Does timing of lumbar fusion affect dislocation rate after total hip arthroplasty?

The Influence of Previous Joint Arthroplasty on Fulfillment of Patients' Expectations of Subsequent Lumbar Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Hip, knee, and lumbar spine surgeries are prevalent with arthroplasty often preceding lumbar surgery. The objective of this analysis was to ascertain whether previous arthroplasty was associated with patients' postlumbar surgery fulfillment of expectations.

METHODS

Identical systematically acquired data were pooled from 3 prospective studies that included assessments of preoperative expectations of lumbar surgery and 2-year postoperative assessment of fulfillment of expectations using a valid survey with points assigned for amount of improvement expected for symptoms and function. The proportion of expectations fulfilled was defined as total points for improvement received postoperatively divided by total points for improvement expected preoperatively (range 0 [no expectations fulfilled] to >1 [expectations surpassed]). Enrollment data included the expectations survey, demographic/clinical characteristics, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and previous hip/knee arthroplasty. Postoperative data included follow-up expectations survey, ODI scores, and any spine complications. The proportion was the dependent variable in multivariable linear regression with demographic/clinical independent variables.

RESULTS

1137 patients were included (mean age 59 years, 51% male); 993 (87%) did not have previous arthroplasty, and 144 (13%) had arthroplasty (51 hip only, 77 knee only, 16 both hip/knee). Patients with any arthroplasty had similarly high expectations compared with patients with no arthroplasty but lower proportion of expectations fulfilled (0.69 versus 0.76, P = 0.03). In multivariable analysis, variables associated with a lower proportion of expectations fulfilled were greater preoperative expectations (P < 0.0001), not working (P < 0.0001), positive depression screen (P = 0.0002), previous lumbar surgery (P < 0.0001), previous arthroplasty (P = 0.03), surgery on ≥3 vertebrae (P = 0.007), less preoperative-to-postoperative ODI improvement (P < 0.0001), and postoperative complications (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

After accounting for a spectrum of highly associated covariates, patients with previous arthroplasty still had less fulfillment of expectations of subsequent lumbar surgery. For patients with previous arthroplasty, surgeons should discuss potential differences between arthroplasty and lumbar surgery during preoperative evaluations and during shared postoperative assessments of the outcome.

Spine or Hip First? Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Sequential Lumbar Spine or Hip surgery

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar spine pathology frequently coexists in patients who have hip arthrosis. There is controversy on whether lumbar or hip pathology should be first addressed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of sequential lumbar spine (LSP) or hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Using a large national database from 2010 to 2020, we reviewed the records of 241,279 patients who had concurrent hip arthritis and lumbar spine disease defined as spinal stenosis, lumbar radiculopathy, or degenerative disc disease. During the study period, 6,458 (2.7%) patients with concurrent hip/spine disease underwent sequential operative treatment of either the hip joint or lumbar spine within 2 years. The rates of subsequent surgery in either the hip or spine, opioid requirements, and rates of hip dislocation were determined and analyzed using compared Chi-squared analyses.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing THA first had lower risk of subsequent spinal procedure compared to patients who had spinal procedures first (5.7 vs. 23.7 %, P < 0.001). This disparity was maintained up to 5 years (P<0.001). Opioid requirements at 1 year were highest in patients who underwent spinal procedures only (836 pills/patient) compared to any other group (THA only (566 pills/patient), LSP and then THA (564 pills/patient), THA and LSP (586 pills/patient). Also, THA following LSP was associated with significantly higher rates of dislocation compared to patients undergoing THA first (3.2 versus 1.9%, P<0.001).

SUMMARY

Total hip arthroplasty first in patients who have concurrent spine disease was associated with lower risk of subsequent surgery, opioid requirement, and risk of postoperative instability compared to patients having lumbar procedure first.

Current Evidence for Spinopelvic Characteristics Influencing Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Risk

BACKGROUND

Decreased pelvic mobility and pelvic retroversion may result from spinal degeneration and lead to changes in the orientation of the acetabular implant after total hip arthroplasty (THA). While multiple patient and surgery-related factors contribute to THA dislocations, there is increasing evidence that sagittal spinopelvic dynamics are relevant for THA stability. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the relationship between previously described sagittal spinopelvic characteristics and implant dislocations after primary THA.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search in the PubMed and Embase databases was conducted for studies reporting on spinopelvic morphology, alignment, pathology, or surgery and THA dislocations. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS criteria. Because of high heterogeneity in study methodology, a synthesis of best evidence was performed. Odds ratios (ORs), relative risks (RRs), and effect sizes (g) were calculated.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (1,007,900 THAs) with quality scores of 15 to 23 out of 24 were included. Nine different spinopelvic alignment parameters (8 studies, g = 0.14 to 2.02), spinal pathology (2 studies, OR = 1.9 to 29.2), and previous spinal fusion surgery (8 studies, OR = 1.59 to 23.7, RR = 3.0) were found to be related to THA dislocation. Conflicting results were found for another sagittal pelvic morphology parameter, pelvic incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Several sagittal spinopelvic patient characteristics were found to be related to THA dislocation, and the associated risks were greater than for other patient and surgery-related factors. Future research is needed to determine which of those characteristics and parameters should be taken into account in patients undergoing primary THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.