Prevalence of metal hypersensitivity in total knee replacement

Existing and Novel Assessment Methods for Metal Sensitivity in Elective Lower-Limb Arthroplasty-A Scoping Review

Background

Metal sensitivity is a possible cause for revision in elective lower-limb arthroplasty. This scoping review aims to identify and evaluate all existing and novel assessment methods for metal sensitivity in elective lower-limb arthroplasty.

Methods

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies published between January 1, 2000, and September 1, 2023. Studies evaluating one or more metal sensitivity assessment method preoperatively, perioperatively, or postoperatively were included. Studies were grouped based on the assessment methods reported and summarized based on the study design, outcome measure, results, and comments on the method's validity.

Results

A total of 1220 results were screened, with 39 results (15 retrospective cohort studies, 11 prospective cohort studies, 6 case reports, 5 randomized controlled trials, and 2 case control studies) included, identifying 12 assessment methods. The most used one was patch testing, featuring in 17 studies (43.6%). Lymphocyte transformation assay/testing featured in 12 studies (30.8%). Plasma/serum concentration of metal ions featured in 6 studies (15.4%). Patient history and serum cytokine testing featured in 7 (17.9%) and 4 (10.3%) studies each. Generalized serum inflammatory markers featured in 3 studies (7.7%). The remaining 6 methods each featured in one or 2 studies. Evidence of the reliability of most metrics was limited.

Conclusions

Several assessment methods were identified. However, evidence of any methods reliably predicting and diagnosing the occurrence of metal sensitivity was limited. There is a need for improved metrics of metal hypersensitivity.

Understanding immune-mediated titanium allergy to in situ orthopaedic implants: a narrative review of the current literature

INTRODUCTION

Clinical recognition of potential immune-mediated allergic responses to implanted metal devices is increasing. For orthopaedic implants, while 'pure' compounds are used in specific circumstances, the majority of components are alloys - a combination of two or more distinct metals. Titanium is found commonly in many orthopaedic devices and is often championed as a 'hypoallergenic' option or inclusion. In the absence of a relevant previously published summary on the topic, this paper explores the current state-of-understanding of titanium allergy and proposes a patient management algorithm whereby such immune reactions are clinically-suggested.

METHODS

A structured, systematic literature review was performed following PRISMA search principles to provide a contemporary summary-of-understanding in this area and to highlight clinical and knowledge deficiencies.

RESULTS

Thirty-five topic-related articles were identified, the majority reflecting small case series' or proof-of-concept studies. The general standard of scientific evidence available was poor. Justification for arthroplasty utilization of titanium as a 'hypoallergenic' option is largely extrapolated from non-orthopaedic domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ionic and conjugated titanium particles released from implant surfaces have the potential to trigger innate immune responses and true allergy. There exists no simple, high-sensitivity, screening test for titanium allergy. Conventional skin-patch testing is unreliable due to poor dermal penetration. Given established lymphocyte and macrophage activation pathways for allergy responses, in vitro methods using both cell-types show diagnostic promise. Surgical biopsy analysis from host-implant interfaces remains the contemporary 'gold-standard', however this represents an invasive, costly and highly-specialized approach not readily available in most settings. Further research to establish reliable/accessible diagnostic methods are indicated.

Correlation between environmental nickel exposure and the development of arthritis: A large-sample cross-sectional investigation

BACKGROUND

Nickel is a common metallic element in orthopedic implanted devices and living environment exposures. It is associated with varieties of diseases. The purpose of this investigation was to explore the correlation between nickel exposure and the prevalence of arthritis.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2017 to 2018. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to analyze the relationship between urinary nickel levels and arthritis. In addition, hierarchical modeling further explored the interactions and trends between urinary nickel levels and arthritis. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to reduce the effect of confounders. Additionally, restricted cubic spline curve (RCS) was used to assess the possible nonlinear association between urinary nickel and arthritis.

RESULTS

The investigation was comprised of 139 arthritis patients and 547 healthy participants. After correction by PSM, there was a positive correlation between arthritis and Nickel exposure levels. The risk of developing arthritis was significantly increased when nickel exposure levels were in the Q4 interval (OR=2.25, 95 % CI=1.03-5.02). When stratified by age and sex, nickel exposure was significantly and positively associated with arthritis in the subgroup aged over 65 years. (OR=2.78,95 %CI=1.20-6.46). Also, the difference between nickel exposure and arthritis was significant in the different gender subgroups (interaction P<0.05). Restricted cubic spline (RCS) results showed a significant linear association between nickel exposure levels and arthritis. In addition, there was a non-linear association between nickel exposure and arthritis across gender and age subgroups.

CONCLUSION

A significant positive association between nickel exposure levels and arthritis was showed by the experimental data. Controlling the use of nickel-containing medical prostheses and reducing exposure to nickel-containing daily necessity could help to slow the onset of arthritis.

Understanding immune-mediated cobalt/chromium allergy to orthopaedic implants: a meta-synthetic review

BACKGROUND

The frequency of primary joint replacement surgery continues to increase worldwide. While largely considered biologically inert entities, an increasing body of evidence continues to validate a not insignificant incidence of allergic reactions to such implants. Little previous work has explored genuinely immune-mediated reactivity in this context. In the absence of a contemporary published summary on the topic, this paper explored the current state of understanding of cobalt/chromium allergy and proposes a patient management algorithm whereby such immune reactions are clinically suggested.

METHODS

A structured, systematic literature review was performed by following PRISMA search principles to provide an updated review of this area.

RESULTS

Thirty-six topic-related articles were identified, the majority reflecting lower tiers of scientific evidence with a lack of homogeneous quantitative data to facilitate valid cohort comparisons. Largely, the available literature represented small case series' or expert opinions.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increasing clinical awareness and acknowledgement of true allergy to joint replacement components, this review highlighted that the evidence base underpinning the diagnosis and management of such patients is limited. Both patient-reported metal allergy or skin patch testing are grossly unreliable methods and show almost no correlation with true immune reactivity. Recent studies suggested a potential role for patient-specific in vitro cellular activation testing and/or targeted genetic testing when cobalt/chromium allergy is clinically suspected. However, while likely representing the contemporary "best available" approaches both can be costly undertakings, are not yet universally available, and still require broader validation in non-research settings before wider uptake can be championed.

Do Patients With Hypoallergenic Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants for Metal Allergy Do Worse? An Analysis of Health Care Utilizations and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

BACKGROUND

Metal allergy is a rare and controversial cause of implant failure and poor outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Few studies have investigated clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients treated with hypoallergenic implants. This investigation aimed to compare: (1) health care utilizations (eg, hospital length of stay, 90-day readmission rate, and incidence of nonhome discharge) and (2) 1-year PROMs between patients who received hypoallergenic and standard TKA implants.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent primary TKA between 2018 and 2019. Propensity score matching (3:1) was used to compare standard TKA patients with those who received hypoallergenic TKA implants, respectively. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain, KOOS Physical function Shortform (PS), and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental Component Score were collected preoperatively and at 1-year. After matching, 190 hypoallergenic and 570 standard TKAs were analyzed.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in length of stay (P = .98), 90-day readmission (P = .89), and nonhome discharge (P = .82). Additionally, there was no significant difference in change from preoperative to 1-year PROMs (KOOS pain, P = .97; KOOS PS, P = .88; Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental Component Score, P = .28). Patient-reported satisfaction was similar at 1-year (P = .23). Patients achieved similar rates of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for KOOS pain (PASS, P = .77; MCID, P = .33) and KOOS PS (PASS, P = .44; MCID, P = .65).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with hypoallergenic TKA implants for suspected metal allergy had similar outcomes compared to patients who had standard implants and no metal allergy.

Cross-Reactivity of Intraoral Allergic Contact Mucositis in the Nickel-Sensitized Ear Model of Metal Allergy

Cross-reactivity of metal allergies can make metal allergy treatment complicated because the background of immune response in cross-reactions remains unknown. In clinical settings, cross-reactivity among several metals has been suspected. However, the precise mechanism of immune response in cross-reactivity is unclear. Two sensitizations with nickel, palladium, and chromium plus lipopolysaccharide solution into the postauricular skin were followed by a single nickel, palladium, and chromium challenge of the oral mucosa to generate the intraoral metal contact allergy mouse model. Results showed that the infiltrating T cells in nickel-sensitized, palladium- or chromium-challenged mice expressed CD8+ cells, cytotoxic granules, and inflammation-related cytokines. Thus, nickel ear sensitization can cause cross-reactive intraoral metal allergy.

Metal Allergy: State-of-the-Art Mechanisms, Biomarkers, Hypersensitivity to Implants

Metal allergy is mainly an environmental disorder which can cause allergic contact dermatitis. Environmental metal exposures include jewelry, everyday metal items, mobile phones, leather, metal-rich food and implants, including stents or anchors. While consumer exposure is liable for the majority of metal hypersensitivity cases, the significance of occupational exposure to metals remains relevant. Although the most common metal allergens are nickel, chromium, and cobalt; however, lately, gold, palladium, titanium, and some others have also attracted attention. This review highlights advances in metal allergy mechanisms, biomarkers for potential patients' stratification as well as biological treatments. The most recent evidence of human exposure to metal for risk assessment is discussed, as well as the relationship between the occurrence of metal hypersensitivity and implanted devices, including non-characteristic symptoms. The latest data on the diagnosis of metal hypersensitivity are also reported.

The effect of Nickel hypersensitivity on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty and the value of skin patch testing: a systematic review

Background

To assess the Nickel sensitizing potential of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), explore the relationship between hypersensitivity and clinical outcomes, and evaluate the utility of skin patch testing pre- and/or postoperatively.

Materials and methods

A literature search was performed through EMBASE, Medline and PubMed databases. Articles were screened independently by two investigators. The level of evidence of studies was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Criteria and the quality evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies and Cochrane risk-of-bias tools.

Results

Twenty studies met the eligibility criteria, reporting on 1354 knee arthroplasties. Studies included patients undergoing primary or revision TKA, pre- and/or postoperatively, and used patch testing to identify Nickel hypersensitivity. Prevalence of Nickel hypersensitivity ranged from 0% to 87.5%. One study compared the prevalence of Nickel hypersensitivity in the same patient group before and after surgery and noted newly positive patch test reactions in three patients (4.2%). Three studies reported lower prevalence of Nickel hypersensitivity in postoperative patients compared to preoperative ones. Seven studies suggested that hypersensitivity might cause adverse clinical outcomes, but six did not support any relationship. Seven studies recommended preoperative patch testing in patients with history of metal allergy, and nine concluded that testing may be valuable postoperatively.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing TKA with no prior history of metal hypersensitivity do not seem to be at an increased risk of developing Nickel hypersensitivity, and there is conflicting evidence that patients with pre-existing hypersensitivity are more likely to experience adverse outcomes. Patch testing remains the most commonly used method for diagnosing hypersensitivity, and evidence suggests preoperative testing in patients with history of metal allergy to aid prosthesis selection, and postoperatively in patients with suspected hypersensitivity once common causes of implant failure have been excluded, since revision with hypoallergenic implants may alleviate symptoms.

Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes after two different hypoallergenic medial unicompartmental knee in patients with metal allergy

BACKGROUND

The purpose in the present study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who had undergone a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with either titanium niobium nitride (TiNbN) alloy implants or with fixed-bearing oxidized zirconium alloy implants.

METHODS

The records of two consecutive cohorts for a total of 86 hypoallergenic implants were prospectively analyzed. The first cohort consisted of 49 consecutive implantations of the hypoallergenic UKA Journey Uni Oxinium (Ox Group), while the second consisted of 37 consecutive series of UKA Oxford (TiNbN Group). All patients were evaluated by two independent surgeons who were not involved in the index surgery. The clinical evaluation consisted of evaluating each patient's Oxford Knee Score and Knee Society Score day before surgery (T₀), and with two consecutive follow-ups at T₁ (minimum follow-up 9 months) and T₂ (minimum follow-up 24 months).

RESULTS

The two groups were homogeneous in all preoperative values, except Body Mass Index (BMI) and duration of final follow-up [both statistically higher (p < 0.05) in the TiNbN group]. Both groups showed a clinically significant improvement for all scores at final follow-up (p < 0.05). The only differences between the two groups involved a higher pre-operative Oxford Score in TiNbN group (p = 0.031), and different tibial and femoral angles at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TiNbN and Oxinium UKA procedures enabled patients from good to excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes after the final follow-up, regardless of the age, gender, BMI bearing type, and implant size.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

LEVEL II: Comparative study.

Aortic valve replacement in a patient with self-reported systemic multiple metal allergy

We report our experience with aortic valve replacement in a patient with severe aortic stenosis who had self-reported allergies to multiple metals. The patient was a 74-year-old man. He developed palmoplantar pustulosis after using a dental prosthesis, and a patch test revealed reactions to several metals; therefore, he was diagnosed with systemic metal allergy. His condition progressed to severe aortic stenosis, and bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement was planned. The Avalus valve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was selected for aortic valve replacement, since the patient reported having allergies to several metals. While most devices used in cardiac surgery contain some amount of metal, the Avalus bioprosthetic valve does not contain metal in the stent and has been extremely useful for aortic valve replacement in patients with suspected metal allergies.

Metal wear debris generation in primary total knee arthroplasty: is it an issue?

More durable total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are needed, due to the rising life expectancy, the higher activity levels of patients and the growing concerns about aseptic loosening being caused by metal hypersensitivity. In response, different hypoallergenic metal coatings have been developed for TKAs. However, possible adverse effects of these different metals (cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, zirconium, titanium and tantalum) have been neglected. The aim was to summarize the local and systemic adverse effects (including metal hypersensitivity), survival ratios, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the plasma metal ion concentrations of the different TKA coatings. A literature search on PubMed and EMBASE was performed. In total, 15 studies were found eligible. Common adverse effects of TKA were infection, loosening, pain, instability and hyper- coagulation disorders. Serious adverse effects related to TKA implants were not reported. The survival ratios and patient-reported outcome measures seem to confirm these good results. In contrast with chromium and cobalt, no significant differences were reported in the nickel, molybdenum and titanium concentrations. No significant differences between the hypoallergenic and standard TKA implants were found in terms of adverse effects, survival ratios and PROMs. A causal relationship between the common adverse effects and the different metals is unlikely. Due to the heterogeneity of the TKA implants used, no firm conclusions could be made. Further research with longer follow-up studies are needed to find possible adverse effects and differences. Thus far, the hypoallergenic implants seem to perform equal to the standard implants.

Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty : a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach

Aims

Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Studies were identified by searching electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase, from their inception to November 2020, for studies evaluating TKA patients with metal hypersensitivity/allergy. All studies reporting on diagnosing or managing metal hypersensitivity in TKA were included. Data were extracted and summarized based on study design, study population, interventions and outcomes. A practical guide is then formulated based on the available evidence.

Results

We included 38 heterogeneous studies (two randomized controlled trials, six comparative studies, 19 case series, and 11 case reports). The evidence indicates that metal hypersensitivity is a rare complication with some histopathological features leading to pain and dissatisfaction with no reliable screening tests preoperatively. Hypoallergenic implants are viable alternatives for patients with self-reported/confirmed metal hypersensitivity if declared preoperatively; however, concerns remain over their long-term outcomes with ceramic implants outperforming titanium nitride-coated implants and informed consent is paramount. For patients presenting with painful TKA, metal hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion where patch skin testing, lymphocyte transformation test, and synovial biopsies are useful adjuncts before revision surgery is undertaken to hypoallergenic implants with shared decision-making and informed consent.

Conclusion

Using the limited available evidence in the literature, we provide a practical approach to metal hypersensitivity in TKA patients. Future national/registry-based studies are needed to identify the scale of metal hypersensitivity, agreed diagnostic criteria, and management strategies.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):785–795.

Return to physical activity and change in body mass index after hypoallergenic medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Background

The primary purpose of the present prospective study was to consecutively analyse the outcomes of the return to sports activity of patients with positive patch tests undergoing a medial mobile-bearing titanium niobium nitride (TiNbN) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The secondary purpose was to ascertain if a higher grade of physical activity leads to a reduction in the body mass index (BMI) of the patients.

Material and methods

Forty-one patients with positive skin patch tests were included in this prospective study. The clinical evaluation consisted of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale and the High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS). Each patient was evaluated the day before surgery (T₀), after 12.37 ± 0.70 months (T₁), and on the day of the final follow-up, after 67.03 ± 18.2 months (T₂). Furthermore, the BMI of each patient was analysed before surgery and during the final follow-up.

Results

The UCLA and HAAS mean preoperative values ranged from 3.68 ± 1.1.7 and 6.15 ± 0.76 to 6.1 ± 0.76 and 10.34 ± 1.3, respectively, at T₁ (p < 0.0001) and to the final values of 6.34 ± 0.62 and 11.0 ± 8.9, respectively, at T₂ (UCLA: T₂ versus T₁: p = 0.132; T₂ versus T₀: p < 0.0001; HAAS: T₂ versus T₁: p = 0.0027; T₂ versus T₀: p < 0.001). BMI ranged from a preoperative value of 27.97 ± 3.63 to a final value of 26.84 ± 3.11 (p < 0.0001). The only differences within the subgroups concerned patients with BMI ≥ 28, showing a superior HAAS at each follow-up (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was found between BMI and HAAS at T₀ and T₂ (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

This is the first study to evaluate the rate of the return to sports activities and change in BMI following hypoallergenic UKA. The majority of patients reduced their weight following UKA and improved their physical activity, showing outcomes that were comparable to the standard cobalt–chrome (CoCr) prostheses, regardless of gender, age, BMI and implant size.

Level of evidence

IV – Prospective Cohort Study.

Trial registration researchregistry5978—Research Registry www.researchregistry.com

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10195-021-00598-4.

No Clinical or Radiographic Differences Between Cemented Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium-Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with positive patch tests undergoing a medial mobile-bearing titanium-niobium nitride (TiNbN) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to patients undergoing standard UKA (cobalt-chromium [CoCr] implants).

METHODS

Two successive groups of patients, amounting to a total of 246 individuals, who received Oxford (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) UKA were included. The first group was composed of a series of 203 consecutive standard CoCr UKAs (Standard Group), while the second group comprised 43 consecutive hypoallergenic TiNbN UKAs (HA group). The patients of the second group had a positive epicutaneous patch test result for metals. Each patient was evaluated using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Society Score (KSS) a day prior to the surgery (T ₀) and at two consecutive follow-ups, namely T ₁ (minimum follow-up of 12 months) and T ₂ (minimum follow-up of 34 months). Radiographic measurements were performed at the final follow-up (T ₂).

RESULTS

No statistical differences were noted between the two groups regarding demographic data (p > 0.05). No clinical or radiographic differences were found between the HA and standard groups at any follow-up (p > 0.05). A statistically significant improvement was found at any follow-up for both OKS and KSS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

No clinical or radiographic differences between the hypoallergenic and standard cobalt-chromium groups at any follow-up were found, with a clinically significant improvement being experienced by both groups during the entire follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-comparative prospective study.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00486-3.

Self-reported metal hypersensitivity in patients undergoing unicondylar knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES

There is ongoing discussion about arthroplasty surgery of patients with metal hypersensitivity. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and eosinophil counts of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients with and without a history of metal hypersensitivity.

METHODS

A retrospective review was made of the medical records of 148 extremities of 140 consecutive patients who underwent primary UKA between January 2016 and December 2017. The patients who met the inclusion criteria were screened for history of metal hypersensitivity using a questionnaire. The functional outcomes of patients and eosinophil levels were evaluated immediately before and at 6 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 37 months (range, 18-48 months). Of the total 128 patients, 13 (10.2%) reported a history of metal hypersensitivity before the operation. There was no statistically significant difference between patients with or without a history of metal hypersensitivity in respect of the functional outcomes or eosinophil counts (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed that the functional outcomes of patients who underwent UKA using a standard alloy did not change between the groups who reported having or not having a history of metal hypersensitivity. Although the study also showed that the eosinophil counts decreased after surgery compared to the preoperative counts, there was no statistical relationship between the eosinophil count and functional outcomes or metal hypersensitivity history.

Ten-year outcomes of a nitrided Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy fixed-bearing total knee replacement with a highly crosslinked polyethylene-bearing in patients with metal allergy

BACKGROUND

Metal hypersensitivity in patients with a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare condition and a very controversial topic. Despite the lack of data concerning the real effective impact of allergy on TKA failures, most of the manufactures offer the choice of 'non-allergenic' implants both for primary and revision TKA, some of which provide the same designs and surgical techniques as the conventional ones. Only a few studies are available on outcomes on these 'hypersensitivity-friendly' implants and even fewer specifically on allergic patients with a mid- to long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2015, we enrolled 72 patients (57 females, 15 males), who underwent TKA treated with a non-allergenic posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee implant for a declared and proven metal allergy. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean 10 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

With revision as an endpoint the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate showed a survival rate of 97.2% at five years and 95.1% at 10 years. Significant improvements in range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Scoring (KSS) and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores were registered at final follow-up (P < 0.0001). At final follow-up validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) showed the following scores: Oxford Knee Score (OKS) 42.1, EQ5D 0.80, EQ VAS 80.1, Forgotten Joint Score 71.2.

CONCLUSIONS

This nitrided Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy fixed-bearing total knee replacement with a highly crosslinked polyethylene-bearing showed interesting results and survival rates in patients with metal allergy at mid- to long-term follow-up.