The Effect of Ginger on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Among Patients Undergoing Upper and Lower Limb Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effective role of aromatherapy in reducing big little problem-postoperative nausea and vomiting: A systematic review

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing side effects after surgery and anesthesia. Pharmacological treatment is not sufficient to manage these two symptoms. Although the use of certain anesthetic agents is considered the main basis for this phenomenon, the exact factors are unknown. Aromatherapy is effective in reducing PONV in adults. The aim of this review is to scan the studies evaluating the effect of aromatherapy on the management of nausea and vomiting in the postoperative. A literature search was performed by scanning Cochrane Reviews, PubMed, OVID, Sciences Direct, and Google Scholar. Keywords "aromatherapy," "use of aromatherapy," "aromatherapy oils," "nausea," "vomiting," "postoperative nausea and vomiting," and "PONV" combined with Boolean operators, including AND, OR, and NOT. Data gathered from studies published from 2013 to 2023 were reviewed for the effect of aromatherapy on PONV. As a result of the screening, 12 studies out of a total of 706 studies were examined based on the inclusion criteria. In the studies, aromatherapy was used either by inhalation or orally. The plants that were used the most in these studies were ginger and mint. When the literature was reviewed, it was found that aromatherapy reduced the rate of nausea and vomiting and the need for antiemetics, especially in the first minutes after surgery. Using aromatherapy in surgical patients may relieve common postoperative symptoms. The limitations of drug therapy have led to an increase in the use of alternative drugs for the management of nausea and vomiting. Aromatherapy was favored by most patients and is an effective treatment option for PONV.

Effect of herbal medicine on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, herbal medicines have been used to alleviate nausea and vomiting; however, a comprehensive clinical evaluation for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), especially after laparoscopic surgery, remains limited. This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine as an alternative therapy to prevent and manage nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery compared with untreated, placebo, and Western medicine groups.

METHODS

We searched 11 databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of herbal medicines on PONV after laparoscopic surgery on July 7, 2022. Two independent reviewers screened and selected eligible studies, extracted clinical data, and evaluated the quality of evidence using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV, whereas the secondary outcomes included the frequency and intensity of PONV, symptom improvement time, antiemetic requirement frequency, and incidence of adverse events. Review Manager Version 5.3. was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 19 RCTs with 2726 participants comparing herbal medicine with no treatment, placebo, and Western medicine. The findings showed that compared with no treatment, herbal medicine demonstrated significant effects on vomiting incidence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.57, P < .00001). Compared with placebo, herbal medicine revealed a significant effect on the severity of nausea 12 hours after laparoscopic surgery (standardized mean difference = -2.04, 95% CI -3.67 to -0.41, P = .01). Herbal medicines showed similar effects with Western medicine on the incidence of postoperative nausea (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.42, P = .77) and vomiting (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.25-1.84, P = .45). Furthermore, comparing the experimental group containing herbal medicine and control group excluding herbal medicine, adverse events were considerably lower in the group with herbal medicine (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.72, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Herbal medicine is an effective and safe treatment for nausea and vomiting secondary to laparoscopic surgery. However, the number of studies was small and their quality was not high; thus, more well-designed RCTs are warranted in the future.

Nutraceuticals and biotics in pediatric gastrointestinal disorders

In recent years there has been growing interest in the use of nutraceuticals and biotics in both pediatric and adult clinical practice. The overlapping and often ambiguous symptoms of both functional and organic gastrointestinal disorders have led to a search for alternative therapeutic approaches that avoid the use of synthetic or chemical treatments. However, while nutraceuticals and natural supplements are widely used, their health benefits are often not supported by adequate scientific evidence, and an unregulated use of nutraceuticals can be potentially harmful. The correct use of nutraceuticals, prebiotics, and probiotics can optimize the results of drug therapy in some cases and reduce the risk of side effects. This review aims to provide clinicians with guidance on the use of complementary therapies for pediatric gastrointestinal symptoms and disorders, highlighting the scarcity of studies on the kinetics and dynamics of nutraceuticals and biotics. While it is generally difficult to associate their intakes with adverse events due to the often-coexisting pharmacological treatments, it is essential to avoid the abandonment of traditional drugs with proven efficacy in the treatment of single diseases. Overall, the use of nutraceuticals, prebiotics, and probiotics in pediatric gastroenterological practice requires caution and medical supervision. Further research is needed to determine the effects of alternative therapies on pediatric gastrointestinal symptoms and disorders, and to ensure their safe and effective use in the clinical practice.

Nonpharmacological Nursing Interventions in Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the impact of nonpharmacological nursing interventions on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

DESIGN

This is a systematic review.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Tübitak-ULAKBİM, and TRDizin databases were searched for the following search terms, including "Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting," "Nurse," "Nursing," and "Nonpharmacological Interventions" to identify nonpharmacological nursing interventions for PONV. A systematic review of English and Turkish articles published in the period between January 1, 2012 and June 1, 2023 was conducted. The PICOT-SD method was used to determine the compatibility of the pieces with the eligibility criteria.

FINDINGS

Fifty-eight of 3,874 articles obtained from databases fulfilled the eligibility criteria. This study demonstrated that acupuncture, aromatherapy, the oral intake of ginger, listening to music, education, and visits to patients decreased the incidence of nausea and vomiting and increased the quality of life. Additionally, it was found that patients' quality of life tended to improve along with reductions in postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support previous findings in the literature and demonstrate that nonpharmacological nursing interventions help reduce and prevent PONV. Based on our results, we suggest that nonpharmacological nursing interventions can be employed for the management of PONV in patients undergoing surgery.

The effect of dimethicone on preventing ileus in patients with pelvic and femoral fractures: A clinical trial

Ileus and pseudo-obstruction are clinical syndromes that are among the most common postoperative complications. Identifying an effective treatment approach for these conditions is essential. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of Dimethicone on preventing ileus in patients with pelvic and femoral fractures. This study was conducted on 120 patients, with 60 individuals in the Dimethicone group and 60 individuals in the control group. After recording demographic information and clinical notes, bowel movements and defecation after surgery were also recorded. The statistical tests of Chi-square, Fisher's exact-test, Mann-Whitney, and independent t-test were utilized to compare the data. The primary outcome of the study determined the incidence of ileus in the intervention and control groups (intervention group = 1.7 % and control group = 3.3 %) (P = 0.99). The secondary outcome involved comparing the time of gas expulsion between the two groups, intervention, and control (intervention group = 21.05 h and control group = 22.03 h) (P = 0.065). Although the time of gas and feces expulsion, as well as the initiation of bowel movements and the occurrence of ileus, were lower in the intervention group, there was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative results, particularly regarding the occurrence of ileus and the reduction in the duration of feces and gas expulsion and the initiation of bowel movements in patients receiving Dimethicone compared to the control group. Considering the lack of statistical significance in the obtained results and the absence of similar studies using Dimethicone, further research and larger sample size studies with Dimethicone or other pharmacological methods are needed to find the most effective treatment approach in reducing the occurrence of ileus after surgery.

Artificial Intelligence Image Recognition System for Preventing Wrong-Site Upper Limb Surgery

Our image recognition system employs a deep learning model to differentiate between the left and right upper limbs in images, allowing doctors to determine the correct surgical position. From the experimental results, it was found that the precision rate and the recall rate of the intelligent image recognition system for preventing wrong-site upper limb surgery proposed in this paper could reach 98% and 93%, respectively. The results proved that our Artificial Intelligence Image Recognition System (AIIRS) could indeed assist orthopedic surgeons in preventing the occurrence of wrong-site left and right upper limb surgery. At the same time, in future, we will apply for an IRB based on our prototype experimental results and we will conduct the second phase of human trials. The results of this research paper are of great benefit and research value to upper limb orthopedic surgery.