Caring for the patient with obstructive sleep apnea: implications for health care providers in postanesthesia care

Perianesthesia Nurses' Survey of Their Knowledge and Practice With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

PURPOSE

Anesthesia, sedation, and analgesia can negatively impact adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Despite known risks, current evidence, and practice guidelines, insufficient evidence exists that standardization and clinical application of OSA screening tools, problem identification, and perioperative nursing intervention and management strategies are consistently implemented for OSA patients across perianesthesia settings. The purpose of this study was to conduct a knowledge and practice assessment of perianesthesia nurses who care for adult patients with diagnosed or undiagnosed OSA.

DESIGN

An anonymous descriptive study was used to survey perianesthesia nurses who care for adult patients with OSA who present for elective surgical procedures.

METHODS

A total of 1,222 participants completed an expert-developed 27-question online survey.

FINDINGS

The findings indicate the need for more education and research across all perianesthesia settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Next steps also include policy development and an interprofessional collaborative infrastructure nurses need to translate evidence-based screening and management strategies into their clinical practice.

Sleep, Snoring, and Surgery: OSA Screening Matters

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to identify potential obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in ambulatory surgical patients and create perianesthesia nursing protocols using a reliable and validated screening tool.

DESIGN

Descriptive survey.

METHODS

A nurse-initiated OSA survey was conducted in 1,118 preoperative ambulatory patients using the STOP-Bang Questionnaire to identify patients at risk for OSA. The findings resulted in the development of protocols, patient education, and interventions.

FINDINGS

Ambulatory surgical patients were not routinely assessed for OSA before this study. The study verified that 10% of patients scheduled for ambulatory elective surgery had undiagnosed OSA and, because of the OSA identification, 16% of all scheduled surgeries were canceled. There were no unnecessary hospitalizations after the nurse-initiated OSA protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

The STOP-Bang Questionnaire is a useful tool for screening patients with risks of OSA in the ambulatory surgical setting. This study supports using nursing best practices and safe patient care.

A Quality Improvement Project: Using the STOP-BANG Tool in a Military Population to Improve Equity in Preoperative Screening

BACKGROUND

The lack of a preoperative screening tool to detect obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may lead to an increase in postoperative complications.

AIM

The aim of the study was to implement a prescreening tool to identify diagnosed or undiagnosed OSA before a surgical procedure.

SETTING

The study was conducted in the surgical admission center and postanesthesia care unit at a military treatment facility in Hawaii.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants of the study included military personnel, military family members, veterans, and veteran beneficiaries.

METHODS

The STOP-BANG (snore/tired/obstruction/pressure-body mass index/age/neck/gender) tool was used between April and June 2013 to identify and stratify 1,625 patients into low-risk, intermediate-risk, high-risk, and known OSA categories.

RESULTS

The STOP-BANG tool confirmed the diagnosed OSA rate to be 13.48%, and increased at-risk OSA detection by 24.69%. Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders were more frequently found to be at risk with known OSA, likely to have complications, and be transferred to PACU 23-hour extended stay compared to other races and intermediate-risk and high-risk categories.

CONCLUSION

The STOP-BANG tool identified and stratified surgical patients at risk for OSA and standardized OSA assessments.

[Tracheotomy or planned prolonged intubation after surgery for patients with OSAS]

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and obesity have an elevated risk of postoperative complications independent of each other. Within the framework of expert opinions for courts the question arose whether postoperative prolonged intubation or tracheotomy are standard routine approaches which are to be carried out in the normal course of operations on patients with OSAS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search of the literature was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, the Cochrane database of systematic reviews and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials. Furthermore, 78 German otorhinolaryngology (ENT) departments participated in a nationwide survey.

RESULTS

The results of the survey showed that after normal complication-free surgery planned postoperative prolonged intubation is not performed in the majority of ENT departments and no department performs a tracheotomy. In contrast, the standard approach for patients with OSAS and obesity who undergo two-level surgery is intubation and subsequent monitoring without ventilation for the first postoperative day. In the literature no evidence of a scientific basis for carrying out prolonged intubation or a tracheotomy could be found.

CONCLUSION

Neither tracheotomy nor prolonged intubation are standard procedures for OSAS patients with obesity after complication-free surgery.