Shoulder arthroplasty following solid organ transplant: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a history of solid organ transplant: A review

Solid organ transplants (SOT) have evolved into life-saving interventions for end-stage diseases affecting vital organs. Advances in transplantation techniques, donor selection, and immunosuppressive therapies have enhanced outcomes, leading to a growing demand for SOT. Patients with a solid organ transplant are living long enough to develop the same pathologies which are indicated for joint replacement surgery in the general population. SOT patients who undergo a total hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty do similarly in the context of clinical outcomes and implant survival when compared to the general population. These immunosuppressed patients tend to have higher complication rates in the short-term following surgery. Prudent management of these patients in the short-term may be necessary, but patients can expect to do well otherwise.

The Influence of Solid Organ Transplant on Inpatient Complications, Length of Stay, and Hospital Costs in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients

INTRODUCTION

With innovations in transplant medicine and longer life expectancies in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty is predictably rising in this population. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become increasingly popular due to advances in prosthetic design with expanded indications. While previous studies have examined shoulder arthroplasty in SOT patients, information specifically related to RSA patients is largely unexplored. We aim to analyze the demographics and characteristics of SOT patients who have undergone RSA while assessing inpatient complication rates, length of stay (LOS), and hospital costs in these patients compared to a matched cohort of non-transplant patients.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database was utilized to identify all patients undergoing RSA from 2016 to 2019. We generated propensity-matched groups based on pre-operative variables (diabetes, tobacco use, sex, age, and obesity) to compare complications, LOS, and inpatient costs between the SOT and control groups. T-tests and Chi-squared tests were performed where appropriate and odds ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 59925 patients who underwent RSA. Among those, 59769 patients (99.7%) did not have a SOT and 156 patients (0.26%) had a history of SOT. Patients in the SOT group were younger than the control group (67.0 versus 71.4 years, p<0.001). The SOT group were more likely males compared to the control group (53.8% versus 39.3%, p<0.001). Following 1:1 matching, there were 156 patients in each group. The SOT group had a higher risk of acute renal failure (ARF) compared to the control group (OR 9.41, 95% CI (2.13-41.49), p<0.001). The LOS (p<0.001) and inpatient costs (p<0.001) were higher in the SOT group.

CONCLUSION

For RSA, SOT patients are younger and more likely male compared to those without SOT. Inpatient medical and surgical complications are similar between SOT and non-SOT patients, except SOT patients have a higher risk of ARF. SOT patients tend to have longer LOS and higher inpatient costs than non-SOT patients.