prospectively describe postoperative recovery and health-related quality of life among different groups of day surgery patients and to explore the association between postoperative recovery and health-related quality of life 30 days after discharge.

Methods

A consecutive sample of 607 adult day surgery patients undergoing orthopaedic, gynaecological or general surgery was included. Postoperative recovery was assessed on days 1, 7 and 14 using the Swedish Post-discharge Surgery Recovery scale and the Quality of Recovery-23 scale. The EQ-5D was used to assess health-related quality of life preoperatively and 30 days following discharge. A repeated measure ANOVA was conducted to evaluate postoperative recovery from day 1 to day 14 and between different surgical groups. Hierarchical multiple linear regression models were used to explore the association between postoperative recovery and health-related quality of life.

Results

Postoperative recovery improved from day 1 to 14 in all surgical groups (p<0.001). The orthopaedic patients had lower postoperative recovery on day 14 compared to the general and the gynaecological patients (p<0.001). Health-related quality of life was lower among orthopaedic patients (p<0.001), even if significant improvements over time were seen in all groups. Recovery on day 7 was associated with health-related quality of life 30 days after the day surgery (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Particularly orthopaedic day surgical patients seem to favour a closer follow-up in order to support recovery and thereby also positively influence health-related quality of life.

Prolonged recovery after out-patient pediatric adenotonsillectomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine variables predictive of recovery room times in pediatric outpatient adenotonsillectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control.

METHODS

One-hundred ninety consecutive patients undergoing outpatient adenotonsillectomy at an ambulatory surgery center of a tertiary-care free standing pediatric hospital were grouped into upper and lower deciles of recovery room times. Twenty-one variables were analyzed to determine which variables are predictive of prolonged recovery time. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 190 patients, mean recovery room time was 103 min (SD 53.1), 22 patients were in the lower decile (mean recovery room time of 63 ± 6 min) and 17 patients were in the upper decile (155 ± 40 min, P<0.0001). Of the 21 variables analyzed, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) nursing staff was the only significant predictor of prolonged recovery room time. Compared with one PACU nurse, other nurses (N=5) predicted a longer recovery time (OR=10.8, 95% CI 2.0-59.5, P=0.0017). This association remained significant when controlling for anesthesiologist and surgeon (OR=8.8, 95% CI 1.5-50.9, P=0.0072). There were no complications in any patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery room times after outpatient adenotonsillectomy vary significantly (mean 103 min (SD 53.1), range 50-241 min). Of potential predictors, only the human factor (PACU nursing staff) was associated with prolonged recovery room times, independent of surgeon and anesthesiologist. Development of standardized protocols for nurses to use for discharge has the potential to increase throughput for adenotonsillectomy patients in an outpatient surgery center setting.

General anaesthesia and day-case patient anxiety

AIM

This paper is a report of a study carried out to uncover the most anxiety-provoking aspects of general anaesthesia and determine what interventions may help to alleviate such anxiety.

BACKGROUND

General anaesthesia has proved to be highly anxiety-provoking. With the rise in elective day surgery, this aspect of patients' experience has become a prominent issue. Indeed, with brief hospital stays, limited contact with healthcare professionals, restricted formal anxiety management and the acute psychological impact of day surgery, such anxiety may be increasing.

METHOD

As part of a larger study, a questionnaire was given on the day of surgery to 1250 adult patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia over a two year period from 2005-2007. The issue examined was anxiety in relation to the environment, hospital personnel and general anaesthesia. Participants were requested to return the questionnaire by mail 24-48 hours following surgery, and 460 completed questionnaires were returned.

FINDINGS

A total of 85% of respondents experienced some anxiety on the day of surgery. Immediate preoperative experiences and concerns about unconsciousness were highly anxiety-provoking. Using factor analysis Preoperative Anaesthetic Information, Anaesthetic Catastrophising, Final Support, Personal Support, Imminence of Surgery, Possible Adverse Events and Final Preoperative Experiences were identified as central features. Multiple regression demonstrated Preoperative Anaesthetic Information, Anaesthetic Catastrophising and Imminence of Surgery were statistically significantly associated with an overall increased level of anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Focusing on the timely, formal delivery of information about anaesthesia management, emphasizing the notion of 'controlled unconsciousness' and dispelling misconceptions associated with general anaesthesia may help to limit patient anxiety.