Acetabular posterior wall morphology. A CT-based method to distinguish two acetabular posterior wall types

Acetabular dysplasia and posterior wall fractures: The missing link?

BACKGROUND

Traumatologists are unable to predict hip instability based on CT scans and standard radiographs in posterior wall (PW) fractures comprising <50-60 % of the wall, necessitating an examination under anesthesia (EUA). Risk factors for instability have not been clarified, but acetabular dysplasia has been theorized as a potential etiology. Unfortunately, dysplasia is difficult to evaluate in the traumatic setting. The purpose of this study was to compare acetabular morphology between unstable and stable fractures with a novel method to detect dysplasia.

METHODS

Patients ≥ 18 years old with a PW fracture that underwent an EUA from 2013 to 2023 were retrospectively identified. For our experimental measurements, the axial distances on CT between the acetabular dome, lateral acetabular opening, and femoral head vertex were recorded. Acetabular geometry was quantified at these levels. Conventional dysplasia metrics (e.g., Tonnis angle) were obtained. Variables were compared between stable and unstable fractures.

RESULTS

58 patients met inclusion criteria with 42 stable versus 16 unstable fractures. Unstable fractures had higher distances between the acetabular dome and femoral head vertex (p > 0.05). They had more cranial fracture exit points (p = 0.0015), lower femoral head coverage (p = 0.0102), and lower posterior acetabular sector angles (p = 0.0281). No other differences in acetabular geometry, demographics, injury characteristics, or other markers of dysplasia were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Unstable hips demonstrated a more recessed acetabular dome when compared to stable hips. Posterior acetabular femoral head coverage and cranial fracture exit point may be related to hip instability. A larger sample size is needed to validate these findings.

Posterior acetabular wall morphology is an independent risk factor that affects the occurrence of acetabular wall fracture in patients with traumatic, posterior hip dislocation

PURPOSE

Smaller posterior acetabular walls have been shown to independently influence the risk for bipolar hip dislocation. We asked whether differences would also be observed in patients with traumatic posterior hip dislocation with and without posterior wall fractures.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2020 we observed 67 traumatic posterior hip dislocations. Of these, 43 traumatic posterior hip dislocations in 41 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen dislocations were excluded with an acetabular fracture other than posterior wall fracture and six dislocations had insufficient computed tomography (CT) data. The mean age was 41 ± 11 years, 32 males and nine females. We observed 26 traumatic hip dislocations with posterior wall fractures and 17 without. All patients underwent polytrauma CT scans and postoperative/postinterventional pelvic CT scans. On axial CT-scans, posterior wall determining angles were measured.

RESULTS

Patients with posterior wall fractures were not significantly older than patients without posterior wall fractures (42 ± 12 vs. 38 ± 10 years; p = 0.17). Patients without posterior wall fractures had significantly smaller posterior acetabular sector angles (84° ± 10°) than did patients with posterior wall fractures (105° ± 12°) (p < 0.01; OR 1.178). Likewise, the posterior wall angle was significantly smaller in patients without posterior wall fracture (62° ± 9°) than in those with posterior wall fractures (71° ± 8°) (p < 0.01; OR 1.141).

CONCLUSION

Both posterior acetabular sector angle and posterior wall angle are independent factors determining the posterior wall fracture morphology in patients with traumatic posterior hip dislocation. Age and the observed trauma mechanism did not differentiate between traumatic posterior hip dislocations with and without posterior wall fractures.

Risk factors for dislocation after bipolar hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective case-control study of patients with CT data

Purpose

Bipolar hemiarthroplasty has been shown to have a lower rate of dislocation than total hip arthroplasty. However, as the influencing risk factors for bipolar hemiarthroplasty dislocation remain unclear, we aimed to analyse patient and surgeon-specific influencing risk factors for bipolar hemiarthroplasty dislocation.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed patients who were operated between 2012 and 2018 and had dislocated bipolar hemiarthroplasty and matched them to patients without a dislocated bipolar hemiarthroplasty, operated between 2018 and 2019. The study was limited to patients who received either a pre- or postoperative pelvic computed tomography. Besides demographic, morphologic, and physiologic data, we analysed duration of surgery; ASA score; Charlson Comorbidity Index; Almelo Hip Fracture Score; Parker Score; and acetabular morphology angles including acetabular anteversion angle, posterior acetabular sector angle, posterior wall angle, and acetabular roofing.

Results

We included nine patients with a dislocated bipolar hemiarthroplasty and 30 with a non-dislocated bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Patient-specific factors prompting a higher risk for dislocated bipolar hemiarthroplasty were longer duration of surgery (min) (115 ± 50 vs. 80 ± 27, p = 0.01); dementia (56% vs. 13%, p < 0.01); smaller posterior acetabular sector angle (°) (96 ± 6 vs. 109 ± 10, p < 0.01); and smaller posterior wall angle (°) (67 ± 6 vs. 77 ± 10, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Dementia and insufficient posterior wall angle were associated with higher risk of dislocation in bipolar hemiarthroplasty