Functional and radiological outcome of uncemented total hip arthroplasty in young adults - 5 year follow-upollow-up

Functional and Patient-related Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 20 Years

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in adolescent and young adults represent only about 10% of all THAs. Despite the advances in hip conservation surgery, there are still adolescents and young adults who progress to severe joint degeneration. THA seems to be the last solution in these cases. We aimed to assess the clinical and patient-related outcomes at short-term to midterm follow-up for THAs performed before the age of 20 years.

Material and methods

We performed a retrospective monocentric study including all patients that underwent a THA before the age of 20 years between January 2008 and December 2018 at our tertiary orthopaedic center with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Demographic data were recorded. The Harris and Oxford hip scores were used to assess clinical and patient-related outcomes.

Results

A total of 11 patients (12 THAs) were included. Juvenile inflammatory arthritis and avascular necrosis due to slipped capital femoral epiphysis were the most commonly encountered etiologies. The mean age at surgery was 16 years (minimum 13, maximum 19 years). The mean follow-up duration was 6 years (minimum 2, maximum 9 years) without any revision. Regarding the Harris and Oxford hip scores, the mean score were 81 and 39.5 for clinical and patient-related outcomes respectively. The Spearman correlation test revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between the 2 scores of ρ = 0.811 with a P value < .001.

Conclusions

THA in adolescents and young adults suffering from end-stage osteoarthritis due to pediatric hip disorders provides improved hip function and notable pain relief at short-term to midterm follow-up.

Comparing uncemented, hybrid and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in young patients, a New Zealand Joint Registry study

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing use of uncemented implants in young patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is minimal evidence for specific implant combinations in this group. We analysed the most commonly used uncemented (Corail-Pinnacle), hybrid (Exeter-Trident/Tritanium), and fully cemented (Exeter) implant combinations in the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) in patients aged under 40 and between 40 and 55 years.

METHODS

All THAs recorded in the NZJR between 1999 and 2018 were included. The 40-55 and < 40 age groups were analysed separately. Demographic data, implant type, and outcome data including implant survival, reason for revision, and post-operative Oxford Hip Scores were obtained from the NZJR, and detailed survival analyses were performed. The primary outcome was revision for any reason.

RESULTS

We identified 4152 THAs in the 40-55 group and 422 in the < 40 group. In the 40-55 group, revision rates and patient-reported outcome measure scores were comparable between the uncemented implant combination (0.70/100 component years) and the hybrid implant combination (0.62/100 component years), whereas the cemented implant combination exhibited a statistically significant higher revision rate (1.75/100 component years) (p < 0.001). In the < 40 group, revision rate for the hybrid implant combination (0.46/100 component years) was significantly lower than the uncemented implant combination (1.54/100 component years).

CONCLUSION

The most commonly used hybrid and uncemented implant combinations provided equivalent survival and functional outcomes in patients aged 40-55 years. More research is required to guide implant selection in patients aged < 40 years. The authors suggest a transition away from comparing classes of implants (cemented, uncemented, hybrid) given the diverse product range within these categories.