1
|
Lovasi O, Gaál P, Frank K, Lám J. Acute Pain Services and pain-related patient-reported outcomes in Hungarian hospitals. Perioper Med (Lond) 2024; 13:18. [PMID: 38475942 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-024-00373-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain management is an important part of surgical care, where Acute Pain Service offers added value in terms of patient outcomes and costs. The technology, however, has hardly been adopted in Hungary, with only two hospitals operating Acute Pain Service and whose performance has not been evaluated yet. This research compared pain management outcomes of surgical, orthopedic, and traumatology patients in Hungarian hospitals with and without Acute Pain Service. METHODS We recruited 348 patients, 120 in the APS group and 228 in the control group, whose experience was surveyed with an adapted version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire. The questionnaire covered pain intensity, pain interference with physical and emotional functions, side effects, patient satisfaction, information received, and participation in treatment decisions. The differences were analyzed by Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS The APS group showed better results with lower pain intensity scores regarding worst postoperative pain (χ2 = 18.919, p = 0.0043). They reported less pain interference with activities in bed (χ2 = 21.978, p = 0.0006) and out of bed (χ2 = 14.341, p = 0.0129). Furthermore, patients in the APS group experienced fewer pain-management-related side effects, like nausea (χ2 = 15.240, p = 0.0101), drowsiness (χ2 = 26.965, p = 0.0001), and dizziness (χ2 = 13.980, p = 0.0124). However, patient information (χ2 = 3.480, p = 0.0945) and patient satisfaction (χ2 = 5.781, p = 0.2127) did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our findings confirm earlier international evidence on the benefits of Acute Pain Service in postoperative pain management and support the wider adoption of the technology in Hungarian hospitals. Nevertheless, close attention should be paid to patient information and involvement as better outcomes alone do not necessarily increase patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orsolya Lovasi
- School of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Péter Gaál
- Health Services Management Training Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Applied Social Sciences, Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Krisztián Frank
- Szekszárd District Office of the Government Office of Tolna County, Szekszárd, Hungary
| | - Judit Lám
- Health Services Management Training Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- NEVES Society for Patient Safety, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lovasi O, Lám J, Frank K, Schutzmann R, Gaál P. The First Comprehensive Survey of the Practice of Postoperative Pain Management in Hungarian Hospitals - a Descriptive Study. Pain Manag Nurs 2023; 24:342-349. [PMID: 36642581 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2022.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain management is a key issue in health care. Providers adopt promising technological developments, like Acute Pain Service, at differing speeds, with countries, such as the USA and Germany taking the lead. Where Hungary stands is unknown, as the practice of pain management has not yet been comprehensively reviewed in that country. AIM To explore the practice of postoperative pain management in Hungarian hospitals by addressing the questions of who is responsible for it, who measures pain and how, what kind of pain relief technologies are used, and who takes care of patients during duty hours. METHODS We carried out a survey covering Hungarian hospitals with operational license for surgery, traumatology, orthopedics and anesthesiology between December 2019 and March 2020. The response rate was 72%, and we analyzed 135 questionnaires. RESULTS We identified only 2 hospitals with an Acute Pain Service. In the majority of hospitals, the attending physician orders pain relief therapy. During duty hours the surgeon on duty takes care of pain management in 52.1% of the cases. Among pain relief therapies, intravenous infusions (74.1%) and oral medication (67.4%) are the most frequent. Ward nurses measure postoperative pain (77.8%) with unidimensional scales. According to 59.7% of the respondents, pain is not measured and documented at rest. Written protocols are available in 34.4% of the departments. CONCLUSIONS Compared with other countries, pain management in Hungary lags behind with significant room for improvement. Development and implementation of pain management protocols with appropriate education is the key intervention point.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orsolya Lovasi
- School of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Judit Lám
- Health Services Management Training Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Krisztián Frank
- Szekszárd District Office of the Government Office of Tolna County, Szekszárd, Hungary
| | - Réka Schutzmann
- School of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Gaál
- Health Services Management Training Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, Faculty of Technical and Human Sciences, Department of Applied Social Sciences, Targu Mures, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Breathing Exercises for Pain Management in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Pain Manag Nurs 2022; 24:299-310. [PMID: 36566114 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Unmanaged pain significantly affects cancer survivors' quality of life. Nurses should play a significant role in pain management through non-pharmacological interventions. This review aims to explore the efficacy and safety of breathing exercises for pain management in all cancer survivors. DESIGN A systematic review. DATA SOURCES Thirteen databases, including PubMed, EMBase, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINAHL, JBI, Science Direct, Scopus, SocINDEX, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CNKI, and Wan Fang, were searched from inception to May, 2021. REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS Studies that focused on the efficacy of breathing exercises for pain management, regardless of the age of the cancer survivors, were included. Cochrane tools were used for the quality appraisal of the included studies. Because of the limited number of studies, descriptive data analysis was used to summarize the results. RESULTS Ten studies were included. Slow pursed lip breathing showed benefits for post-surgical pain. Contradictory findings were identified in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for post-surgical pain. Slow deep breathing and Hey-Hu regular breathing techniques were effective for pain management in pediatric cancer patients. The Active Cycle of Breathing Technique and five-minute mindful breathing did not have any statistically significant effects on pain relief. Quality of life was measured in three studies, with some improvement. Only one study addressed adverse events and reported that no adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS Breathing exercises may be a promising approach to pain relief in cancer survivors. However, more rigorously designed studies are required to establish the evidence.
Collapse
|
4
|
Lovasi O, Lám J, Schutzmann R, Gaál P. Acute Pain Service in Hungarian hospitals. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257585. [PMID: 34550982 PMCID: PMC8457450 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical procedures play an increasing role among health technologies to treat diseases. Pain often accompanies such diseases, both as a result of their pathology, but also as the side-effect of the intervention itself, and it is not only a burdensome subjective feeling, but adversely affects the recovery process, can induce complications and increases treatment costs. Acute Pain Service Teams are becoming increasingly widespread in hospitals to address post-operative pain, yet we have so far no data on how many hospitals have actually adopted this technology in Hungary. Objectives The main objectives of our study were to assess the prevalence of Acute Pain Service Teams, map their structure and operation, as well as to understand the barriers and conducive factors of their establishment in Hungarian hospitals. Methods We carried out a survey among the 72 hospitals with surgical departments. The questionnaire was filled in by 52 providers, which gave us a response rate of 72.2%. Results Our results show, that only two of the responding hospitals have Acute Pain Service Teams albeit their structure and operation are in line with the literature. In the 50 hospitals without such teams, financing difficulties and human resources shortages are mentioned to be the most important obstacles of their establishment, but the lack of initiative and interest on the part of the specialities concerned are also an important barrier. Conclusions Lagging behind the more affluent EU member states, but similarly to other Central and Eastern European countries, Acute Pain Service has been hardly adopted by Hungarian hospitals. Hungarian health professionals know the technology and would support its wider introduction, if the technical feasibility barriers could be overcome. Health policy should play a more active role to facilitate change in this area, the investment in which promises a substantial return in terms of health gains and cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orsolya Lovasi
- School of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- * E-mail:
| | - Judit Lám
- Semmelweis University Health Services Management Training Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Réka Schutzmann
- School of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Gaál
- Semmelweis University Health Services Management Training Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Andrews JS, Kudrow D, Rettiganti M, Oakes T, Bardos JN, Wenzel R, Kuruppu DK, Gaul C, Martinez JM. Impact of Galcanezumab on Total Pain Burden: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Patients with Episodic Cluster Headache. J Pain Res 2021; 14:2059-2070. [PMID: 34267550 PMCID: PMC8275210 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s305066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose In a phase 3 study, galcanezumab significantly reduced the frequency of episodic cluster headache attacks across weeks 1–3 (primary endpoint) compared with placebo. However, multiple pain dimensions may contribute to the total burden of episodic cluster headache pain. This post hoc analysis assessed the impact of galcanezumab on the total pain burden of episodic cluster headache using a composite measure. Patients and Methods Patients with episodic cluster headache were randomized 1:1 to galcanezumab 300 mg or placebo once monthly for 8 weeks. Mean weekly total pain burden was calculated (daily cluster headache attack frequency × average duration × average pain severity summed over 7 days) using data collected in an electronic patient-reported outcomes diary. Change from baseline in weekly total pain burden across weeks 1–3 was compared between galcanezumab and placebo. To explore construct validity, mean weekly total pain burden scores were stratified by Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) responses at the week 4 clinic visit. Results The reduction from baseline in mean weekly total pain burden was significantly greater with galcanezumab (N=49) than with placebo (N=57): the least squares mean difference was −11.18 severity-weighted hours (p=0.035). Median weekly total pain burden decreased as PGI-I ratings improved, from 33.6 to 5.0 severity-weighted hours for patients who felt “very much worse” and “very much better,” respectively. Conclusion Galcanezumab significantly reduced mean weekly total pain burden compared with placebo in patients with episodic cluster headache. The composite pain measure demonstrated construct validity. Total pain burden may provide a holistic measure of the pain of episodic cluster headache. Clinical Trials ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02397473.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Kudrow
- California Medical Clinic for Headache, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | | | - Tina Oakes
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vitullo M, Holloway D, Tellson A, Nguyen H, Estimon K, Linthicum J, Viejo H, Coffee A, Huddleston P. ∗Surgical patients' and registered nurses' satisfaction and Perception of Using the Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment (CAPA©) Tool for Pain Assessment. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR NURSING 2020; 38:118-131. [PMID: 32950112 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvn.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Pain management is a significant issue in all health care systems. Pain is often mismanaged because of lack of a comprehensive pain assessment. This often leads to inappropriate medication administration, inadequate pain relief, negative patient outcomes, and delayed discharges. There is an opportunity for developing a more comprehensive pain assessment. The Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment (CAPA©) pain tool was developed by the University of Utah.. It assesses 5 dimensions of pain: comfort, change in pain, pain control, functioning, and sleep. The purpose of the study was to determine if the patients and nurses were more satisfied discussing pain with CAPA© or the numeric rating scale (NRS) and words to describe pain, intensity, location, duration, and aggravating and/or alleviating factors (WILDA) tool. This study had a 2-group comparison design with mixed methods approach. One group comprised patients and the other group comprised nurses. There were 63 nurses and 95 patients enrolled in the study at two perioperative hospitals. The results demonstrated that the patients and nurses were more satisfied with using the CAPA© tool than the NRS/WILDA. The CAPA© tool allows for a more comprehensive way to assess pain which has the potential to create more effective treatments for pain, improve discharge time, and positive patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Vitullo
- Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX.
| | | | | | - Hoa Nguyen
- Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | - Henry Viejo
- Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | - Amy Coffee
- Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Scher C, Petti E, Meador L, Van Cleave JH, Liang E, Reid MC. Multidimensional Pain Assessment Tools for Ambulatory and Inpatient Nursing Practice. Pain Manag Nurs 2020; 21:416-422. [PMID: 32448737 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the critical components in pain management is the assessment of pain. Multidimensional measurement tools capture multiple aspects of a patient's pain experience but can be cumbersome to administer in busy clinical settings. AIM We conducted a systematic review to identify brief multidimensional pain assessment tools that nurses can use in both ambulatory and acute care settings. METHODS We searched PUBMED/MEDLINE, PsychInfo, and CINAHL databases from January 1977 through December 2019. Eligible English-language articles were systematically screened and data were extracted independently by two raters. Main outcomes included the number and types of domains captured by each instrument (e.g., sensory, impact on function, temporal components) and tool characteristics (e.g., administration time, validity) that may affect instrument uptake in practice. RESULTS Our search identified eight multidimensional assessment tools, all of which measured sensory or affective qualities of pain and its impact on functioning. Most tools measured impact of pain on affective functioning, mood, or enjoyment of life. One tool used ecological momentary assessment via a web-based app to assess pain symptoms. Time to administer the varying tools ranged from less than 2 minutes to 10 minutes, and evidence of validity was reported for seven of the eight tools. CONCLUSIONS Our review identified eight multidimensional pain measurement tools that nurses can use in ambulatory or acute care settings to capture patients' experience of pain. The most important element in selecting a multidimensional pain measure, though, is that one tool is selected that best fits the practice and is used consistently over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Scher
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, White Plains, New York
| | - Emily Petti
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York; Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lauren Meador
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Eva Liang
- New York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, New York
| | - M Carrington Reid
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jaaniste T, Noel M, Yee RD, Bang J, Tan AC, Champion GD. Why Unidimensional Pain Measurement Prevails in the Pediatric Acute Pain Context and What Multidimensional Self-Report Methods Can Offer. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2019; 6:E132. [PMID: 31810283 PMCID: PMC6956370 DOI: 10.3390/children6120132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Although pain is widely recognized to be a multidimensional experience and defined as such, unidimensional pain measurement focusing on pain intensity prevails in the pediatric acute pain context. Unidimensional assessments fail to provide a comprehensive picture of a child's pain experience and commonly do little to shape clinical interventions. The current review paper overviews the theoretical and empirical literature supporting the multidimensional nature of pediatric acute pain. Literature reporting concordance data for children's self-reported sensory, affective and evaluative pain scores in the acute pain context has been reviewed and supports the distinct nature of these dimensions. Multidimensional acute pain measurement holds particular promise for identifying predictive markers of chronicity and may provide the basis for tailoring clinical management. The current paper has described key reasons contributing to the widespread use of unidimensional, rather than multidimensional, acute pediatric pain assessment protocols. Implications for clinical practice, education and future research are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiina Jaaniste
- Department of Pain and Palliative Care, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia; (R.D.Y.); (J.B.); (G.D.C.)
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
| | - Melanie Noel
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Renee D. Yee
- Department of Pain and Palliative Care, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia; (R.D.Y.); (J.B.); (G.D.C.)
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
| | - Joseph Bang
- Department of Pain and Palliative Care, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia; (R.D.Y.); (J.B.); (G.D.C.)
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
| | | | - G. David Champion
- Department of Pain and Palliative Care, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia; (R.D.Y.); (J.B.); (G.D.C.)
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chesnut GT, Zareba P, Sjoberg DD, Mamoor M, Carlsson S, Lee T, Fainberg J, Vertosick E, Manasia M, Schoen M, Ehdaie B. Patient-reported pain, discomfort, and anxiety during magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy. Can Urol Assoc J 2019; 14:E202-E208. [PMID: 31793867 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The addition of targeted prostate biopsy to systemic biopsy impacts patient experience. We examined patient-reported pain, discomfort, anxiety, and tolerability among men undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy in addition to transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy compared to those undergoing systematic biopsy alone. METHODS All patients underwent transrectal systematic 14-core biopsies. Patients with regions of interest on MRI underwent additional targeted biopsies. All patients received equivalent periprostatic nerve block. Four single-item, standard, 11-point numerical rating scales evaluating pain, discomfort, anxiety, and tolerability were completed immediately after biopsy. Differences in means were compared using t-tests. Correlation between rated domains was tested using Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS Of 273 consecutive patients, 195 (71%) underwent targeted biopsy and 188 (69%) had undergone prior biopsy. In all men, the median score for pain and tolerability was 3, while the median score for discomfort and anxiety was 4. Pain was rated at 7 or above by 15% of patients. Moderate correlation between pain, discomfort, anxiety, and tolerability of repeat biopsy was observed (Spearman's ρ between 0.48 and 0.76). Compared to patients undergoing systematic biopsy alone, men who received both targeted and systematic biopsies reported higher anxiety scores (difference 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-2.0; p=0.004) and discomfort (difference 1.0; 95% CI 0.3-1.7; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing targeted and systematic biopsies report more discomfort and anxiety than patients undergoing systematic biopsies alone. Absolute differences are small, and patients are willing to undergo repeat biopsy if advised. Interventions to reduce biopsy-related anxiety are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory T Chesnut
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Piotr Zareba
- Department of Surgery, Urology Division, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel D Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Maha Mamoor
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sigrid Carlsson
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Taehyoung Lee
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan Fainberg
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Emily Vertosick
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Michael Manasia
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mary Schoen
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|