Decreasing the Incidence of Postoperative Urinary Retention and Incontinence With Total Joint Replacement Patients After Spinal Anesthesia in the Postanesthesia Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project

Routine Use of Bladder Scans After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty is Not Necessary: Results of a Protocol Change

BACKGROUND

Postoperative urinary retention is a common concern after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and can cause discomfort, incontinence and, if left untreated, myogenic changes to the bladder. However, overdiagnosis of postoperative urinary retention by bladder scans may lead to unnecessary interventions and delayed discharges. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety of two bladder management protocols following TJA.

METHODS

From January 3, 2022 to April 29, 2022, 519 consecutive patients operated on by thirteen surgeons underwent routine postoperative bladder scanning (standard protocol). From February 28, 2022 to April 29, 2022, a new protocol was introduced by three surgeons in 209 consecutive patients using a specific algorithm (selective protocol) so that only symptomatic patients had bladder scans. The primary outcome of interest was catheterization rate. Chi-square and Students t-tests were used for analyses. There were 37.7% of patients in the selective group who received scans.

RESULTS

Times to catheterization, readmissions, emergency department visits, and straight catheterization rates (15.0 versus 14.8% P = .999) were similar. More scans in the selective group resulted in intervention (39.2 versus 15.0%, P < .001). Prevoid volumes were higher in the selective protocol (608 versus 448 mL, P < .001). Postvoid volumes were similar (233 versus 223 mL, P = .497). There was one readmission for a urinary tract infection in the standard group and no urinary-related readmissions in the selective group.

CONCLUSION

The selective protocol had a higher rate of same day discharge, fewer bladder scans, and did not lead to increased rates of urinary-related complications. These findings suggest that selective bladder scanning for symptomatic patients can be safely instituted for TJA patients.

Effect of single spinal anesthesia with two doses ropivacaine on urinary retention after hemorrhoidectomy in male patients

Background

Anorectal diseases are common in the population and include internal, external, and mixed hemorrhoids. Although hemorrhoid surgery is a brief operation, anesthesia, anesthetic drugs, drug concentrations, and anesthesia level control are closely related to postoperative uroschesis. For hemorrhoid surgery, a single spinal block with ropivacaine is commonly used that blocks the S2-S4 parasympathetic nervous system, which in turn governs the voiding reflex, causing postoperative urinary retention; this affects the recovery of patients. This study was performed to investigate the effects of two doses ropivacaine that provided satisfactory analgesia and muscle relaxation and inhibited adverse reflexes on urinary retention after hemorrhoidectomy.

Methods

The study included 200 male patients who underwent anorectal surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II single elective spinal anesthesia between March 2021 and March 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups using a random number table: Group A (n = 100) received 10 mg 0.5% ropivacaine (1.5 ml 1% ropivacaine + 1.5 ml 10% glucose = 3 ml), and Group B (n = 100) received 15 mg 0.5% ropivacaine (1.5 ml 1% ropivacaine + 1.5 ml 10% glucose = 3 ml).

Results

The anal sphincter exhibited good relaxation, and no obvious traction pain or significant difference in the time of muscle strength recovery was observed between the 10 mg and 15 mg 0.5% ropivacaine groups (P > 0.05). The 10 mg 0.5% ropivacaine group had shorter time of micturition exceeding 100 ml and lower voiding International Prostate Symptom Score than the 15 mg 0.5% ropivacaine group (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Single spinal anesthesia with 10 mg 0.5% ropivacaine not only provides satisfactory anesthetic effect for hemorrhoidectomy but also has less influence on postoperative uroschesis and is worthy of clinical application.

Trial registration

The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn; identifier: ChiCTR2,100,043,686) on February 27, 2021.

Mepivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia for Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Mepivacaine is an intermediate acting amide local anesthetic that can be used for neuraxial anesthesia in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with a shorter duration of action (1.5-2 hours) compared to the more commonly used local anesthetic bupivacaine. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing bupivacaine and mepivacaine spinal anesthesia during elective TJA and the surgical outcomes of the time to full neurologic motor return, pain, mobility, length of stay (LOS), and complications including transient neurologic symptoms and urinary function.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid Embase were screened for "arthroplasty, spinal anesthesia, bupivacaine, and mepivacaine," in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 159 studies were screened and 5 studies were evaluated. Data were compared regarding motor function return, mobility (distance ambulated), pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), LOS, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Full-text screening yielded 5 studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 2 retrospective cohort studies), with a total of 1,550 patients. Mepivacaine spinals had an earlier return to motor function (154 minutes vs 170 minutes, 95% CI: [-31.6, -0.9], P = .04), shorter LOS (25.95 hours vs 29.96 hours, 95% CI: [-6.8, -1.2], P = .01), and decreased urinary retention (7.15% vs 10.58%, 95% CI: [-6.3%, -0.6%], P = .02) with no differences in pain (VAS 3.57 vs 3.68, 95% CI: [-2.1, 1.9], P = .90) or distance ambulated (94.2 ft vs 89.1 ft, 95% CI: [-15, 25.2], P = .60) compared to bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

The method of anesthesia administration has been an increasing area of focus for quicker and safer recovery to allow for early ambulation and facility discharge. The rapid recovery facilitated by mepivacaine may further enable outpatient TJA and enhance patient recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Reduced Need for Urinary Bladder Catheterization in the Postanesthesia Care Unit After Implementation of an Evidence-based Protocol: A Prospective Cohort Comparison Study

Background

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a known complication in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). The variations in catheterization thresholds contribute to unnecessary invasive procedures.

Objective

In the current study, we implemented an algorithm for a sterile intermittent catheterization (SIC) threshold of 800 ml with volume-dependent bladder scan intervals and compared the incidence of SIC with that of a matched patient cohort threshold of 400 ml.

Design, setting, and participants

This comparative study of two prospective historical cohorts represented two thresholds for POUR, set at 400 ml without a standardized bladder scan protocol and 800 ml with a volume-dependent bladder scan protocol.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The primary outcome was the frequency of catheterization during the PACU stay. Secondary outcomes evaluated patient safety aspects in occurrence of thresholds above 400/800 ml. The study was set at the PACU under the Department of Anesthesia, Center for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

Results and limitations

In total, 741 patients were consecutively included, with 307 in the POUR-400 and 434 in the POUR-800 group, and with comparable group characteristics. Significantly fewer patients fulfilled the SIC/catheter a’ demeure (CAD) criteria in the POUR-800 (5.0%) versus POUR-400 (14.3%) group, equivalent to a 65.0% relative reduction in SIC.

Conclusions

Implementation of a standardized ultrasound-guided protocol with volume-dependent scan intervals and an evidence-based catheterization threshold of 800 ml decreases the need for SIC by >65%, without increasing the need for urinary catheterization at the wards.

Patient summary

In this study, we implemented an algorithm for a sterile intermittent catheterization threshold of 800 ml with volume-dependent bladder scan intervals. A marked reduction was seen in catheterization in the postanesthesia care unit, without increasing catheterization rates at the ward.