Intercalary and geographic lower limb tumor resections with the use of 3D printed Patient Specific Instruments- when less is more

Novel Clinical Practice Assessments: Informational Statements by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society

Musculoskeletal oncology involves rare diseases. As a result, there is a paucity of literature to guide practitioners. Studies are often clinical experience, retrospective reviews, noncomparative studies, and involve small numbers of patients. However, technological advances consistently arise in this field. This article represents the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society efforts to improve multispecialty collaboration and research credibility. It involves brief systematic reviews of novel ideas and suggests high-quality research needed to provide and standardize best practices within this field.

3D-Printed Personalized Lattice Implant as an Innovative Strategy to Reconstruct Geographic Defects in Load-Bearing Bones

OBJECTIVE

Geographic defect reconstruction in load-bearing bones presents formidable challenges for orthopaedic surgeon. The use of 3D-printed personalized implants presents a compelling opportunity to address this issue. This study aims to design, manufacture, and evaluate 3D-printed personalized implants with irregular lattice porous structures for geographic defect reconstruction in load-bearing bones, focusing on feasibility, osseointegration, and patient outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved seven patients who received 3D-printed personalized lattice implants for the reconstruction of geographic defects in load-bearing bones. Personalized implants were customized for each patient. Randomized dodecahedron unit cells were incorporated within the implants to create the porous structure. The pore size and porosity were analyzed. Patient outcomes were assessed through a combination of clinical and radiological evaluations. Tomosynthesis-Shimadzu metal artifact reduction technology (T-SMART) was utilized to evaluate osseointegration. Functional outcomes were assessed according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) 93 score.

RESULTS

Multiple pore sizes were observed in porous structures of the implant, with a wide distribution range (approximately 300-900 um). The porosity analysis results showed that the average porosity of irregular porous structures was around 75.03%. The average follow-up time was 38.4 months, ranging from 25 to 50 months. Postoperative X-rays showed that the implants matched the geographic bone defect well. Osseointegration assessments according to T-SMART images indicated a high degree of bone-to-implant contact, along with favorable bone density around the implants. Patient outcomes assessments revealed significant improvements in functional outcomes, with the average MSTS score of 27.3 (range, 26-29). There was no implant-related complication, such as aseptic loosening or structure failure.

CONCLUSION

3D-printed personalized lattice implants offer an innovative and promising strategy for geographic defect reconstruction in load-bearing bones. This approach has the potential to match the unique contours and geometry of the geographic bone defect and facilitate osteointegration.

What to choose in bone tumour resections? Patient specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation: a systematic review

Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) and intraoperative surgical navigation (SN) can significantly help in achieving wide oncological margins while sparing bone stock in bone tumour resections. This is a systematic review aimed to compare the two techniques on oncological and functional results, preoperative time for surgical planning, surgical intraoperative time, intraoperative technical complications and learning curve. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42023422065). 1613 papers were identified and 81 matched criteria for PRISMA inclusion and eligibility. PSI and SN showed similar results in margins (0-19% positive margins rate), bone cut accuracy (0.3-4 mm of error from the planned), local recurrence and functional reconstruction scores (MSTS 81-97%) for both long bones and pelvis, achieving better results compared to free hand resections. A planned bone margin from tumour of at least 5 mm was safe for bone resections, but soft tissue margin couldn't be planned when the tumour invaded soft tissues. Moreover, long osteotomies, homogenous bone topology and restricted working spaces reduced accuracy of both techniques, but SN can provide a second check. In urgent cases, SN is more indicated to avoid PSI planning and production time (2-4 weeks), while PSI has the advantage of less intraoperative using time (1-5 min vs 15-65 min). Finally, they deemed similar technical intraoperative complications rate and demanding learning curve. Overall, both techniques present advantages and drawbacks. They must be considered for the optimal choice based on the specific case. In the future, robotic-assisted resections and augmented reality might solve the downsides of PSI and SN becoming the main actors of bone tumour surgery.

3D-printed custom-made short stem with porous structure for fixation of massive endoprosthesis in joint-preserving reconstruction after tumor resection

BACKGROUND

Large malignant bone tumors and revision limb salvage procedures often result in massive bone loss, leaving a short residual bone segment that cannot accommodate a standard stem for endoprosthesis fixation. Three-dimensional-printed (3DP) short stem with porous structure seems to be an alternative for short-segment fixation. This retrospective study aims to evaluate surgical outcomes, radiographical results, limb functions, and complications of using 3DP porous short stems in massive endoprosthesis replacement.

METHODS

Between July 2018 to February 2021, 12 patients with massive bone loss undergoing reconstruction with custom-made, short-stemmed massive endoprostheses were identified. Endoprosthesis replacement involved the proximal femur (n = 4), distal femur (n = 1), proximal humerus (n = 4), distal humerus (n = 1), and proximal radius (n = 2).

RESULTS

The mean percentage of resected bone was 72.4% of the whole length of the bone, ranging from 58.4 to 88.5%. The mean length of 3DP porous short stems was 6.3 cm. The median follow-up was 38 months (range, 22-58 months). The mean MSTS score was 89%, ranging from 77% to 93%. Radiographical assessment results showed bone in-growth to the porous structure in 11 patients, and the implants were well osseointegrated. Breakage of the 3DP porous short stem occurred in one patient intraoperatively. The patient developed aseptic loosening (Type 2) four-month after surgery and underwent revision with a plate applied to assist fixation. The implant survivorship was 91.7% at 2 years. No other complications were detected, such as soft-tissue failures, structural failures, infection, or tumor progression.

CONCLUSIONS

3DP custom-made short stem with porous structure is a viable method for fixation of the massive endoprosthesis in the short segment after tumor resection, with satisfactory limb function, great endoprosthetic stability, and low complication rates.